"Sugar Babies" and "Arrangements"

[OliverNP]

Yes I only use the web version too. Seeking is in the google app store I just checked. Also I think the rebrand to "dating up" is additional cover so they maintain anti trafficking or anti prostitution compliance even though absolutely nothing has changed about the site and how users use it.

I'm not sure why they aren't in the Apple app store, because there are lots of apps there that are blatantly branded sugar daddy dating apps.

Maybe it has more to do with billing practices or limitations.

[FarFarAway]

Yes I only use the web version too. Seeking is in the google app store I just checked. Also I think the rebrand to "dating up" is additional cover so they maintain anti trafficking or anti prostitution compliance even though absolutely nothing has changed about the site and how users use it.

This is not true. The girls used to have a thing on their profiles for their allowance expectations. They went from practical to extravagant or some such, and then elsewhere on the site, there was a 'key' that told you what the monthly was for those descriptors. I think the lowest one, practical, was like 2 K. So SDs learned to ignore those completely. Girls communicate that same thing on their profiles these days, they just do it with coded language. High maintenance, etc.

[NuGuy36]

Try dating something besides white girls. Tell me I am wrong. Its my opinion that all the karens that get guys banned from seeking are white. Just my 2 cents.

All women have varying tiers of crazy.

[LouisHernandez]

There is a web version of seeking.com, right? I use it almost exclusively, I don't have to pay for web access, whereas the bandwidth on my smart TracFone I do pay for. You can also disable your profile on seeking (on the web version, IDK about the app, as I don't use it anymore. I did at one time. However, didn't the app stores stop including 'trafficking' applications a while back?

Yes I only use the web version too. Seeking is in the google app store I just checked. Also I think the rebrand to "dating up" is additional cover so they maintain anti trafficking or anti prostitution compliance even though absolutely nothing has changed about the site and how users use it.

[LouisHernandez]

As someone who dates all types -- white / black / asian / latina / various mixes of any or all of above and stopped counting their SB conquests after the number exceeded 1500, I can tell you that BSCD (bat shit crazy disease) does not discriminate by race. The nut jobs come in all colors.

Also stick with UTRs b / c they tend to be less crazy and have alot less rules. Rules can make or break an "arrangement". I'm not paying for a rulebook. The more "amateur" the better. I know I'm singing to the choir.

[FarFarAway]

Maybe this will help:

The other thing I like about bumble is there's just a lot more volume especially if you are in a big city and are located near the city center. Seeking, depending on your location, can be sparse; I see too much of the same girls. On seeking I typically run a 30 day membership and then quit for 3-4 months and wait for a fresh crop to come in. Also you can use bumble in a desktop web browser ( I hate smart phone apps)

Oh another thing about bumble, you can easily disable your profile / make yourself invisible when you want to take a break. This is all without paying anything.

There is a web version of seeking.com, right? I use it almost exclusively, I don't have to pay for web access, whereas the bandwidth on my smart TracFone I do pay for. You can also disable your profile on seeking (on the web version, IDK about the app, as I don't use it anymore. I did at one time. However, didn't the app stores stop including 'trafficking' applications a while back?

[LouisHernandez]

Does it allow you to set who you want (age range etc) messages from? On most civilian dating sites, if I post real pics of myself I get too many requests from 40+ cougars because I look young for my age and they tend to be dreamers (thinking they are in my dating league). For it to work for me, there would likely need to be a way to indicate I'm looking for a young age range and auto-filter incoming requests from anyone else.

Maybe this will help:

The other thing I like about bumble is there's just a lot more volume especially if you are in a big city and are located near the city center. Seeking, depending on your location, can be sparse; I see too many of the same girls. On seeking I typically run a 30 day membership and then quit for 3-4 months and wait for a fresh crop to come in. Also you can use bumble in a desktop web browser ( I hate smart phone apps)

Oh another thing about bumble, you can easily disable your profile / make yourself invisible when you want to take a break. This is all without paying anything.

[Gatsby32]

You're wrong. Shit like this has no place here.

Try dating something besides white girls. Tell me I am wrong. Its my opinion that all the karens that get guys banned from seeking are white. Just my 2 cents.

[OliverNP]

I've had some luck on bumble with 7 and up but it's been a while. It works better than the other sites b / c women must msg first.

Does it allow you to set who you want (age range etc) messages from? On most civilian dating sites, if I post real pics of myself I get too many requests from 40+ cougars because I look young for my age and they tend to be dreamers (thinking they are in my dating league). For it to work for me, there would likely need to be a way to indicate I'm looking for a young age range and auto-filter incoming requests from anyone else.

[CrempieLover]

As someone who dates all types -- white / black / asian / latina / various mixes of any or all of above and stopped counting their SB conquests after the number exceeded 1500, I can tell you that BSCD (bat shit crazy disease) does not discriminate by race. The nut jobs come in all colors.

It's like the crazy / hot scale. The hotter they are most likely means they are bat shit crazy.

[OliverNP]

Try dating something besides white girls. Tell me I am wrong. Its my opinion that all the karens that get guys banned from seeking are white. Just my 2 cents.

As someone who dates all types -- white / black / asian / latina / various mixes of any or all of above and stopped counting their SB conquests after the number exceeded 1500, I can tell you that BSCD (bat shit crazy disease) does not discriminate by race. The nut jobs come in all colors.

[HollywoodGuy]

Here's a nut job to avoid. We texted a bit, all nice and cordial. We finally got down to specifics and she says $500. I politely responded that was out of my range and the most I could do was $300. She responded:

"Did you forget what I look like?

And sent me about 10 very sexy pics and this response:

"If you are a man who does not like to invest in a quality woman's time, please just being mature adult, and say that so that I can block you and make sure that I never received a message from your greedy ass again. ".

This was my response:

"I know you're incredibly sexy, and I'm sure you're very much in demand. I was considering it, but after the attitude with that last sentence I'm definitely not interested. I'm blocking you as well. ".

I then blocked her on both Google Voice as well as on SA.

Then I receive like 4 calls on GV from another number. Here's the transcript from the messages:

"Kill yourself? You're f* worthless. You're f* useless. You're nothing f* kill yourself. Put a f* bullet through your no good worthless brain, b*. ".

Personally, rather than put a bullet through my brain, I'd say I dodged a bullet, LOL. No girl who turns that nasty would be a good experience to be with.

Sorry I don't have the link to her profile, I wanted to block it ASAP.

As always, Good Hunting.

Travelin.

Try dating something besides white girls. Tell me I am wrong. Its my opinion that all the karens that get guys banned from seeking are white. Just my 2 cents.

[Peter Johnson]

I've had some luck on bumble with 7 and up but it's been a while. It works better than the other sites b / c women must msg first. Simps ruin all the other dating sites b / c the dudes blow the girls inbox up. It's different than seeking as seeking requires a pretty sizeable membership fee to message any girls, not the case with bumble. If you don't have really good photos on bumble or any civilian dating site you are completely wasting your time. Seeking you can get away with not looking so good although don't kid yourself, if you stand out on seeking, there's a lot less BS thrown your way and girls all of a sudden get much more affordable and less flakey.

The women messaging first on Bumble is really just a gimmick. Perhaps it makes them feel more in control and "empowered", but the two people still have to match first, so it doesn't really matter who sends the first message, at that point. If you are young and attractive, then Bumble is probably a good hookup app. But old and relatively unattractive, not so much.

And yes, I always say I am much better looking with $300 in my hand, which is why I do ok on Seeking. $300 can raise you from a 5 to a 7...if not an 8, depending on when the girl's rent is due.

[LouisHernandez]

That's pretty funny about the weight gain. How old is she? I don't mind a little pudge on a young one.

What's Bumble like? Is it the best civilian dating site going? It's "about" describes that only women can contact you, not vice versa. That makes me question it.

I've had some luck on bumble with 7 and up but it's been a while. It works better than the other sites b / c women must msg first. Simps ruin all the other dating sites b / c the dudes blow the girls inbox up. It's different than seeking as seeking requires a pretty sizeable membership fee to message any girls, not the case with bumble. If you don't have really good photos on bumble or any civilian dating site you are completely wasting your time. Seeking you can get away with not looking so good although don't kid yourself, if you stand out on seeking, there's a lot less BS thrown your way and girls all of a sudden get much more affordable and less flakey.

I'll run both in parallel and post results as they come in.

The chunky chick is 27. She was already a little pudgy, the 15 extra pounds put her over the edge. She said she had the flu or something and hasn't been able to exercise. Who knows and who cares.

[NewAnonymousName]

I'm going to fire up bumble next week after I take some new pics. I've been dieting pretty hard core for the past 8 weeks. One tip I recommend is using photofeeler.com , post your pics and get them rated. I learned I'm my own worst critic / fan when it comes to my own pics.

I'll get back in the sugar bowl after new years b / c I'm pretty much running dry. The last SB put on 15 pounds from my previous encounter and I simply can't hit that again. Weight gain is the most annoying thing with these girls forcing me have to go fishing in the bowl again. It sucks b / c she had no rules and was trustworthy, a rare thing to find.

That's pretty funny about the weight gain. How old is she? I don't mind a little pudge on a young one.

What's Bumble like? Is it the best civilian dating site going? It's "about" describes that only women can contact you, not vice versa. That makes me question it.