Kgirls Rebrands

[Resilient John]

BG LoveRosie = FirstAsians / Asianworld Ms. Daphne. Not to be confused with Bona / Daphne / Ring, very tall and skinny gal, good service from what little details I can remember.

BG Suji4 = BG Choa = TA Choa = Natti = Somsom. She's been bouncing around a long time now, cute baby-ish face, good English, and average service.

CGLA Kiki = TA Kiki = Apple. I left a review of her not that long ago, refer to that.

[FreeWally]

Yup, the easiest way to get verified in another agency is if you ask a girl you regularly see (that use multiple bookers) to get you in. I've done it multiple times in the past. Some of these bookers hate each other and won't give reference lmao.

I've used SDAG 11 years now. They forgot me after Covid. Told me I needed one more reference (they require TWO). So I had to go to the thai booker for 6 months, get their HX network, and then SDAG let me back in. Since no other korgs would do it. I even had CAKD in my HX network for 10 years but SDAG didn't even care, they wanted new network even though I was still using CAKD. They refuse to just ask CAKD of course.

So as a result, I was forced to repeatedly BBFSCIP these three thai girls shown below, over and over again, just to ever see the SDAG exclusive roster of kgirls again. All three thai girls were only half thai. Two of them weren't even bb menu, one let me UTR cuz she liked me I guess, and the other on the 2nd visit the condom broke. So she just went with it from then on for a tip, the next 5 visits. She was not even on birth control so told me to never cum inside her. She made me solemnly promise three times in a row, it was intense.

All three girls allowed triple fuck without a word. One was on birth control as I said, but I managed to dump my cum into the other two dozens of times thanks to averaging triple shot msog sessions. Most kgirls don't even allow it, some look at me funny when I try. Thai girls may not have a kgirl routine, but the young ones tend to be really DTF and get into it no holds barred. All this so I could eventually dip into some exclusive kpussy again. DTB

The other thing about thai girls is these all used real photos, no PS. They don't need it.

One is now a model, another a restaurant hostess for a high end restaurant in WLA for celebrities. Emily still working. For the two UTR bb girls I check their IG just in case, and no babies came out. The reason I even check is because of Pink from COI, that girl is crazy offering bb while popping out babies. I saved the proof on my encrypted drive, it is haunting and I will die with that near miss secret. Okay here's that story:
http://www.usasexguide.nl/forum/show...75#post6979475

After that wild 6 months of thai girls and almost impregnating a COI girl, finally I got back in SDAG. I then reminded SDAG that I've now used them almost 10 years to that point, so they better add me to their HX network or it'll just happen again. They finally added me, after almost TEN YEARS of using them. Reluctantly.

So to your point, they really don't want to.

[Stonkz]

A girl's word is the gold standard. If a girl says I can see her, that's as good as it gets. She sends my number to the booker and all I was asked for was my basic info for future bookings, did not need further screening. Same as a solid HX network.

I was literally dropping the girl off at her apartment when I was making one booking (her place is a dorm and not for banging). Had just spent earlier in the day helping her pack to move, then a full day date around town. Yes I know, I am a simp. But I got what I wanted, I made her day. I don't expect anyone else to understand.

The point is the few times a girl moved agencies and vouched for me with a new booker, I was her long-time regular. She was bringing new business to the booker, and I've used them since. But don't tell the booker that, keep it business only. The less they know the better.

One time a booker asked me if I was XXX online (they guessed my ID wrong). I said sorry no, I'm not good with computers and don't post online. The less they know the better.

The girls I dated had no say on their rebrand. In one case they didn't even know, but the reason was a different girl at the agency already had her exact name. In other cases it was the agency's policy. But they used her recent selfies with minimal PS, so people recognized her.

Yup, the easiest way to get verified in another agency is if you ask a girl you regularly see (that use multiple bookers) to get you in. I've done it multiple times in the past. Some of these bookers hate each other and won't give reference lmao.

[FreeWally]

I remember one incident several years ago when a booker initially refused to schedule me with a certain well-known k-girl, despite the fact that she texted him telling him I was "safe" and it was OK to go ahead and book the appointment. But he kept saying, "No, can't do it unless you send photo and identification. " I think he literally just wanted to F with me for a while and see how pissed off I would get. Eventually, later that day, he relented and agreed to make the appointment. But what an a-hole! He works for the girl, not the other way around. Her text should have been immediately good enough to let me in the door.

A girl's word is the gold standard. If a girl says I can see her, that's as good as it gets. She sends my number to the booker and all I was asked for was my basic info for future bookings, did not need further screening. Same as a solid HX network.

I was literally dropping the girl off at her apartment when I was making one booking (her place is a dorm and not for banging). Had just spent earlier in the day helping her pack to move, then a full day date around town. Yes I know, I am a simp. But I got what I wanted, I made her day. I don't expect anyone else to understand.

The point is the few times a girl moved agencies and vouched for me with a new booker, I was her long-time regular. She was bringing new business to the booker, and I've used them since. But don't tell the booker that, keep it business only. The less they know the better.

One time a booker asked me if I was XXX online (they guessed my ID wrong). I said sorry no, I'm not good with computers and don't post online. The less they know the better.

The girls I dated had no say on their rebrand. In one case they didn't even know, but the reason was a different girl at the agency already had her exact name. In other cases it was the agency's policy. But they used her recent selfies with minimal PS, so people recognized her.

[Stonkz]

+1 to this, BG is weirdly rude to me half the time even though I'm never late, never cancel, always communicate well. It's bizarre. One time I prebooked a girl a couple days in advance. She ended up taking that day off and they never told me. Two hours before the appt I asked if it was confirmed and BG acted annoyed and told me to pick someone else. CG is 1000% better.

LOL BG and SAG are newb bookers. They are basically stepping stones for newbs to get references. Those 2 bookers are the only ones that have bait and switched me.

[Gruyere]

Yup, I wholeheartedly agree with that statement. I like to maintain good relations with all of the bookers. If someday the a-hole attitude and the shoddy customer service improves, I would reconsider my position. But that appears highly unlikely. So I just refuse to book with Tom.

Would also be nice to see fewer rebrands and fewer fake profile pics, but that's a problem across the board.

+1 to this, BG is weirdly rude to me half the time even though I'm never late, never cancel, always communicate well. It's bizarre. One time I prebooked a girl a couple days in advance. She ended up taking that day off and they never told me. Two hours before the appt I asked if it was confirmed and BG acted annoyed and told me to pick someone else. CG is 1000% better.

[Resilient John]

True that. That's one benefit of the Korean booker reorganization over the past few years. Each individual booker no longer has the power they used to have over our ability to see whoever we want to see. There are also a few drawbacks, but there's no question that the multiple-booker system has diminished the power of bookers to F with us.

I remember one incident several years ago when a booker initially refused to schedule me with a certain well-known k-girl, despite the fact that she texted him telling him I was "safe" and it was OK to go ahead and book the appointment. But he kept saying, "No, can't do it unless you send photo and identification. " I think he literally just wanted to F with me for a while and see how pissed off I would get. Eventually, later that day, he relented and agreed to make the appointment. But what an a-hole! He works for the girl, not the other way around. Her text should have been immediately good enough to let me in the door.

That's still happening now actually. Couple months back or so, I go to a booker I don't often use but still want to let her now I'm active and say is X available at a certain time. Response comes back that she's fully booked for the day. Fair enough, I thought, but the girls fairly new and there's wasn't anything too outstanding about her ad that IMO would merit the rush (I think there was one review out at the time, good review but nothing that would stand out). Something just didn't sit well with me so I contacted a booker I use most often and sure enough she's open for a couple slots. There's no way that within a span of several minutes that slots open up that fast unless fate wanted to fuck around with me on that particular day with those particular bookers. Take that anecdote however you want.

[Taliesin92]

I used to book with Tom back in the day when he ran his own stable. Not sure how he got to absorb booker gray site but whatever. There's so many bookers here in LA that have the same girls. I give my business to those who keep it professional and courteous. The booker at sag is idiotic as well. Again, there's so many bookers that it doesn't matter.

True that. That's one benefit of the Korean booker reorganization over the past few years. Each individual booker no longer has the power they used to have over our ability to see whoever we want to see. There are also a few drawbacks, but there's no question that the multiple-booker system has diminished the power of bookers to F with us.

I remember one incident several years ago when a booker initially refused to schedule me with a certain well-known k-girl, despite the fact that she texted him telling him I was "safe" and it was OK to go ahead and book the appointment. But he kept saying, "No, can't do it unless you send photo and identification. " I think he literally just wanted to F with me for a while and see how pissed off I would get. Eventually, later that day, he relented and agreed to make the appointment. But what an a-hole! He works for the girl, not the other way around. Her text should have been immediately good enough to let me in the door.

[Pyhan83]

Yup, I wholeheartedly agree with that statement. I like to maintain good relations with all of the bookers. If someday the a-hole attitude and the shoddy customer service improves, I would reconsider my position. But that appears highly unlikely. So I just refuse to book with Tom.

Would also be nice to see fewer rebrands and fewer fake profile pics, but that's a problem across the board.

I used to book with Tom back in the day when he ran his own stable. Not sure how he got to absorb booker gray site but whatever. There's so many bookers here in LA that have the same girls. I give my business to those who keep it professional and courteous. The booker at sag is idiotic as well. Again, there's so many bookers that it doesn't matter.

[Coca Cvs]

What ever happen to that guy? He seemed difficult to work with like BG.

[RockItAllNite]

Yup, I wholeheartedly agree with that statement. I like to maintain good relations with all of the bookers. If someday the a-hole attitude and the shoddy customer service improves, I would reconsider my position. But that appears highly unlikely. So I just refuse to book with Tom.

Would also be nice to see fewer rebrands and fewer fake profile pics, but that's a problem across the board.

You guys have caught on.

[Taliesin92]

Seems like the takeaway is to avoid using BG / Tom if you can help it.

Yup, I wholeheartedly agree with that statement. I like to maintain good relations with all of the bookers. If someday the a-hole attitude and the shoddy customer service improves, I would reconsider my position. But that appears highly unlikely. So I just refuse to book with Tom.

Would also be nice to see fewer rebrands and fewer fake profile pics, but that's a problem across the board.

[BonerAppetitty]

BG Sumatra, BG Prada2, BG Baby Gold are rebrands.

BG Sky2 = BG Adie.

BG Lucy5 = BG Bona2

I am only speculating about rebrands cause I ain't coming when I smell MILFs or rebrands.

[BonerAppetitty]

I heard Aloe had toys and Kiss / Alice also had toys.

[BonerAppetitty]

I heard about the long nipples and it triggered some memory. LoveRosie was in OC and LA before.