Korean Agency BB

**Phazze93** · 09-18-23 16:12

Originally Posted by RockItAllNite [View Original Post]

T-E-are I'd 377117.

https://loveksweetie.com/mia

Have you tried any of these girls before & know the rates? Being new, can I use simply tell other agencies that I'm verified with kbliss and they can validate me that way?

TER seems somewhat unreliable at times when it comes to age. Range says 21-25, but reviews might state she's 35+ or whatever.

**Phazze93** · 09-18-23 16:05

Originally Posted by SolarisMan [View Original Post]

As a newbie, try to understand that West LA hub is like a Costco and you will get a better deal. MW and K-Town can be referred to as Up-Charge town.

Krystal, Ina and Maia are all good girls and each have strength and no weaknesses. Too bad Krystal is not here anymore.

Originally Posted by RockItAllNite [View Original Post]

So they can stay busy and make $$ If you want to pay more you can always frequent those kgirls that ask for more. LOL.

Yea just curious is all from a business standpoint, if you were a popular provider, going for the 340+100 bb+40 msog would make more sense than the less frequented providers charging that.

Anyways, I'm just exploring more variation at this point since kbliss lineup is relatively small.

At the same time, if I'm going once a week, I also don't really want to increase my spending by an extra 140 on a weekly basis on providers that are less reviewed. When I know what I'll be getting from kbliss. With that being said, if anyone has any recommendations for girls similar to Maia, Ina & Krystal in terms of age, physique & service (offering BB, MSOG). I'd love to hear it! I'm researching as well ofc.

I know it shouldn't matter if she's 30 but looks 20, but I still prefer providers who are early 20's considering I'm early 30's.

**SsStuntCock** · 09-18-23 14:25

Originally Posted by Phazze93 [View Original Post]

Looking at the forum, it seems like INA has consistently one of the most popular providers. Anyone know why she wouldn't be charging more?

She's at 340 flat, whereas 90% of providers on CGLA are 320 base + 100 for bb + 40 for msog, etc. And none of which seem to be nearly as popular as INA?

Better question is why aren't the other girls charging LESS? But let's really put the rat on the table and ask why dudes succumb to such dastardly upcharges to begin with.

**Tk1134** · 09-18-23 13:53

I'm visiting from out of state, any agencies to visit and any agencies to avoid?

**RockItAllNite** · 09-18-23 11:56

Originally Posted by Phazze93 [View Original Post]

Question for those more experienced in the Kgirl scene. Only agency I've gone through was kbliss via a referral.

I've tried krystal (2), maia (3) & ina (1).

Looking at the forum, it seems like INA has consistently one of the most popular providers. Anyone know why she wouldn't be charging more?

She's at 340 flat, whereas 90% of providers on CGLA are 320 base + 100 for bb + 40 for msog, etc. And none of which seem to be nearly as popular as INA?

Personally, Maia is a younger nymph hence the repeats. Ina was great but clearly has had some work done as she's nearing her late 20's.

So they can stay busy and make $$ If you want to pay more you can always frequent those kgirls that ask for more. LOL.

**PumpNDump** · 09-18-23 11:47

Kbliss Monday roundup.

Viki Hana Maia Juni Ina.

**SolarisMan** · 09-18-23 11:32

Originally Posted by Phazze93 [View Original Post]

Question for those more experienced in the Kgirl scene. Only agency I've gone through was kbliss via a referral.

I've tried krystal (2), maia (3) & ina (1).

Looking at the forum, it seems like INA has consistently one of the most popular providers. Anyone know why she wouldn't be charging more?

She's at 340 flat, whereas 90% of providers on CGLA are 320 base + 100 for bb + 40 for msog, etc. And none of which seem to be nearly as popular as INA?

Personally, Maia is a younger nymph hence the repeats. Ina was great but clearly has had some work done as she's nearing her late 20's.

As a newbie, try to understand that West LA hub is like a Costco and you will get a better deal. MW and K-Town can be referred to as Up-Charge town.

Krystal, Ina and Maia are all good girls and each have strength and no weaknesses. Too bad Krystal is not here anymore.

**SolarisMan** · 09-18-23 11:29

Originally Posted by RockItAllNite [View Original Post]

T-E-are I'd 377117.

https://loveksweetie.com/mia

Wet Dream Indeed.

**RockItAllNite** · 09-18-23 10:40

Originally Posted by BonerAppetitty [View Original Post]

Your link doesn't work.

T-E-are I'd 377117.

https://loveksweetie.com/mia

**Phazze93** · 09-18-23 05:50

Question for those more experienced in the Kgirl scene. Only agency I've gone through was kbliss via a referral.

I've tried krystal (2), maia (3) & ina (1).

Looking at the forum, it seems like INA has consistently one of the most popular providers. Anyone know why she wouldn't be charging more?

She's at 340 flat, whereas 90% of providers on CGLA are 320 base + 100 for bb + 40 for msog, etc. And none of which seem to be nearly as popular as INA?

Personally, Maia is a younger nymph hence the repeats. Ina was great but clearly has had some work done as she's nearing her late 20's.

**AlexisDavis** · 09-18-23 03:12

Originally Posted by Tbtbfftb [View Original Post]

Also interesting with the J girls they seem to generally only appear for 2 weeks or so and go home. I bet the bookers love that. Constant rotation of new talent driving business.

Not sure about LA, but the J-girls in Toronto are super young and all have been very pretty. Unfortunately, none of them stop in LA since I'm sure they can't just go from Canada to the US that easily as a Japanese citizen. If LA treats these new girls well, we might get more options in the future.

**BonerAppetitty** · 09-18-23 02:32

Your link doesn't work.

Originally Posted by RockItAllNite [View Original Post]

I just read an overwhelming amount of reviews https://*******.com/2swyrr5t she has worked in Las Vegas and several SF Bay area locations.

Those that have seen her claim she is the stuff of dream are made of. Wet dreams that is.

Curious if she ever graces our fair city of LA. Has anyone seen her before?

**BonerAppetitty** · 09-18-23 02:29

While I agree many girls now are not as hot or skilled as before, I have met some HYAs that could replace the New Good Days providers. Only 2 or 3 older providers you mentioned may still be in my rotation with new HYAs if they all stay at the same time.

I may not even see the women from the good old days now. It's not their real age. It's their face and body that may disappoint me. I have always felt excited chasing new HYAs since I saw my first hot young Kgirl which started the Kgirl addiction.

I never once thought Elle was past her prime or look like MILF. Her body is still unmatched and face still attractive. I still repeat and don't feel the GPS.

Originally Posted by BuildingGuy [View Original Post]

I knew many of the women from the good old days. Moli, Rebecca, La Sera; Meagan, Shannon, Avani, Roya, Cona and many more I don't remember. They were beautiful and gave great service. The fact is that the providers of the New Good Days are equally gorgeous. Stella, Amber, Yoco, Asia, Elle, Cami and Jane, to name a few. Their age doesn't bother me...I have seen all of them in the last two months or so (except Stella) and have been thoroughly pleased. The HYAs and the BBF girls are generally not worth seeing. That's my two cents...

**BonerAppetitty** · 09-18-23 02:21

LA Baby Sakura was already reviewed in HYA thread. Irvine Sakura could be a hidden gem or nothing to write home about. Fake pics and I will check her out if I have time.

More will TOFTT on Jgirls when good reviews are legit. Check out BC review in PLEASER thread to see why there not much noise about Jgirls even with such a large influx.

Originally Posted by Tbtbfftb [View Original Post]

Sakura at US Bodyshop (Irvine) as I believe a Baby Sakura in LA currently as well. Has anyone seen her. ? Want does it mean when someone looks like HYA and yet no comments about them for 4-5 days. ?