Korean Agency BB

**Vulcan1009** · 09-07-23 21:52

Originally Posted by SturdyBirdy [View Original Post]

That review of Sua could have been a warning sign, but I just remembered that the search does not work on strings of 3 or fewer characters. So there's no way this lad could have seen that review. And that sucks, because the review says her waist doesn't curve at all and that she has a boxy build. I like tight boxes, not torsos shaped like you-Haul boxes.

So after talking to bookers who I am a regular for a long time.

They were honest about Sua being the new Erika, which is giant tits with boxy build like the old Erika.

So you either wait for review before visiting or have a good relationship with bookers so they are honest with you before you book.

**Vulcan1009** · 09-07-23 21:49

Originally Posted by DailyFantasy [View Original Post]

15 years seeing KGirls and just when I thought I've encounter few bad apples in the past, Candy is by far the worst I've seen. I'll spare you the unpleasant details, since they are negative in many perspectives. That said, just avoid seeing her.

What a 2nd review we have on Candy? It is night and day from post.

http://www.usasexguide.nl/forum/show...827&viewfull=1#post6579827.

I wonder what happened.

**LoveAsianGirls** · 09-07-23 21:14

Originally Posted by TheBude [View Original Post]

I really would love to do this.

Has anyone done this? Can anyone provide a clip of the video so I can gauge the situation and lighting?

Would love to get this off my bucket list before I'm too old.

Thanks in advance and hope someone can help before she leaves.

Sent DM to op requesting link a couple of days ago but crickets so far.

**LoveAsianGirls** · 09-07-23 21:00

Originally Posted by SturdyBirdy [View Original Post]

That review of Sua could have been a warning sign, but I just remembered that the search does not work on strings of 3 or fewer characters. So there's no way this lad could have seen that review. And that sucks, because the review says her waist doesn't curve at all and that she has a boxy build. I like tight boxes, not torsos shaped like you-Haul boxes.

My post. #37325.

**SolarisMan** · 09-07-23 20:46

Originally Posted by Undftd88 [View Original Post]

Anyone seen new jgirl Natsume yet who can provide feedback? She's listed as B cup but those pictures are at least a D.

https://www.candygirlla.com/portfolio-1/natsume

Golden Rule#1: When it comes to the MW inventory of CGLA booker, do not pay attention to any of her MW ads. Only and only you can trust her, if the same girl is advertised with any other booker: The fakest advertising by CGLA booker is her MW / KT territory.

Her West LA and OC crew are advertised by other bookers and you can seek some truth from other booker if you are a good customer.

**TempletonRat** · 09-07-23 18:16

Originally Posted by DailyFantasy [View Original Post]

15 years seeing KGirls and just when I thought I've encounter few bad apples in the past, Candy is by far the worst I've seen. I'll spare you the unpleasant details, since they are negative in many perspectives. That said, just avoid seeing her.

Fake pics too, I imagine?

**TheBude** · 09-07-23 17:43

I really would love to do this.

Has anyone done this? Can anyone provide a clip of the video so I can gauge the situation and lighting?

Would love to get this off my bucket list before I'm too old.

Thanks in advance and hope someone can help before she leaves.

**Undftd88** · 09-07-23 16:56

Anyone seen new jgirl Natsume yet who can provide feedback? She's listed as B cup but those pictures are at least a D.

https://www.candygirlla.com/portfolio-1/natsume

**SolarisMan** · 09-07-23 16:46

Originally Posted by DailyFantasy [View Original Post]

15 years seeing KGirls and just when I thought I've encounter few bad apples in the past, Candy is by far the worst I've seen. I'll spare you the unpleasant details, since they are negative in many perspectives. That said, just avoid seeing her.

Candy left the WLA and she is at MW under a new name Belle. And I think that she is featured at MW with a TopAngel booker now.

**SuperMan333** · 09-07-23 16:36

Originally Posted by DailyFantasy [View Original Post]

15 years seeing KGirls and just when I thought I've encounter few bad apples in the past, Candy is by far the worst I've seen. I'll spare you the unpleasant details, since they are negative in many perspectives. That said, just avoid seeing her.

LOL that looks like Lady Sol who worked for a few days at CG / Melo who was charging $340 no bb. She was also a huge rebranded through out the years starting at around 2020. Kinda looks like a Tran, bad attitude, overall doesn't look very clean and worse of all a low quality girl like this that also rush you out the door. Yeah I can totally see why you say to avoid at all cost. Personally I won't even fuck her for $120/ hr.

**DailyFantasy** · 09-07-23 15:18

Originally Posted by TempletonRat [View Original Post]

Any second opinions or am I going to have to TOFTT to check out this young Candy BB special?

15 years seeing KGirls and just when I thought I've encounter few bad apples in the past, Candy is by far the worst I've seen. I'll spare you the unpleasant details, since they are negative in many perspectives. That said, just avoid seeing her.

**SturdyBirdy** · 09-07-23 13:01

Originally Posted by BobLove [View Original Post]

To be fair, M advertises her at 116 lb so you ignored all warning signs.

That review of Sua could have been a warning sign, but I just remembered that the search does not work on strings of 3 or fewer characters. So there's no way this lad could have seen that review. And that sucks, because the review says her waist doesn't curve at all and that she has a boxy build. I like tight boxes, not torsos shaped like you-Haul boxes.

**PumpNDump** · 09-07-23 11:54

Kbliss Thursday availability roster.

Viki Hana Tami Maia Juni Ina.

**BobLove** · 09-07-23 03:16

Originally Posted by BuildingGuy [View Original Post]

I booked Sua through M. M has given me excellent service for many years and I have no complaints.

Unfortunately, Sua was among my worst experiences ever. She is ugly and overweight. I felt sorry for her because her appearance was so painful. There was an air of desperation. I allowed her to do a barely adequate BJ. She then jumped on CG. She has gigantic breasts which were thoroughly unattractive. I jumped into the shower. I left her donation while she was still cleaning up in the bathroom.

To be fair, M advertises her at 116 lb so you ignored all warning signs.

**SolarisMan** · 09-07-23 00:43

Originally Posted by Vulcan1009 [View Original Post]

Saw her once because of her initial pix were attractive, but when I see her in person, small A to B cup with overall baby fat body, yes she is young but her face were average at best.

Her overall package would go at most a 5 to me. Too many 340 girls better than Sienna or what was her name when she 1st came out.

One thing, name change is always a sign of fishing new client who didn't know, LOL.

You have been warned.

Haha! Isn't that just what I said at post#37667 ? I would say 5 is a right number if you want be generous but 4 or 5 is where I rate that experience also.