Thread: Hot Young Asian Girls
+
Add Report
Results 316 to 330 of 10196
-
09-10-25 22:39 #9881Regular Member

Posts: 18I feel this. Vibe is more important to me than looks and service. Speaking of which, anyone know when Haven will be back?
Originally Posted by DownloadX
[View Original Post]
-
09-10-25 21:07 #9880Senior Member

Posts: 292Sad day today. It's Baby Soi's last day. The last girl standing in my rotation. Anyone hiding a hya out there in LA? Can only do GFE of the service is decent. Dunno who to even tofft.
-
09-10-25 19:51 #9879Regular Member

Posts: 15I was wondering about her as well! I was trying to choose between her or if I want a spinner with a cute face. Did you end up seeing her?
Originally Posted by Slooppy
[View Original Post]
-
09-10-25 14:10 #9878Senior Member

Posts: 1728Laurent - S-Tier face, B-Tier natural white body. Safest for guys who are "face first" and "looks only" because she has no kgirl vibe. B or C cup with good nipples, 5'6", 20s. Very nice wide smile, unique and nice make up with highlights. Not thick or skinny, trimmed bush, clean. Nice choice of black see-through outfit and red lipstick. Winter's body type, which is normal, natural, feminine. Good shower routine. GFE, positive about sex. She is a nice girl, but I feel it is hard to vibe even though she does the right things (see link below). Normal level service for HYA with good and fresh attitude, it will probably continue to improve with time. Face in mirror during sex is wonderful to look at, she noticed how much I loved staring at it and making sure her face was always in view somehow. Important: One-shot, GFE only and hygenic.
About why I warn about lack of vibe, see 'Know What you Want' in the link. It is an important predictor of why two guys have opposite opinions on a HYA despite agreeing about her description:
http://www.usasexguide.nl/forum/show...=1#post7389344 9/8 OC
When I describe her style and make up, obviously styles do change and I can only describe what I saw. But it tends to help give the right idea even if it changes later. There is one kgirl she really looks like, but I don't feel the time is right to make a photo guide. I may have to visit again to confirm, but 3 beautiful jgirls are keeping me busy so I am in no rush. I reviewed 2 of them in OC:
http://www.usasexguide.nl/forum/show...=1#post7390594 Kurumi J and Aoi J
She seemed to really enjoy sex with me, but maybe I did the right things for her. I just say 'Positive about sex' or shorthand 'Sex positive' because the potential is there, and I'm sure most guys get it too. But I don't want to piss of the remainder. Hope that makes sense.
I wrote clear and simple guides on how to make women feel good in bed and it clearly works, but I get that some people don't have the energy. You can find it in the 'How to prepare Lizza' (Baby Dalli) section:
http://www.usasexguide.nl/forum/show...=1#post7389052 How to prepare Lizza
I see today Angel and Laurent are at the top of CGLA. There is different rationale for ordering, it is not just one thing (sometimes the rationale changes). For example, lately Get9 orders chronologically. But that will change again some day.
A lot of people have been posting accurate intel lately, it's very helpful. Accurate intel is at best 80% accurate, because it's partly subjective. When people focus on the 20% that's off, it misses the point. 80% accurate is a top tier reviewer. Best a person can do.
Originally Posted by Download X
[View Original Post]
When people complain about small things and aren't on my ignore list, I immediately click on their name and look at their post history. 50% of the time they have had exactly zero reviews in the last 6 months. They did not even seen the girl they were arguing about, so naturally they were also wrong. 25% of the time they have exactly 1 review in the last 6 months. 20% of the time they have reviewed more than 1 girl, but does not review as often or as accurately as the reviewer they are complaining about. Wild. There is a difference between being skeptical and "being mean just in case". Being skeptical means knowing new reports may be true or false, rather than just assuming they are false. All you have to do to know which is to wait for future reports, it's easy.
A copy of my commentary on Vibe. It is a critical predictor of which girls you'll like, and it explains why guys have the opposite opinion on a girl they both agree is hot af.
Haven has amazing Vibe, and it's why I rate her high service. When I rate "looks only", I put Haven at high B-Tier because there are girls who do look slightly better if you are just looking at them without any interaction. However, Haven's service and attitude makes her more attractive. The moment I walked in, she looked at me like I was wanted and it was striking. She was very fun to talk with, it felt natural. We had a special connection. That is Vibe, and it is a magic part of service.
Originally Posted by Download X
[View Original Post]
Jenny also has a high tier vibe, a different style but she never misses a beat to focus on you. This makes them more attractive then they visually are. It explains why my "looks only" rankings are not enough for some guys. "Looks only" is nearly objective (i.e. staring at a photo of a girl), in contrast to attractiveness which is extremely subjective (i.e. interacting with a girl and seeing how much she wants you). So even though I put Jenny and Haven both as B-Tier "looks only", they are more attractive than that. But it's so objective, so I can't rank based on attractiveness instead.
This is the reason some guys do not find S-Tier and A-Tier girls attractive, even though they simultaneously agree the girl does look good when "just staring at her". Those are different things, and "Trophy fuck" is a common way to put it. Yes, the girls are "hot but that is not the problem". You can basically say that true attraction is the "looks only" rating modified by Vibe.
The reason I liked Evian when others didn't is that even though I care about Vibe, it is not a dealbreaker for me. Same with tits or ass. For example if a girl has an S-Tier face, I don't care about her vibe, tits, or ass. It's easily forgiven. But other guys will not forgive if the vibe isn't there. This is why Boner and I both gave Evian S-Tier service ratings, while other guys give her F-Tier service rating. There is no contradiction, that is how subjective service is.
Since Vibe is so subjective and the difference between an S and an F, it's why all I can do is warn guys about a possibility rather than predict it.
Know what you want
That is the key predictor if you will like Kuzumi J or not. Boner chimed in when she was Ai, and he and I agree with Superman's review because we are looks first and bring service. We are fine if the girl doesn't have a special vibe outside of bed. Another example of this is Baby Evian, where Boner rated her S-Tier service and I 100% agree. To me, she is the 2nd best kgirl service out of 180 kgirls. But other guys were very disappointed and ranked her at the bottom. They even agreed Evian's performance in bed was very good, just that she had no vibe, didn't talk, and didn't make them feel good and special. In other words, those guys are looking for something Evian didn't have, while me and Boner were looking for something that Evian did very well. I hope that's clear, we all agree on the girl's description but have opposite conclusions and wants. This magic point of division can be called Vibe.
This is why there is such a wide divide on some girls. It was clear enough to me and many guys Kuzumi J enjoyed our time, but she is subtle rather than expressive. You catch her real smile or she has a subdued reaction, she is quiet. Other guys take this as being cold, they want to hear the girl say things and make it clearer. Just how it is.
I was talking with a friend recently. Maybe it would make guys less upset to imagine the quiet girls are just autistic so they aren't offended when the girl doesn't express anything despite seeming to enjoy it. You get to dump a big load into a beautiful girl, maybe that's good enough. To me, that's the beauty of it. It feels like a loophole that never gets closed. Society cockblocked me too hard and long, but these girls solved that cruelty. This is why I never disrespect a working woman. Who else will help me solve this injustice. It takes that cooperation, and my one condition was always simple. It is my motto. MILFs for others, HYA for me please. Help me with that.
-
09-10-25 11:29 #9877Senior Member

Posts: 98Lael K
I think this is the third opinion on Lael K but shoutout to the two bros that plugged her for the rest of us. Things that I can confirm that the other guys have said is that her pictures are fake but she's very pretty. Her face actually is knockout material and I'd be capping if I said I wasn't gooning on introductions. Her tits are natural but there is some sag but I do like the ladies with that natural hang and even some marginal tiger stripes if the girl has them. Only thing I differ on is that I do think qualifies as a hya. Her face is solidly a non-MILF or even pre-MILF so I'll put that out there.
Personality wise she was cool meaning she smiles, seemed chill, and seemed like she wanted to be there. As optional stated though, I think her BBBJ was decent, good but not crazy. I didn't get teeth though so idk, maybe optional has a different sizing than me. She fucks better thankfully and her interest in the whole thing seemed legit. I went down on her and I do like to watch to see if I'm doing anything of if the girl dead fishes it. She did pull back her pussy so the clot was more accessible and oscillated between nipple pinching herself or just squeezing the fuck out of her tits. Kinda hot and I want to believe maybe I did something there.
Also, I just noticed when I plugged the link that AsianVibe has a new website I guess.
https://asiankgirls.com/models/lael-...B5-8-30-start/
-
09-09-25 05:42 #9876Regular Member

Posts: 7Baby Ray
Speaking of drought, had seen some pre / MILF service queens in place and realized they are not for me. Most have many reviews already so I won't be redundant. Took a chance with baby ray.
Photos obviously not her, they are from a well-followed Korean instagrammer. The body is representative though, being taller at 5'8 and having a thin frame / waist. She had nicely shaped natural b's, a small ass with a little padding, and nice skin with a lighter tone. Some small tattoos loosely dotted her limbs. Straight black hair ran all the way down her back near her waist. My face preference seems to differ from others on the board, but remember thinking she looked cute with her light natural makeup. I'd guess she's in her mid 20's. Overall I'd say a tall and thin CYA.
Service was very basic, a 6/10 if I had to grade. A little bit of effort, but not too much technique. I prefer girls who don't give a pornstar level enthusiasm though, so I enjoyed her style regardless. Those looking for high service marks would not. YMMV of course.
Knows simple English words, not enough for full conversation.
I didn't see the previously rebranded Ray / baby Molly / baby Gyuri / Hyojin. Based on the few descriptions I could find, I believe they are different people. Could be wrong. Not sure if this baby ray went by a different name elsewhere for review comparison.
Repeat: Normally I'd explore others options before considering, but the list is short at the moment.
-
09-08-25 11:29 #9875Senior Member

Posts: 292Baby Yeeun
Baby Yeeun (Sources say rebrand) - Late 20's early 30's in the dark. But with my laser eye vision and her overall demeanor, I'll say 30+. Pictures are fake but you know what they kind of do resemble her face surprisingly. Service was average. No preview, decent BBBJ and multiple positions. Minimal kissing so that's an automatic no chemistry with me. But very friendly. Also she wears strong perfume so if you're married or in a relationship be careful because that perfume stuck with me the whole day until I took a full shower at home.
Originally Posted by Optional
[View Original Post]
-
09-08-25 02:44 #9874Senior Member

Posts: 30Hani intel
I am visiting from Arizona for 1 day. Hani profile really caught my eyes but I can't find any solid info about her yet. Anyone has seen her who is kind enough to share your experience? Thanks.
Originally Posted by DashingD
[View Original Post]
-
09-07-25 19:30 #9873Senior Member

Posts: 292LA drought
No problem bro. If you know any young girls let me know. Now that Nali is gone and the only other girl in my rotation is leaving soon, I got nothing LOL. The 2 girls I tried this week weren't young enough to be mentioned here. So it seems like I'm going to be going on vacation from this hobby soon. I hope SSG, Candygirl, kgla, M etc. Can bring us a new superstar here in LA. My wallet will be waiting.
Originally Posted by DefCooked
[View Original Post]
-
09-07-25 18:12 #9872Regular Member

Posts: 12Not sure where to ask this, I'm headed to the bay for a week for work, and was checking their forums for intel but they all seem dead / dated. Does anyone know where if any if it exists? Or any agency / hya recs?
-
09-07-25 16:47 #9871Senior Member

Posts: 120B. I. V.
Baby IV is young and hot for sure, but not so sure about the acronym she goes by on booker site. Especially the I. V. Part. I hope she means Isla Vista.
Originally Posted by Heizenberg
[View Original Post]
-
09-07-25 14:03 #9870Senior Member

Posts: 98Lmfao thanks for the run back. Thank you still for the comprehensive hya data dump earlier. I got baby IV and Lumi on my list now.
Originally Posted by Stonkz
[View Original Post]
-
09-05-25 00:06 #9869Senior Member

Posts: 1728Lissom has reviews if you search far back. Very many people have tried Kiwi. She is a true MILF service queen, so I posted on the K BB thread:
Originally Posted by Optional
[View Original Post]
http://www.usasexguide.nl/forum/show...=1#post7386683 A disturbance in the force
Thanks for your review. If you search Lael K, there are two reviews - yours and Pistol's. Both of your reviews were accurate, so there are no conflicting reviews imo. Some say early 30s, some say late 20s, so we can say about 30. It means some will say HYA while others will not. It is kind of splitting hairs, so the best solution is for everyone to just say their opinion. For those interested, here was his review:
Originally Posted by Optional
[View Original Post]
Lael K has saggy Ds, has both looks and service. I knew Pistol's review was accurate when he posted it.
Originally Posted by PistolPete357
[View Original Post]
This is the way.
Originally Posted by PistolPete357
[View Original Post]
We are here to review girls, not review reviewers. The latter is why I dislike reviewing for LA, because people love to argue when we're all really here for the same thing. We're on the same team. We just want to know who to bang. It's why I skip past any post not about that in some way.
One thing that isn't obvious is that reviews can at best be about 80% accurate. For example, you can just assume that any height I quote could be off by 1 or 2 inches, and cup size off by up to 1 size. More than once I have said a girl is not her ad photo but someone said she was. It's not worth debating imo, I truly have no idea sometimes and we just want to know if a girl is hot or not. And if I say a girl has a nice face, obviously you might not agree. But who cares, just review the girls. If you say a girl I liked wasn't good looking, that's actually quite helpful because then other people will understand there is a range to taste and that the girl is probably borderline. Whereas there were some girls who everybody agreed is beautiful. So it doesn't matter what I or someone else said about a girl, your opinion is as good as mine.
I always welcome a different opinion, the only thing I'm not going to do is have an argument about review accuracy. It is just a handful of people supplying most of the intel, so even if they make a mistake you'll never hear me complain about them.
This is one advantage of the PLEASER thread. Anything but a review gets deleted.
-
09-04-25 18:58 #9868Senior Member

Posts: 292You don't need to be professional. All you have to do is right click a picture and find image source on google. Shows directly where every picture was taken from.
Originally Posted by PistolPete357
[View Original Post]
-
09-04-25 18:56 #9867Senior Member

Posts: 292Hey bro don't take that review seriously I was just trolling lmao.
Originally Posted by DefCooked
[View Original Post]













Reply With Quote











