Korean Agency BB

[BuildingGuy]

Anyone here been with Allie? How old is she actually and her body type?

"She looks exactly like this photo plus a few years: https://myalbum.com/album/Yb77hNMuHTjK . See is mid-40's. Her reviews are generally accurate. I am a fan because her personality is so pleasant. ".

[TD Leafs]

No way. I was told they no longer do duos.

Damnnn.

[LoveAsianGirls]

Much has been said and written about Remi in WLA. I have an eye for shapes and figures so when I.
came across a pic that typifies her body shape almost exactly and decided to share it.

This is her body shape but NOT her face. I am curious to see who agrees with me and who doesn't.

Here's the link to put in your browser. https://qph.cf2.quoracdn.net/main-qi...b3b54340b43-lq.

Yep. Very good representation of Remi's body!

[TD Leafs]

I've seen all the high profile BBFS girls at all the various kgirl agencies for around 10 years. I am convinced there has never been even one pic that was real. Not one. And I do have a unique job and skill set that makes me good at deducing this. Point being, never rely on pics, rely on reviews from trusted people.

Not true at all. Been many who used their real photos (although P.S.'ed).

[BuddhaHead]

...I do, however, agree with your last point. The likelihood of bookers posting real pictures nowadays is much lower than before so relying on fellow mongers for info is more prudent, if it is readily available.

Whether it's 100%, 99%, or 75%, is irrelevant since one has to assume they are fake if there is no prior information to the contrary. Even if there are prior reviews, most hobbyists who see someone in person cannot tell for certain whether the pictures are fake (not the same person), real but altered, or real but from several years ago. Hobbyists' physical descriptions are very unreliable and are open to interpretation based on the words used and their own biases about looks ("not my type" That's why we get vague descriptions on body type and age, and that pics are "representative" or "90% accurate". All of these descriptions are unreliable and near meaningless. One has to see in-person in order to decide for themselves about their looks, regardless of whether the pics are "real".

[DatStuddd]

Anyone here been with Allie? How old is she actually and her body type?

[IAmGib1]

Something's not right here. I've tried unsuccessfully to book girls with him a few times and every time he has simply suggested I book someone else. Always very cordial. The response you got was not normal.

That is the real BG answering you now. He must have been on vacation before.

[IAmGib1]

Speaking in superlatives and making blanket statements, with few exceptions, is usually a bad idea. It comes across too grandiose, holier than thou, and with a touch of hubris, diluting the persuasiveness of the point you're trying to make and diminishing the credibility you may have had. Prime example is Trump. Politics aside, the superlative vocabulary that he is wont to use and frequently satirized for perfectly showcases why you don't want to employ such an approach.

In addition, just providing one valid example against your premise shatters any claims you make and reflects poorly on your credibility. One such example is Megan of M's stable. She's wildly proud of her unique proportions among Korean females which plays a huge factor in why she, to the best of my knowledge, uses her real pictures. At one point, there was a set taken at her incall if you pay attention to the furniture and background. Moreover, she even had videos of herself during her stint as Hanna in Philly.

I do, however, agree with your last point. The likelihood of bookers posting real pictures nowadays is much lower than before so relying on fellow mongers for info is more prudent, if it is readily available.

Is Megan back?

[IAmGib1]

Much has been said and written about Remi in WLA. I have an eye for shapes and figures so when I.
came across a pic that typifies her body shape almost exactly and decided to share it.

This is her body shape but NOT her face. I am curious to see who agrees with me and who doesn't.

Here's the link to put in your browser. https://qph.cf2.quoracdn.net/main-qi...b3b54340b43-lq.

[MrGeorge]

I am responding to your post because you were articulate and made a case. I will agree that I used superlatives to make a point. I will get more specific: 90% of Kgirl pics have been found elsewhere online as Korean models. Another 9% come from who-knows-where. I'll allow 1% that could be real but highly photoshopped. So, still invalid in any practical sense. I have seen Megan. Hell, she worked literally across the street from me. Her pics were not representative of what I saw. Still sexy, no complaints, other than she demanded a condom which was odd and unfortunate. Want to see real pics? Here ya go:

https://goodgirls.catalog.to/s/goodgirls/goodgirls/cmh

I stand by my assertion.

Speaking in superlatives and making blanket statements, with few exceptions, is usually a bad idea. It comes across too grandiose, holier than thou, and with a touch of hubris, diluting the persuasiveness of the point you're trying to make and diminishing the credibility you may have had. Prime example is Trump. Politics aside, the superlative vocabulary that he is wont to use and frequently satirized for perfectly showcases why you don't want to employ such an approach.

In addition, just providing one valid example against your premise shatters any claims you make and reflects poorly on your credibility. One such example is Megan of M's stable. She's wildly proud of her unique proportions among Korean females which plays a huge factor in why she, to the best of my knowledge, uses her real pictures. At one point, there was a set taken at her incall if you pay attention to the furniture and background. Moreover, she even had videos of herself during her stint as Hanna in Philly.

I do, however, agree with your last point. The likelihood of bookers posting real pictures nowadays is much lower than before so relying on fellow mongers for info is more prudent, if it is readily available.

[RawrHard]

This isn't rocket science bros, it's really easy to put two and two together.

Assuming anyone follows this close enough to even know who Daeun or Haru are.

I've seen all the high profile BBFS girls at all the various kgirl agencies for around 10 years. I am convinced there has never been even one pic that was real. Not one. And I do have a unique job and skill set that makes me good at deducing this. Point being, never rely on pics, rely on reviews from trusted people.

There have been plenty of real pics LOL, even if they've been photoshopped to accentuate certain body parts. Case in point Vixen's photos (from Pepsi org) have always been real, perhaps a younger her.

[Bastard Chorum]

Any recommendations for good kissers in OC? Looking to book 1 hr and make out for 15-20 mins at least and preferably not shy.

Just some recommendations in no particular order (you'll need to check availability as some are sporadic):

Nicole with SAG.

Cari or EJ with HiddenMango (HX).

White with Kdolls OC.

Flynn with StunningAsians (HX).

[Bastard Chorum]

I've seen all the high profile BBFS girls at all the various kgirl agencies for around 10 years. I am convinced there has never been even one pic that was real. Not one. And I do have a unique job and skill set that makes me good at deducing this. Point being, never rely on pics, rely on reviews from trusted people.

Speaking in superlatives and making blanket statements, with few exceptions, is usually a bad idea. It comes across too grandiose, holier than thou, and with a touch of hubris, diluting the persuasiveness of the point you're trying to make and diminishing the credibility you may have had. Prime example is Trump. Politics aside, the superlative vocabulary that he is wont to use and frequently satirized for perfectly showcases why you don't want to employ such an approach.

In addition, just providing one valid example against your premise shatters any claims you make and reflects poorly on your credibility. One such example is Megan of M's stable. She's wildly proud of her unique proportions among Korean females which plays a huge factor in why she, to the best of my knowledge, uses her real pictures. At one point, there was a set taken at her incall if you pay attention to the furniture and background. Moreover, she even had videos of herself during her stint as Hanna in Philly.

I do, however, agree with your last point. The likelihood of bookers posting real pictures nowadays is much lower than before so relying on fellow mongers for info is more prudent, if it is readily available.

[BobLove]

Any recommendations for good kissers in OC? Looking to book 1 hr and make out for 15-20 mins at least and preferably not shy.

I recommend Sonay.

[Vulcan1009]

I was just browsing through and saw ANN from M pop up on CGLA with stats of DD cup which is NO WHERE CLOSE.

More like saggy small C or big B. Thing got so bad that multiple booker booking same girl with all different stats and names.

Sometime I just feel tired to do all that research and at the end just went back to the usual.

Looking at most of recent post from yall gents, many were rebrands, fake or heavily photoshopped.

The good old days of real photos are gone, I don't mind glammed up photoshop like Nicole, Allie or Mini or Rami, but some just a complete different person.

I think we should start a list of who use real photo BUT glammed up, many of us has been fooled by booker and took that grenade hard.

I will start here just a few:

1. Allie.

2, Stacy.

3, Nicole.

4, Mini.

5, Remi.

6, Ann.

7, Vicki.

Many others I have seen before as for now are long gone. Moli, bobo, cona, cami, lyn, rebecca.

Sharing is caring so we don't all fall into their trap.