Thread: Escort Reports
+
Add Report
Results 3,556 to 3,570 of 23367
-
07-11-23 10:29 #19812
Posts: 3748Originally Posted by Sj2222 [View Original Post]
-
07-11-23 10:05 #19811
Posts: 58Originally Posted by KingOfFours [View Original Post]
-
07-11-23 09:55 #19810
Posts: 381Thanks, but seems a scam
Thanks to everyone who responded with info, but I think this ad is a scam. Comms were good, directed to a spot in Attleboro but once I started the trip crickets, and crickets ever since. Not sure what the deal is, it's possible this is a scammer using a different number but her pics, the number in this ad is different from the SA ad that someone posted a screenshot of. But who knows, YMMV.
Originally Posted by RHTreller [View Original Post]
-
07-11-23 09:54 #19809
Posts: 3748Monique
Originally Posted by Sj2222 [View Original Post]
-
07-11-23 09:44 #19808
Posts: 58Blue eyes
This person is different from blue eyes.
Originally Posted by KingOfFours [View Original Post]
-
07-11-23 09:42 #19807
Posts: 58Blue eyes
I've had her several times and the first doesn't appear to be the same as 2 and 3. I've been wondering if she is still around. I thought she was great.
Originally Posted by KingOfFours [View Original Post]
-
07-11-23 09:29 #19806
Posts: 3748Jodi
Originally Posted by LilBoyBlue [View Original Post]
But I probably won't inseminate her again. Perfectionist that I've lately become, in my golden years, I generally don't repeat, unless I find them VERY VERY attractive, and only if their performance is stellar. With Jodi, performance was just fine. No problem there. But as you can see from my picture below from about 7 years ago, she had legs like tree trunks, and I did not really think her face was pretty, and, although the tits and ass were surely world class, she just did not fulful my stringent requirements for a repeat.
Truth be told, I've repeated with very, very, few in New England over the last decade. I have a couple I cum-pump on the left coast every time I'm there. But in New England, the ones I've left rivers of sperm in since 2013, with many repeats, I can almost count on the fingers of just one hand: Jamie / Sparrow (now deceased, I think), Stephieg69, Bathroomless Ashley, Joelle, Kim / Nicole in New Bedford who I think is now retired, and Luciana in Smithfield, who I KNOW is, unfortunatly, retired. Oh--I just thought of one more: I did repeat with that young big natural tit GFE cumdumpster Brianna, who used to share rooms with Jamie, but she is now also retired as far as I know.
One of the reasons I don't repeat unless I'm REALLY turned on by both their looks and performance, is that I love to inseminate STRANGE! As a gorgeous MILF hoe who I did repeat with in San Fransicko (when it used to be a real city) said some 20 years ago, "If you come and fuck me again, the sex will again be great. But there is nothing to compare with fucking a STRANGER, for the FIRST time!"
Out of the mouths of babes, LOL!
Oh---note added in proof! I DID repeat many times leaving many loads in both thressomes and solo sessions with Holly and her half-sister Sammie!
-
07-11-23 06:39 #19805
Posts: 3748Junkies
Originally Posted by DarkClouds [View Original Post]
The point is, that's basically how I was able to succeed at bareback-fucking SO many hoes! I don't generally query them like that any more, though, because most of the legitimate harlots are now very LE-aware and just won't discuss services.
But now, I want to avoid junkies, as much as I want to fuck raw. Not only because they are significantly greater health risks because most are immunocompromised and thus more likely to spread diseases, but also because of their dangerous environment where thugs both with and without badges can end up in the mix. And, of course, while there have been exceptions, junkies are frequently unbathed, physically run-down and unattractive, and exhibit abysmally unsatisfactory sexual performance.
So, what do you guys think would be the reply if one were to ask these girls before seeing them, by phone or text, whether or not they are junkies?! As the president would say, I'm NOT joking!
Think about it! So many of them now actually are advertising, "party favors". The ones that do that, of course, have, for me, conveniently weeded themselves out. But what do you think? If one were to put the query politely, such as, "I was wondering. . . Do you have party favors? If so, do you have any crack or meth or heroin?" Has anyone ever tried something like that, in order to weed them out? Because I doubt one would get an honest answer if one were to just ask outright, "Hey, honey, your ad pics look great. . . but are you a junkie? ".
-
07-10-23 23:28 #19804
Posts: 17Saw these 2 for a BBBJCIM. Both were cool but the brunette was a bit shy. Looks were decent too. Blonde gave okay head, the brunette was better. 250 hh. Not sure if I'll repeat though, chemistry wasn't there.
https://skipthegames.com/posts/bosto...t/369930636954
-
07-10-23 20:43 #19803
Posts: 12Mimi
Saw Mimi for the first time recently. STG photos are legit. Definitely remember her from the Cadillac Lounge back in the day.
We really hit it off. I think she liked me (I'm being facetious LOL).
Reached out via text and got a prompt response. Standard two text system. Was at her place in WW within the hour.
Arrived to see her in nice lingerie and was led upstairs to the bedroom. Started off with BBBJ for a bit then she put the condom in and bent over on the bed. Pounded her from the back for a while, she did a great job pretending to enjoy it, then flipped her missionary for quite a bit, but felt like I was fucking the ocean so went back sucking, first CBJ for a minute then pulled it off and back to BBBJ. Politely asked that I let her know when I'm about to cum as she doesn't like it in her mouth. Proceeded to do so, got cleaned up, chatted for a good fifteen minutes.
Sweet girl, told me a bunch of her life story, her real name, etc.
Didn't feel rushed at all. 160 hh I was there for almost 45 minutes. Would repeat.
Happy hunting,
Slim.
-
07-10-23 20:40 #19802
Posts: 2032Demons
Yes, it's her. Might have demons. But I was with her for a solid hour and she never showed any impatience for a fix. Instead she was happily partaking in the lubrication I was supplying. This was pre-covid and almost everyone gained weight during covid, which might explain the first two pics. Also, when I visited we spent some luxurious time in her spacious living room before moving to the nice bedroom. Clean. Safe. Not on my hall of fame list. But also not on my hall of shame list. She's good enough. Long legs. Little floppy titties. Just how I like them (perky is even better of course, but no McDonald's supersized jugs for me thank you). On the other hand, she hasn't responded to my text, so there's that. Not that I want to see her. I rarely repeat.
Originally Posted by LBrad52 [View Original Post]
-
07-10-23 17:09 #19801
Posts: 406I third that
Originally Posted by LBrad52 [View Original Post]
-
07-10-23 13:45 #19800
Posts: 1259Originally Posted by KingOfFours [View Original Post]
-
07-10-23 13:40 #19799
Posts: 1259Originally Posted by KingOfFours [View Original Post]
-
07-10-23 12:40 #19798
Posts: 3748Originally Posted by JunkieMonkey [View Original Post]
https://sumosear.ch/images/webpage/r...s-out/14509817
https://sumosear.ch/images/webpage/c...tacks/13536771
Similar tits and build, surely! For my report on Jodi, see my post 9499, here:
http://www.usasexguide.nl/forum/show...552&viewfull=1#post4695552.
For comparison, take a look at these two pics, the first one is from one of Jodi's old ads, the second one is from the recent STG ad. Same build, same hair . . . same girl?