Korean Agency BB

[Mikexu]

Thinking about do a multi-session with my fav kgirl. Any thought or recommendations?

With all the talks about Erica, I will definitely try her, but my personal favorite was choi and sweet.

[KingSenpai]

Real and accurate photoshop pics. Prettier than 95% of Kgirls in SoCal. Probably as pretty as any prettiest current Kgirl you know. I prefer looks and inexperienced young girls over service so she's perfect for me. Only con is magnums should avoid her cause you and her won't have a good time.

She smiled every time we made eye contact. BBBJ and mish with eye contact but she closed her eyes sometimes. The way she initiated kissing is the way I kiss cute girls. Made the whole experience felt very GFE. Did everything I asked with a smile. Great attitude and a submissive pleaser.

Orgasm easily as CaptCaveman99 said. She did tell me to be soft on DATY and no FIV. I easily adjusted and made it enjoyable for her. She seemed nice and friendly. Pretty good English. Someone else can train her with repeat visits. Already good enough for me and may get better with repeats.

Whether she can grow out of her shell depends on repeated mongers with the tolerant and patience to teach her new tricks. She's not so GPS that she won't try.

This was my experience with Erica as well. She was very friendly with me and submissive / willing to please. My only nitpicks are that she wasn't as slender / petite as I prefer. Her face is very pretty especially her eyes but her complexion isn't that great. Better than Baby Sky's though. Her body could use some toning as it seems like she doesn't work out. Her tits are all natural and they feel great. Some people may not like the way her tits look though. They have a natural sag. She also has a patch of pubic hair whereas I prefer cleanly shaven. These are all nitpicks though and I will continue to repeat with her because of her price point and the fact that she's damn adorable. I still think Jean and Daisy look better overall though.

[Ngbaoan123]

Sfk / kbliss on deck.

Sfk Arisa Viki Erika.

Kbliss Jessica arisa Erika.

Any chance for a reference for Erika? I messaged your inbox.

[Osyri]

Voting with your wallet is the most effective. I won't pay an upcharge if the vibes aren't good at the start of a session, in the rare event that I see an upcharge kgirl.

Erica is worth repeating for the visuals, maybe every other week or so.

I want to vote so badly, I guess I have to wait as a first timer.

[FiatVoluptas]

He posts occasionally every so often then disappears. He lurks more than he posts from the looks of it. Besides being told on the fallacies of his arguments, he apparently sees himself as a savior for these girls. One of his recent posts, he claims to have asked them out on dates that THEY pay for. Going by this logic, if hes so charming and charismatic to woo hoes into this situation, what's he doing on a forum like this about P4 P? Something about this smells funny and it isn't a STD.

I think there is an issue of semantics with this debate, and I also think some people are arguing with each other over completely different points. For one, I think we can all agree that encounters with providers are 100% transactional in that we would not be meeting with and having sex with these women without the exchange of money. Even if you have succeeded in getting OTC sex from a provider, there was still an initial and likely ongoing investment to get to that point (whether it be lavish gifts or many meetings over a period of time). I think we can all agree on that definition of "transactional." However, and perhaps I am wrong, I get the impression that some members here take "transactional" as meaning that providers are some kind of soulless sex robots who are in no way emotionally / physically affected by the idiosyncratic nature of each customer--their looks, hygiene, attitude, preferences, kinks, fucking style, dick size, etc. The mere act of reading reviews, whether here or on TER very clearly and definitively contradicts that perception of providers. The old "YMMV" exists for a reason (as well as blacklisting), and that reason is that providers are human, despite that transactional foundation of their encounters with customers.

I do agree that it is likely that on the whole, most customers are respectful and will respect a provider's boundaries. They complain about boundaries or disappointing service in reviews, and that is fine. That is their right, and they should report, for the benefit of other mongers and providers, as well. Reporting a provider's boundaries or limitations, even if it is in a negative light, will help mongers avoid girls that will disappoint them, and will help providers avoid customers who will either write them a bad review, or at worst, disrespect their boundaries, which, despite the transaction, starts to venture into the realm of rape. Also, I have had provider's tell me about being physically abused by customers. So, while it is the exception, it does happen. Luckily, bookers do a good job of banning them.

About reviews, I think that is where the discussion got taken out of context. As far as I can tell, the OP was not complaining about reviews. He was asking you guys not to railroad fuck a hot newbie. All I have to say about that is if Erica let's you steamroll her cervix, go for it! If she tells you to chill, then chill, and report back so others are in the know about her limitations.

One final thing, at TheAbc. Some guys are totally capable of charming and fucking civies, but go to providers because certain aspects of their personal life rule our civies as an option. Provider's are also capable of being charmed. I have had a couple ATFs buy me meals and small gifts. I am not saying it is because I am prince charming, but rather because I am a long time regular and there is mutual attraction, respect and chemistry between two consenting humans.

[PoopsAndGiggle]

They also have a second website https://www.booker-h.com/shop.

Not sure why the need for a second site but when it first appeared the booker H site would have one or two more girls than the original site. Lately they've been exactly the same. I don't use them that often but they still are good for me when I use them.

Yea I did find that weird. Bonnie was on the second site but not the first one but now she's gone too. I noticed they're probably the only website that actually removes girls when they're off or not available. The only pictures you see are the girls who are currently available. At least that part is transparent.

[TD Leafs]

Saw Berry of CG, SAG, BG and she is a serious MILF, definitely over 40 but her body is totally my type with big juicy natural tits that match the photos and a surprising grade A booty. She lacked a bit in energy, does not like to kiss, but she's a solid fuck and I love her body. BBFSCIPx2. Did not appreciate the clock being ten minutes fast however. Decent English. Said she's taking a break starting tomorrow.

Looks like she's gone?

[LandOfKGirls]

Agreed. Saw CG Shani, and wasn't worth the upcharge. CYA / HYA sure, but not Erica level. And SFK Erica is cheaper. Scarcely repeat with upcharge favorites, but will see a worthy non-upcharge girl almost weekly.

Voting with your wallet is the most effective. I won't pay an upcharge if the vibes aren't good at the start of a session, in the rare event that I see an upcharge kgirl.

Erica is worth repeating for the visuals, maybe every other week or so.

[Tony1628]

Thinking about do a multi-session with my fav kgirl. Any thought or recommendations?

[SsStuntCock]

Reading all these things about Erica, I'm a little hesitant.

What's the worst that can happen? If you see her then decide it's a no-repeat, is that so bad?

[PumpNDump]

You are right about being a rebrand, but which one? Time will time if she shows up as it looks like her pics have been in Vegas agency for the past 2 weeks or so.

Your backup for Erica should be Remi or Bitna.

[Cochese]

I remember people going here back in 19? Or 2020 and no one seems to bring them up anymore. I don't remember hearing good things about them then but they seem to have fell off a cliff in terms of popularity as late. I can't remember the last time anyone posted about this agency.

They also have a second website https://www.booker-h.com/shop.

Not sure why the need for a second site but when it first appeared the booker H site would have one or two more girls than the original site. Lately they've been exactly the same. I don't use them that often but they still are good for me when I use them.

[PumpNDump]

Sfk / kbliss funpad roster.

Sfk Arisa Viki Erika.

Kbliss Jessica Arisa Erika.

For those of you asking about cola, she's not working yet. No eta.

[StopTheMonger]

Bella was less than spectacular, I think a guy here Francesco or something loved her for some reason. Erica might be up my alley in terms of GFE but just about has a train ran into her every time she is working. It was mentioned a few times this year about girls complaining that things were slow. Yeah, slow for them but the free market suggests otherwise with Erica. There's obvious demand and I think Erica being booked fully for days on end since her arrival supports my theory that talent is the problem as we've been saying all this time. She's hitting the perfect blend of price + looks + service (YMMV on the service part) trifecta. The girls / bookers are just getting greedy. I'm only looking at the perspective that matters to me, my own and fellow guys who go. Without trying to sound like a cliche, but I'll always vote with my greenbacks since that's the only thing that matters in this industry. I hope Erica is still around in a few months time.

Agreed. Saw CG Shani, and wasn't worth the upcharge. CYA / HYA sure, but not Erica level. And SFK Erica is cheaper. Scarcely repeat with upcharge favorites, but will see a worthy non-upcharge girl almost weekly.

[TheAbc]

I just traced this chain back to the original thread. Who even is that guy? We're on this website to share information about each provider's quality of service and quality of looks. I think I can honestly fairly say that most mongers on here treat workers well and with respect. And even if it is transactional, it doesn't mean we are dehumanizing sex workers.

But if a provider's looks and / or service is subpar, we are recognizing that the quality of the product (the package offered and NOT the worker themselves) is not to an acceptable standard. This is my money, and I am not going to pay for low quality product if I can help it. And that's what we are all here for.

You CAN perceive services as transactional AND respect sex workers. They are not mutually dependent on one another.

He posts occasionally every so often then disappears. He lurks more than he posts from the looks of it. Besides being told on the fallacies of his arguments, he apparently sees himself as a savior for these girls. One of his recent posts, he claims to have asked them out on dates that THEY pay for. Going by this logic, if hes so charming and charismatic to woo hoes into this situation, what's he doing on a forum like this about P4 P? Something about this smells funny and it isn't a STD.