Korean Agency BB

**HornyToad75** · 01-07-25 03:30

Originally Posted by ResilientJohn [View Original Post]

So I just got confirmation from someone that saw her today that it is Jane. Funny enough, he wasn't sure when he went inside if it was her either. It was the scar on her hip that confirmed it for him. And yes, BBFSCIP confirmed. I plan to see her too since I remember having a good time with her.

Would greatly appreciate if you can report her current physical state after you see her. She was still a good time when I saw her last year even with her weight gain. Was soaking wet and really into the session.

**MisterDotD** · 01-07-25 03:11

Originally Posted by Stgermaine [View Original Post]

Who seems more engaging / extroverted personality wise? Looking for an extroverted / playful personality gal with pretty face and ideally BBFS.

Man, it a tough choice, I didn't have a chance to see Hazel (Erica, Erika), but would love to. However, from what you describe it seem almost all the marks are close to Jenny. The pretty face disparency is only but a small margins. Jenny is CYA more than HYA.

**Download X** · 01-07-25 01:02

Originally Posted by Stgermaine [View Original Post]

Who seems more engaging / extroverted personality wise? Looking for an extroverted / playful personality gal with pretty face and ideally BBFS.

So engaging and extroverted depend on physical or verbal. Jenny is more physically engaging with very limited English, Ericka more verbally engaging (good English and well spoken). Ericka is more extroverted, fun to talk with but I doubt most guys look for that. I appreciate it though. Jenny is more playful, really playful in my opinion. Ericka better face. You asked 4 different things, hope that makes sense. Since you ask for BBFS note that Jenny is cheaper. Also Ericka is now Hazel. More important than any question you asked, Jenny is balanced looks and service. Ericka is looks over service. I think it really depends on your preference here, both girls are good in different ways. If it were me I'd decide by your most important criteria because it's rare that all your priorities are equal.

For most guys, cost of course. Jenny is the best value in Socal, once she and Allie are gone the 320 all-in era is over. Forever. Im actually going to link to this post later this year or whenever it happens, just to remind people I did warn them. LA is already 350 all-in and even that will go up. New OC SD girls are 340 since a few months ago, its just a handful of OG 320 girls grandfathered in. I dont like it either but better I just say it now. If there were a way we could stop price increases I’d like to know of course.

There are other girls too. I always have several backups, it's important no matter who you like. Unless you patiently book far ahead which works but has its own drawbacks. Good luck.

**Resilient John** · 01-07-25 00:56

Originally Posted by Stgermaine [View Original Post]

Who seems more engaging / extroverted personality wise? Looking for an extroverted / playful personality gal with pretty face and ideally BBFS.

Ericka / Hazel has what you're looking for, engaging and fairly extroverted. But I would still choose Jenny over Ericka / Hazel because she is pretty enough and no upcharge.

**Resilient John** · 01-07-25 00:48

Originally Posted by Tobonkornot [View Original Post]

Nike is decidedly not an SB. Whole thing has shaken my brand perception of SBC indefinitely.

First off, thanks for the review. Nike's been around for a bit now but there was not much info about her, I guess we now know partly why.

From what I can gather, SBC works on a sliding scale price that is commensurate to the girl's youth / looks as assessed presumably by the owner / girl in question. In addition, SBC girls automatically get a sign on bonus to their hourly rates because they can. Stephanie (fka Ppomi, Wooju) went from 340 to 380 and Nike herself started at 320 and is now 340. Lily (Esme K) and Lilia (Choco) similarly increased, while Daisy had the biggest jump. Dahlia is their top shelf product at 650, reviews so far are mixed. Service is not taken into consideration, it's all looks / youth or bust.

It's quite evident that they are focused on the generous gentleman archtype by leveraging the HYA they can bring in. I can understand why they do it and their target audience. It's just a bit jarring to market themselves within the kgirl ecosystem as it already has established price ranges. But I think that's either because they can't reach a large enough clientele without the help of multiple bookers, or they don't want to compete or aren't competent enough to operate in market segments that traditionally has similar price points, namely, PD and P411.

In short, IMO, their girls are pushing cash grabs hard. And some guys do bite.

**Stgermaine** · 01-07-25 00:22

Who seems more engaging / extroverted personality wise? Looking for an extroverted / playful personality gal with pretty face and ideally BBFS.

**Resilient John** · 01-07-25 00:20

Originally Posted by Fuzion [View Original Post]

I've seen "Jane / Gem" in the past. Are you guys sure that is the same Gem that's being listed?

From what I remember, Jane doesn't allow BBFS. She's pretty but her tits are natural and saggy. She's elegant and treats you like royalty. Very gentle. I personally wouldn't repeat. I know she's been on tour in Colorado and Dallas.

Gem, however, looks much more beautiful. I love her pics and if she has fake tits (Booker lists natural but I've seen other girls who are listed as natural but has fake tits) then she's an insta book for me. If anyone has more intel, please share.

Danbi: I saw a review of her from elsewhere and it was decent. However, I tend not to put too much weight into other places since their quality is not as high, no disrespect. It is like looking at food reviews for rural places vs big cities. Just because both are 4. 5 stars, I am hesitant to trust since the bar is lower.

Originally Posted by HornyToad75 [View Original Post]

It is possible now she opens up her menu to attract more business. When I saw her last year, she gained quite a bit of weight compared to when she first started, and was firmly in the MILF service queen category for me.

Originally Posted by BonerAppetitty [View Original Post]

Yes I am 90% sure Sora and Gem are rebrands. Sora used to be my ATF too.

So I just got confirmation from someone that saw her today that it is Jane. Funny enough, he wasn't sure when he went inside if it was her either. It was the scar on her hip that confirmed it for him. And yes, BBFSCIP confirmed. I plan to see her too since I remember having a good time with her.

**BonerAppetitty** · 01-06-25 22:50

Sorry but you misunderstood the brand. If she's under 400 then she's not part of the Club. If you want legit Super Beautiful Chick then have to fork 600+. For Sexy Beautiful Chick, it's 400+. You may feel like it's Sucked Being Conned if she is not your type tho. Only certified HYAs so far were Freesia, Peony, Daisy, Dahlia, Poppy, Mocha.

Originally Posted by Tobonkornot [View Original Post]

Nike is decidedly not an SB. Whole thing has shaken my brand perception of SBC indefinitely...

**BonerAppetitty** · 01-06-25 22:42

Yes I am 90% sure Sora and Gem are rebrands. Sora used to be my ATF too.

Originally Posted by HornyToad75 [View Original Post]

https://www.sweetasiangem.com/copy-of-kissy

The ad pics are OG pics of Estee / Mio / Ella, who has been GFE only. The stats matched. Not sure if they just blatantly stole the pics or if she now had to open up her menu to attract more business.

**HornyToad75** · 01-06-25 16:41

https://www.sweetasiangem.com/copy-of-kissy

The ad pics are OG pics of Estee / Mio / Ella, who has been GFE only. The stats matched. Not sure if they just blatantly stole the pics or if she now had to open up her menu to attract more business.

**HornyToad75** · 01-06-25 14:26

Originally Posted by Randy62 [View Original Post]

Jane / Gem from what I deciphered from my notes C cup GFE service queen. She has been on my repeat list but only saw her once quite some time ago. And yes no BBFS.

It is possible now she opens up her menu to attract more business. When I saw her last year, she gained quite a bit of weight compared to when she first started, and was firmly in the MILF service queen category for me.

**Randy62** · 01-06-25 11:13

Originally Posted by Fuzion [View Original Post]

I've seen "Jane / Gem" in the past. Are you guys sure that is the same Gem that's being listed?

From what I remember, Jane doesn't allow BBFS. She's pretty but her tits are natural and saggy. She's elegant and treats you like royalty. Very gentle. I personally wouldn't repeat. I know she's been on tour in Colorado and Dallas.

Gem, however, looks much more beautiful. I love her pics and if she has fake tits (Booker lists natural but I've seen other girls who are listed as natural but has fake tits) then she's an insta book for me. If anyone has more intel, please share.

Danbi: I saw a review of her from elsewhere and it was decent. However, I tend not to put too much weight into other places since their quality is not as high, no disrespect. It is like looking at food reviews for rural places vs big cities. Just because both are 4. 5 stars, I am hesitant to trust since the bar is lower.

Jane / Gem from what I deciphered from my notes C cup GFE service queen. She has been on my repeat list but only saw her once quite some time ago. And yes no BBFS.

**HandsOfMidas** · 01-06-25 10:56

Anyone try this duo? I've had Sophia before numerous times and she's wonderful but haven't really tried Everly or a duo. Thanks.

**Fuzion** · 01-06-25 10:37

I've seen "Jane / Gem" in the past. Are you guys sure that is the same Gem that's being listed?

From what I remember, Jane doesn't allow BBFS. She's pretty but her tits are natural and saggy. She's elegant and treats you like royalty. Very gentle. I personally wouldn't repeat. I know she's been on tour in Colorado and Dallas.

Gem, however, looks much more beautiful. I love her pics and if she has fake tits (Booker lists natural but I've seen other girls who are listed as natural but has fake tits) then she's an insta book for me. If anyone has more intel, please share.

Danbi: I saw a review of her from elsewhere and it was decent. However, I tend not to put too much weight into other places since their quality is not as high, no disrespect. It is like looking at food reviews for rural places vs big cities. Just because both are 4. 5 stars, I am hesitant to trust since the bar is lower.

**Resilient John** · 01-06-25 02:10

Originally Posted by BonerAppetitty [View Original Post]

Danbi was in SanDiego but got no review. I recognized her face but its been a few years since I saw her. I thought she was pretty and was into it. I wouldn't expect exact girl in the P.S. Pics. Her reviews (click here).

Gem was pretty well known GFE girl in OC. First time BB upcharge. She was in my Superior tier for service, attitude, and performance. Tier A in looks just cause I liked the way she looked. She was a classy beautiful and elegant lady when I first saw her some years ago. She took excellent care of me like a loving wife, starting with the blue toast to when I left. Someone said she was "insatiable GFE". I saw the resemblance from her new P.S. Pics. She had more accurate P.S. Pics before. Don't expect girl in the P.S. Pics cause that's AI enhanced / idealized P.S. Version of her. She's also tall at 5'7" pale skin slender body with soft natural Cs. Her reviews (click here).

When you say Gem, are you referring to Jane (see attached pics)? I only know her as Jane.