"Sugar Babies" and "Arrangements"

[FarFarAway]

Damn, that second one is stunning. Totally my type. Was that a SB or escort and how much was ppm / donation? Share some more pics of her in the "Greatest Hits" thread, if you like.

I feel the same way. The first girl was a single mom, European heritage, and had experience as a kept woman. I couldn't really afford her long-term, but did a lot of socializing w / her and got one overnight date at 600. The younger one, what a hard body, and I do have more photos of her from that same shoot, but I was really rolling the dice w / that posting, I don't think I'll take any more risks. She was 19, and I think I gave her 300. One small disappointment, I got her off DATY, and then she became super sensitive, so I couldn't do any more, she couldn't really have multiple Os. She relocated from soCal to San Jose last I knew. Both were well before the pandemic. Both SBs. From SA. I am retirement age, so there's that. 😁128513;.

My approach is to be the nicest guy they've ever been with. Its really the only weapon I have. Also bedroom skill of course, but they don't know that when they agree. I read of guys on here who are getting hot youngsters at small money because they have a quasi-dating relationship w / them. That will never happen with me of course, I am 40 years older than some of these girls. So, you geezers reading, take heart. Get in there, you would be surprised what kind of girls you can pull off of SA, at least around here. I have also had great luck when traveling, recently did a trip to Chicago, scored great dates w / 2 mid-late 20's girls.

[Peter Johnson]

I'm sure she was born a girl, but not your type clearly LOL, and that's ok. I usually just immediately block any trannies I see.

Yes same here. Trannies get immediate block. I don't know they should be on that part of the site, but it's Seeking mgmt's fault, not theirs.

[Peter Johnson]

Here are a couple of examples, both I saw long ago. You can find really nice girls here, w / great personality, who aren't as hot as these, but still way above average, and who you can hang w / for a while without having to tolerate the usual SB crap.

Damn, that second one is stunning. Totally my type. Was that a SB or escort and how much was ppm / donation? Share some more pics of her in the "Greatest Hits" thread, if you like.

[HollaHolla321]

https://members.seeking.com/member/2...6-3a8b081d2a3f

Just curious if anyone has got anywhere with this one. Profile is a few months old, and they don't talk like a scammer. Moved her to snap, she snapped me a live pic. When I asked for one with a specific pose she pouted. Normaly I'd immediately cut off and move on, but her chatting doesn't have the usual hallmarks of scamming, and she hasn't asked for $.

AVOID! She snaps you pics to make you believe she's real. I asked her multiple times to send me a video to verify she's legit but she said she would charge me for that. I said okay I'll meet you. She stays in Buckhead. I want to the place she said she stay and she wanted me to cash app first before she came to see me. I warn she ahead of time that I would only do it once I saw her in person. Anyways she refused to meet me she actually share the location what she was in Buckhead but I wouldn't take a chance. I would say cash only and see if she meets than.

[LaidLow17]

How did you arrive at this conclusion? Granted, the main profile pic is a little sketchy, and 6'2" Hispanic is an Amazon, but I don't see even the hint of an Adam's apple.

Lordy, that ain't a lady.

[FarFarAway]

I'd challenge any of you to stack your girls up against those in SoCal. So many hotties, but also a lot of GPS. If I didn't have to worry about the SO catching me about the $, I'd have a hard time restraining myself with many of them. Like that earlier poster.

Here are a couple of examples, both I saw long ago. You can find really nice girls here, w / great personality, who aren't as hot as these, but still way above average, and who you can hang w / for a while without having to tolerate the usual SB crap.

[LouisHernandez]

Agreed, I very intentionally avoided using "nice" in my post. I don't simp, but I'm respectful and classy. It's amazing how quickly you can get a girl to go from boring conversation to full on sexting and nudes by just being respectful while being just a little flirty.

The whole goal and I sometimes get sidetracked on this, is to make them laugh within the first several texts. If you can't do that you're sunk. Once they confirm with a few "LOLs" etc, then I try to setup a meet.

[GoneForGood97]

I would say be "classy". Not necessarily nice. There's a fine line between nice and simp. Simps get nothing. And agree on usernames.

Agreed, I very intentionally avoided using "nice" in my post. I don't simp, but I'm respectful and classy. It's amazing how quickly you can get a girl to go from boring conversation to full on sexting and nudes by just being respectful while being just a little flirty.

[LouisHernandez]

Bruh.

I hope you know that's NOT a female. Unless you're just into that sort of thing.

+1. That's no broad. The height also gives it away.

[LouisHernandez]

I talked to her a couple of days ago and moved to text. Gave her my schedule and requirements, her response and I quote "My ppms have thusfar been between 5-8. I'd ask for 7+" After 9 was late night so extra for hosting and I couldn't stay for long.

She was pleasant to talk to, but ghosted her due to ridiculousness.

Here's a little jedi mind trick when they pull stupid GPS numbers. Say "I'll do $600 a week if we meet twice a week". Sometimes it'll work, and you've got her down to $300. I've done that for a few one and dones and it worked.

[LouisHernandez]

So, I apologize in advance if I'm wrong here. Your user name just looked super familiar, and I finally remembered why. Kids, gather round, I'm about to give you a demonstration on why you should never use the same user name on multiple sites ESPECIALLY on the pay to play site AND the site you post reviews on for those you pay to play.

A few months ago I was messaging this real cute blonde up in Atlanta, and we were chatting about the sugar game. She mentions that for the most part she felt like SDs were higher quality than the random dudes she'd find on Tinder, except sometimes you find guys like this: she then texted me the attached screenshots and said to me "Fuck this guy. What made him think I'd respond well to that?..I'm ripe fodder for doms that think they're too good to 'pay for sex'. I feel sorry for submissives that fall for that shit." Now, maybe it's a complete coincidence that this guys user name is the same as yours, and I apologize if I'm lumping you in with this guy if you're not him. But dude if any girl from SA Google's your user name and spells it out (and people will because that's often how I find these girls social media accounts, and I'm sure some of them are as good or better at this than I am) they will very easily find your posts here.

So lesson 1) Don't use the same screen name across platforms, even if you very cutely replace "too" with "2". This is the only place I use this name, no where else.

Lesson 2) Thanks to the way you (or this dude that is not you but just happens to have the same user name) approached this hottie, she jumped into my bed for cheaper than she otherwise would have because I wasn't a disrespectful douche. And for the record she was a fantastic lay, very submissive in the best way, but she was too far away for me to make her my regular. So selfishly thanks for being so bad at talking to women online they happily jumped into bed with me. However, the reason you're having to pay so much for "red carpet treatment" isn't because you're paying a premium. I promise I get the red carpet from most of these girls with my standard 200-300 arrangements. But you're basically paying an asshole tax. If you didn't approach them as indicated in these texts, you'd find you'd get "red carpet" experiences without the tax, and in fact I bet my next paycheck I actually get better experiences than you do while paying way less because my approach isn't. Whatever the fuck this is LOL. You do you, but don't delude yourself into thinking you're paying more for a better experience. You're paying more because you come off as a dick, and you're very likely not getting the best the girl has to offer. That's not to say you're not having a good time, you probably are, but I promise you've had some experiences that were subpar (even if you didn't realize it) and the girl was only putting up with you because you were willing to overpay and doing just enough to get you off and get done. But hell, if you're getting your rocks off with hot girls, do what you want. But in the spirit of giving guys in this thread advice on sugaring, this is textbook case of what not to do.

I would say be "classy". Not necessarily nice. There's a fine line between nice and simp. Simps get nothing. And agree on usernames.

[GoneForGood97]

Bruh.

I hope you know that's NOT a female. Unless you're just into that sort of thing.

I'm sure she was born a girl, but not your type clearly LOL, and that's ok. I usually just immediately block any trannies I see.

[AmpFanatl]

Why are there so many 18-20 yr old women on SA only wanting to sell pics. And that's just the real ones, not to mention the scammers. The number is too damn high!

/ rant.

[Member #6718]

So, I apologize in advance if I'm wrong here. Your user name just looked super familiar, and I finally remembered why. Kids, gather round, I'm about to give you a demonstration on why you should never use the same user name on multiple sites ESPECIALLY on the pay to play site AND the site you post reviews on for those you pay to play.

Standing ovation for this post LOL.

[Hal1957]

How did you arrive at this conclusion? Granted, the main profile pic is a little sketchy, and 6'2" Hispanic is an Amazon, but I don't see even the hint of an Adam's apple.

Bruh.

I hope you know that's NOT a female. Unless you're just into that sort of thing.