Seeking Arrangements

[TRowePrice]

Been chatting with this one as I am coming to FTL for a trip.

Was wondering if anyone had any intel they can share my way by DM or here is fine. Prefer the unrush experience but it looks like I will be in South FL a bit more these days. Thanks.

Taylor (32).

https://members.seeking.com/member/b...4-a3683dcee010

[MrFairfax]

https://members.seeking.com/member/9...d-a2907009d5af

The pics seem like they're of at least 3 different people. Anyone seen her?

[Rubtug21]

Hey, so, I am somewhat new to seeking, but I just wanted to check with you boys that out of the girls who give you their number to take it to text, what percentage of them do you end up meeting with? I am trying to figure out if its something wrong with my approach or if its the fact I'm a younger (mid / late 30's) SD, or something else that's off. I've literally not been able to meet with a single girl out of 15 active text threads, one was willing to meet last night but she kinda pinged me out of the blue and she wasn't super attractive, and the whole "Can you meet right now and host" thing kinda threw me. I've heard Seeking is like pulling teeth, but 1/15 texting (on phone, not the app) -to-meet rate is pretty bad, no?

Thanks in advance.

Stick to escorts and massage parlors. SA is not worth it. Afterall, those girls are glorified escorts. I banged 3 girls from there, one of whom was on the very first date. 500 PPM plus about 170 for hotel. Although we chilled for a few hours, I could have gotten 3 good escorts for the amount I spent. I later discovered she had advertisements on LC for 120 cardates. Keep in mind that, they ask for money on the daily for nails, hair, cellphone bill, car broke down, Uber and etc. The money adds up quick. It would make more sense financially to invest that money in a GF. No loyalty. Even when they promised exclusivity, they have at least three different SD's on the side hitting it raw. It's a shitshow. Stay away, run.

[MrFairfax]

When I was active. It was 1 out of 20 that actually I met for some fun. Only a few replied enough to get an idea of what they wanted and their availability to meet based on donation and schedule. I felt like I wasted way too much time trying to communicate due to long delays between them replying (if at all) to actually meetup. Some blocked me if I did not reply back to them with 15 minutes. Others it was days between them replying. Keep in mind that they can join for free but only get 10-15 messages allowed per month so if they joined on a lark after a friends recommendation you will rarely hear back. I set my filter for newest members only. The ones who have not been active on the sight for months are not worth even contacting. You are better off meeting actual women at a night club or out at stores shopping.

OK makes sense. This helps. Thank you.

[FourSeasons2]

Hey, so, I am somewhat new to seeking, but I just wanted to check with you boys that out of the girls who give you their number to take it to text, what percentage of them do you end up meeting with? I am trying to figure out if its something wrong with my approach or if its the fact I'm a younger (mid / late 30's) SD, or something else that's off. I've literally not been able to meet with a single girl out of 15 active text threads, one was willing to meet last night but she kinda pinged me out of the blue and she wasn't super attractive, and the whole "Can you meet right now and host" thing kinda threw me. I've heard Seeking is like pulling teeth, but 1/15 texting (on phone, not the app) -to-meet rate is pretty bad, no?

Thanks in advance.

When I was active. It was 1 out of 20 that actually I met for some fun. Only a few replied enough to get an idea of what they wanted and their availability to meet based on donation and schedule. I felt like I wasted way too much time trying to communicate due to long delays between them replying (if at all) to actually meetup. Some blocked me if I did not reply back to them with 15 minutes. Others it was days between them replying. Keep in mind that they can join for free but only get 10-15 messages allowed per month so if they joined on a lark after a friends recommendation you will rarely hear back. I set my filter for newest members only. The ones who have not been active on the sight for months are not worth even contacting. You are better off meeting actual women at a night club or out at stores shopping.

[MrFairfax]

Hey, so, I am somewhat new to seeking, but I just wanted to check with you boys that out of the girls who give you their number to take it to text, what percentage of them do you end up meeting with? I am trying to figure out if its something wrong with my approach or if its the fact I'm a younger (mid / late 30's) SD, or something else that's off. I've literally not been able to meet with a single girl out of 15 active text threads, one was willing to meet last night but she kinda pinged me out of the blue and she wasn't super attractive, and the whole "Can you meet right now and host" thing kinda threw me. I've heard Seeking is like pulling teeth, but 1/15 texting (on phone, not the app) -to-meet rate is pretty bad, no?

Thanks in advance.

[DrWho]

7. Seems slightly pro 4 ppm, might have a drinking problem. Everything covered.

https://members.seeking.com/member/d...5-eb3dddb1d0af

Most definitely a pro, have seen her ads often on LC and other sites.

4 ppm = all covered!!?? I guess PT Barnham was right!

[MiamiFun316]

Have a few reviews / Intel I'm going to post.

1. Very sexy and looks just like her pics. I haven't seen her in a couple years but she looks like she's in better shape. Was 4 ppm but might have gone up with hoeflation. Mostly covered and no kissing but still a great tine.

https://members.seeking.com/member/7...d-a797ba612133

2. GPS, GPS, GPS. Incredibly sexy and but wants 15 OO, can be had for probably half that if you can't track her down at the Hard Rock.

https://members.seeking.com/member/b...d-29f0866ec2a9

3. 250 is trans but very passable and sexy.

https://members.seeking.com/member/3...0-f61d7a7fa66d

4. A little heavier than pics but not too bad, kind of a dead fish in bed but overall probably 6/10. Seems like she has done this a decent amount and likes to get right into things. Mostly covered 5 ppm.

Https://members.seeking.com/member/5...1-1a0e4d89e970

5. 100% pro, looks good in pics but I'd definitely keep clear of this one. IiRC she wants 7 ppm but you can maybe get cheaper if you find her # on STG. Her pics have gotten worse over the past couple years and she makes a new profile every couple months.

https://members.seeking.com/member/f...f-d1259fbd411c

6. Heavier than pics, 4 ppm. Mostly covered, was a cool girl but not really my type. Also would keep messaging for weeks asking for $ after.

https://members.seeking.com/member/5...b-501cf9829423

7. Seems slightly pro 4 ppm, might have a drinking problem. Everything covered.

https://members.seeking.com/member/d...5-eb3dddb1d0af

When they say covered everything, I am out. 4 ppm is the lowest nowadays.

[About]

Have a few reviews / Intel I'm going to post.


5. 100% pro, looks good in pics but I'd definitely keep clear of this one. IiRC she wants 7 ppm but you can maybe get cheaper if you find her # on STG. Her pics have gotten worse over the past couple years and she makes a new profile every couple months.

https://members.seeking.com/member/f...f-d1259fbd411c

https://x.com/IvyRose8of

Other link.

https://members.seeking.com/member/9...dWlkZS5ubC8%3D

Sounds like fun for 7 bones. No AA. NO BARE, NO GFE, NO DATY.

https://escortbabylon.net/posts_view...544/9547101081

https://skipthegames.com/posts/fort-...y/441693626835

[TrentWilliams]

Have a few reviews / Intel I'm going to post.

1. Very sexy and looks just like her pics. I haven't seen her in a couple years but she looks like she's in better shape. Was 4 ppm but might have gone up with hoeflation. Mostly covered and no kissing but still a great tine.

https://members.seeking.com/member/7...d-a797ba612133

2. GPS, GPS, GPS. Incredibly sexy and but wants 15 OO, can be had for probably half that if you can't track her down at the Hard Rock.

https://members.seeking.com/member/b...d-29f0866ec2a9

3. 250 is trans but very passable and sexy.

https://members.seeking.com/member/3...0-f61d7a7fa66d

4. A little heavier than pics but not too bad, kind of a dead fish in bed but overall probably 6/10. Seems like she has done this a decent amount and likes to get right into things. Mostly covered 5 ppm.

Https://members.seeking.com/member/5...1-1a0e4d89e970

5. 100% pro, looks good in pics but I'd definitely keep clear of this one. IiRC she wants 7 ppm but you can maybe get cheaper if you find her # on STG. Her pics have gotten worse over the past couple years and she makes a new profile every couple months.

https://members.seeking.com/member/f...f-d1259fbd411c

6. Heavier than pics, 4 ppm. Mostly covered, was a cool girl but not really my type. Also would keep messaging for weeks asking for $ after.

https://members.seeking.com/member/5...b-501cf9829423

7. Seems slightly pro 4 ppm, might have a drinking problem. Everything covered.

https://members.seeking.com/member/d...5-eb3dddb1d0af

[Alinak]

https://members.seeking.com/member/1...9-dff628556223

This one seemed nice at first and crazy good in bed but then keeps hitting me up for money for every single emergency and rent at like 3 am and when I told her not to call and only text she sends a a crazy phone call claiming I screwed her over. I just blocked her number.

[TrentWilliams]

All you have to do is rip the video from another profile. You find a woman in another city / state and you download the video. You can edit the metadata, screencap over it. Whatever.

Now you make a new profile, and the images are not reverse-searchable. You upload the video you ripped from another profile. And bam. You now have a "verified" account that is 100% fake.

I suppose this is why their refund requests are near automatic.

Pro-tip: at any point in time you can demand a 100% refund from sb. The administration understands that the majority of the women on their website are by and large fake.

They don't upload the video though, you have to record it through the site. I guess they could take a video of a video but that would be easy to spot.

[Venky126]

I know many of the providers are part of seeking. The girl is easily identifiable.

Skip the Games link.

https://skipthegames.com/posts/fort-...y/441693626835

Seeking Link:

https://members.seeking.com/member/9...9-e7a8391c3b28

[RandomHobbyist]

SB has a lot of fake account and 90% of the ones who message you are fake. However, they have one great feature with their verified videos. You can filter for verified profiles and the girl has to make a quick video saying "let me be your secret". This is impossible to fake so you can be sure its a real person you're messaging. Also you can tell that none of the girls realize that people will see the video because most of them have no makeup and you can see what they really look like.

All you have to do is rip the video from another profile. You find a woman in another city / state and you download the video. You can edit the metadata, screencap over it. Whatever.

Now you make a new profile, and the images are not reverse-searchable. You upload the video you ripped from another profile. And bam. You now have a "verified" account that is 100% fake.

I suppose this is why their refund requests are near automatic.

Pro-tip: at any point in time you can demand a 100% refund from sb. The administration understands that the majority of the women on their website are by and large fake.

[MiamiFun316]

Yeah, that's the nice thing about sugar, bareback is pretty much the rule.

Yeah. The most fun and most work to meet are single mothers. 90% want bare and CP. But I don't do CP. I want no surprises XD.