Korean Agency BB

[ZebraZebra]

Curious how she changed her hair?

Its long and brown with more noticeable contrasting highlights now.

Kbliss is showing Ina as "available. " Whether that's up to date or not, I don't know.

https://kbliss.net/

I see Lucy is now listed on the Kbliss site, as well. Same Lucy who used to be exclusive to Sesang. Is that a new development or did I miss that change a while ago?

Happy to see two of my favorite k-girls back on the LA scene!

They haven't updated the site in months I'm pretty sure.

[EyceeRaw]

Yes Ina back but off again same girl hair different plus some weight. She works la now.

Curious how she changed her hair?

[DaeWrong]

Kbliss is showing Ina as "available. " Whether that's up to date or not, I don't know.

https://kbliss.net/

I see Lucy is now listed on the Kbliss site, as well. Same Lucy who used to be exclusive to Sesang. Is that a new development or did I miss that change a while ago?

Happy to see two of my favorite k-girls back on the LA scene!

I'm pretty sure the Lucy one on Kbliss was just never taken down. I could be wrong though.

[Taliesin92]

Kbliss is showing Ina as "available. " Whether that's up to date or not, I don't know.

https://kbliss.net/

I see Lucy is now listed on the Kbliss site, as well. Same Lucy who used to be exclusive to Sesang. Is that a new development or did I miss that change a while ago?

Happy to see two of my favorite k-girls back on the LA scene!

[ZebraZebra]

Hmmm weird, I'm 100% positive that she was on the actual main page of CGLA yesterday. Looks like they took it down. Probably a mistake.

Yes you are correct she was up but fully booked, me and my buddy both saw her yesterday. Probably changing apartments now because her current one is temporary.

[Kamehame]

The other review site said Ina is now back in la and she had a review.

Yes Ina back but off again same girl hair different plus some weight. She works la now.

[Madickbiggs]

The other review site said Ina is now back in la and she had a review.

[Bbaka10]

Hmmm weird, I'm 100% positive that she was on the actual main page of CGLA yesterday. Looks like they took it down. Probably a mistake.

This is a bit misleading. I've looked through the sites that usually book Ina and none have her as active. So I believe she's not back yet. One thing you have to keep in mind that site admins or whoever they employ to keep the site up to date can set profiles to be visible or can completely take them down. It appears that CGLA just toggles a visibility setting. But if you know the direct link to a particular profile, you can still access it.

[KGFever]

Does she do BBFS? I got her to twice about 4 or 5 years ago and then for a couple visits after she stopped allowing it.

Yes. She has BB special rate now.

[Download X]

Will be a visitor here in a couple months. Curious though, if they're BBFS, is CIP always an assumption? Especially if some of them can barely speak English.

90% of kgirls who are bb are also cip, it's the default. The girls who don't will always say it. Even if they can barely speak English, they all know the words for the job. Hanni initially was no CIP so I helped her rehearse the pronunciation but she already knew it day one. Even though she speaks little English.

Always work with a girl's boundaries. If you don't think a girl did things right, complain to the booker not her. Don't give her a hard time, it's not right. There is not even one single girl every guy is happy with. I just posted proof of that, only 80% of guys even liked Baby Arin.
http://www.usasexguide.nl/forum/show...29#post7128229 Analysis of 12 reviews of Baby Arin

We are just talking korgs here, where it's 90%. Corgs work totally different.

CGLA now does not show Ina on their active roster.

Good to know. Just a FYI for all, bookers cannot truly know if a girl will be ready until the day comes. This is the risk with booking ahead. It's the girl cancelling btw, the booker's job is to take the blame. Same day bookings are a lot less likely to be cancelled, and there are many other clues too. BTW you could book Ina, it's not like it was some old ad or typo.

Some girls are more consistent than others, but things happen. More common things are the girl is sick (several cases of covid, flu recently), on period, otherwise hurt, or logistical problems. Logistical problems include last minute plumbing issues, accidents, and so on. I know in one case a girl could not show up because her roommate had covid, which led to a domino effect to a far away city. Another had a car accident and stopped working for weeks. None of these things helps us to know, but people always speculate so just listing some actual examples I've encountered.

None of these things the booker has control over. Though I will say they may wait until the day of to actually cancel, which sucks. However some guys do not want a random text in the middle of the day or week. They're not going to use a booker if they get such a text. Out of hundreds of appointments, my cancellation rate is about 2% for same day, 5% for day before, and 10% for multi-day. 3% overall because I avoid booking far ahead for that very reason. For your enjoyment, I strongly recommend having multiple girls lined up as backups instead, rather than risking it multi-day. Unless she's truly your ATF. Of course, have a backup in case she cancels. Then you don't rely on the booker's recs last minute.

With certain girls I know the cancellation rate is much higher. But, I'd rather her cancel if she's not feeling well. No point in blaming or wondering. As I said it's not the booker cancelling, but the booker's job is to cover for the girl and take the blame anyways. Some guys really take it the wrong way if they think "the girl cancelled". So blame the booker if you really have to, but it's no different than blaming the cashier for running out of stock. Best to just move on. We are here to have fun, and we have to problem solve with backups.

My greatest disappointment was not being able to film a jgirl a second time because she left a day earlier than her schedule showed, so I got a cancellation next day. But as far as I'm concerned, my only criteria for bookers is safety. I'm not going to stop using a booker over a girl cancelling, because the other booker would have had to do exactly the same. And I've been through far worse with independent girls and international travel.

[Kent747]

This is a bit misleading. I've looked through the sites that usually book Ina and none have her as active. So I believe she's not back yet. One thing you have to keep in mind that site admins or whoever they employ to keep the site up to date can set profiles to be visible or can completely take them down. It appears that CGLA just toggles a visibility setting. But if you know the direct link to a particular profile, you can still access it.

CGLA now does not show Ina on their active roster.

[PumpNDump]

Kbliss Monday roster.

Lucy Dana Viki Sammy Veronica Sawtelle. Lena Linda Tanya Jena Jiyoung mw.

[JackHolly]

I personally have never comes across a K-girl that allows BBFS but does not allow CIP. Doesn't mean that they don't exist, but at this point, I've probably seen about just under 150 K-girls that have allowed BBFS and I have done CIP with every single one of them without any issues. I've probably seen about 40-50 girls of other ethnicities, doing BBFS, and there, it can vary. With white and Latina providers, in my limited experience, if they allow BBFS, CIP is good. With providers that are Black, Thai, middle Eastern, etc. , my experience has been YMMV. I've had a couple from each ethnicity that allowed BBFS, but when the topic of CIP came up, it was mostly a "no" from them.

That's why I've mostly stuck with K-agency girls for the past 10 years. BBFSCIP is a sure thing, in my experience, if the girl offers BBFS (it was under the radar 6+ years ago, so it felt more special when I was getting it 10+ years ago (and was free if you got a K-girl to agree to do BBFS! But now it's just explicitly advertised, often as an upcharge).

Of course, it can still be YMMV with K-girls that offer BBFS, so please don't reply to me saying something like, "well, this one girl at this one agency allowed BBFS but denied CIP this one time". Can that happen? Sure. Is it likely to happen? In my limited experience, no.

And with civilians? That is most definitely a YMMV situation, and definitely something you want to make sure you're clear on, ideally before your penis makes a showing. Plenty of civilians that will let you go bare but want you to cum outside the pussy.

Will be a visitor here in a couple months. Curious though, if they're BBFS, is CIP always an assumption? Especially if some of them can barely speak English.

Like I would ask first but if they can't understand or it accidentally happens if they are riding hard, would mongers get in trouble?

Pretty sure that CIP is assumed unless explicitly said otherwise. That's my default when BBFS.

I wouldn't say that it should always be the assumption. There are girls out there that do BBFS but no CIP. Most of the time the girl will be proactive and let you know, a simple "outside" should be clear enough. However, don't assume. You can always clarify with the booker or girl beforehand if her menu isn't listed or CIP is not listed or explicitly stated. Don't be disingenuous and play dumb because of the language barrier (there are assholes like out there). Consent is still paramount even if you are paying for it.

Everyone's got boundaries and limits to what they are comfortable doing, respect her and yourself.

BBaka aint wrong as I think 99% of women allow it if they allow BBFS but I did have a recent run in with an AMP lady in Seattle that I came inside with that mindset and she was pretty upset by it so I have tried to verify the boundaries prior to the fun. This time, I shot myself in the foot by not doing so I ended up not doing to be on the safe side.

I don't think you need to be so cautious however, its a personal thing.

[PumpNDump]

BookerM. Juicy back on duty today.

https://www.rokm.ch/

[WaffleEater]

Will be a visitor here in a couple months. Curious though, if they're BBFS, is CIP always an assumption? Especially if some of them can barely speak English.

Like I would ask first but if they can't understand or it accidentally happens if they are riding hard, would mongers get in trouble?

Pretty sure that CIP is assumed unless explicitly said otherwise. That's my default when BBFS.

BBaka aint wrong as I think 99% of women allow it if they allow BBFS but I did have a recent run in with an AMP lady in Seattle that I came inside with that mindset and she was pretty upset by it so I have tried to verify the boundaries prior to the fun. This time, I shot myself in the foot by not doing so I ended up not doing to be on the safe side.

I don't think you need to be so cautious however, its a personal thing.