Rubrankings.com
Find Your New Baby
rubmaps
High Class Companions
Adult Live Video Cam Chat Models 4U!        Watch Online Cams Girl Now!
Top Tier Escorts
click for FREE hookups
Meet Sugar Babies
Mix and Match Combo Pack

Viagra 100mg

Thread: Hot Young Asian Girls

+ Add Report
Page 24 of 680 FirstFirst ... 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 74 124 524 ... LastLast
Results 346 to 360 of 10193
This blog is moderated by BonerAppetitty
  1. #9848
    Quote Originally Posted by ResilientJohn  [View Original Post]
    Are the advertise F cups real or MM?
    Unfortunately it's MM D not F.

  2. #9847
    Quote Originally Posted by Heizenberg  [View Original Post]
    She is a repeat for sure. Great body and GND face said 24 but maybe 27/28 I'm not really good at guessing Asian ages.

    She is not a service queen so bring your own service but nice fucking a HYa for sure.
    Are the advertise F cups real or MM?

  3. #9846
    Quote Originally Posted by Optional  [View Original Post]
    There's so many different bookers that have overlapping girls in LA. CGLA, Get9, Rokm, etc. Is there really any difference between these bookers? I mean, do certain bookers specialize in one thing over another?

    CGLA seems to have some unique girls that are not on the other booker sites, and Sesang seems to be it's own thing entirely. But otherwise, it seems like if you have access to one booker, you have access to most of the girls?
    Aside from exclusive girls (I. E. SBC, CAKD, SSG, GKS, FA, etc.), you pretty much have access to 95% of all available kgirls by getting in with a couple or may three larger ones. IMO, from my experience, the main differences are English competency, discount programs, and general goodwill to recommend or provide info of girls that cater to your preferences. Keep in mind that most bookers do not know the girl, but the good ones solicit feedback from customers and owners to help customers as much as possible. SSG is in it's own class cause for the most part reliability and good communication is usual part and parcel of being a booker but they just unique in how they operate.

  4. #9845

    Difference between bookers

    There's so many different bookers that have overlapping girls in LA. CGLA, Get9, Rokm, etc. Is there really any difference between these bookers? I mean, do certain bookers specialize in one thing over another?

    CGLA seems to have some unique girls that are not on the other booker sites, and Sesang seems to be it's own thing entirely. But otherwise, it seems like if you have access to one booker, you have access to most of the girls?

  5. #9844

    Baby IV is amazing

    Quote Originally Posted by Reepbe  [View Original Post]
    Hope you like her! I liked her so much I repeated, which I almost never do!
    She is a repeat for sure. Great body and GND face said 24 but maybe 27/28 I'm not really good at guessing Asian ages.

    She is not a service queen so bring your own service but nice fucking a HYa for sure.

  6. #9843

    You'll love her

    Quote Originally Posted by Heizenberg  [View Original Post]
    Have a date with her tom my first HYA since arina and can't wait.

    I know pics are fake but she is highly recommend by the booker and mongers from here as well!!

    After seeing baby Sohee let's hope she is better!!

    Thanks for all that gave me this recommendation.
    Hope you like her! I liked her so much I repeated, which I almost never do!

  7. #9842

    Baby IV

    Have a date with her tom my first HYA since arina and can't wait.

    I know pics are fake but she is highly recommend by the booker and mongers from here as well!!

    After seeing baby Sohee let's hope she is better!!

    Thanks for all that gave me this recommendation.

  8. #9841
    Quote Originally Posted by Mrworldwide89  [View Original Post]
    Does anyone know where Haven has gone to? She used to be on CGLA but it's been while since I've seen her on there but I see some reviews on TER on her recently located in LA.
    Looks like she's in the bay area, the location on her TER just didn't change.

  9. #9840
    Does anyone know where Haven has gone to? She used to be on CGLA but it's been while since I've seen her on there but I see some reviews on TER on her recently located in LA.

  10. #9839

    Too good to be true

    Quote Originally Posted by Chaplin8  [View Original Post]
    The review was a LASER and Easter her face a 6. 5 and body 7. 5. Says she looks early to mid 30's. Not even close to her pasted age of 20. I guess she's from Canada and is a nail tech of 5 years so that further confirms she's not 20 unless she started working at 15.
    Ad did seem too good to be true. Well thank you for your report.

  11. #9838

    Baby dahee is not HYA.

    Quote Originally Posted by Stonkz  [View Original Post]
    Ok but did they say if she was hya lmao?
    The review was a LASER and Easter her face a 6. 5 and body 7. 5. Says she looks early to mid 30's. Not even close to her pasted age of 20. I guess she's from Canada and is a nail tech of 5 years so that further confirms she's not 20 unless she started working at 15.

  12. #9837

    Anyone test drive Aella yet?

    I'm thinking of TOFFT soon because she looks like the type of slim thicc with a booty that I enjoy. Baby IV and Angel were great but I can never seem to keep going back to the same girl because I want to try everyone under the sun and my wallet has limits. Was also thinking of seeing Ellie since a few of you have said she is curvy but I'm not into the MILFs.

  13. #9836

    ATF roll call

    Curious to see everyone's ATF list. Just trying to compare taste overlap to get a better sense of reviews.

    I tend to oscillate: the fuller / curvy types (Haven, Ellie, IV), but generally prefer more skinny / willowy types (Esme K, Katie K, Angel).

    My ATFs are (in no particular order, I would consider them all S-tier):

    Nali: Epic service, perfect pussy and love her skinny body. Virtually no body fat. I also like her face a lot. She has a very feline, cat-like look to me. Drawback is she can't really take it doggy and she has pretty much no ass. And her MMs are not super natural feeling, but they look good (maybe a bit too big for her frame). Honestly wish she didn't have MMs. But her BBBJ is so good though, and her squirms and squeals are unparalleled.

    Katie K: Tiny, super skinny. Also virtually no body fat. Perfect tits for her size, with veins and perfect nipples. Pretty much shaved, but had tiny wispy hairs and I loved it. Her demeanor was the best, like a girlfriend / wife that is caring and loving. Service is great. Top tier face. I would date her IRL. Not the greatest ass, but it's not as flat as Nali.

    Esme K: Probably my favorite body-wise. Ballerina-esque and all-natural. Skinny. Long legs. Nice ass and hips. Perfect natural Cs with perfect puffy / inverted nipples and her pussy was full Bush (if you can call it that), but it was such a tiny little patch it was so sexy. Great English too, but maybe a little too talkative. I hope she comes back.

    Angel Another great ballerina-esque body (similar to Esme, but not as natural). Her face was top tier, kind of reminds me of a Korean Angelina Jolie. Service was okay though, but I did like that she had a little bit of hair down there (trimmed). Too expensive for a consistent repeat IMO, but definitely worth a try at least once.

    If I could combine Nali's service with Katie K's pussy, face, and demeanor and Esme's body, and throw in a fuller ass, that would be my dream girl and I would be a broke man, but a happy man.

    Rankings by attribute:

    Face: Katie K > Angel > Nali > Esme K.

    Body: Esme K > Katie K > Angel > Nali.

    Service: Nali > Katie K > Esme K > Angel.

    Tits: Esme K (natural, which gives her the edge) >= Katie K > Angel > Nali.

    Pussy: Katie K > Esme K >= Nali > Angel.

    Ass: Esme K > Katie K > Angel > Nali.

    Honorable mentions:

    Freesia is definitely S-tier in terms of looks, service, body. But for some reason I just didn't click with her. Also her pussy isn't the tightest and I think her tattoos weren't tasteful (I'm not opposed to tattoos in general). Daisy is someone I feel that people generally consider S-tier, but for me she is overrated and was A, maybe A+ at best. Still solid, but I would rather have Ina / Collette over Daisy (she scratches a similar itch for me). Ina has better service and is definitely A+ tier body / looks for me (S-tier service), really great value.

  14. #9835

    Ellie

    I would say she's more premilf than true HYA. Probably late 20's, early 30's. I'm not Asian though, so probably don't have the best gauge here. But she is definitely sexy. Shaved kitty, porcelain skin. The pictures are pretty accurate, especially body wise. But based on your review, sounds like Baby IV might have the upper hand. I'm definitely an ass man too.

    Quote Originally Posted by Reepbe  [View Original Post]
    A true HYA in your opinion, ore more preMILf?

    Thank you to everyone who left reviews / reports!

    Now, the question remains for me. Try a new girl or return to B. IV, who I greatly enjoyed.

  15. #9834
    Quote Originally Posted by DownloadX  [View Original Post]
    Everyone describes girls their own way. It's much better that you give your take than we have no info, so it's much appreciated. We all have to work together with our different ways of communicating.

    About walking, most bookers understand and some say they would rather you walk than be disappointed. Some mongers even communicate beforehand that they are looking for a certain type of girl, for example: young, tits, good face, "close enough to ad", and so on. Things that are obvious enough when the door opens. So a friend might confirm beforehand that the girl is supposed to be young and that he will leave if she is not young. He doesn't walk often and he sees girls all year, so the booker agrees. He has only walked about once a year, so it's not a problem.

    The other time I might walk after the shower is if something is very wrong. Whether hygene or attitude. This would be a last resort, I've never done it but probably should have in 1% of cases. Same way if a girl sees you have something strange going on she might do the same as a last resort. Or she sees you are gigantic and she knows she can't take it. It is rare.

    Yes there are a few bookers or agencies that don't want you to walk, but with competition that is becoming rare. I can think back to one or two examples where the booker will specifically say "no cancellations" for one specific popular girl, but that at least makes some sense since she is busy. It is sometimes said for a high tier or superstar girl, and at least it is upfront communication which makes it more fair. If you don't agree, then that is when you say nevermind. Among people I know, walking has never been a problem. Good communication solves a lot of problems.
    Honestly I only ever walked out twice. They were bait and switches to a girl I have seen before. Safe to say I do not use those 2 bookers any more. I would never cancel a superstar. If it was my fault, I have no problem paying. Now if you only book once a month then yeah probably not in your best interest to walk lmao. But if you are a frequent flyer, they know you are the cash cow.

Posting Limitations

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Click here for the best sugar babies
Sex Vacation
Best Escorts
Top Escorts
Ava Escorts
LoveHUB Escorts Directory
click for FREE hookups
Generic Cialis (Vidalista 20 mg) USA to USA Only

Mvitra 20 mg (Generic Levitra or vardenafil 20 mg pills)
Fast-Acting Kamagra Oral Jelly – Feel the Difference in Minutes! Best ED Solution – Powerful Combination for Peak Performance! Complete Protection – Stay Safe & Stress-Free!

Protected by Copyscape