Korean Agency BB

**AsianBaller1** · 07-13-23 22:00

Even though he doesn't have the same taste as me, but his reviews seem to be legit through out the years. I normally just use his reviews to filter some of the girls.

He even saw the girls I wouldn't think of so kudos to him. I kind a use other people to judge my own sense to see if it's accurate and improve for the future.

**RocketManP** · 07-13-23 21:59

I have nothing against BC.

It's just the concept of early access needs disclosure imo.

Let me try to explain it.

Imagine you have someone higher up connected to the very top of company executive, arriving to check on your work for a day.

You prepare your ass off, give a great impression, everything looks great. You go a mile above and beyond.

Now fast forward few weeks. You've relaxed on a Friday ready to go to happy hour. You are kinda half assing your work, making some jokes with co-workers and stuff. There's some quiet guy in the corner you don't know taking some notes but you're like whatever who dis don't matter.

Then it turns out the guy in the corner was actually evaluating your work, he is an executive from private equity firm that owns your company.

It's not a perfect analogy, but hopefully it's clear what I'm trying to say here.

A lot of girls during early access know that they are about to be fucked / evaluated by VIP folks with tons of reviews and whom they need to impress so they can tell others they're good.

Obviously they won't be able. To change body or face, but they will likely be on top of their game. Often these are guys who spend a lot of money on this org.

Just my two cents.

**Kent747** · 07-13-23 21:20

Originally Posted by Leocat2020 [View Original Post]

How do I get that gig? 😋

Some house owners are ex providers who got chummy with their regular clients. I met few owners when they were hanging around with their girls although not in recent years. Allegedly NG got hooked up with her current boss by a client who had a connection with the boss.

**SharingHer** · 07-13-23 19:28

You all need to relax on BC's review being "early". There are many ways for bookers to advertise their girls. One of the ways is through a website. Another way is through text message. I also received a text asking if I wanted to try out Krystal before she was put on the website. They said she was just 21 and getting her feet wet so taking a limited amount of appointments at first each day. I am sure the booker reached out to several regular customers who were likely to enjoy Krystal, and guys that Krystal would probably like, guys that girls never complain about. I paid full price. Krystal is also an auto repeat for me and I have repeated a few times already. If anything, I am even more enthusiastic about her than BC.

It is funny though. BC's review styles are in my head. When I first saw the small tattoo on her, I thought to myself, "This tattoo is a surprise because this girl is not been reviewed yet. BC will write about this tattoo with the scientific name for the location on her anatomy. " Anyone who does not trust BC's reviews has problems. I have found him to be the most impartial reviewer on here. I have taken note of all of you who have reviewed Jaehee positively the last few weeks, and started to mute you.

Full disclosure: Krystal is pure dynamite, like Hana's slightly younger sister. Anyone paying 420 to 460 to meet almost anyone else in LA is nuts in my opinion is nuts when Hana, Ina, Juni, Maia, Mini and now Krystal are available for 340.

**RocketManP** · 07-13-23 17:52

Ideally any conflict of interest, any status of VIP or ability to have "early access" should probably be mentioned in a review and fully disclosed.

Besides maybe orgs knowing who you are, what else does one have to hide?

Ironically, I've read thousands upon thousands of kgirl reviews and I text searched scraped reviews I have from different platforms.

Anyone want to guess how many reviews mention being VIPs / early access? Barely any. Conflict of interest? Zero.

There are some intricate nuances involved when you have early access. If I read a review that is written for an early access girl, I kinda want to know that fact without having to infer or deduce it based on the poster.

But maybe that's just me.

**PounderMC** · 07-13-23 12:40

Originally Posted by Leocat2020 [View Original Post]

How do I get that gig? 😋

You have to get on your knees and blow the dudes. LOL.

**Leocat2020** · 07-13-23 12:10

Originally Posted by Kent747 [View Original Post]

Some guys are friends of house owners and they get sneak previews.

How do I get that gig? 😋

**Kent747** · 07-13-23 11:33

Originally Posted by RockItAllNite [View Original Post]

As SS has said it is common for VIPs / good clients, to get a preview session with new girls if they are ready prior to the ad being run.

Most mongers are just not as prompt as BC in writing reviews afterward.

I have found BC's reviews to be truthful more often than not.

Some guys are friends of house owners and they get sneak previews.

**PumpNDump** · 07-13-23 11:26

Thursday kbliss lineup. Reminder, booker says Krystal slots fill up quick.

Viki Diva.

Hana Krystal Maia Juni Ina.

**RockItAllNite** · 07-13-23 09:17

Originally Posted by SsStuntCock [View Original Post]

It's not uncommon for "VIPs" to be offered sneak previews of new talent. Think soft-opening meets hard cock.

As SS has said it is common for VIPs / good clients, to get a preview session with new girls if they are ready prior to the ad being run.

Most mongers are just not as prompt as BC in writing reviews afterward.

I have found BC's reviews to be truthful more often than not.

**RocketManP** · 07-13-23 08:00

Originally Posted by BastardChorum [View Original Post]

You can think what you like but I've always tried my best to present an objective portrayal of my experiences with the girls within the confines of my own bias / preferences. My track record on this speaks for itself and I stand by all of my reviews. It's a two way street here as I've gotten good info from this board also so I review in kind. While I can understand the need to be skeptical of newly minted handles with single digit posts, I would have expected better from someone who seems to know their way around the scene to first look at whose posting and their history before jumping to conclusions.

Do you think someone disclosing in the review that they had "early access" is an unreasonable ask?

**Jimbo571** · 07-13-23 05:41

Name: Sunny & Loro.

Rate: $800 PSE with 2 Pops.

Location: K-Town.

https://topangels.ch/topangel/loro-sunny/

I saw Sunny had a new duo partner, so I couldn't wait to give them a try. I have saw Sunny several times both solo and with her other duo partners in the past. I don't think anyone will ever top Ari, but Loro gives some good service.

I was greeted by both at the door with some DFK. Sunny is always smiling and laughing when we meet. She is just so sweet. We showered then headed to the room. They started by giving me a lesbian show. I thought it would just be the typical kissing and licking breast, but these two real get into it and give show. They licked each others kitty's and just watching had me rock hard and ready to go. They turned their attention to me with a nice double BBBJ. After awhile I put Sunny on top of my face for some DATY. Loro continues with BBBJ for awhile, then climbs on for CG. She is really tight and has some nice breast to watch when she is bouncing up down. We move through many position changes and swaps with no wiping in between until I finally CIP with Loro in K-9 while Sunny was giving me some encouragement.

Next we chatted for awhile. Sunny told me she got new implants back in April. I thought her breast looked a little bigger. After a little massage we started round 2. It was much the same as the first with multiple swaps and positions. I finished with a nice BBBJCIM with Sunny.

I don't think anyone can replace Ari, since her and Sunny worked so well together, but Loro is nice pretty with big breasts and puts in a lot of effort to make sure you are happy. Definitely worth a visit if you are on the fence. I know I will be repeating often.

**ZebraZebra** · 07-13-23 05:36

Originally Posted by JoseMan [View Original Post]

My general observation is that in general and a great probability of 90% that if a girl is a looker, she will not be working in the WLA locations; Somehow the hot ones are all in MW area. There is always exception here and there but that is what I see based on talent pool.

Funny enough, I have had so many one-and-done no-repeats in MW / KT (Jazmin, Elle, NG, Amber, Shay, Mini, BBBJ Min, Loro, Baby Joo) whereas I constantly revisit WLA (first Erica, and now Ina). Not that the one-and-done girls were bad or anything, most of them are quite popular, but just not really my type. The only girl I've repeated in MW is Stella, who rarely works.

On a side note, booked Ina as the last appointment of the day today since I had a stack of Andrew Jacksons in my wallet due to Celine's cancellation yesterday. It's nice being the last appointment since you get to spend more time with the provider due to them not having to rush for the next client. I never get a tired vibe from her either, not even once after 20+ visits. Still ate out that nice pink kitty of hers like it was the last meal of my life and didn't taste any of your guys' previous deposits. She does a great job cleaning up between clients!

**Bastard Chorum** · 07-13-23 03:08

Originally Posted by HiKeke [View Original Post]

I know. I was pointing that out. These reviews can to be biased and not 100% honest. I've been offered these previously too. They usually offer these sessions for free or discounted rates, in return they ask for "positive" reviews. Now we know BC's reviews are one of those too. Just saying.

You can think what you like but I've always tried my best to present an objective portrayal of my experiences with the girls within the confines of my own bias / preferences. My track record on this speaks for itself and I stand by all of my reviews. It's a two way street here as I've gotten good info from this board also so I review in kind. While I can understand the need to be skeptical of newly minted handles with single digit posts, I would have expected better from someone who seems to know their way around the scene to first look at whose posting and their history before jumping to conclusions.

**BonerAppetitty** · 07-13-23 02:42

That was why I called BC the MVP when I was getting my feet wet on this forum. He consistently reviewed new girls when I was depressed thinking most legit OG reviewers had retired.

I would have boned Krystal even without review cause I believed pics are real and she is young. I thought she was available last weekend but I was busy with other girls. Cute young Asian with BBFSCIPMSOG all in, what's not to love?

Originally Posted by SsStuntCock [View Original Post]

Not all VIPs are cut from the same cloth tho. I've never suspected BC of shilling. His reviews are exceedingly thoughtful, objective, and devoid of hyperbole.

Originally Posted by GoldDust58 [View Original Post]

Bastard's review are always legit and I trust him fully when it comes to honesty. He doesn't just chase the HYA and give them high praise because they are young or pretty. He also TOFTT on the girls most of us wouldn't touch. Milfs and fatties included. Some of the TOFTT on this board are geared toward a particular shilled org that admin had been banning left and right. One was recently caught after offering to TOFTT with anyone LOL. The shill has stopped tagging his own org and is now tagging the other bookers postings so admin doesn't catch him. It's pretty obvious to most mongers and we all know he is as they keep reviewing the same girls over and over again that moved from Ktown to WLA now LOL.

As far as Krystal goes, they were booking her all weekend but said she didn't have pic ready so couldn't add to their site. If you see the majority of their girls, you probably got texts advertising her as being only 21, which I agree with Bastard it's pretty spot on. Maia and her have very similar builds with Krystal being the youngest of the two. Maia has a banging body right now. Krystal def is very really nice body too and slim. You can tell she is young. Not pubescent looking but young thin / fit with new puppies. Both very similar but Krystal doesn't look as Korean like Bastard said. She has big eyes. Typical young girl eye surgery nowadays.