Thread: Korean Agency BB
+
Add Report
Results 20,581 to 20,595 of 49708
-
06-03-22 20:00 #29128Banned Member

Posts: 1333Anzo from Booker M
https://myalbum.com/album/Yb77hNMuHTjK
I would say that face is 4 or 5, body is 6 or 7 (not fat or skinny) as she is too damn short. Also service and endurance is lacking as she is not magnum friendly. She is submissive and non-engaging. I would not repeat but I will say her strong points are her tits and tits and tits.
I forgot the session the moment that I walked out of the apartment.
Ya. It was that boring.
-
06-03-22 19:56 #29127Banned Member

Posts: 1333Oh boy. We finally getting honest opinion on Stacey and Stella.
Originally Posted by KingSenpai
[View Original Post]
Regarding Stella: I thought Stella was a little pervert but I did not find anything attractive about her; as you said, her body is an average with baby fat; she is too short and her squished face and pig tail ain't sexy in my book.
Regarding Stacy: You wrote: "Her face is a 3, but her gym-toned body is a banging 8-9. " I concur, her face is 3 or 4 but her body is seriously 9 and she has really outstanding skills whereas Stella lacks both.
On Mini: Don't waste your effort on Mini. I liked her first time I saw her and I did not care second time that I saw her.
Save your money Anzo from "M". I might have got switch and bait but I did fuck a lazy dwarf this AM. Face is 4 or 5; body and face is definitely better than Stella but she is reserved and not magnum friendly at all.
-
06-03-22 16:12 #29126Regular Member

Posts: 19Echo most of the comments here, definitely not slim and chest is pretty small. But my experience was a bit more positive where she kept wanting to go the entire time, very playful and loads of energy. I did go really early in the day so that might have helped with her enthusiasm.
Sounds very much YMMV, but I would repeat.
Originally Posted by Vulcan1009
[View Original Post]
-
06-03-22 14:50 #29125Regular Member

Posts: 12Great time with SAG yura
Don't have much exp with k agencies. Only booked once in the past (2021) and today was my second.
Initially wanted either Jenny or sua but booker said they aren't available till noontime- so was suggested I tried Yura.
Glad I did that.
Upon knocking, the door slowly opened as I crept inside. There I see "Yura" in a lingerie and she gives me a warm hug along with DFK. Now we know the girls on the websites aren't actually what you get, it's someone that'll closely resemble them. And it was the same case here. However, she was a lot better as advertised. Shorter, way more petite with a flat stomach, and chest at least a cup fuller.
We go to the room and she asks if I want to shower with her, I say absolutely. We enter the shower as she lathers me up and starts kissing me all over. Proceeds to give me a BBBJ and I'm in heaven. Tells me to turn around so she can wash my backside LOL and reaches around to play with my junior and boys.
We then head to the bed fully dry and action begins. Will keep it short. She did everything I wanted and she was probably down to go bareback but I insisted we use a condom. After we finished I still had time, so she gave me a great massage and we just chatted, joked around, and she would kiss me at random times. My experience was not rushed and it actually felt like she was my gf for one hour LOL.
She was was great And an obvious repeat IMO. Enjoy her while you can.
If anyone has intel on Jenny, miso, or maise that'll be great.
-
06-03-22 13:42 #29124Senior Member

Posts: 130Dodged
Sorry bro. Gone are the days that you can sample a girl for 200 bucks half hour. I'm glad I went to see my ATF and canceled my appointment with her.
Originally Posted by Vulcan1009
[View Original Post]
-
06-03-22 12:54 #29123Regular Member

Posts: 10Any comment for this?
Do you believe this guy? My experience with Stella (Sydney) was great. Petite small girl with baby face. Her service was also good. Her pics are accurate and recent. A lot better than 320 old girls in West L. A. I asked the PO about this and she said this is Stxxx. And she said he is one of the guys blocked from most orgs in LA and OC. Because of "no show", "walk out" and stalking. The PO believes he put this because she did not let him meet Stella.
Originally Posted by Vulcan1009
[View Original Post]
Well guys, what do you think?
-
06-03-22 12:33 #29122Senior Member

Posts: 778You should have read my review before seeing her.
Originally Posted by Vulcan1009
[View Original Post]
-
06-03-22 11:52 #29121Senior Member

Posts: 322I'm not generally a fan of M's stable. How does Candy rate against other current HYAs?
Originally Posted by BonerAppetitty
[View Original Post]
-
06-03-22 11:50 #29120Regular Member

Posts: 10I have been there twice recently. One in the morning and one in the evening. PO gave me a clear instruction.
Originally Posted by GhstFace
[View Original Post]
No one asked me in the morning. And evening guy asked me where to go and told him exactly what PO said about the unit.
Nice and easy.
-
06-03-22 11:50 #29119Senior Member

Posts: 322Yes, positively brilliant work!
Originally Posted by SsStuntCock
[View Original Post]
I like the pleasant surprise, when I see a rebrand of a past favorite. The flip side is stepping inside and seeing a girl I didn't enjoy and don't want to see again. I'd like to avoid the 2nd scenario.
-
06-03-22 10:49 #29118Senior Member

Posts: 2409The Kgirls Rebrands Thread
Good shit BA for creating what's clearly been needed for some time now.
Originally Posted by BonerAppetitty
[View Original Post]
http://www.usasexguide.nl/forum/show...girls-Rebrands
-
06-03-22 09:48 #29117Senior Member

Posts: 76I forget the website name. But I am pretty sure he is still lurking on these boards with another identity.
Originally Posted by TempletonRat
[View Original Post]
-
06-03-22 05:15 #29116Senior Member

Posts: 451Candy at M
Tried Candy in WLA today. Young, very cute, and somewhat friendly. Very nice set of MM C-cup with small pink nips. Service is lacking and not as good as Stacy, Eunji, or the other girls. Kissing is between LFK and DFK, and bbbj is just meh. Asked me to cum quickly which is a cardinal sin in my book. Doesn't seem to want to accomodate a 2nd shot. Candy is maybe good for one session and no repeat for me.
Originally Posted by BonerAppetitty
[View Original Post]
-
06-03-22 01:09 #29115Senior Member

Posts: 82You don't see it as an issue as you're not on their end trying to set up appointments and having several numbers texting you at the same time, only to have your time wasted because some mongers weren't patient enough to wait for a reply back. If you don't like how long one is taking to reply back? Then don't bother that PO for availability times and stick to another one for inquiring and booking and wait, instead of mass texting all of them and waiting to see who replies first. I'm only relaying a message that I received from several POs and telling others to heed warning if they don't want to be blocked and yes its happening already.
Originally Posted by HobbyRusty
[View Original Post]
-
06-03-22 00:17 #29114Senior Member

Posts: 308Ten Minute Rule
I think it is reasonable to expect a response within ten minutes. Fifteen at the outside. Yes, they are probably busy, and yes, a text can get lost in the mix, but, "time keeps on slippin', slippin', slippin' into the future"! It's nothing to get bent out of shape about, but mongers got to monger!
Early on, sometimes Pepsi Palace booker wouldn't respond until the next day when I was trying to pre-book. I would just run down my list until I hooked up. Other times I booked with MissX the next day. One time I texted about who was at the "other" location, not Norton, because I didn't want to go in that building anymore, but I never got a response.
Originally Posted by FillHerPussyUp
[View Original Post]













Reply With Quote












