Agency Discussion and Reviews

**Tomk2323** · 09-23-23 03:09

My ATF Lynn is back at DS. I can't recommend her enough. She is gorgeous, sweet and totally willing to please. DFK, BBBJ, Daty, MSOG.

**FunctionK** · 09-23-23 02:29

F: Really cute and beautiful face just like the photo on the website.

B: If I didn't see her face, I wouldn't believe it was her body. I didn't mean anything else. She is not as thin as in the photo. She has a bigger frame. If you like slender girl or hot spinner, she is not your type. Also, she has a nice ass and her body is very tight because she is really young, everything is pink. (I think some guy would like her type).

S: She is inexperienced although she wants to take the lead, she told me she wants to be the aggressor during sex, this girl is interesting. But I still take the lead in the session and she obligated. Her pink pussy was tight and she had two big labia, and after she followed my route, everything was back on track.

A: She is playful, this girl is happy when she see me, she likes to talk but her english is limited. She is very lively and active, just like a little girl. And she is willing to follow your guide.

Overall FBSA 8/7/7/8，YMMW.

**LittleGiant** · 09-22-23 20:10

[Deleted by Admin]

EDITOR'S NOTE: This report was edited or deleted in accordance with the Forum's policy prohibiting unsubstantiated reports claiming that another person is afflicted with a Sexually Transmitted Disease, this limitation being necessary because a disturbing number of these reports are less than genuine.

STD allegations are not permitted in the forum at any time EXCEPT when substantiated by links to internet-accessible public records.

Please read the Forum's Posting Guidelines for further information.

**IronClad999** · 09-22-23 18:21

Originally Posted by SweetDog [View Original Post]

C. org definitely has shills and fake reviews to drum up business. More of their girls are unknown or new.

Less need for fake stuff from K-org girls as most are known or have info before they get here. Current CP and DS girls are known. New arrivals like Tinker SA and Barbie LLVA all have plenty of reviews. BTW Barbie was known for no upcharge BB on west coast if that's your thing. Don't know if that no upcharge applies here. Seems she doesn't care BB or not. I haven't seen her or plan to, but just saying. There are exceptions with unknown girls like IU and Taeri both recently at AG that didn't have info. Definitely some dudes withholding info with those two. I would have gone, but that's the only place I'm not in. K-org more stacked with longtime customers so prob less reliant on reviews since there is talk of Taeri being booked anyway.

Tbh, the most common answer behind those curtains is often if the providers being booked solid with many gatekeepers, the chances are the clients are gaining special perks from the provider; that seems to be the most logical explanation (although the special perks can be a YMMV gig which also contributes to the fully booked reasonings).

**IronClad999** · 09-22-23 18:16

Originally Posted by Tadalagash [View Original Post]

Ladies with solid service don't need shill reviews. They will have Johns lining up to see them. Need to bring in the A-team talent from SoCA, NYC and even Canada. Mainly the K Girls. There's a lot of money in NoVA to be made. I don't mind if they increase the rate to attract the ladies to here.

Unfortunately, the rebranded MP for J girls is nowhere its predecessor in terms of quality or looks. They used to have at least one new great talent, every week. Now they bringing in second rate gals and make them stay here for a full month.

Sometimes even if they bring stellar girls over (assuming those have pos reps from where they derived) at the cost of higher / attractive price tiers, the likelihood of those chicks being jaded faster is on the higher spectrum (gps or simply lazy GFE wanting more giving back less attitude). It has happened a lot in the past and the cycle just keeps rolling back and forth cas agencies can't bring much solutions on fixing these handicaps. No business is perfect.

**SweetDog** · 09-22-23 18:06

C. org definitely has shills and fake reviews to drum up business. More of their girls are unknown or new.

Less need for fake stuff from K-org girls as most are known or have info before they get here. Current CP and DS girls are known. New arrivals like Tinker SA and Barbie LLVA all have plenty of reviews. BTW Barbie was known for no upcharge BB on west coast if that's your thing. Don't know if that no upcharge applies here. Seems she doesn't care BB or not. I haven't seen her or plan to, but just saying. There are exceptions with unknown girls like IU and Taeri both recently at AG that didn't have info. Definitely some dudes withholding info with those two. I would have gone, but that's the only place I'm not in. K-org more stacked with longtime customers so prob less reliant on reviews since there is talk of Taeri being booked anyway.

**NightHawk 1967** · 09-22-23 16:04

I try to follow logic.

One monger say post more reviews to give gals lots of business so we get best gals.

Then a monger say gals not reviewed is booked solid. I knows some gals hard to book.

If booked solid without review, seem that we should get more best gals. Or Supply demand mean then agency need to charge more? They already at NYC rates.

Anyways, I like to post good or bad if what I posts adds to forum. Wish other monger do too. And I hopes the price stays where is, or even get lower.

**Member #6464** · 09-22-23 12:53

Originally Posted by IronClad999 [View Original Post]

Sometimes often those reviews actually got posted even BEFORE the providers appeared on web which is funny af LOL. Also, its a lot easier to tell which ones are shills / good shills (yes those that are shilling but in a very proficient way to disguise themselves off by mixing it with half baked knowledge thinking we are idiots).

Ladies with solid service don't need shill reviews. They will have Johns lining up to see them. Need to bring in the A-team talent from SoCA, NYC and even Canada. Mainly the K Girls. There's a lot of money in NoVA to be made. I don't mind if they increase the rate to attract the ladies to here.

Unfortunately, the rebranded MP for J girls is nowhere its predecessor in terms of quality or looks. They used to have at least one new great talent, every week. Now they bringing in second rate gals and make them stay here for a full month.

**FoxIndc** · 09-22-23 12:10

Originally Posted by MrFairfax [View Original Post]

1. I think the c-orgs are doing fake reviews lately, just my suspicion, a lot of the reviews for their girls sound SO SIMILAR lately. I could be wrong idk. Maybe bc they have so many girls they're trying to make sure all the girls are getting some business. Which goes back to my original point, REVIEWS ARE GOOD FOR BUSINESS.

2. I have had both c-orgs and k-orgs ask me to review girls after seeing them.

Many K-agencies do not accept new customers, and their existing old customers are enough to support their business. Those K agencies have never asked me about my feelings or asked me to write reviews after I finish my session.

While those C-org or J-org are still in the commercial development stage because they have more girls (not like K agency just 1 or 2, they may have 6 or 8 sometimes over 10). Often after the session, bookers ask me how I feel. If I feel good, he will ask me to help write a review if I have time. But I agree with you, they may doing fake reviews, since the service is YMMW and these girls were not machines, they also have their preferences. So it's hard to tell. Fortunately, these J girls usually post real photos (It's easy to tell fake photos. If it's a fake photo, it means it's either a C girl, or it can't take a good enough photo. You know the reason.) I don't usually book a girl for her services, but I will pay for her looks.

**IronClad999** · 09-22-23 10:41

Originally Posted by MikeShores [View Original Post]

I posted on this a while back. Generally the first 3 reviews on the other site are by reviewers that only review those org's personnel and are 8's or 9's. I don't consider a review valid until I see a reviewer with reviews for people outside those orgs. It's pretty clear the initial reviews are promotional.

Sometimes often those reviews actually got posted even BEFORE the providers appeared on web which is funny af LOL. Also, its a lot easier to tell which ones are shills / good shills (yes those that are shilling but in a very proficient way to disguise themselves off by mixing it with half baked knowledge thinking we are idiots).

**MikeShores** · 09-22-23 10:20

Originally Posted by MrFairfax [View Original Post]

1. I think the c-orgs are doing fake reviews lately, just my suspicion, a lot of the reviews for their girls sound SO SIMILAR lately. I could be wrong idk. Maybe bc they have so many girls they're trying to make sure all the girls are getting some business. Which goes back to my original point, REVIEWS ARE GOOD FOR BUSINESS.

2. I have had both c-orgs and k-orgs ask me to review girls after seeing them.

I posted on this a while back. Generally the first 3 reviews on the other site are by reviewers that only review those org's personnel and are 8's or 9's. I don't consider a review valid until I see a reviewer with reviews for people outside those orgs. It's pretty clear the initial reviews are promotional.

**MrFairfax** · 09-22-23 09:47

Originally Posted by Derilious89 [View Original Post]

Agreed. The c-org side has daily reviews but I barely see anything out of the k-agencies. It's weird because most of the time I review, it's the first review for a girl after she's been there for a week or so. I guess the k-agencies are doing well without it, but I've been very surprised by the fact that there is such a discrepancy between the review count for k-agencies and c-orgs. Do the APC / BO / etc girls request reviews from mongers?

It kinda makes me suspicious, in a way.

1. I think the c-orgs are doing fake reviews lately, just my suspicion, a lot of the reviews for their girls sound SO SIMILAR lately. I could be wrong idk. Maybe bc they have so many girls they're trying to make sure all the girls are getting some business. Which goes back to my original point, REVIEWS ARE GOOD FOR BUSINESS.

2. I have had both c-orgs and k-orgs ask me to review girls after seeing them.

**IronClad999** · 09-22-23 09:23

Originally Posted by GolfGod69 [View Original Post]

I just left an outstanding review for Purple over at AG because I want the agency to bring her back. I also texted them that as well.

Its the same purple from west coast;.

Xxx: 372392.

They merged both old and new scrolls.

**Derilious89** · 09-22-23 09:06

Originally Posted by MrFairfax [View Original Post]

Try again. She was booked solid during her stay here. So guys were definitely seeing her and just not reviewing.

Stop trying to justify this shit practice.

Agreed. The c-org side has daily reviews but I barely see anything out of the k-agencies. It's weird because most of the time I review, it's the first review for a girl after she's been there for a week or so. I guess the k-agencies are doing well without it, but I've been very surprised by the fact that there is such a discrepancy between the review count for k-agencies and c-orgs. Do the APC / BO / etc girls request reviews from mongers?

It kinda makes me suspicious, in a way.

**MrFairfax** · 09-22-23 07:56

Originally Posted by Alien988 [View Original Post]

Seems more likely that the reason some girls were left off reviews is that this month the Asian agencies had like 15 girls of repute instead of the usual 5 girls on average.

Try again. She was booked solid during her stay here. So guys were definitely seeing her and just not reviewing.

Stop trying to justify this shit practice.