Thread: "Sugar Babies" and "Arrangements"
+
Add Report
Results 841 to 855 of 16129
-
01-08-25 11:17 #15289
Posts: 220Thoughts on Mariah, Taylor, Kati or Linda
Mariah - https://members.seeking.com/member/d...9-abf84c7bec3a.
Taylor - https://members.seeking.com/member/6...8-7c592c3de560.
Kati - https://members.seeking.com/member/3...2-9b910fbf11fa.
Linda - https://members.seeking.com/member/6...1-4a6b6bdf5321.
Kati seems like a massage girl, but I can't find her escort page. But, I like her look.
-
01-07-25 23:07 #15288
Posts: 60I agree
I saw them too and I concur.
Originally Posted by PeterJohnson [View Original Post]
-
01-07-25 18:25 #15287
Posts: 1673Kelsee, 35 in Austell
Ok I don't want to only focus on the negative, so here is a woman from Seeking, who was good.
https://members.seeking.com/member/0...e-04cf49458f5a
I saw her awhile back and she is very chill, and also affordable, but YMMV there. Pics in her profile are fairly accurate, age could be off a bit.
She is in Austell right now, but seems to be good about driving to where you are.
-
01-07-25 17:36 #15286
Posts: 1673A few girls to avoid
Seductivediva, 23 in Atlanta, maybe Buford, real name Alyssa.
https://members.seeking.com/member/a...7-bb5abfe99249
I saw her awhile back and terrible experience, and another guy here was telling me about a bad time he had, and turns out it was with this same girl. You have been warned.
Also Joy in Covington age 29.
https://members.seeking.com/member/e...6-251c5909f38b
Another bad experience, quasi-scammer.
Also Rose in Sandy Springs. I can't find her profile, but she is in her 20s and just dangerous.
I can't give more details, because some losers on here tell the girls everything we write, but just take my word for it ... or take your chances.
The pics below are of Alyssa and Rose.
-
01-07-25 17:13 #15285
Posts: 579Originally Posted by SetoMan [View Original Post]
-
01-07-25 16:54 #15284
Posts: 1673Originally Posted by GoneForGood97 [View Original Post]
And sure, 1 in 1000 hot instagram models on Seeking would take 200 ppm for first visit, but not much more than that.
It seems to me that 300 (plus hotel) is now the usual baseline for 8+ girls. Maybe even 7+. Yes you can get some 6's and 7's for 200, maybe, if you contact hundreds of them. And contacting hundreds of them not a bad strategy, although certainly time consuming.
But I doubt many hot girls are ok with less than 300 on first visit. I mean like less than 5% of them, or somewhere in that area. More and more of them want 400 minimum, even the homely ones. I have no idea how many guys go for that, but if you have to negotiate too hard with them, then less likely they will provide good service. But perhaps that is not a huge factor.
Anyway, you make good points not to overpay, but it isn't that clear what price point "overpaying" begins at, with different classes of girl.
-
01-07-25 14:12 #15283
Posts: 1673Originally Posted by Cmcae1 [View Original Post]
It's good to remember that a lot of these SB girls are thieving drug addicts, just like in the regular escort/hooker world. I forget that sometimes.
-
01-07-25 14:12 #15282
Posts: 1673Originally Posted by BerolLoz [View Original Post]
-
01-07-25 12:38 #15281
Posts: 59Originally Posted by DiscreetMeet [View Original Post]
-
01-07-25 11:42 #15280
Posts: 16Is Sugardaddymeet better than seeking? I have been using seeking on and off for 5 years now. Has everyone switched? Are there better girls asking for lower $$.
-
01-05-25 20:54 #15279
Posts: 542Originally Posted by ChristianTroy [View Original Post]
-
01-05-25 20:52 #15278
Posts: 542Originally Posted by Sneaknfreak [View Original Post]
-
01-05-25 20:50 #15277
Posts: 542Originally Posted by NickJohnson85 [View Original Post]
-
01-05-25 20:43 #15276
Posts: 542Originally Posted by MadDog1746 [View Original Post]
-
01-05-25 20:36 #15275
Posts: 542Originally Posted by TallGuy3000 [View Original Post]
It's up to you, but it's probably the same kind of thing, as it's not SDM holding your picture; it's whatever security company does that verification service for them. The good thing is, if that company gets hacked in the future it's going to be their name in the media, not TallGuy is on SDM.