Thread: Korean Agency BB
+
Add Report
Results 19,936 to 19,950 of 49709
-
07-09-22 01:13 #29774Senior Member

Posts: 1834I'm merely arguing that the kgirl model is just like any other business bowing down to the pressure of inflation. Based on that premise, the rates we're seeing today falls in line with an inflation adjusted price point. Regardless of what you think about the price point, I'm just offering an explanation that's both plausible and reasonable.
Originally Posted by BuddhaHead
[View Original Post]
Attributing price increases to only supply / demand dynamics oversimplifies and takes a lot of nuance away IMO. By that logic, the few years following FOSTA / SESTA and preceding COVID should have seen a massive surge in price as kgirl numbers dwindled and tapered off. Only when COVID was in full force and inflation started to rise dramatically, did we see increases across all agencies. Don't get me wrong, supply / demand plays a huge part but inflation has a sizeable role too.
I'll make the case that inflation is built into the rates already. CPI, the government's measure of inflation as experienced by consumers, comprises of many market baskets. Three of which is directly applicable our situation: Shelter, Housing Supplies, and Transportation (specifically the Motor Fuel subset). I'm not sure if you've ever had the unfortunate and very awkward experience of being at an incall when they are restocking. For one thing, it's unexpected. Secondly, it's jarring how the ajummas are rather nonchalant about the whole thing. I was pretty much ignored while they were hauling up and unloading Kirkland body wash, water bottles, boxes of Okamotos, and other toiletries from a mini-van. I share this as it relates to the Housing Supplies market basket portion of the CPI. All three baskets have been hit hard during COVID. So when property management comes back when your incall lease ends with a take or leave it 10% or more increase in rent, all manner of housing supplies cost more, and fuel prices are at an all time high, the increase in overhead has to go somewhere. The bosses could be feeling charitable and take less of the profit and absorb the cost but that is incredibly unlikely. So the portion the house takes to cover these expenses increase. Consequently, the rate as a whole increases. I would imagine even durable goods (beds, mattress, mirrors, towels, etc.) would be factored in.
Now these are just observations and musings of a random monger and may or may not accurately reflect what is really is happening. I'm just connecting the dots of what I see of the scene, my buying experiences, and publicly available data points about the current economy. This could be very much be utterly useless and worth jack shit to some but I hope that others can appreciate a better understanding of or at least an approximation of the what may be happening behind the scene. Personally, I find it satisfying when I can piece together a puzzle that makes sense to me even if I'm completely wrong about it. Take of it what you will.
-
07-09-22 00:32 #29773Senior Member

Posts: 312Bay Area guys always were tough on price increases. $200 was the norm for very long time there. Several attempts to $250 were unsuccessful as guys were not kind to ones who tried to increase prices. Meanwhile a good number of LA guys were bragging about tips to girls as they felt spending more was cool and noble.
Originally Posted by SsStuntCock
[View Original Post]
-
07-08-22 23:29 #29772Senior Member

Posts: 1834It's interesting that they separate it into iphone and android users. Still, I'm impressed that Sophia was able to handle such a large roster while providing prompt back and forth communication. Hopefully, the new PO (if it is someone else), maintains the same standard.
Originally Posted by SsStuntCock
[View Original Post]
-
07-08-22 15:51 #29771Senior Member

Posts: 2409Looks like CG finally added another PO x0211. Either that or it's still just the one but double-fisting like it was last call for happy hour.
-
07-08-22 15:17 #29770

Posts: 13Pepsi is Dragon Chinese year. So she will be born 1964 not 1966. I don't think her is 58.1976 seem more right.
Originally Posted by NintyNine
[View Original Post]
-
07-08-22 13:29 #29769Senior Member

Posts: 111Friday July 8th. SFK, Kbliss
SFK- https://sexyfunkgirls.escortbook.com/models.
Dana, Tiana, Lucy, and Lina.
Kbliss- https://kbliss.net.
Angel, Tiana, Lucy, Jessica.
-
07-08-22 11:56 #29768Senior Member

Posts: 113What kind of inflation?
My morning brain read this as cip inflation LOL.
Originally Posted by BuddhaHead
[View Original Post]
-
07-08-22 06:23 #29767Senior Member

Posts: 778Price increases are due mainly to supply / demand, not cpi inflation. When there is an oligopoly like the Kgirl business, and there's a growing demand and limited supply for these type of services, they can raise their prices to whatever the market will bear. You stated this yourself in your next post that some dropped their price because of reduced demand.
Originally Posted by BastardChorum
[View Original Post]
-
07-08-22 05:01 #29766Senior Member

Posts: 98CG Miso
Just google the archive, and Ctrl+F her. She's been extensively reviewed here. But I did see her recently; not good. Dyed blonde hair, same length with two tacky chest tattoos. Service was not as good, and she pinned me in Mish saying it was too painful. Think I might be done with her.
Originally Posted by DashingD
[View Original Post]
-
07-08-22 01:02 #29765Senior Member

Posts: 2409Don't sell yourself short my guy. If you could afford to see a girl with 5 glowing reviews, you could afford to see her with no reviews.
Originally Posted by Vulcan1009
[View Original Post]
But don't listen to me, I'm just reminiscing on the days when dudes would swordfight to TOFTT in M's stable.
-
07-08-22 00:33 #29764Senior Member

Posts: 231Bookers know to rebrand. It's not the girls. They know we fall for new listings every 3 weeks and it prevents us from keeping information and tabs on the ones that may not be a good value.
Originally Posted by BonerAppetitty
[View Original Post]
-
07-08-22 00:15 #29763Senior Member

Posts: 1364Yuri at M
Has anyone seen Yuri Yet?
Originally Posted by Member#2210
[View Original Post]
I can not afford to TOFT because the funds are limited, she seems to have a very generic stats like 5' ish, 100 lbs ish and C ish. Way too typical.
But her pictures does look cute but also look professionally shopped.
Please share your review, thanks.
-
07-07-22 23:14 #29762Senior Member

Posts: 230Going to wait until she allows three shots, have other girls to visit in the meantime.
Originally Posted by CreamFire
[View Original Post]
-
07-07-22 23:09 #29761Senior Member

Posts: 3449I think the boss reuses Jackpot's pics. I notice some girls using other girl pics before. I am just waiting for 7/9 to put SAG IB and SAG Lisa2 in rebrand thread. I believe they will offer Greek for extra.
Originally Posted by RocketManP
[View Original Post]
-
07-07-22 23:00 #29760Senior Member

Posts: 3449LA attracts a lot of "rebrand" types. You think a girl is leaving when they may just rebrand or change org. I think the problem is they are not hot enough or not good enough as pleaser. The OGs love pleaser and will write tons of reviews for them. Some younger inexperienced girls also may not be able to handle LA load. Some were upset cause I made them too busy.
There are girls worth seeing but if nobody write good reviews for them then how would others know to try them? There were many more reviews in the old days.
Originally Posted by SsStuntCock
[View Original Post]












Reply With Quote












