Korean Agency BB

**Typical John** · 12-23-24 12:35

Originally Posted by HapaBoy86 [View Original Post]

So, I've heard this from a little birdie if anyone knows about the BiG korg Bust in Tysons Corner and Boston last year?

The feds have been trying to reachout to le agencies on the westcoast (LA / SJ) if they want to make a bigger bust?

Many of the kgirls we're from LA / Sf / SJ that we're squeezed and have talked.

The kgirls have worked at current korgs that are popular right now in LA and SJ.

Will it happen, who knows but be mindful and remember is Jan is HT month!

Clear your mailbox.

**Cream Inside** · 12-23-24 08:35

Anybody know if Tami is around or if she has rebranded and working under another name? DM is fine too.

**Cream Inside** · 12-23-24 08:29

Originally Posted by Kent747 [View Original Post]

The owner who was a provider herself needs to get her acts together. She made her girls disgruntled and we lost girls to out of town. She also denied girls to use their name and image which is petty. She has developed bad reputation in the industry and she will have trouble recruiting qualify girls now. She did get some new talents with SKS however they don't look like star qualify ones.

Correct me if I'm wrong but isn't Sesang the org that charges a cancellation fee where you have to pay the full amount of the donation on your next visit? I always thought that was absurd. There is no other k girl org that does this in socal so I hope it is not some sort of policy that catches on. Yeah, I think it would be best if Sesang goes away because I don't want these types of policies being adopted by other orgs. I would never give my business to an org that has these type of dumb rules and policies.

**HapaBoy86** · 12-23-24 02:44

So, I've heard this from a little birdie if anyone knows about the BiG korg Bust in Tysons Corner and Boston last year?

The feds have been trying to reachout to le agencies on the westcoast (LA / SJ) if they want to make a bigger bust?

Many of the kgirls we're from LA / Sf / SJ that we're squeezed and have talked.

The kgirls have worked at current korgs that are popular right now in LA and SJ.

Will it happen, who knows but be mindful and remember is Jan is HT month!

**Kent747** · 12-23-24 01:34

Originally Posted by BonerAppetitty [View Original Post]

I don't know of the drama between SSG and mongers or girls, but I think they are / were top tier. They weren't rude or unethical to me. The ONLY org in SoCal who can make me run to see their BB girls cause I think those girls still hot and young enough. Not only that, most of their girls use real / P.S. Pics instead of fake pics. I would trust them enough to TOFTT even on fake pics. Hot girls, inclusive BB? I was never disappointed.

To lose them is to be fine with more MILFs with upcharges, fake pics, and rebrands. My top three pet peeves are gatekeepers, rebrands, and MILFs. I would be quite upset by now if I wasn't already so good at identifying rebrands and MILFs. I hope SesangGirls can recover and bring more hot girls. I will cheer for them.

The owner who was a provider herself needs to get her acts together. She made her girls disgruntled and we lost girls to out of town. She also denied girls to use their name and image which is petty. She has developed bad reputation in the industry and she will have trouble recruiting qualify girls now. She did get some new talents with SKS however they don't look like star qualify ones.

**Chupacabra** · 12-23-24 00:20

Originally Posted by DownloadX [View Original Post]

A selfie request is common these days to rule out certain people

They could also just speak with you on the phone for two seconds to see if you have that certain accent.

**Download X** · 12-22-24 23:28

Originally Posted by Cowboy21 [View Original Post]

Question about CG screening. I have had it up to here with SAG and Kbliss. So I reached out to CG, they wanted full information, full I'd, plus a selfie. I am not giving them all that. I have seen numerous gals with SAG and Kbliss without the hardcore screening that CG is wanting. Any of you fellas want to chime in on what they do with the information if I were to pass it along? I am fine with a selfie, and redacted I'd info, but that is about as far as I'm going. Any tips or experiences with CG would be appreciated.

No one will ever be able to give you an accurate account of that either way. I suggest that there are other bookers you can try if it's a dealbreaker, this is just a hobby and no girl is that much worth seeing if you aren't comfortable. Some people are fine with a compromise of limited info, only you can decide that. I know people who gave info with no problem for a very long time, but at the same time I tell them to start using references instead as soon as they can. And I totally sympathize if you are tired with an agency and want to try another. We have a choice.

A selfie request is common these days to rule out certain people, but I've never had to do it. References are still the best way. The more you have, the easier it gets over the years. You can find guides on other ways if you read around, some guy posted a detailed Humaniplex guide. But at some point, it's no good to repeat this information too much or to make things too easy. People already screened with an agency are on repeat and the last thing they want is for new people to cause problems. Screening naturally has to have higher standards the longer an org has been running, it's nothing personal.

People ultimately do have to research and figure things out on their own in this hobby, if they can't then it's not for them. There are plenty of alternatives including AMPs and COI, something for everyone. Even Japan, TJ, or NYC are options where things are very open and different, either totally legal or practically due to near zero enforcement. Good luck.

http://www.usasexguide.nl/forum/show...ders-Manhattan Jgirl heaven in NYC
http://www.internationalsexguide.nl/...=1#post2969516 $200 to $280 for 60 mins Japan
http://www.usasexguide.nl/forum/show...ijuana-Reports About $100 a bang last I checked, legal

**Cowboy21** · 12-22-24 23:17

Hi.

Question about CG screening. I have had it up to here with SAG and Kbliss. So I reached out to CG, they wanted full information, full I'd, plus a selfie. I am not giving them all that. I have seen numerous gals with SAG and Kbliss without the hardcore screening that CG is wanting. Any of you fellas want to chime in on what they do with the information if I were to pass it along? I am fine with a selfie, and redacted I'd info, but that is about as far as I'm going. Any tips or experiences with CG would be appreciated.

Thanks.

**TastyDelights** · 12-22-24 23:16

This has probably been asked a million times, but how does one get passed Id verification these days? I have one review on Humaniplex from LAKAngels, but I suspect that's not going to cut it.

What alternative methods are there (e. G. , scanning your face over someone else's Id, gathering references on a site like Humaniplex, etc.). I understand the goal is to filter out unsavory characters, which I understand, but I ain't going to hand out my PII like that.

**Black Angel 99** · 12-22-24 20:08

Originally Posted by BonerAppetitty [View Original Post]

Thanks for replying. I would hate to disrupt bros reviews on this thread but I have said all my piece on Miranee. Now it's time to choose a Kgirl to bone like choosing what to have for dinner.

Yeah I liked her face in pics enough to remember her. I kept having this nagging feeling that she's service over looks and might be MILF. It doesn't mean I will never see her now that you mention it. I will put her on the boning list.

Thanks, I think I remember the gut comment from glancing at your review. Cindy Starfall still looks cute enough 10 years ago with the right makeup and angle. I wouldn't see Cindy Starfall by choice, but I am willing to get the freak on if I am in the room and she's willing LOL. I will secretly see MILFs with real pics and great service.

Kona was the first girl I saw at a K agency, she is not a HYA, but I would not say she is a MILF either, I think she must have started early and been in this business for a long time and that is why she gives off that MILF look, but she was better than many HYAs I saw, I liked Kona more than Ina and Juni, Kona loses points in the face section and a service that I think is ideal, I do not like MILF services.

Speaking of milfs, any MILF who has a juicy body with big ass, long black hair and very white skin? 2 of these options would be fine if not all 3 options. Thanks.

**BonerAppetitty** · 12-22-24 19:58

Thanks for replying. I hate to disrupt bros reviews on this thread but I have said all my piece on Miranee. Now it's time to choose a Kgirl to bone like choosing what to have for dinner.

Originally Posted by AsianAssEater [View Original Post]

Kona has been using real photos for years. She's not as slim she's got a nice juicy ass but when you show up and see her Irl you'd instantly recognize the face from the pictures.

Yeah I liked her face in pics enough to remember her. I kept having this nagging feeling that she's service over looks and might be MILF. It doesn't mean I will never see her now that you mention it. I will put her on the boning list.

Originally Posted by Randy62 [View Original Post]

I've seen her twice. For some reason she reminded me of Cindy Starfall with a little pooch gut. She is service over looks for me.

I think I remember the gut comment from glancing at your review. Cindy Starfall still looked cute enough 10 years ago with the right makeup and angle. I wouldn't see Cindy by choice, but I am willing to get the freak on if in the room and she's willing LOL. I will secretly see MILFs with real pics and great service.

**BonerAppetitty** · 12-22-24 19:38

I don't know of the drama between SSG and mongers or girls, but I think they are / were top tier. They weren't rude or unethical to me. The ONLY org in SoCal who can make me run to see their BB girls cause I think those girls still hot and young enough. Not only that, most of their girls use real / P.S. Pics instead of fake pics. I would trust them enough to TOFTT even on fake pics. Hot girls, inclusive BB? I was never disappointed.

To lose them is to be fine with more MILFs with upcharges, fake pics, and rebrands. My top three pet peeves are gatekeepers, rebrands, and MILFs. I would be quite upset by now if I wasn't already so good at identifying rebrands and MILFs. I hope SesangGirls can recover and bring more hot girls. I will cheer for them.

Originally Posted by Thud1 [View Original Post]

SesangGirls need to close shop and disappear. They have been a low tier agency with one or two decent providers at a time. Plus the booker is rude and unethical. So are so many other great agencies that have great customer service to choose from!

**BonerAppetitty** · 12-22-24 19:29

Until someone said to keep Miranee rebrand a secret or it may cause her to have to leave town. As the #1 rebrand detective in SoCal, I felt compelled to respond to the post leading to that. I did have consideration for her or I would out her already. I would out her with zero thought if she upcharges.

I meant "CGLA org" or whoever manages Miranee if she didn't go independent yet. Some bookers are also owners. "They" can make girl exclusive like Amy is exclusive. "CGLA org" has no need for other bookers cause they already dominate. Like DownloadX said, I think rebranding Miranee is more like a courtesy move than fear of retaliation.

I thought it was dramatic to say Miranee may leave town cause she was outed. CGLA can give her all the customers she wants and I don't see why she would leave if her slot fills up and nobody is playing dirty.

Originally Posted by TomKeen [View Original Post]

I don't think any of this really matters as long as she's back and available. CGLA is just a booker and DOES NOT dictate who remains exclusive. That's up to whichever org she is currently working with or up to Ina herself. This is most likely Ina's decision. The name change and the fact that she is not being listed with SSG should tell you everything you need to know about what is happening. Things obviously ended on bad terms, just like so many other stories involving SSG. Every single girl that has come out of there has never returned. That's an indictment on that particular org, which was notoriously difficult. If you are cleared with CGLA then you should go book her and ask her yourself.

**BonerAppetitty** · 12-22-24 19:24

I wouldn't have posed a question thinking you assumed things if you said this in the first place. KBliss, KGLA, MKG, etc are not "most bookers" to me and SSG does not represent all "house owners" either. From the way guys talk, they either think the writing on the wall for SSG or wish for it. If that's the case then it will just be business as usual a few months from now. Miranee will be able to do whatever she wishes so I don't see what's the big deal.

Originally Posted by Kent747 [View Original Post]

CGLA is the dominant booker in the area and they will gladly take in demand girls such as Miranee. However minor ones such as KBliss, KGLA, MKG, etc need to be friendly to house owners to keep their business. Apparently SSG is telling bookers to refuse Miranee.

**Resilient John** · 12-22-24 18:38

Originally Posted by Taliesin92 [View Original Post]

Absolutely. Customers want, and deserve, maximum information. Bookers and owners only want to release as much information as they have to in order to further their business. I'm sure some of them hate it when mongers here reveal the girls who have rebranded. But that's not up to them. We should feel no obligation to honor any request to "keep quiet. " That's the free-market system at work.

And you guys can bet, if this discussion forum, and others, ever disappeared, their business would collapse. Without us talking about the girls incessantly all day and all night, they would lose their No. 1 promotional vehicle. They should be grateful this place exists, and not making things difficult by attempting to suppress information.

This forum and those like it are double edged swords for the kgirl scene in general. You are right that as a girl gets more exposure and positive reviews through this forum, her business will undoubtedly go up as a result. On the other hand, it's also true that disclosing rebrands and info that paints a girl less than ideal can have dramatic effects too. As such, it's a game of cat and mouse as mongers want and gather as much info as possible while the bookers / owners / girls try to limit it if they perceive it to be detrimental to their bottom line.