Thread: Korean Agency BB
+
Add Report
Results 24,106 to 24,120 of 49731
-
12-31-21 12:40 #25626Regular Member

Posts: 12Lumi
Hello,
Did anyone tried Lumi from LAKangels?
-
12-31-21 12:34 #25625Senior Member

Posts: 3480How's this for an idea. Make a call or send a text, make an appointment and go get laid. If you like it maybe go back. If you don't just move on. That's what this business used to be all about.
Originally Posted by BastardChorum
[View Original Post]
-
12-31-21 06:54 #25624Senior Member

Posts: 1834Of course it would become a much more welcoming experience for new and old players alike in the kgirl scene if such predatory tactics were stopped. However, it won't. To think otherwise would be naive. So long as there exists kgirls that are average looking, out of shape, (insert any number of dud characteristics here) and bookers that are willing or mandated to push them, these practices will continue. What we can do is to alert others of bookers or girls that have such a history or track record to hopefully preempt another monger from experiencing it.
Originally Posted by RocketManP
That's why I advise against disclosing that you write reviews do to bookers or girls. Just play dumb and say that you don't, full stop. Now for whatever reason you did or somehow your reviews / posts contained details that could be traced back to you. Well, you fucked up. Retire the handle and take up a new one if you want help others, the community, and as a result yourself going forward.
Originally Posted by RocketManP
I never said reviews shouldn't matter. I stated that it should be inconsequential in the matter of how standing is determined. To the contrary, the very first sentence of the paragraph where you plucked out the second statement starts out by saying that reviews are paramount to mongers. I'll address your later points below as they are essentially the same concerns.
Originally Posted by RocketManP
From what I can gather, you have mainly three misgivings / points of contention in the kgirl scene: 1) predatory tactics employ by various bookers, 2) coercion by said bookers to takedown / limit / control information that would reflect negatively on the agency or the girls they currently book and 3) mongers that stand by and not "trashing the girl" leading to the deception of other mongers.
Originally Posted by RocketManP
1. I already addressed this above. This is not going to change and is out of our immediate control. PSA's, posts, and reviews are the only mitigation measures we can take.
2. By how frequently you circle back to this point, I can only assume that you or monger (s) you know were in that type situation. Ideally, you don't want any bookers or girls to know that you write reviews. As this can and will become a weakness that can be leveraged against you. Again, addressed above. Restart with a new handle and learn to limit information that can be tied to you. This also goes for sharing with other mongers directly, there's no need to divulge any details specific to you to anyone. If questioned why you stopped writing reviews, just come up something plausible. I don't think they'll punish you for no longer writing reviews. As for me, I've been questioned by bookers about reviews / handles and have been asked by many girls to review them but I've always been consistent in saying that I don't review. Consistency is the key as you never know if the girls or bookers are back channeling on you with each other. Keep in mind that the amount of mongers that do review is a very small slice of the active monger pool.
3. This is a matter of perspective in my opinion. And as such I can only speak for myself. We're all adults here. Who I ultimately choose to see, how it turns out, and the consequences that arises thereafter falls squarely on my shoulders. I have a responsiblity to myself to research and evaluate to the best of my ability that a specific kgirl is worth seeing. The mentalities of others and their willingness to share information or post reviews are out of my control. Therefore, I can only rely on what's available to me, red herring and all. It's all a part of this broken and dysfunctional system we call kgirls which even leaves the best of us muddled at times.
-
12-31-21 06:27 #25623Senior Member

Posts: 338Erika
This same erika from SAG? Your description matches quite well.
Originally Posted by PussyDestroyr
[View Original Post]
-
12-31-21 04:45 #25622Senior Member

Posts: 26Lisa
Anyone been with Lisa from Candygirl? How was she?
-
12-31-21 01:37 #25621Senior Member

Posts: 417Bay Area SweetAngels Leah.
Originally Posted by BobLove
[View Original Post]
-
12-30-21 23:01 #25620Senior Member

Posts: 1246Speaking of KTE, anyone know where's Radeon Girl?
Originally Posted by Cricket79
[View Original Post]
-
12-30-21 21:41 #25619Senior Member

Posts: 66No pancake ass and no roast beef pussy is my motto.
Originally Posted by NintyNine
[View Original Post]
-
12-30-21 21:01 #25618Senior Member

Posts: 66Agreed! In 18 they had some young spinners at the nice place on Westmoreland and they were available till 3 am. Since than the girls got bigger and quality of service went to shit.
Originally Posted by Eddy68
[View Original Post]
-
12-30-21 19:45 #25617Senior Member

Posts: 841I hate big flat asses. Just like MistressX, just wide and flat.
Originally Posted by PussyDestroyr
[View Original Post]
-
12-30-21 19:30 #25616Senior Member

Posts: 766And don't you think if this passage was to be shortened and straightened, it would benefit newbies immensely? This does involve cutting down on predatory tactics from agencies.
Originally Posted by BastardChorum
[View Original Post]
The chief difference here is that you're trying to navigate through lies. And I want the lies and bullying to stop. If that happens then there's barely any navigation left. I'm a service lover and generally the feedback I get is consistent. But if you're a picky face and body lover. I have no idea how'd you stay in the game and not be frustrated. Unless someone distributes real pics utr, all you have is pics that are psd to death and other mongers recap that don't exactly paint a sketch approximation of a kgirls face. Or body for that matter. There are fat girls out there masquerading as thin git ones in their pics. This is pure disrespect to your own customers to do this.
It shouldn't but often is. When an agency texts you saying take down that negative review or we will blacklist you, and never do that again. Is the definition of mutually exclusive.Standing within any agency and your ability to share the truth with other mongers or the community should not be mutually exclusive.I'm sorry, but these statements contradict each other.As far as I can tell, standing mainly comprises a combination of three parts: the frequency of your visits, how you come across to the booker, and the girls individual feedback of you. I would . Whether you review or not should is inconsequential, IMHO, regardless of how bookers may feel about it.
This leaves you in the position of only expressing positive praise or reviews and / or omitting negative ones unless you use an alias. With the tacit understanding what may potentially happen if they do otherwise. Furthermore, I've heard of bookers in the past probing mongers about their reviews / handles.
You say that reviews shouldn't matter, but clearly they do from your second statement. Many many times the orgs figure out who the reviewer is themselves. Many orgs have lackeys running around snitching and collecting info. And then standing is impacted. Clearly if you write negative reviews, even if they're fully truthful, it will impact your standing. Why? Is it because orgs and girls are more interested in $ than actually being truthful and have truthful feedback and improve upon it? Reviews are never, were never and never will be intended for advertising. And that's what it feels they are for orgs.
I'm not terribly interested in how to "work around it". You're just circumventing the problem and leaving the next monger to again run into the same problem. I'm interested in solving the root of the actual problem. Greed breeds deception and negligence towards customers. Many seem to have the mentality "I'm not going to trash this fat girl who can't fuck because then there might be a superstar". But ideally, this fat girl who can't fuck gets zero customers and like any faulty product / good is removed from the lineup fast as hell, with no one biting. And not trashing the girl resulted in many unhappy "Green" mongers being deceived. So, these guys just fucked over other mongers in order to get pussy. How is this fair or ethical?
But again, that's not what I asked. You not visiting them is not what I care about. I care about them asking you to remove a public review, to not write anything negative or you're gone from that org. Then what do you do? Please don't say it can't happen to you. Here's the fork in the road, you have to lie / remove truthful review of a negative experience or risk being booted from that agency forever. You don't have an option to pm mongers silently. Your only way of delivering this info is via public channels. So what do you do? Do you take the bl and stand proudly by truth or remove the truth preserving your supply line of pussy? Think of Galileo and his recantation. In this case, it's not your survival in question, merely some pussy that is replaceable.In regards to how far will I go, I'm a pragmatist at heart and am selfish when it comes to this hobby. I'll see who I find interesting and if an agency doesn't have anyone else I deem worthwhile then I don't visit until one comes along. Does this diminish my standing with them? Possibly. Does this relegate me to the back of the line when a starlet appears? Sure. I understand this and accept it as par for the course for this type of business relationship. But it doesn't cut me off seeing that starlet completely because I bitched about a previous session, took it out on a booker for whatever reason, or any number of things that may result it a possible BL.
-
12-30-21 17:20 #25615Senior Member

Posts: 551Erika at Candy
Had a dream I needed a quick fix in WLA, booker c mentioned Erika. Odd she isn't listed on their site. Been meaning to try her for some time, but held back due to other hobbyist feedback. I arrived and was pleasantly surprised. She isn't thick or fat at all. Here are my highlights:
Pros: TITS for days! Good BBBJ and her eye contact seemed to pierce through my soul, both during BBBJ and standing dog, bbfscip; very clean and fresh smelling.
Cons: Flat butt, kind of a large head.
I would repeat at some point. Please take my review with a grain of salt. Big tits skew my ratings up, always. Then I woke up.
-
12-30-21 17:16 #25614Senior Member

Posts: 25Viki is solid
Went to see Viki because why'all be hogging up all the hya apparently. Haven't seen her in a while and honestly I have a short term memory for most providers. Like I've probably tried all the top girls that have come through in the last few years but I can't put a name to a face.
Anyway, if you are in a pinch like me and all the new girls are booked up. Viki is hella solid. She's prob mid 30's but her physique is really great. Also her service is top notch. She cleaned me in places that are traditionally very dirty. She went back for seconds and thirds once she knew I liked it too. I'm talking knuckle deep tongue twisting tonsil yodelling. Also has a great vag to finish in.
Excellent service. Should always be in your lineup and great for emergencies.
-
12-30-21 16:27 #25613Senior Member

Posts: 1246Which girl is 140 lb?
Originally Posted by Cricket79
[View Original Post]
-
12-30-21 14:51 #25612Regular Member

Posts: 9Any help with finding Pink / Noah?
Hi all,
I hope to come down for some fun in LAsoon. I am able to get into most of the organizations. Was hoping to be able to find pink? I missed her on my last day down which was her last day with her first organization. Unfortunately had to cancel. PO gave me some grief but overall I am a good customer.
Anyway any help would be greatly appreciated. Just wondering where she ended up. I have no issues with charger anything. Obviously I'd rather have her at the original 300 but it is what it is.
Please PM if this is a sensitive topic for some reason. Just wanting to visit a current favorite.














Reply With Quote











