Thread: Hot Young Asian Girls
+
Add Report
Results 871 to 885 of 10200
-
04-25-25 19:58 #9330Senior Member

Posts: 572Thanks for the TOFTT. Does she have bunny teeth and really good English and slight smokers breath and studies fashion? Her stats reminds me of Sonya K a while ago who was also listed as natural F cup but was more like a saggy C or D.
Originally Posted by Alex60
[View Original Post]
-
04-25-25 17:38 #9329Senior Member

Posts: 26I won't gatekeep her
She's too big-bone for Asian taste, 5' 5' at most, once and done for me.
Originally Posted by BlackAngel99
[View Original Post]
The perfect example of gatekeeping is baby Bonita, way out of the league, best of whole life!
-
04-25-25 14:01 #9328Senior Member

Posts: 90Before I saw her I searched and didn't find any information about her here, maybe it's because her short name doesn't appear in the search, but yes, there is in fact a review of her and I think it's unique so far, girls like her, Yaya, Lime, Bora, Yui. Normally don't go so long without a review and since she's been very busy.
Originally Posted by ResilientJohn
[View Original Post]
About the comparisons I think Bora is more thic like Ooyo, Lime and Soa are more athletic, I don't consider Lime thin like Baby Sweet, like Yaya, Nakamura. But what you said are personal tastes and different views, Soa is above in beauty and body of most kgirls for my taste that I don't think is cool MM and face with work (Lime's case) Soa is young, beautiful, ideal skin and body for me.
-
04-25-25 13:39 #9327Senior Member

Posts: 691I wouldn't call this as evidence of gatekeeping since she's already had reviews posted, just not a lot here. If it is Baby Soa, then I was just caught off guard when you made a comparison of her to Lime in terms of build. Unless Lime has gain weight since last I've seen her then I personally don't think the two are comparable. The case for Baby Bora might be more understandable. Just goes to show you that people have a variety of tastes and preferences. Just for another perspective, I did review her two weeks ago in the pleaser thread. It should still be on the first page too.
Originally Posted by BlackAngel99
[View Original Post]
-
04-25-25 11:33 #9326Senior Member

Posts: 138I saw Banny K
Sorry to report Banny K was a real disappointment. Her pics are NOT representative of her current look -- not as hot as her pics, more weight around the hips, and her "F-Cup" breasts seemed more like C / Ds and had a fair amount of sag. And the service, jeez. When I kissed her stomach she asked me to stop because it was ticklish, when I massaged her shoulders she asked me to stop because she was "sore". Really a bummer because I like to make my partner feel good with caresses and touches... I don't just pound away. The final disappointment was in mish where she added WAY too much lube, so much so that there was really no friction and I lost my hard-on. No response / reaction from her as I popped out, she just kind of laid there, so I improvised by ripping off the rubber and got in position for a tit-fuck. I guided her hands to wrap her breasts around my cock, and with some straightforward pumping I finally got it on and shot my load all over her chest.
Originally Posted by Undftd88
[View Original Post]
She was a pleasant girl, no attitude, and I hate writing bad reviews, but I feel responsible to you guys to tell it like it is. NOTE: When I booked her the booker said she was getting "good reviews" so maybe this is just a case of YMMV. I'd be curious to hear any other opinions / experiences.
-
04-25-25 03:39 #9325Senior Member

Posts: 2405Sounds like growth. I suppose gatekeepers hold a scarcity mindset. Or perhaps they get off on being a have versus have not. If the latter is true, how good was their experience really, if they still seek attention and validation on a forum?
Originally Posted by BonerAppetitty
[View Original Post]
-
04-25-25 02:51 #9324Senior Member

Posts: 165Destroy the gates boner. Punish the gatekeepers.
Originally Posted by BonerAppetitty
[View Original Post]
-
04-25-25 00:36 #9323Banned Member

Posts: 102Thank you for your service sir. May the HYA be with you.
Originally Posted by BonerAppetitty
[View Original Post]
-
04-25-25 00:02 #9322Senior Member

Posts: 34451000 Gatekeepers vs 1 Boner
As a former Gatekeeper, I can tell you that nothing will make them switch side unless something drastic happen. I wouldn't switch side if FOSTA didn't happen and made most reviewers go into hiding, shills explosion for MILFs, making HYAs be in danger of extinction. I came to save the H***
What I hoped for was to build a comfortable community where the shy or excluded mongers not in any big private groups can share their thoughts. I may get depressed sometimes and gripe cause too many rebrands and MILFs out there. I boned lots of new girls but they keep coming like a human wave assault at The Boner. It gets tiring fast.
You will just get more guesses and PMs instead. I have formed a habit of sharing The Boner Weekend Update and no longer feel the need to gate keep. I want to be pokeball champ and catch them all. No time for reviews. I see more girls than I talked about, but will put them on Boner Select list if they are young and cute enough for me.
I will write glowing reviews for girls who treated me right or better than the average Kgirls.
Originally Posted by BlackAngel99
[View Original Post]
Originally Posted by BlackAngel99
[View Original Post]
-
04-24-25 23:58 #9321Senior Member

Posts: 90Perfect!
Originally Posted by BonerAppetitty
[View Original Post]
Perfect!! Very well observed and accurate!!
-
04-24-25 23:49 #9320Senior Member

Posts: 3445I don't know if it's stolen pics but the pics are still on a C-org for 300/ hhr or 500/ hr. Baby Sua might have changed org or is booked by both. Stat with Corg also matches. 20 yrs old, 166 cm, 45 kg, D cup.
Originally Posted by Advoc8
[View Original Post]
-
04-24-25 23:40 #9319Senior Member

Posts: 3445Prolly Baby Soa
Couldn't be Susie K or Baby Jin cause The Boner already called them the top 5% prettiest girls in SoCal currently. But yea, his description fit Baby Jin a lot. I even wrote a glowing review for her. Anyway, if she was any one of Boner Select girls then it couldn't be gatekeeping. As a master buster of gates, I already freed them from the gatekeepers.
It's no longer gatekeeping when we already talk about a girl here.
Originally Posted by ZebraZebra
[View Original Post]
-
04-24-25 23:37 #9318Senior Member

Posts: 90It's not Baby Jin, Baby Jin has a lot of comments here, including Boner and Download who made great contributions here about Baby Jin.
Originally Posted by ZebraZebra
[View Original Post]
To those who said I'm a Gatekeeper, just look at how many girls I've posted comments to here, both in this new username and in my old username. Some people DMed me asking who this HYA is and when I look they're people who've never posted anything about any girl, these people are a disgrace.
-
04-24-25 23:29 #9317Senior Member

Posts: 3445Quote was "once you go bare back, you will never go back. " The Boner has been back and forth many times tho.
Originally Posted by BookerN
[View Original Post]
-
04-24-25 23:24 #9316Senior Member

Posts: 3445Nobody is gatekeeping Kylie. She has been discussed and The Boner had seen her. If bros know The Boner Manifesto then they will know why The Boner didn't put her into Boner Select girls even if she was a Boner Solid girl.
If anything, it's the other site doing gatekeeping cause Kylie has 0 review there since her OC stay.
Contact: (click here).
Originally Posted by Heizenberg
[View Original Post]














Reply With Quote








