"Sugar Babies" and "Arrangements"

**TooHotForYou** · 05-21-22 12:28

Energizerkitty will see each guy for a 100 for a party. Anything goes. She is in a bad situation right now and needs help. She did not mean to be a hustler with some of you guys as she's in a jam. If we're going to do this has to be tomorrow at some time. Will be checking my DMs.

**JoyDrop** · 05-21-22 10:21

Originally Posted by Ngasub20 [View Original Post]

Not a scammer at all. She's just *extremely* direct about what she wants, and what she'll put up with. Sexually, she's unique. 100% submissive, but absolutely requires and demands physical satisfaction, repeatedly. Lower volume, absolutely insatiable drive, but, if you don't know what you're doing (for real), she'll get bored quick and move on. If you're a one pump hump, and can't go a few rounds, you won't get far with her.

I can co-sign this. She's very real and has a GREAT body. I talked to her for quite a while and got to know her a little bit a year or two ago, but never smashed. I'm not sure I can agree with the "lower volume" part though, as the main reason I didn't ever hit it was because it was pretty clear that she was taking a lot of dicks. At one time she was pretty savvy about using her snapchat to bring in the business, constantly trolling for dates. She may not be as high volume as a typical backpage / LC girl, but she's not a typical sugarbaby either. She's more of a selective / low volume UTR. It's always a fine line on how we classify these girls, but she's definitely not a sugarbaby in the traditional sense.

That's not a knock on her, she was nice enough and sincere, and like I said, has a bangin' body. As mentioned she is very direct and she makes it clear she wants hers. I've heard she's a pretty good time (and she's been reviewed on here before). If you're looking for a UTR, you could do a lot worse. For my part, when I am on SA I am looking for a traditional sugarbaby that is going to be exclusive to me, so she wasn't a good match for my needs.

**NewAnonymousName** · 05-21-22 09:43

Originally Posted by GoneForGood97 [View Original Post]

If she wants to talk on Whatsapp.
If she has more than 1 or 2 photos but they all look like exotic environments without either recognizable landmarks (for Atlanta based girls) or at least the same basic environment (i.e. outdoor pics with no pine trees or only palm/tropical/snow)
Otherwise, everything you have is basically my list. This probably goes along with "no deposits" but also anytime they want me to buy content before meeting is a big fat no. I smashed one girl who did O*lyFans but she never asked me to buy content, just let me know she made it. Was one of my ATF but she ghosted after our initial date.

Good point about WhatsApp. I've noticed scammers often want to move the conversation there right away. But why? It's a legitimate mainstream app as far as I know. Why do scammers prefer WhatsApp to just texting over a google voice number, which would be equally anonymous for the foreign based scammers? Is there a security flaw in WhatsApp that I'm not aware of?

**GoneForGood97** · 05-20-22 23:58

Originally Posted by 2me4Looking2 [View Original Post]

I've asked this before a few years ago and am curious what everyone sees as red flags that a profile is fake? I know there are obvious ones like brand new with one picture and very little description or really poor grammar or clearly ripped off photos or any mention of strictly online or even a mention of cashapp. What are some of your less obvious red flags that you have found to almost always indicate a profile is fake?

Here are a few of mine.

Refers to college as going to University.

Won't say what part of Atlanta they are in or says Downtown (I know people do live downtown, but that seems to be the standard response so they don't have to research neighborhoods).

Doesn't want to text if I use Google voice and says I have to use a real phone. Some even say I have to have an iPhone.

Wants to use email or Google Hangouts.

Tells me what they will do for their verification pic and won't let me choose.

I have always ignored any profile that shows a recent location other than US but today I had someone I had spoken to a few years ago and based on pics and our conversations seemed very real, but now shows their recent location as Chile. Maybe that's a VPN?

So what ya got to add to this list?

If she wants to talk on Whatsapp.
If she has more than 1 or 2 photos but they all look like exotic environments without either recognizable landmarks (for Atlanta based girls) or at least the same basic environment (i.e. outdoor pics with no pine trees or only palm/tropical/snow)
Otherwise, everything you have is basically my list. This probably goes along with "no deposits" but also anytime they want me to buy content before meeting is a big fat no. I smashed one girl who did O*lyFans but she never asked me to buy content, just let me know she made it. Was one of my ATF but she ghosted after our initial date.

**GoneForGood97** · 05-20-22 23:52

Originally Posted by LGSeeking [View Original Post]

Having a convo with this girl. Any reports for you experts?

https://members.seeking.com/member/0...d-e6beff78f4d1

I haven't spoken with her but nothing on her profile raises my red flags. She'll probably have a little GPS but otherwise looks fun. Let us know how it goes and what the $ expectation is.

**Ngasub20** · 05-20-22 21:58

Originally Posted by WoodstockShane [View Original Post]

She was strange. She wanted to meet at a hotel right out of the gate, which is a red flag. I do believe she's either just a scammer, or possibly a reformed scammer trying to get back into the game. I'd pass, but if she's giving you some good vibes, go for it. Just remember, No deposits!

Stay Frosty Dude.

Not a scammer at all. She's just *extremely* direct about what she wants, and what she'll put up with. Sexually, she's unique. 100% submissive, but absolutely requires and demands physical satisfaction, repeatedly. Lower volume, absolutely insatiable drive, but, if you don't know what you're doing (for real), she'll get bored quick and move on. If you're a one pump hump, and can't go a few rounds, you won't get far with her.

**TooHotForYou** · 05-20-22 19:52

Originally Posted by TooHotForYou [View Original Post]

200 per guy. Anything goes.

She'll see guys for a party for 150 per guy. Trying to do this weekend in Dunwoody. Anything goes. If you are down dm me your number.

**WoodstockShane** · 05-20-22 19:41

Originally Posted by LGSeeking [View Original Post]

Having a convo with this girl. Any reports for you experts?

https://members.seeking.com/member/0...d-e6beff78f4d1

She was strange. She wanted to meet at a hotel right out of the gate, which is a red flag. I do believe she's either just a scammer, or possibly a reformed scammer trying to get back into the game. I'd pass, but if she's giving you some good vibes, go for it. Just remember, No deposits!

Stay Frosty Dude.

**Jims2321** · 05-20-22 12:55

Here is one on the west side (Carrolton). Not sure why Seeking even allows these freaks to be on their Seeking tab.

https://members.seeking.com/member/f...c-ec5dae4bf2f1

So if your into trannies, have at it.

Stay Safe.

JimS2321.

**SoonerFan72** · 05-20-22 12:20

Wants 1 K PER MEET. Apparently her pussy is lined with gold. Not sure if she is real or not, I bailed when I got that quote.

https://members.seeking.com/member/6...d-78dd8068f899

**LGSeeking** · 05-20-22 11:57

Having a convo with this girl. Any reports for you experts?

https://members.seeking.com/member/0...d-e6beff78f4d1

**NewAnonymousName** · 05-20-22 11:09

Originally Posted by 2me4Looking2 [View Original Post]

I've asked this before a few years ago and am curious what everyone sees as red flags that a profile is fake? I know there are obvious ones like brand new with one picture and very little description or really poor grammar or clearly ripped off photos or any mention of strictly online or even a mention of cashapp. What are some of your less obvious red flags that you have found to almost always indicate a profile is fake?

Here are a few of mine.

Refers to college as going to University.

Won't say what part of Atlanta they are in or says Downtown (I know people do live downtown, but that seems to be the standard response so they don't have to research neighborhoods).

Doesn't want to text if I use Google voice and says I have to use a real phone. Some even say I have to have an iPhone.

Wants to use email or Google Hangouts.

Tells me what they will do for their verification pic and won't let me choose.

I have always ignored any profile that shows a recent location other than US but today I had someone I had spoken to a few years ago and based on pics and our conversations seemed very real, but now shows their recent location as Chile. Maybe that's a VPN?

So what ya got to add to this list?

Great list. A few more for me:

Only wanting a platonic arrangement. Who pays for this? There are enough profiles along these lines that there must be some losers who do it.

Her profile indicates she wants to get to know her prospective SD before meeting up. (There are many variations -- get to know each other before meeting, take it slow before meeting, online at first to get comfortable, etc.) It's almost always a scam to get money for an online arrangement. I have messaged several of these by saying I'm OK with communicating until she's comfortable, but any financial arrangement will happen only when an in person arrangement starts. So far, every single one of them has ghosted me after that message.

She "knows her worth," doesn't want a "splenda daddy," or any other phrase that emphasizes how valuable she is. Every one of these so far has had absurd expectations about price. Strangely, a lot of these "I know my worth" types are middle aged women who also should know that they aren't the cream of the crop on a site overrun with 20 to 30 year olds offering better bodies for less money.

Similar to the last one, a profile saying her "time" is not free or she doesn't meet up for free. She's going to ask you to pay her upfront for the coffee / drink meeting that will never happen. (Never pay in advance, not ever.).

Anyone with an overused catchphrase as their tag line. The how to scam sugar daddy chat groups come up with the tag lines, and then lots of women will put them to use around the same time. They change over time so you have to watch for the patterns. A recent example is "Tell your wife you're donating to a good cause."

And the most obvious -- a "seeking trans friendly" box. I like really tall and really short women for some reason. If I see one over 5'10", I always keep my eye out for the "seeking trans friendly" box in her profile. Crossing swords is not on my to do list.

**2me4Looking2** · 05-20-22 10:03

I've asked this before a few years ago and am curious what everyone sees as red flags that a profile is fake? I know there are obvious ones like brand new with one picture and very little description or really poor grammar or clearly ripped off photos or any mention of strictly online or even a mention of cashapp. What are some of your less obvious red flags that you have found to almost always indicate a profile is fake?

Here are a few of mine.

Refers to college as going to University.

Won't say what part of Atlanta they are in or says Downtown (I know people do live downtown, but that seems to be the standard response so they don't have to research neighborhoods).

Doesn't want to text if I use Google voice and says I have to use a real phone. Some even say I have to have an iPhone.

Wants to use email or Google Hangouts.

Tells me what they will do for their verification pic and won't let me choose.

I have always ignored any profile that shows a recent location other than US but today I had someone I had spoken to a few years ago and based on pics and our conversations seemed very real, but now shows their recent location as Chile. Maybe that's a VPN?

So what ya got to add to this list?

**ElKurdo** · 05-19-22 22:10

Originally Posted by GoneForGood97 [View Original Post]

Came across this profile on SA: https://members.seeking.com/member/a...c-9c74f9f7f0cb.

What do ya'll think? Is this our resident nutjob (been reviewed in SB thread under EauRose or Grace) or just a close looking lookalike? If you need to refresh your memory, some guy posted her nudes in the greatest hits thread, and you can see some her reviews back in March and early April.

Matched with her, chatted, seemed like a robot, really slow replies that were 5 word sentences. Wouldn't trade numbers. Not sure what the angle is for her, but she's swapped pictures 4 times in 2 days so yeah.