"Sugar Babies" and "Arrangements"

**Oily123** · 02-17-22 07:43

Originally Posted by Devil6661 [View Original Post]

What website is SA? Seek Arran?

Sorry, Seeking. Used to Seeking Arrangement from before.

**Member #6704** · 02-17-22 00:47

Originally Posted by GoneForGood97 [View Original Post]

Just curious if the juice is worth the squeeze here: https://members.seeking.com/member/7...1-ac61a6c1eef1.

Did she say how much?

**Member #6704** · 02-17-22 00:45

Originally Posted by TallGuy3000 [View Original Post]

Unicorns may exist. But anytime the only thing in their About Me section is. Have you seen my wish list, that's a red flag for me.

Fair point. GPS!

**Devil6661** · 02-16-22 15:28

Originally Posted by Oily123 [View Original Post]

Has anyone actually uploaded more pictures on a profile when you sent a request for more? Just curious if all of those with only 1 picture are fake.

What website is SA? Seek Arran?

**Oily123** · 02-16-22 10:06

Has anyone actually uploaded more pictures on a profile when you sent a request for more? Just curious if all of those with only 1 picture are fake.

**GoneForGood97** · 02-16-22 09:37

Just curious if the juice is worth the squeeze here: https://members.seeking.com/member/7...1-ac61a6c1eef1.

**JoyDrop** · 02-15-22 20:22

Originally Posted by TallGuy3000 [View Original Post]

But anytime the only thing in their About Me section is. Have you seen my wish list, that's a red flag for me.

That just means they didn't enter anything in that section. The "have you seen my wish list" text is added automatically by the website.

**DocHolliday35** · 02-15-22 14:52

Originally Posted by LoriTruck [View Original Post]

Any one remember a lady named Shard? There was a post here about her but I can't seem to find and her SA profile looks like it was deactivated. Suposed to go see her next week.

Yes but its been awhile.

**JimStokes** · 02-15-22 12:58

Originally Posted by PeterJohnson [View Original Post]

What do you mean "less emphasis on sugar daddy / sugar baby". There doesn't seem to be any emphasis on it at all, at this point. And if you even mention PPM or allowance, you get banned.

But I suppose they could change it, for the search results, so less potential sugar babies could find the site. I need to get on that other one that is sometimes mentioned here, for a backup.

The article I scanned, wasn't interested enough to read, is that supposedly Brandon Wade believed being "in love" was for poor people. From recollection, his started SA was based on the economics of older successful men looking for younger broke women and that male / female relations were fundamentally transaction based. The site has alway had accusations that it was an escort site. Hence why it policed the PPM or discussion of money exchanges. I don't know if he still hosts these but he used to hold meets and greets in several US cities. Not unlike what Pwhipped did in Atlanta a few years back. The jest of the article is that now that Wade is "in love" he wants to change the site to foster these type of relationships as opposed to economic / transaction based.

No disagreement on your take on SA. When I read the first post, it cause me to recollect this article. Now, it could be camouflage because he is or has been taking heat in the current sex trafficking dynamic that has changed the risks / costs of running SA. Or, he may be "in love". I will say if he is marrying a 21 year old with no prenup, he takes simp to a new level. May need to rebrand from Seeking.com to simp.com.

**Peter Johnson** · 02-15-22 11:23

Originally Posted by JimStokes [View Original Post]

So the founder / CEO of Seeking Arrangements, Brandon Wade, is marrying a 21 year old woman he met on the site. Apparently is waiving a prenup. It appears he will change the site to a more regular or normalize dating site with less of an emphasis on sugar daddy / sugar baby. Not sure if this is a delayed reaction to or due to pressure under FOSTA SESTA or if its the intoxication of 21 year old orifices on his middle aged self. Either way it appears the changes that have occurred will continue and not in a direction of the old days.

What do you mean "less emphasis on sugar daddy / sugar baby". There doesn't seem to be any emphasis on it at all, at this point. And if you even mention PPM or allowance, you get banned.

But I suppose they could change it, for the search results, so less potential sugar babies could find the site. I need to get on that other one that is sometimes mentioned here, for a backup.

**JimStokes** · 02-15-22 02:07

Originally Posted by LovePunnany [View Original Post]

Fellows is it just me or are the prices the women on SA are charging is getting out of hand? I had one girl tell me $600 for 30 minutes and now most girls are asking $350- $600 with a time limit? What happened to the good old days? I am very close to cancelling my membership.

Fell free to share you comments.

So the founder / CEO of Seeking Arrangements, Brandon Wade, is marrying a 21 year old woman he met on the site. Apparently is waiving a prenup. It appears he will change the site to a more regular or normalize dating site with less of an emphasis on sugar daddy / sugar baby. Not sure if this is a delayed reaction to or due to pressure under FOSTA SESTA or if its the intoxication of 21 year old orifices on his middle aged self. Either way it appears the changes that have occurred will continue and not in a direction of the old days.