Thread: LA LA Land Bullshit and Fight Club
+
Add Report
Results 841 to 855 of 1313
-
11-21-21 21:33 #473Senior Member

Posts: 26Self defense
First guy who got shot is a pedophile (anally raped multiple boys) that apparently just got out of a mental hospital and was off his meds; he knocked Kyle down twice and tried to stomp kyle's head with lethal force while attempting to take his weapon. Pedo got shot and killed. Second guy was a habitual woman beater and whacked Kyle in the head 2 times with a skateboard trying to kill him. The woman beater got shot and killed. Third guy was a burglar / felon illegally carrying a gun which he attempted to use to try to murder Kyle first but got his biceps blown off before he can. This guy admitted this in trial. All three guys were chasing after Kyle and initiated the altercations. Its all on video. I'm happy with the outcome of the trial as well.
-
11-21-21 18:06 #472Troll, if you don't put me on ignore then don't complain about what I post

Posts: 2901The method
I am not sure what fish mongering school you went to, but the only professor of any value I had was professor fleming who wrote a book called the law of torts. He was a WW2 veteran and taught something in law school that is hardly ever taught anymore, namely, the law. Not women and the law, race and the law, gays and the law. No, the law.
Originally Posted by TempletonRat
[View Original Post]
For many, his class was uncomfortable. There was no opinionating on a person's background, the victim's race, or any other such matters. I felt comfortable in this milieu as I had learned the talmud in the method of the brisker dynasty.
So, to look at the case of young kyle, you cannot just say, well, he had a rifle and someone through a bag at him, oh, and we do not like trump, so he is guilty. NO. Just as in a shaved cooter is anathema to all that is holy, and you never decline a table shower, you must state the distinction in the law that provides for justified homicide. Namely - self defense. Only then can you opine.
Now, it is complicated because Kyle was lawfully carrying this gun, which was a charge that was brought to mislead the jury. Plus Kyle was in fact allowed to protect the pooon JAW bee car lot. The owners kids posed with him and knew why kyle was there. They benefited from his services. They did not kick him off the lot. He was not violating curfew. So, he had a right to be where he was with his gun, which was of legal length.
As for his attackers, he is certainly lucky they were not melanin enhanced or he would likely have been found guilty, but the criminal background of the persons shot is irrelevant. And their race is too, but I will not begin to deny 2020 reality. You did not see any of the leading black leaders in the court, etc. This was white on white crime.
Self defense applies as follows in Wisconsin:
A person is privileged to threaten or intentionally use force against another for the purpose of preventing or terminating what the person reasonably believes to be an unlawful interference with his or her person by such other person. The actor may intentionally use only such force or threat thereof as the actor reasonably believes is necessary to prevent or terminate the interference. The actor may not intentionally use force which is intended or likely to cause death or great bodily harm unless the actor reasonably believes that such force is necessary to prevent imminent death or great bodily harm to himself or herself.
The last sentence is crucial because it is clear that the second sentence make no sense given that we are talking about deadly force. There is no way, despite what old joe says, to use a gun without it being deadly force.
So, one asks, did Kyle reasonably believe he needed to shoot people to prevent imminent death or great bodily harm to himself?
Well, with the two assholes using a skateboard and a. 22, it is not a close call. Skater boy and bicep boy presented a clear threat of death or mongo bongo (pm me for the mongo bongo joke). I don't give a shit what your cause is, kyle was done shooting the first guy, he stopped shooting. If those two mental giants were truly afraid of a mass shooter, they would either call the police or take cover. They saw a chance to overcome the guy and strike a blow for their cause.
As for the first victim, it is closer and requires much more clinical and perhaps some results oriented reasoning. As you know, what is reasonable depends on all the facts and circumstances that apply to determine if Kyle acted reasonably. The video shows he was being chased. The "man" chasing him grabbed his gun (sounds like the dude who posted here about viet MILF), a particular act of gormlessness. Shots had rung out, the cops were engaged in political retreat so as to allow for rioters to burn the city until it was in ashes. The legal term for the situation is a shit show. So, yes, political incompetence and correctness has consequences, namely, people who like to engage in idiocy are not going to be protected by the rule of law just as they have driven out the rule of law.
So, asking myself, if I was lawfully carrying a gun and was in a place that I was protecting property at and some guy runs after me, the police are taking talk therapy lessons, there are shots and the guy grabbed my gun, well, this is not going to end in a hitchens style debate. Someone is going to die. If you were kyle, would you have acted the same way? I am not asking you if you support trump, or if you would be at home reading white fragility. No, you are there, what do you do? I know the answer, I would shoot until the danger to me was over.
Next post on the three inbreds who killed that guy who was jogging.
-
11-21-21 15:52 #471Senior Member

Posts: 682Well.
He took out a convicted, multiple offense child rapist. I'm cool with that.
Originally Posted by TempletonRat
[View Original Post]
-
11-20-21 18:44 #470Banned Member

Posts: 466Rittenhouse
It has admittedly been a few decades since fish-mongering school, but how could young Kyle get away with self-defense? I don't remember much from crim law, but I remember something about having to respond with like force. If a dude comes up to punch you, you can't cap him in the head with your gat. But isn't that what the lad Kyle did? I heard protesters chased him with a bag and a skateboard.
Is the equivalent force rule for self-defense different in WI? Or did young Kyle think the first mental guy was throwing a bag full of grenades at him, or something?
-
11-15-21 11:06 #469Banned Member

Posts: 1258It's a question. Don't get why you are so hurt by it.
Originally Posted by ManUp
[View Original Post]
Why post in 5-6 different threads between LA and OC Forums? Assorted threads include; Escorts, MILF / GILF, BBBJ and many others?
When I looked up your forum posts the last 10 are all about your GF FVM. Common sense indicates an interest in her booking by others that exceeds the norm. So are you bragging or advertising?
-
11-15-21 00:19 #468Senior Member

Posts: 243It's fine man. Don't sweat it. I appreciate your post. Maybe just don't copy it between so many threads. If they're looking for FVM info they'll be able to search it and find your review.
Originally Posted by ManUp
[View Original Post]
-
11-14-21 23:22 #467Senior Member

Posts: 7221When you spam threads like you did its a little obvious that you're could be a booker, pimp, possible stalker in the making, white knight in the making.
Originally Posted by ManUp
[View Original Post]
-
11-14-21 21:37 #466Senior Member

Posts: 204This is why!
This is why I don't like posting about my experience. HX and other sites give reviews and it's cool. But when you try to report a great encounter, yes sometimes twice in one week your subjected to BS comments. Guess because your a senior member that give you the right to be a moron.
Originally Posted by IAmGib1
[View Original Post]
-
11-14-21 09:22 #465Banned Member

Posts: 1258Shill or Pimp for FitVietMilf?
Originally Posted by ManUp
[View Original Post]
-
11-11-21 20:26 #464Senior Member

Posts: 262Spready
Can you imagine if the young healthy Asian dick doctors were the (a) cause for the spread? Most of these fellows here would be out of the game permanently. Its inane thinking to believe the V has prevented transmission when Israel spikes, now Russia etc. They have some of the highest Vax rates in the world (and hookers). Point being, is if you have faith in the Big V then god bless you. For me, the post cover infected, it's working out eating mainly a Blue Zone diet and pussy. Good on you Fiat for calling BS!
Originally Posted by FiatVoluptas
[View Original Post]
-
11-11-21 12:36 #463Senior Member

Posts: 682True.
I don't really expect to change anyone's mind with my opinion. I gave up on that in real life a long time ago. I was just giving my thoughts for the sake of giving them.
Originally Posted by SFVsag
[View Original Post]
-
11-11-21 01:54 #462Senior Member

Posts: 399Your opinion on the subject doesn't really matter to the next fella. Their risk remains the same every time, regardless of anyone's thoughts on the matter. And each person's level of risk is different.
Originally Posted by FiatVoluptas
[View Original Post]
-
11-09-21 23:44 #461Troll, if you don't put me on ignore then don't complain about what I post

Posts: 2901Spread them
Oh boy, California's positivity rate is going up. Looks like it is booster time.
Originally Posted by Draves
[View Original Post]
-
11-09-21 22:17 #460Senior Member

Posts: 682Absolutely.
And given the objective data from around the world, both about covid and vaccines, we should all be much more worried about various venereal diseases than about the "coof. ".
Originally Posted by SFVsag
[View Original Post]
-
11-09-21 20:38 #459Senior Member

Posts: 399Bottom line. It's the same as it's always been. You pays your money, you takes your chances. You have no idea if the lady or the monger before you has been vaccinated, is a carrier, is actually ill, or if they're even being truthful to you about any of the above. Only way to be sure is abstinence.
Originally Posted by FiatVoluptas
[View Original Post]















Reply With Quote










