Thread: Korean Agency BB
+
Add Report
Results 23,551 to 23,565 of 49200
-
01-02-22 01:46 #25650
Posts: 13332 pop shop
Originally Posted by BobLove [View Original Post]
-
01-02-22 00:38 #25649
Posts: 3480Originally Posted by RocketManP [View Original Post]
-
01-02-22 00:34 #25648
Posts: 3480Originally Posted by BastardChorum [View Original Post]
-
01-01-22 23:05 #25647
Posts: 1834Originally Posted by RocketManP [View Original Post]
Originally Posted by RocketManP [View Original Post]
In regards to the predatory tactics employed by various agencies, I think with outlets such as this board and review sites most mongers now are better able to assess for themselves the pros and cons for the majority of kgirls that show up. But I believe those tactics won't stop, even with cautionary posts and honest reviews, because the main motivating factors why bookers use those tactics (greed and kgirls of poor quality whether that be looks or service) won't be disappearing any time soon. In addition, the effects accomplished and seen by those posts and reviews haven't dissuade bookers to change their tune. That's where we fundamentally disagree, I think.
The threat of blacklisting, doxxing, backlash, or whatever you want to call it from bookers and agencies has always been one of the few tools that they had in their arsenal to mete out punishment as necessary. You paint a picture too black and white in my opinion. I think some of us forget that these measures are necessary as a deterrent to keep the girls safe also. Because let's face it, a few of us mongers aren't the best of examples either. But, the dynamics of the game hasn't changed in the least. If you wanted to speak your mind and / or help warn others, you needed to be duplicitous in action to both see the next rotation of kgirls while protecting yourself through anonymity and not outing yourself in the process, both then and now. By your own admission, there are fellow mongers looking to curry favor with agencies and would gladly backstab you in the dark. I think private groups serve a good purpose and has a place in this space, but far too often it lends a false sense of security, dropping your guard. The paradigm of maintaining a balance of keeping access to kgirls while voicing dissent, unveiling injustices, and providing succor to those that need it has always existed. Some of us knew the risks, a few didn't, others didn't care, and the rest failed to keep themselves covert. There's no shifting of blame here, the game was the way it is well before my entry onto the field and likely yours too, I would imagine.
If given the choice of maintaining standing or tell the truth then I would most likely choose the former. For one, it's a hobby I enjoy, having carefully and successfully meandered through screening hell. Second, it's far more easier to create another handle and vent any dissatisfaction, unfairness, or misgivings to others and the community. The question you pose isn't realistic and too binary. Everyone comes into the kgirl scene for various reasons and we're all afforded the option to be as selfish or altruistic as we see fit.
-
01-01-22 21:23 #25646
Posts: 1236Originally Posted by BinRob [View Original Post]
-
01-01-22 21:11 #25645
Posts: 1834Originally Posted by Toungsten [View Original Post]
-
01-01-22 19:12 #25644
Posts: 756Originally Posted by LandOfKGirls [View Original Post]
Customers spend time and money based on promise (pcis) that are often fake, from face to body.
In an actual business where both sides matter equally (customer and supplier) if you are promised a product and are given something different, you can expect customer not only to be indignant and refuse the sale, but also demand a refund for their time. Some mongers drive for hour or more to get to incall. I don't have to tell ya'll LA folks about driving times do I?
In this biz, it's not how it works. Many people explicitly said they're afraid to walk in order to not anger booker or trigger bl. It's not a matter of "going back", it's a matter of not paying a single penny-and maybe even getting refunded for your time. If you were misled. If this was to be fair, orgs would allow unlimited, infinite walks if a girl body is not what it is advertised in ad. To everyone, not just VIP people who spent thousands in the org. Then subpar product would not earn any money, and organically orgs would strive to hire better quality or show wysiwyg body pics.
As is, a subpar product still earns money during the first week when cats not out of the bag yet. People stay with subpar product, while being misled, and many times not enjoying the girl at all. All because they are scared to lose their standing and potentially be BLd. As well as they have this thought in head that's its just rite of passage and next time they'll get a hottie from this org.
And if you're BLd at one place, great chance it could extend elsewhere.
-
01-01-22 14:16 #25643
Posts: 3480DT or not DT. That is the question.
Ever notice a review that says DT when you saw the same girl and it wasn't even close. How is that possible. Well, the moral of that story is the the smaller the cock the deeper the throat and that equation goes for anal as well. If it's too long or too wide the service will not be the same. There may be a few exceptions to the rule like Nora / Chadoney but as a rule size matters and small size matters most. YMMV.
-
01-01-22 13:41 #25642
Posts: 72 pop
Is the site down? I can't access the website anymore.
-
01-01-22 13:38 #25641
Posts: 66Originally Posted by PsuGuy911 [View Original Post]
-
01-01-22 12:19 #25640
Posts: 3480Monday Jan 1
M. Allie, Viki.
https://preciousklove.escortbook.com/ Berry, Helena. (WLA). (MW).
http://www.kgla.net/ Berry, Helena. (WLA). . MW.
Sexy Angels. https://sexyangels.site/ Jenny https://sexyangels.site/ Jenny.
SFK. https://sexyfunkgirls.escortbook.com/ Tiana, Viki.
-
01-01-22 07:44 #25639
Posts: 163Tiana SFK
Saw Tiana on Thursday her first day I think and overall I would rate her a little above average. She is about 5'2" maybe 5'3" probably 110 lbs, she has a very cute face about B size tits, small waist line a little bit of some stomach fat and some rolls actually depending on position but definitely not fat but nowhere close to spinner which I prefer, her thighs are thick also. She seems new as her kissing technique was not too good sticks tongue out doesn't really know how to dfk but she tries so probably just needs practice or time to learn, good attitude allowed one cip then massage after which consisted of just her squeezing my legs the entire time so that was weird too again probably just new to the game. Overall I enjoyed my time and it was not the most disappointing time but I would not repeat myself only because I prefer spinners, but worth a try as she gains experience over time, those that like eunji she kind of reminds me of that body type so thicker bottom half but not fat and easy on the eyes, absolutely zero english also as when I asked to switch positions and her on bottom she thought I wanted a condom and opened one up even though we had already been raw dogging it for 10 minutes LOL.
-
01-01-22 04:55 #25638
Posts: 64This is the best advice I've seen in a long time.
Originally Posted by Toungsten [View Original Post]
-
01-01-22 00:48 #25637
Posts: 9Originally Posted by SuperMan333 [View Original Post]
https://sweetangels.ch/leah
Shows GFE. Was she pse in LA?
-
12-31-21 20:23 #25636
Posts: 756Originally Posted by BastardChorum [View Original Post]
So long as there exists kgirls that are average looking, out of shape, (insert any number of dud characteristics here) and bookers that are willing or mandated to push them, these practices will continue. What we can do is to alert others of bookers or girls that have such a history or track record to hopefully preempt another monger from experiencing it.
That's why I advise against disclosing that you write reviews do to bookers or girls. Just play dumb and say that you don't, full stop. Now for whatever reason you did or somehow your reviews / posts contained details that could be traced back to you. Well, you fucked up.
You want a tale? From some reviews posted in a private, mind you, group, org lackeys were able to connect a review to the monger. This is a private fucking group for bay area with only about 100 members and maybe 35 active. Forget about public forum.
If you want to warn others of bad product, you ideally do on day 1. There are only so many mongers who see a girl on the first day, so it can be traced back easily. Either more mongers are misled or you are caught by org lapdogs. It's really not as easy as tell them you don't write reviews. And it's really not your fault that you got caught by them deciphering your monger persona. Any details you mention, any specific deeds, etc will further expose you. But you want there to be more details for your fellow mongers! Why do we have to cower in fear that some org will threaten us for writing truthful and honest recap. Even worse, if they have all your pii info they can go far with blackmail.
Retire the handle and take up a new one if you want help others, the community, and as a result yourself going forward.
I never said reviews shouldn't matter. I stated that it should be inconsequential in the matter of how standing is determined.
If orgs can bl you for a truthful and honest review, reviews surely impact your standing. Come on now.
1. I already addressed this above. This is not going to change and is out of our immediate control. PSA's, posts, and reviews are the only mitigation measures we can take.
2. By how frequently you circle back to this point, I can only assume that you or monger (s) you know were in that type situation. Ideally, you don't want any bookers or girls to know that you write reviews. As this can and will become a weakness that can be leveraged against you. Again, addressed above. Restart with a new handle and learn to limit information that can be tied to you. This also goes for sharing with other mongers directly, there's no need to divulge any details specific to you to anyone. If questioned why you stopped writing reviews, just come up something plausible. I don't think they'll punish you for no longer writing reviews. As for me, I've been questioned by bookers about reviews / handles and have been asked by many girls to review them but I've always been consistent in saying that I don't review. Consistency is the key as you never know if the girls or bookers are back channeling on you with each other. Keep in mind that the amount of mongers that do review is a very small slice of the active monger pool.
Orgs have long reach. They got some insider mongerd doing errands and watching boards for them. Many many times I've had mongers complain that the org figured out who they were. The review and feedback system is for them to get feedback. , not to advertise their product. I don't give two shits about their biz. It is not our fault that in order to warn mongers many write their review on the same day or the day after, therefore letting orgs figure out who is who.
3. This is a matter of perspective in my opinion. And as such I can only speak for myself. We're all adults here. Who I ultimately choose to see, how it turns out, and the consequences that arises thereafter falls squarely on my shoulders. I have a responsiblity to myself to research and evaluate to the best of my ability that a specific kgirl is worth seeing. The mentalities of others and their willingness to share information or post reviews are out of my control. Therefore, I can only rely on what's available to me, red herring and all. It's all a part of this broken and dysfunctional system we call kgirls which even leaves the best of us muddled at times.