Hot Young Asian Girls

**PistolPete357** · 09-01-25 12:55

HYA alert. Met Lael K first day in US. No mention of her here, this HYA is flying under the radar. Booker Marie says first time in US and young. Pictures are real she is young and fkn hot! I was pleasantly surprised when she appeared behind the door. She giggled as I was standing there, probably my goofy smile haha. Definite certified HYA. Kpop car model looks. She was very GFE and gives off civvie vibes which I love. Natural D / E a bit saggy but big soft handfuls. Nice ivory skin and thin. She is cool as a cucumber, confident and knows her way around. Service was good also. Dfk pays attention to me and pussy is tight wet. Very nice feeling puss. I lasted a bit longer than usual and she was game the whole time. I'd have to say one of the youngest in town right now. Kpop looks and great chemistry. I'm going to se her again this afternoon.

**Heizenberg** · 09-01-25 01:43

Originally Posted by ResilientJohn [View Original Post]

Are the advertise F cups real or MM?

Unfortunately it's MM D not F.

**Resilient John** · 09-01-25 00:45

Originally Posted by Heizenberg [View Original Post]

She is a repeat for sure. Great body and GND face said 24 but maybe 27/28 I'm not really good at guessing Asian ages.

She is not a service queen so bring your own service but nice fucking a HYa for sure.

Are the advertise F cups real or MM?

**Resilient John** · 09-01-25 00:44

Originally Posted by Optional [View Original Post]

There's so many different bookers that have overlapping girls in LA. CGLA, Get9, Rokm, etc. Is there really any difference between these bookers? I mean, do certain bookers specialize in one thing over another?

CGLA seems to have some unique girls that are not on the other booker sites, and Sesang seems to be it's own thing entirely. But otherwise, it seems like if you have access to one booker, you have access to most of the girls?

Aside from exclusive girls (I. E. SBC, CAKD, SSG, GKS, FA, etc.), you pretty much have access to 95% of all available kgirls by getting in with a couple or may three larger ones. IMO, from my experience, the main differences are English competency, discount programs, and general goodwill to recommend or provide info of girls that cater to your preferences. Keep in mind that most bookers do not know the girl, but the good ones solicit feedback from customers and owners to help customers as much as possible. SSG is in it's own class cause for the most part reliability and good communication is usual part and parcel of being a booker but they just unique in how they operate.

**Optional** · 09-01-25 00:09

There's so many different bookers that have overlapping girls in LA. CGLA, Get9, Rokm, etc. Is there really any difference between these bookers? I mean, do certain bookers specialize in one thing over another?

CGLA seems to have some unique girls that are not on the other booker sites, and Sesang seems to be it's own thing entirely. But otherwise, it seems like if you have access to one booker, you have access to most of the girls?

**Heizenberg** · 08-31-25 15:09

Originally Posted by Reepbe [View Original Post]

Hope you like her! I liked her so much I repeated, which I almost never do!

She is a repeat for sure. Great body and GND face said 24 but maybe 27/28 I'm not really good at guessing Asian ages.

She is not a service queen so bring your own service but nice fucking a HYa for sure.

**Reepbe** · 08-31-25 02:06

Originally Posted by Heizenberg [View Original Post]

Have a date with her tom my first HYA since arina and can't wait.

I know pics are fake but she is highly recommend by the booker and mongers from here as well!!

After seeing baby Sohee let's hope she is better!!

Thanks for all that gave me this recommendation.

Hope you like her! I liked her so much I repeated, which I almost never do!

**Heizenberg** · 08-30-25 21:57

Have a date with her tom my first HYA since arina and can't wait.

I know pics are fake but she is highly recommend by the booker and mongers from here as well!!

After seeing baby Sohee let's hope she is better!!

Thanks for all that gave me this recommendation.

**Im Myself** · 08-30-25 16:06

Originally Posted by Mrworldwide89 [View Original Post]

Does anyone know where Haven has gone to? She used to be on CGLA but it's been while since I've seen her on there but I see some reviews on TER on her recently located in LA.

Looks like she's in the bay area, the location on her TER just didn't change.

**Mrworldwide89** · 08-30-25 15:44

Does anyone know where Haven has gone to? She used to be on CGLA but it's been while since I've seen her on there but I see some reviews on TER on her recently located in LA.

**Reepbe** · 08-30-25 02:16

Originally Posted by Chaplin8 [View Original Post]

The review was a LASER and Easter her face a 6. 5 and body 7. 5. Says she looks early to mid 30's. Not even close to her pasted age of 20. I guess she's from Canada and is a nail tech of 5 years so that further confirms she's not 20 unless she started working at 15.

Ad did seem too good to be true. Well thank you for your report.

**Chaplin8** · 08-29-25 20:15

Originally Posted by Stonkz [View Original Post]

Ok but did they say if she was hya lmao?

The review was a LASER and Easter her face a 6. 5 and body 7. 5. Says she looks early to mid 30's. Not even close to her pasted age of 20. I guess she's from Canada and is a nail tech of 5 years so that further confirms she's not 20 unless she started working at 15.

**Slooppy** · 08-29-25 18:28

I'm thinking of TOFFT soon because she looks like the type of slim thicc with a booty that I enjoy. Baby IV and Angel were great but I can never seem to keep going back to the same girl because I want to try everyone under the sun and my wallet has limits. Was also thinking of seeing Ellie since a few of you have said she is curvy but I'm not into the MILFs.

**Wolfgar1** · 08-29-25 16:50

Curious to see everyone's ATF list. Just trying to compare taste overlap to get a better sense of reviews.

I tend to oscillate: the fuller / curvy types (Haven, Ellie, IV), but generally prefer more skinny / willowy types (Esme K, Katie K, Angel).

My ATFs are (in no particular order, I would consider them all S-tier):

Nali: Epic service, perfect pussy and love her skinny body. Virtually no body fat. I also like her face a lot. She has a very feline, cat-like look to me. Drawback is she can't really take it doggy and she has pretty much no ass. And her MMs are not super natural feeling, but they look good (maybe a bit too big for her frame). Honestly wish she didn't have MMs. But her BBBJ is so good though, and her squirms and squeals are unparalleled.

Katie K: Tiny, super skinny. Also virtually no body fat. Perfect tits for her size, with veins and perfect nipples. Pretty much shaved, but had tiny wispy hairs and I loved it. Her demeanor was the best, like a girlfriend / wife that is caring and loving. Service is great. Top tier face. I would date her IRL. Not the greatest ass, but it's not as flat as Nali.

Esme K: Probably my favorite body-wise. Ballerina-esque and all-natural. Skinny. Long legs. Nice ass and hips. Perfect natural Cs with perfect puffy / inverted nipples and her pussy was full Bush (if you can call it that), but it was such a tiny little patch it was so sexy. Great English too, but maybe a little too talkative. I hope she comes back.

Angel Another great ballerina-esque body (similar to Esme, but not as natural). Her face was top tier, kind of reminds me of a Korean Angelina Jolie. Service was okay though, but I did like that she had a little bit of hair down there (trimmed). Too expensive for a consistent repeat IMO, but definitely worth a try at least once.

If I could combine Nali's service with Katie K's pussy, face, and demeanor and Esme's body, and throw in a fuller ass, that would be my dream girl and I would be a broke man, but a happy man.

Rankings by attribute:

Face: Katie K > Angel > Nali > Esme K.

Body: Esme K > Katie K > Angel > Nali.

Service: Nali > Katie K > Esme K > Angel.

Tits: Esme K (natural, which gives her the edge) >= Katie K > Angel > Nali.

Pussy: Katie K > Esme K >= Nali > Angel.

Ass: Esme K > Katie K > Angel > Nali.

Honorable mentions:

Freesia is definitely S-tier in terms of looks, service, body. But for some reason I just didn't click with her. Also her pussy isn't the tightest and I think her tattoos weren't tasteful (I'm not opposed to tattoos in general). Daisy is someone I feel that people generally consider S-tier, but for me she is overrated and was A, maybe A+ at best. Still solid, but I would rather have Ina / Collette over Daisy (she scratches a similar itch for me). Ina has better service and is definitely A+ tier body / looks for me (S-tier service), really great value.

**Wolfgar1** · 08-29-25 16:06

I would say she's more premilf than true HYA. Probably late 20's, early 30's. I'm not Asian though, so probably don't have the best gauge here. But she is definitely sexy. Shaved kitty, porcelain skin. The pictures are pretty accurate, especially body wise. But based on your review, sounds like Baby IV might have the upper hand. I'm definitely an ass man too.

Originally Posted by Reepbe [View Original Post]

A true HYA in your opinion, ore more preMILf?

Thank you to everyone who left reviews / reports!

Now, the question remains for me. Try a new girl or return to B. IV, who I greatly enjoyed.