Korean Agency BB

[Midway13]

Got a text from M on Thursday 10/21 saying "Cona back tomorrow". I texted back that I would probably book for Monday and got a reply "Text me anytime ". I just texted M about 10 minutes ago today (aka Monday) and got the reply "We have Nicole and allie today" "Cona not here". When I asked when she'll be back I got the reply "not sure".

I'm confused as hell. How can they be booking Cona for one day and then not be sure of when she'll be back four days later? Is her schedule that erratic, or was there a falling out over the weekend?

[JrueArtist]

Got a text from HGV about new Mimi. Booked a 11 am and I was shocked to see Kimi. It was so nice to see her still looking cute at and innocent. Blonde hair and looking good. Had an hour, her first customer in a while LOL. If you guys miss Kimi she is available for limited hours.

https://honeyguavagirls.escortbook.com/

Saw her last week. She delivered. Great head. Loved watching her ride and the reflection of her expressions from hitting it from behind in front of the big closet mirrors. Excellent service, good pussy.

[RocketManP]

"What it is, is what it is!" - James Brown.

I totally agree with the philosophical underpinnings and theory of your arguments, except the part about symmetry. I think the orgs are taking a much bigger risk than the mongers. This is such a base and basic market that I don't think there is room for a lot of subtleties, or consideration. Also, I don't think there are too many "subtle" people involved at any level of the orgs, or the "girls".

Time for another of my favorite sayings: "If all you have is a hammer, everything looks like a nail!

If I get burned by my dealer, I don't go running to the BBB (but I would run to the BBFS). I try to find another dealer. I guess the question in this instance is exactly how many dealers are there? If we were to draw up a heirarchical chart of the booker's and orgs, would we find out that in fact that there are not that many players, and their relationships to each could effectively blackball one right out of the game? If so, I think it is fair to consider what is likely to be the most productive course of action, and not just stand on principal!

Assymetric risk is inherent to any business; in the example of airlines they always have higher risk than individual flyers.

I don't agree with the inherent risk justifying bad practices.

I'd assume if you get burned by your dealer, you'd warn all your friends and others to not deal with that dealer anymore. Well, this board is the equivalent of this. If people are afraid of bullying where orgs will blacklist you for even mentioning their practices. As you seem to imply. Well that sucks. But there are solutions. They could for example forward their grievances or instances of bad practices to someone who aren't afraid to pound on issues and they'd compile an anonymous list. Will there be false positives? Sure.

I don't agree with the concept of because the orgs run it and are all networked, it's ok to be bullied and stay quiet and treated like dumb atm machine Johns instead of like long-term customers. Just my 2 c.

[TD Leafs]

I find it odd that if Chanel and Cona are working even sporadically and UTR along with an alleged different name to keep Cona even more UTR then how is it that everyone on this board seems to know about it. That's with M indignant about the fact that they both haven't been working. This has become the most non UTR provider availability I have ever heard of. As for Cona being pissed off because of all the BBFS she was that since I met her in 2015 and loved every minute of it. Singles, doubles, you name it. The reality is that she has invested her money wisely and doesn't really need to provide any more.

Cona's a smart and savvy investor.

Did quite well with stocks last yr and so far this yr.

I share / exchange stocks info with her quite a bit. Cona's unavailable bec she's not working not UTR.

[Toungsten]

M. Nicole, Allie.

Newtopasian. http://newtopasia.cuties-sites.com/m...................

http://www.kgla.net/ Cutie, Tiny, Eunji, Pink. (WLA) Jean, Saki, Daisy (MW).

Pink Angels. https://pinkangels.site/..............................

Sexy Angels. https://sexyangels.site/ Jenny https://sexyangels.site/ .

SFK. https://sexyfunkgirls.escortbook.com/ Nicole, Dana.

http://preciousklove.cuties-sites.com/home Cutie, Tiny, Eunji, Pink. WLA. Jean, Saki, Daisy MW.

[Toungsten]

Exactly the same info. M Texted me on the 14th, said Channel available Monday and Wednesday. Which I was happy to partake in! Channel is not available this week however.

Hopefully T's Supply Chain of Intel has not hit a speed bump.

Just received my daily text from with the daily lineup and she insisted that Chanel and Cona are not and have not been available. If everyone here is talking about it here then it doesn't sound like a well kept secret from the masses or even UTR. I'm sure that those saying they were offered appointments would have been told not to broadcast it if it was UTR. Don't shoot the messenger.

[Cricket79]

[Deleted by Admin]

EDITOR'S NOTE: This report was redacted or deleted to remove sections of the report that were largely argumentative. Please read the Forum FAQ and the Forum's Posting Guidelines for more information. Thank You!

[HexenDuction]

"What it is, is what it is!" - James Brown.

I totally agree with the philosophical underpinnings and theory of your arguments, except the part about symmetry. I think the orgs are taking a much bigger risk than the mongers. This is such a base and basic market that I don't think there is room for a lot of subtleties, or consideration. Also, I don't think there are too many "subtle" people involved at any level of the orgs, or the "girls".

Time for another of my favorite sayings: "If all you have is a hammer, everything looks like a nail!

If I get burned by my dealer, I don't go running to the BBB (but I would run to the BBFS). I try to find another dealer. I guess the question in this instance is exactly how many dealers are there? If we were to draw up a heirarchical chart of the booker's and orgs, would we find out that in fact that there are not that many players, and their relationships to each could effectively blackball one right out of the game? If so, I think it is fair to consider what is likely to be the most productive course of action, and not just stand on principal!

Again this creates a dichotomy of "we do what we want (cancel at any time for any reason with no reimbursement) and you do what you can (can't cancel at any time for any reason without reimbursement). OK, sure. Shit practice but sure. Then let's see the list of all orgs who engage in such practice, it's only right that we enumerate them publicly.

[RocketManP]

I'm sure no one wants to hear this, but some credit is due to the orgs that are thriving. It's is presumptuous to think that "the customer is always right" policy is applicable to the KAAMP world! None of us really know what the order flow looks like from their side. The good thing about a Zero Tolerance Policy is that it doesn't require the time to judge each cancellation on it's merits, which they don't have the time or inclination to do. A "no fault" cancellation policy would just lead to more cancellations.

Figuring out how many distinct orgs there are would be helpful in decision making process. If they are plentiful, just move on. If not, "charge it to the game" and amortize the fee over total number of visits. But, I'm still not sure how the fee paying process would work. It would be interesting to engage the booker on this subject right before getting shut down!

I actually think most people WANT to hear such policy stated explicitly beforehand, so they know what they're getting into. Forget "customer is always right", it's more like "supplier is always right". And if so, this should be stated clearly. And currently this board is one of the few places it can be stated on.

I agree zero tolerance policy is easier (and lazier) approach. But wherr is zero tolerance on the other side? When a girl or booker cancels you, do you get full compensation? An airline cancellation gives passengers vouchers that are higher in value. No such thing in this biz. This creates very assymetric relationships.

At the very least, people could report it publicly so others know, that agency X will demand full price for canceling on a prebook, even in emergency situation.

Charging it to the game is a fine concept, but only if it applies to both sides. Mongers lose money=time every time we're canceled on.

Again this creates a dichotomy of "we do what we want (cancel at any time for any reason with no reimbursement) and you do what you can (can't cancel at any time for any reason without reimbursement). OK, sure. Shit practice but sure. Then let's see the list of all orgs who engage in such practice, it's only right that we enumerate them publicly.

[LngTimeMongr]

I received the same info.

What text?

[Thud1]

M texted me on Oct. 12 that Chanel was back and Cona back on Fri Oct. 15.

Exactly the same info. M Texted me on the 14th, said Channel available Monday and Wednesday. Which I was happy to partake in! Channel is not available this week however.

Hopefully T's Supply Chain of Intel has not hit a speed bump.

[Toungsten]

100% correct Golddust. I saw her under another name too.

I find it odd that if Chanel and Cona are working even sporadically and UTR along with an alleged different name to keep Cona even more UTR then how is it that everyone on this board seems to know about it. That's with M indignant about the fact that they both haven't been working. This has become the most non UTR provider availability I have ever heard of. As for Cona being pissed off because of all the BBFS she was that since I met her in 2015 and loved every minute of it. Singles, doubles, you name it. The reality is that she has invested her money wisely and doesn't really need to provide any more.

[JrueArtist]

Am I the only one that misses Adela / Elena? Been over a month since I've been inside her.

For reference, I found these posts that contained pics of Adela/Tia/Elena.

#22496

#22269

https://switter.at/@Loveangels/102798933208095007 (higher res Tia pic).

Adela @ CandyGirlLA

.

[Member #2210]

He ain't lying. I just saw her last week.

M texted me on Oct. 12 that Chanel was back and Cona back on Fri Oct. 15.

[Jack926]

Cona works on the low sometimes. I've been offered her as well and she was not listed. Either she has a stalker or keeping her working a secret from someone. The reason I say this is because a few months ago my buddy saw her under another name. Her reviews weren't favorable under this name. Just comes to show their name with reputation really are important.

I would not be surprised if Cona reinvented herself and attempted to offer CFS as she is / was bit bitter about the numerous CIP's. But once a girl get reputation of BBFS / CIP, it will be hard for her to reinvent herself. Almost like adult star that want go main stream-it just does not happen.

Yes-Cona WAS HOT and still is for majority of the guys but I think she is defintely past the age that will be considered as PRIME MEAT.