They wanted way too much information. DL pic with no redacting, two pieces of mail pics with my address, Work information. It ain't worth it IMO. I'd rather stick to my bookers that I have already cleared with than give CG all that information. Way too intrusive. I have tried to get references from SAG and KBliss, but they won't give them out. My guess is that they want to protect their own supply of donations and giving out a reference would harm their bottom line as dudes would perhaps move on to other orgs.
I would still recommend reaching out other bookers to have them under your belt as a fallback. Do it at your own pace depending on your needs. Some might even be willing to reference to CGLA. Unfortunately, I don't know know which bookers are friendly with each other. A few years ago most were all fine and dandy but recently there seems to be some bad blood between them. I don't care what the reason is but for those looking to expand their booker network, it's become a hassle to overcome.
I am still advocating using the smaller orgs though. In my eyes, they feel more appreciative of your business.
No one will ever be able to give you an accurate account of that either way. I suggest that there are other bookers you can try if it's a dealbreaker, this is just a hobby and no girl is that much worth seeing if you aren't comfortable. Some people are fine with a compromise of limited info, only you can decide that. I know people who gave info with no problem for a very long time, but at the same time I tell them to start using references instead as soon as they can. And I totally sympathize if you are tired with an agency and want to try another. We have a choice.
A selfie request is common these days to rule out certain people, but I've never had to do it. References are still the best way. The more you have, the easier it gets over the years. You can find guides on other ways if you read around, some guy posted a detailed Humaniplex guide. But at some point, it's no good to repeat this information too much or to make things too easy. People already screened with an agency are on repeat and the last thing they want is for new people to cause problems. Screening naturally has to have higher standards the longer an org has been running, it's nothing personal.
People ultimately do have to research and figure things out on their own in this hobby, if they can't then it's not for them. There are plenty of alternatives including AMPs and COI, something for everyone. Even Japan, TJ, or NYC are options where things are very open and different, either totally legal or practically due to near zero enforcement. Good luck.
They wanted way too much information. DL pic with no redacting, two pieces of mail pics with my address, Work information. It ain't worth it IMO. I'd rather stick to my bookers that I have already cleared with than give CG all that information. Way too intrusive. I have tried to get references from SAG and KBliss, but they won't give them out. My guess is that they want to protect their own supply of donations and giving out a reference would harm their bottom line as dudes would perhaps move on to other orgs.
Correct me if I'm wrong but isn't Sesang the org that charges a cancellation fee where you have to pay the full amount of the donation on your next visit? I always thought that was absurd. There is no other k girl org that does this in socal so I hope it is not some sort of policy that catches on. Yeah, I think it would be best if Sesang goes away because I don't want these types of policies being adopted by other orgs. I would never give my business to an org that has these type of dumb rules and policies.
If you cancel you either pay double or get banned it's what happened to me. Then they try the scare tactics of saying you're banned from other orgs too which was total bs as well because I'm still using the ones I'm supposedly banned from lmao.
The owner who was a provider herself needs to get her acts together. She made her girls disgruntled and we lost girls to out of town. She also denied girls to use their name and image which is petty. She has developed bad reputation in the industry and she will have trouble recruiting qualify girls now. She did get some new talents with SKS however they don't look like star qualify ones.
Facts. The only booker that was ever a dick to me was SG they need a lesson in customer service and they also need an ego check. Looks like all their bs is finally biting them in the ass.
So, I've heard this from a little birdie if anyone knows about the BiG korg Bust in Tysons Corner and Boston last year?
The feds have been trying to reachout to le agencies on the westcoast (LA / SJ) if they want to make a bigger bust?
Many of the kgirls we're from LA / Sf / SJ that we're squeezed and have talked.
The kgirls have worked at current korgs that are popular right now in LA and SJ.
Will it happen, who knows but be mindful and remember is Jan is HT month!
Yup, January is always a dangerous month for that exact reason. Over the years, many of the biggest cases in the pay-for-play world have been announced in January. (Which shows you that it's done for PR value more than anything else. They are desperate for headlines, not justice.).
It wouldn't be surprising if the authorities on the East Coast want to expand their case to the West Coast. They know LA is the epicenter of this business. But, so far, the authorities in LA have expressed no interest in taking on new cases that have originated outside their jurisdiction. They specifically declined to do it in the 2016 Seattle case, for example, even though the King County prosecutor came down here himself and begged them join forces with him. They flatly said "No. " We can only guess, it's because the authorities in LA have real crime to deal with, and this low-level stuff isn't worth their time. Or perhaps the Koreans are politically powerful enough in LA to protect themselves. Could be a combination of the two. Let's hope that continues.
The owner who was a provider herself needs to get her acts together. She made her girls disgruntled and we lost girls to out of town. She also denied girls to use their name and image which is petty. She has developed bad reputation in the industry and she will have trouble recruiting qualify girls now. She did get some new talents with SKS however they don't look like star qualify ones.
Correct me if I'm wrong but isn't Sesang the org that charges a cancellation fee where you have to pay the full amount of the donation on your next visit? I always thought that was absurd. There is no other k girl org that does this in socal so I hope it is not some sort of policy that catches on. Yeah, I think it would be best if Sesang goes away because I don't want these types of policies being adopted by other orgs. I would never give my business to an org that has these type of dumb rules and policies.
I don't know of the drama between SSG and mongers or girls, but I think they are / were top tier. They weren't rude or unethical to me. The ONLY org in SoCal who can make me run to see their BB girls cause I think those girls still hot and young enough. Not only that, most of their girls use real / P.S. Pics instead of fake pics. I would trust them enough to TOFTT even on fake pics. Hot girls, inclusive BB? I was never disappointed.
To lose them is to be fine with more MILFs with upcharges, fake pics, and rebrands. My top three pet peeves are gatekeepers, rebrands, and MILFs. I would be quite upset by now if I wasn't already so good at identifying rebrands and MILFs. I hope SesangGirls can recover and bring more hot girls. I will cheer for them.
The owner who was a provider herself needs to get her acts together. She made her girls disgruntled and we lost girls to out of town. She also denied girls to use their name and image which is petty. She has developed bad reputation in the industry and she will have trouble recruiting qualify girls now. She did get some new talents with SKS however they don't look like star qualify ones.
Question about CG screening. I have had it up to here with SAG and Kbliss. So I reached out to CG, they wanted full information, full I'd, plus a selfie. I am not giving them all that. I have seen numerous gals with SAG and Kbliss without the hardcore screening that CG is wanting. Any of you fellas want to chime in on what they do with the information if I were to pass it along? I am fine with a selfie, and redacted I'd info, but that is about as far as I'm going. Any tips or experiences with CG would be appreciated.
No one will ever be able to give you an accurate account of that either way. I suggest that there are other bookers you can try if it's a dealbreaker, this is just a hobby and no girl is that much worth seeing if you aren't comfortable. Some people are fine with a compromise of limited info, only you can decide that. I know people who gave info with no problem for a very long time, but at the same time I tell them to start using references instead as soon as they can. And I totally sympathize if you are tired with an agency and want to try another. We have a choice.
A selfie request is common these days to rule out certain people, but I've never had to do it. References are still the best way. The more you have, the easier it gets over the years. You can find guides on other ways if you read around, some guy posted a detailed Humaniplex guide. But at some point, it's no good to repeat this information too much or to make things too easy. People already screened with an agency are on repeat and the last thing they want is for new people to cause problems. Screening naturally has to have higher standards the longer an org has been running, it's nothing personal.
People ultimately do have to research and figure things out on their own in this hobby, if they can't then it's not for them. There are plenty of alternatives including AMPs and COI, something for everyone. Even Japan, TJ, or NYC are options where things are very open and different, either totally legal or practically due to near zero enforcement. Good luck.
Question about CG screening. I have had it up to here with SAG and Kbliss. So I reached out to CG, they wanted full information, full I'd, plus a selfie. I am not giving them all that. I have seen numerous gals with SAG and Kbliss without the hardcore screening that CG is wanting. Any of you fellas want to chime in on what they do with the information if I were to pass it along? I am fine with a selfie, and redacted I'd info, but that is about as far as I'm going. Any tips or experiences with CG would be appreciated.