Agency Discussion and Reviews

**EasyEmail786** · 06-29-25 17:33

Originally Posted by DanAtmos [View Original Post]

Met her earlier this week. I was skeptical seeing the stock images on the site. But the booker is easy to work with, and did assure that I'll have a good time see her. I was just hoping it wouldn't be a 40+ year old out of shape granny.

To my surprise, Andrea is in incredible body. She must be in her mid-30's. Natural boobies and nice soft jiggly ass. A sight to behold in DS. She gave a nice sloppy head. She had options, but I didn't partake. Highly recommend if you like seeing a petite latina woman who is willing to please.

I was looking to see her also but was not sure as I had one experience like this with the same company a year ago and it was mid 30"s was pretty mechanical was the picture similar? Or total different? Also I have noticed that they keep changed HER NAME from ANDREA TO ANDRIA. Not sure what is that about?

**FF1993** · 06-28-25 23:51

I spotted Rin's ad on FFC's website, drawn by her slim waist, athletic build, and perfect B / C-cup bust, so I booked a same-day appointment. Meeting her, I was stunned—her big, doll-like eyes and fit physique matched her videos perfectly. After a shower, we shared light kissing that turned into passionate DFK, her responses eager and warm. I performed DATY, which she loved, reacting intensely. Her BBBJ was gentle, just average in skill. Her toned legs were a highlight. In ACG, her snug pussy felt amazing, though she prefers gentler rhythms, as intense sex is too much for her. In side saddle, I varied pace slowly, and she enjoyed it, submissively massaging my balls. Missionary with DFK was superb, her compliance perfect. In standing mish, her shapely frame and sultry eye contact pushed me to climax. We showered, shared kisses, and dressed. She's a beautiful and warm girl who needs gentle care. Her stunning looks make her a must-see. Treat her well, and you'll leave smiling.

**Noworth** · 06-28-25 22:10

Originally Posted by DownloadX [View Original Post]

Service is generally YMMV, especially what one person considers good service is very different than another. So it helps to be specific and you'll tend to find a bit more agreement. Some guys have a major dealbreaker that comes down to one or two very specific things that another guy doesn't even care about.

So the simplest solution is to search every reviewer's review. In your post history, you've only reviewed Nana in Nova. It didn't even match up with what other reviewers got. Rather than concluding you are a fake reviewer just because you don't agree with another reviewer, we all learn sooner or later that service is truly YMMV. Honest reviewers disagree all the time on service, and fake reviews mixed in don't help either.

If daty is an important dealbreaker for you, it does make research tougher since not every review covers it. In fact, short reviews usually don't. TER can help supplement info, but with jgirls and their short tours that's not easy either. Seeing kgirls is definitely the solution for more reasons than one. Some kgirls have pages and pages of TER reviews (i.e. hundreds of reviews) and it becomes obvious what they allow.

I've read through and evaluated over 10k TER reviews plus a ton of USAG reviews for decades. Long or short reviews don't correlate with accuracy. It is more important you research the reviewer's past posts, especially if they covered a girl you saw. You will be surprised that even among the most honest reviewers, you and they simply will not agree on service. It's as simple as that.

I do think some are quick to jump to a conclusion that is not merited and ultimately just cause drama and adds low value. Just because someone else reported a different experience neither refutes the one someone else had or imply they are fake. Let's all give each other the benefit of a doubt, evaluate if their wants / preferences match up with what I / you are looking for and then make the decision on how much weight to give that reviewer's info in our decisions. Doesn't have to be antagonistic, we all scratch the itch we feel, not the one someone else might be feeling.

**Pornstar2022** · 06-28-25 17:45

Originally Posted by Superman270 [View Original Post]

Good service? Was thinking about going to see her but my experiences with J-girls have been hit or miss in that respect.

She was very good and was friendly. Nice ass for a Asian lowkey big nipples as well.

**Download X** · 06-28-25 00:12

Originally Posted by Ncsmm [View Original Post]

I tried Nana, she is a sweet girl that's 100% but, she is only allowed little daty almost the whole time her legs was closed even can touch her pussy, she was nothing close to GFE.

Originally Posted by FunctionK [View Original Post]

Never met this problem during my session with Nana. Sorry to hear that bro. J girls always YMMV. Maybe you should try some K girls, K girls' service usually more consistent.

Service is generally YMMV, especially what one person considers good service is very different than another. So it helps to be specific and you'll tend to find a bit more agreement. Some guys have a major dealbreaker that comes down to one or two very specific things that another guy doesn't even care about.

Originally Posted by Ncsmm [View Original Post]

All the very long reviews fake. Short reviews real.

So the simplest solution is to search every reviewer's review. In your post history, you've only reviewed Nana in Nova. It didn't even match up with what other reviewers got. Rather than concluding you are a fake reviewer just because you don't agree with another reviewer, we all learn sooner or later that service is truly YMMV. Honest reviewers disagree all the time on service, and fake reviews mixed in don't help either.

If daty is an important dealbreaker for you, it does make research tougher since not every review covers it. In fact, short reviews usually don't. TER can help supplement info, but with jgirls and their short tours that's not easy either. Seeing kgirls is definitely the solution for more reasons than one. Some kgirls have pages and pages of TER reviews (i.e. hundreds of reviews) and it becomes obvious what they allow.

I've read through and evaluated over 10k TER reviews plus a ton of USAG reviews for decades. Long or short reviews don't correlate with accuracy. It is more important you research the reviewer's past posts, especially if they covered a girl you saw. You will be surprised that even among the most honest reviewers, you and they simply will not agree on service. It's as simple as that.

**Cooley** · 06-27-25 22:55

Originally Posted by PasoDelRey1742 [View Original Post]

Tonight I'm going to try Mimi or Apple fron gsgdww123.

They have 45 min BBFS anal 4. 0.

Nice, lets us know how it goes.

**Superman270** · 06-27-25 18:58

Originally Posted by Pornstar2022 [View Original Post]

Sex warrior is my review sheesh.

Good service? Was thinking about going to see her but my experiences with J-girls have been hit or miss in that respect.

**Pornstar2022** · 06-27-25 18:19

Sex warrior is my review sheesh.

**FunctionK** · 06-27-25 16:45

Originally Posted by Ncsmm [View Original Post]

I tried Nana, she is a sweet girl that's 100% but, she is only allowed little daty almost the whole time her legs was closed even can touch her pussy, she was nothing close to GFE.

Never met this problem during my session with Nana. Sorry to hear that bro. J girls always YMMV. Maybe you should try some K girls, K girls' service usually more consistent.

**DanAtmos** · 06-27-25 16:24

Originally Posted by HouseBlend [View Original Post]

https://www.dmvgirlsva.com/copy-of-model-page-jay

Anyone try the Latina in this korg? I haven't gotten bare Latina services unless its at FHOH but even that is a hit or miss since it was never GFE.

Met her earlier this week. I was skeptical seeing the stock images on the site. But the booker is easy to work with, and did assure that I'll have a good time see her. I was just hoping it wouldn't be a 40+ year old out of shape granny.

To my surprise, Andrea is in incredible body. She must be in her mid-30's. Natural boobies and nice soft jiggly ass. A sight to behold in DS. She gave a nice sloppy head. She had options, but I didn't partake. Highly recommend if you like seeing a petite latina woman who is willing to please.

**Ncsmm** · 06-27-25 16:07

I tried Nana, she is a sweet girl that's 100% but, she is only allowed little daty almost the whole time her legs was closed even can touch her pussy, she was nothing close to GFE.

Originally Posted by FunctionK [View Original Post]

So which girl you saw? AHG has some real good girls over the past 2 weeks. I tried Tomoka and Nana, both are good.

**Ncsmm** · 06-27-25 16:02

All the very long reviews fake. Short reviews real.

Originally Posted by EasyEmail786 [View Original Post]

Admin need to do something honestly its getting ridiculous at.

This time all these are fake and also on ter you can.

See these are giving by agency.

**FunctionK** · 06-27-25 16:00

Originally Posted by Ncsmm [View Original Post]

Past couple weeks I was reading here all the reviews. I decided go with AHG because is was many good reviews I think 70% of this reviews fake. My experience not was very good.

So which girl you saw? AHG has some real good girls over the past 2 weeks. I tried Tomoka and Nana, both are good.

**EasyEmail786** · 06-27-25 15:43

Originally Posted by Ncsmm [View Original Post]

Past couple weeks I was reading here all the reviews. I decided go with AHG because is was many good reviews I think 70% of this reviews fake. My experience not was very good.

Admin need to do something honestly its getting ridiculous at.

This time all these are fake and also on ter you can.

See these are giving by agency.

**Ncsmm** · 06-27-25 14:57

Past couple weeks I was reading here all the reviews. I decided go with AHG because is was many good reviews I think 70% of this reviews fake. My experience not was very good.