|
This blog is moderated by Admin
-
Regular Member
 Posts: 10
Any comment for this?
 Originally Posted by Vulcan1009
[View Original Post]
Ok, once again I got fooled by mongers who hyped her up as young, slim and decent looking but fun. NOT!!
This is like the 2nd or 3rd time since I see a hyped girl and wasn't all that, instead, far from it. YMMV but wayyyyyy YMMV.
She is short yes, but no where close to spinner, baby fat I say.
You know her picture look like those hour glass coke bottle but when you see her, you get the aluminum generic soda can.
She remind me of Nana, smaller and stubby. Here is a good comparison, Erika big bear stubby, Nana medium stubby, then Sydney small stubby.
And tits, where is it? Not sure who said nice perky B, its more like a pancake with a raisin, nothing to grab on or to suck on.
Overall look was disappointed, there are lot more better choice for 320.
Service wise, she was playful at 1st but pretty much it, got tired easily and 40 min in, ask me to cum. I paid an hour sister!!
Face. Like I said, everything squished from her picture, so No, will not repeat.
Let's be honest, I don't even want to rate her, just what I see in reality vs picture was way far apart. Face and tits. Not to mention service. Sigh .
Do you believe this guy? My experience with Stella (Sydney) was great. Petite small girl with baby face. Her service was also good. Her pics are accurate and recent. A lot better than 320 old girls in West L. A. I asked the PO about this and she said this is Stxxx. And she said he is one of the guys blocked from most orgs in LA and OC. Because of "no show", "walk out" and stalking. The PO believes he put this because she did not let him meet Stella.
Well guys, what do you think?
-
Senior Member
 Posts: 769
 Originally Posted by Vulcan1009
[View Original Post]
Ok, once again I got fooled by mongers who hyped her up as young, slim and decent looking but fun. NOT!!
This is like the 2nd or 3rd time since I see a hyped girl and wasn't all that, instead, far from it. YMMV but wayyyyyy YMMV.
She is short yes, but no where close to spinner, baby fat I say.
You know her picture look like those hour glass coke bottle but when you see her, you get the aluminum generic soda can.
She remind me of Nana, smaller and stubby. Here is a good comparison, Erika big bear stubby, Nana medium stubby, then Sydney small stubby.
And tits, where is it? Not sure who said nice perky B, its more like a pancake with a raisin, nothing to grab on or to suck on.
Overall look was disappointed, there are lot more better choice for 320.
Service wise, she was playful at 1st but pretty much it, got tired easily and 40 min in, ask me to cum. I paid an hour sister!!.
You should have read my review before seeing her.
-
Senior Member
 Posts: 322
 Originally Posted by BonerAppetitty
[View Original Post]
I think Candy is the hottest and youngest M girls currently.
I'm not generally a fan of M's stable. How does Candy rate against other current HYAs?
-
Regular Member
 Posts: 10
 Originally Posted by GhstFace
[View Original Post]
Seems like you never been to her apartment based on your reply. The instructions were crystal clear. Only problem was the security was there next to the elevator. The dude asked me who was I here to see as soon as I walked in.
I have been there twice recently. One in the morning and one in the evening. PO gave me a clear instruction.
No one asked me in the morning. And evening guy asked me where to go and told him exactly what PO said about the unit.
Nice and easy.
-
Senior Member
 Posts: 322
Yes, positively brilliant work!
I like the pleasant surprise, when I see a rebrand of a past favorite. The flip side is stepping inside and seeing a girl I didn't enjoy and don't want to see again. I'd like to avoid the 2nd scenario.
-
Senior Member
 Posts: 2367
The Kgirls Rebrands Thread
 Originally Posted by BonerAppetitty
[View Original Post]
M Jelina was M Porsche. Yeji was definitely in the Bay but can't remember her other names. I think Candy is the hottest and youngest M girls currently.
Good shit BA for creating what's clearly been needed for some time now.
http://www.usasexguide.nl/forum/show...girls-Rebrands
-
Senior Member
 Posts: 76
 Originally Posted by TempletonRat
[View Original Post]
Curious if I made this list. Is there a way to see the list, maybe on the Wayback Machine or something?
I forget the website name. But I am pretty sure he is still lurking on these boards with another identity.
-
Senior Member
 Posts: 451
Candy at M
 Originally Posted by BonerAppetitty
[View Original Post]
M Jelina was M Porsche. Yeji was definitely in the Bay but can't remember her other names. I think Candy is the hottest and youngest M girls currently.
Tried Candy in WLA today. Young, very cute, and somewhat friendly. Very nice set of MM C-cup with small pink nips. Service is lacking and not as good as Stacy, Eunji, or the other girls. Kissing is between LFK and DFK, and bbbj is just meh. Asked me to cum quickly which is a cardinal sin in my book. Doesn't seem to want to accomodate a 2nd shot. Candy is maybe good for one session and no repeat for me.
-
Senior Member
 Posts: 82
You don't see it as an issue as you're not on their end trying to set up appointments and having several numbers texting you at the same time, only to have your time wasted because some mongers weren't patient enough to wait for a reply back. If you don't like how long one is taking to reply back? Then don't bother that PO for availability times and stick to another one for inquiring and booking and wait, instead of mass texting all of them and waiting to see who replies first. I'm only relaying a message that I received from several POs and telling others to heed warning if they don't want to be blocked and yes its happening already.
 Originally Posted by HobbyRusty
[View Original Post]
While I don't do this I don't see the issue. If the booker doesn't want to lose the appointment then they need to respond quicker and have better customer service. Since most girls can be booked by multiple bookers they are less relevant. I understand it's not completely in their control but our time is just a precious as theirs. Mongers should also accept the consequences if it upsets the bookers.
-
Senior Member
 Posts: 308
Ten Minute Rule
I think it is reasonable to expect a response within ten minutes. Fifteen at the outside. Yes, they are probably busy, and yes, a text can get lost in the mix, but, "time keeps on slippin', slippin', slippin' into the future"! It's nothing to get bent out of shape about, but mongers got to monger!
Early on, sometimes Pepsi Palace booker wouldn't respond until the next day when I was trying to pre-book. I would just run down my list until I hooked up. Other times I booked with MissX the next day. One time I texted about who was at the "other" location, not Norton, because I didn't want to go in that building anymore, but I never got a response.
 Originally Posted by FillHerPussyUp
[View Original Post]
When making your appointments or inquiring about a girl, please give POs time to respond as they might be setting up appointments or getting a client to their pre-scheduled booking or doing something in their personal life that's taking up their time, they're all independent from each other and have different response times but just be patient, they all want to get paid just like you want to get laid. Also, stick to using one PO when inquiring about availability times and following through with the appointment after inquiring about availability. It's come to my attention from several POs, yes several, that customers are routinely asking all of them, at that same time, for available times for a girl they intend to see (since multiple POs book the same girl), but won't follow through after receiving a response since they will use the PO that responded first to set up their booking, this is very tacky behavior that will only lead to tanking your reputation amongst POs. Let's not forget they communicate with each other and they share everything amongst each other, from your good behavior to your antics. Make life easier for the people that are trying to hook YOU up, not harder.
-
Senior Member
 Posts: 308
Who?
Sincerely interested!
 Originally Posted by Vulcan1009
[View Original Post]
Overall look was disappointed, there are lot more better choice for 320
-
Senior Member
 Posts: 126
 Originally Posted by FillHerPussyUp
[View Original Post]
When making your appointments or inquiring about a girl, please give POs time to respond as they might be setting up appointments or getting a client to their pre-scheduled booking or doing something in their personal life that's taking up their time, they're all independent from each other and have different response times but just be patient, they all want to get paid just like you want to get laid. Also, stick to using one PO when inquiring about availability times and following through with the appointment after inquiring about availability. It's come to my attention from several POs, yes several, that customers are routinely asking all of them, at that same time, for available times for a girl they intend to see (since multiple POs book the same girl), but won't follow through after receiving a response since they will use the PO that responded first to set up their booking, this is very tacky behavior that will only lead to tanking your reputation amongst POs. Let's not forget they communicate with each other and they share everything amongst each other, from your good behavior to your antics. Make life easier for the people that are trying to hook YOU up, not harder.
While I don't do this I don't see the issue. If the booker doesn't want to lose the appointment then they need to respond quicker and have better customer service. Since most girls can be booked by multiple bookers they are less relevant. I understand it's not completely in their control but our time is just a precious as theirs. Mongers should also accept the consequences if it upsets the bookers.
-
Senior Member
 Posts: 1331
Stella / Sydney from KGLA
Ok, once again I got fooled by mongers who hyped her up as young, slim and decent looking but fun. NOT!!
This is like the 2nd or 3rd time since I see a hyped girl and wasn't all that, instead, far from it. YMMV but wayyyyyy YMMV.
She is short yes, but no where close to spinner, baby fat I say.
You know her picture look like those hour glass coke bottle but when you see her, you get the aluminum generic soda can.
She remind me of Nana, smaller and stubby. Here is a good comparison, Erika big bear stubby, Nana medium stubby, then Sydney small stubby.
And tits, where is it? Not sure who said nice perky B, its more like a pancake with a raisin, nothing to grab on or to suck on.
Overall look was disappointed, there are lot more better choice for 320.
Service wise, she was playful at 1st but pretty much it, got tired easily and 40 min in, ask me to cum. I paid an hour sister!!
Face. Like I said, everything squished from her picture, so No, will not repeat.
Let's be honest, I don't even want to rate her, just what I see in reality vs picture was way far apart. Face and tits. Not to mention service. Sigh .
-
Regular Member
 Posts: 18
 Originally Posted by HSD69
[View Original Post]
If you follow clear instructions from PO, at no point should you be interacting with the front desk. Now you went ahead and put that place on alert. Are you new to this or something? To everyone else, this is a clear example of something you not to do when trying to get to your appt. SMH.
Seems like you never been to her apartment based on your reply. The instructions were crystal clear. Only problem was the security was there next to the elevator. The dude asked me who was I here to see as soon as I walked in.
-
Banned Member
 Posts: 466
 Originally Posted by AkaLegend
[View Original Post]
Not too long ago, some monger put up a website with all the mongers name and phone numbers. I was surprised to see my number in it but thankfully back then we never had to give out any sensitive information and I used a burner phone number.
I guess either he was one or he happened to be close to one of the booker and one day just decided to blackmail every body.
The website was called, behind the peep hole or something like that. It was a pretty interesting site I got to admit. Anyone remember that fiasco?
I think you should think twice before giving out anything with your real identity because there are bad actors in all corners of the planet.
Curious if I made this list. Is there a way to see the list, maybe on the Wayback Machine or something?
Posting Limitations
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
|
|