Korean Agency BB

[Francescoo]

Anyone here that is a long time viagra / sidenafill user? Has it affected your vision at all? I have been using it on and off for the last year and I feel my vision is getting worse at a fast rate.

Go see an eye doctor boss man.

[SharingHer]

You guys should make signs and protest outside like a grocery store strike.

My protest was held inside Hana's pussy until she left and I made sure to tip her better than upcharge girls could make.

[Toungsten]

I prefer to approach it from another side.

I simply ask myself whether there are any conflict of interest, double standards or uneven distribution of a reviewer's profile.

Can someone post an objective review if all their reviews are positive? Answer is no.

Can someone post an objective review of a girl if they deal with her OTC? Answer is no.

Can someone post an objective review of a girl if they are OK with excessive praise but not OK with excessively negative review? Answer is no, it's a double standard.

In your case, ask yourself if people using excessive hyperboles for glowing reviews do the same for negative reviews, if they even have any. If the answer is no, then they aren't putting anything even close to objective reviews. If any wet hole of Korean origin constitutes an amazing experience, what are reviews even about?

An objective review doesn't hold back. In an objective and honest review, one doesn't need to think about "being too harsh" or worry about any consequences of the review on girls or bookers business. As long as it's honest, it really doesn't matter what happens to the girl or business. An objective review is as easily written about a bad product as about a good product.

Just my two cents.

Can all positive reviews be accurate if the reviewer doesn't review the negative experiences so as not to kill a girl's business or if he makes sure his experiences are positive with some legwork?. The answer is yes.

[Toungsten]

Agreed. Which goes back to your earlier comment about reviews that say "go buy. " To call them reviews is far less accurate than to call them infomercials with a paid actor.

Deflecting blame through questions like, "Why do you read them then," or "Why not just ignore" are convenient ways to absolve themselves from taking responsibility for what they write.

Or maybe they are spot on the the reader didn't get what the writer got. Never Assume.

[Toungsten]

My sentiment exactly. You wrote: "Extremely nice booker, but the quality of the girls is getting poorer, with them pushing rising prices even with diluted product. Feels like a cash grab and they might think I am dumb."

Fool me once, shame on you; Fool me twice, shame on me.

It seems like they have become the Walmart. Just the leftover crap that no one wants. Throw enough shit against the wall and some sticks.

[PussyDestroyr]

Anyone try Lomy yet? Or shall I take one for the team? She might be Lom-errific. She had me at DD.

[Cricket79]

It's more like fool me twenty times, shame on me. And now that I have discovered their 440 or 450 girls are absolutely not worth it for the most part, I am less likely to even try the 420 girls, since I now assume they must be horrible if they do not get the 440 pricing. Also at the 420+ range, it is less cool to me to use blatantly fake pictures. Just blur the face at this range. There are pics of 440 and 450 girls that completely misrepresent their body type and age. Anyways, despite wanting to support this booker, I have been seeing a lot more of the PKL girls and the KTE girls who get the Baby name. Now I'll pretty much just wait until there is a proven star like Sweet to see a 420+ Candygirl.

You guys should make signs and protest outside like a grocery store strike.

[PussyDestroyr]

It's more like fool me twenty times, shame on me. And now that I have discovered their 440 or 450 girls are absolutely not worth it for the most part, I am less likely to even try the 420 girls, since I now assume they must be horrible if they do not get the 440 pricing. Also at the 420+ range, it is less cool to me to use blatantly fake pictures. Just blur the face at this range. There are pics of 440 and 450 girls that completely misrepresent their body type and age. Anyways, despite wanting to support this booker, I have been seeing a lot more of the PKL girls and the KTE girls who get the Baby name. Now I'll pretty much just wait until there is a proven star like Sweet to see a 420+ Candygirl.

It keeps my dick happy, that's all the matters.

[SuperMan333]

Anyone here that is a long time viagra / sidenafill user? Has it affected your vision at all? I have been using it on and off for the last year and I feel my vision is getting worse at a fast rate.

[SharingHer]

My sentiment exactly. You wrote: "Extremely nice booker, but the quality of the girls is getting poorer, with them pushing rising prices even with diluted product. Feels like a cash grab and they might think I am dumb."

Fool me once, shame on you; Fool me twice, shame on me.

It's more like fool me twenty times, shame on me. And now that I have discovered their 440 or 450 girls are absolutely not worth it for the most part, I am less likely to even try the 420 girls, since I now assume they must be horrible if they do not get the 440 pricing. Also at the 420+ range, it is less cool to me to use blatantly fake pictures. Just blur the face at this range. There are pics of 440 and 450 girls that completely misrepresent their body type and age. Anyways, despite wanting to support this booker, I have been seeing a lot more of the PKL girls and the KTE girls who get the Baby name. Now I'll pretty much just wait until there is a proven star like Sweet to see a 420+ Candygirl.

[SsStuntCock]

If any wet hole of Korean origin constitutes an amazing experience, what are reviews even about?

Agreed. Which goes back to your earlier comment about reviews that say "go buy. " To call them “reviews” is far less accurate than to call them infomercials with a paid actor.

Deflecting blame through questions like, "Why do you read them then," or "Why not just ignore" are convenient ways to absolve themselves from taking responsibility for what they write.

[Jack926]

The one thing I do not like recently about Candy Girl is the pricing recently. They have too many girls at their highest rate (420, 440, or 450) and the quality is just absolutely not there, and then the girls disappear / change names quickly. I used to take their pricing as a signal of how hot the girl is. After numerous subpar experiences, it is starting to feel like a cash grab. Now the pricing is not a signal of how hot the girl is or how good the service is. They still have hot girls but it will cost you about $2200 (at about 20% hit rate) to find one good enough to repeat with if you TOFTT or blindly follow first week hype reviews which are becoming way too common. Extremely nice booker, but the quality of the girls is getting poorer, with them pushing rising prices even with diluted product. Feels like a cash grab and they might think I am dumb.

My sentiment exactly. You wrote: "Extremely nice booker, but the quality of the girls is getting poorer, with them pushing rising prices even with diluted product. Feels like a cash grab and they might think I am dumb."

Fool me once, shame on you; Fool me twice, shame on me.

[Eddy68]

Correct me if I'm wrong. Saw two of them on the site (one Romanian and the other Colombian). Anyone know if their BB?

I just got a confirmation so I won't waste my time.

[RocketManP]

This. It's the hyperbole for me. If one follows this board as much as I do -which is to say way too fkn much- one should know who's suspect for lacking objectivity. And they'll recognize how quick some will counterbalance a review that reads anything less than a strong recommendation. And in those cases, it's always the guy's fault for a poor session, never the girl. It's where 'YMMV' becomes weaponized ad nauseam.

It speaks volumes when one can predict how hyperbolic a review's conclusion will be by who the author is. "As good as it gets. " "Can't ask for more. " "You will get all you want and probably more than you expected. " "Can't be beat. " Are just a few random examples that sound awfully like that damn My Pillow Guy.

But who am I to talk. My writing approach always applies alliteration, like some horn dog high schooler in a creative writing class.

I prefer to approach it from another side.

I simply ask myself whether there are any conflict of interest, double standards or uneven distribution of a reviewer's profile.

Can someone post an objective review if all their reviews are positive? Answer is no.

Can someone post an objective review of a girl if they deal with her OTC? Answer is no.

Can someone post an objective review of a girl if they are OK with excessive praise but not OK with excessively negative review? Answer is no, it's a double standard.

In your case, ask yourself if people using excessive hyperboles for glowing reviews do the same for negative reviews, if they even have any. If the answer is no, then they aren't putting anything even close to objective reviews. If any wet hole of Korean origin constitutes an amazing experience, what are reviews even about?

An objective review doesn't hold back. In an objective and honest review, one doesn't need to think about "being too harsh" or worry about any consequences of the review on girls or bookers business. As long as it's honest, it really doesn't matter what happens to the girl or business. An objective review is as easily written about a bad product as about a good product.

Just my two cents.

[RocketManP]

or the real face on a superimposed photoshopped body with rare exceptions.

This protects the girls anonymity and enhances their market appeal.

I'll say that that a real face with a fake PSd body does not increase the girls anonymity, but rather decreases it. Face recognition works. Body recognition doesn't as long as tats and excessive metal are psd out.

A fake face with a real body would actually increase anonymity. But of course, orgs / girls are more interested in selling some fake body than the truth.