Thread: Korean Agency PSE / BBFS
+
Add Report
Results 5,791 to 5,805 of 7208
-
10-24-21 12:15 #1418Senior Member

Posts: 308Everyone else seemed to get it. Tim and Yuki are scum. I would never vouch for them.
Originally Posted by HapaBoy86
[View Original Post]
-
10-24-21 10:33 #1417Senior Member

Posts: 778We all TOFTT. If you don't want to, then stick with reviewed providers. It doesn't look like that you even knew the screening process since you posted a few days ago. Are you even screened to go to this agency?
Originally Posted by VegasGuy888
[View Original Post]
-
10-24-21 06:16 #1416Regular Member

Posts: 10Cl ltlv
I know that. I was hoping someone on this forum could tell me if she's hot / average or whatever. She's by far the hottest girl judging by pics alone. I just didn't want to take the plunge blind.
Originally Posted by RogerOver
[View Original Post]
-
10-24-21 02:11 #1415Senior Member

Posts: 82Haven't seen any really skinny / petite kgirls recently. Anyone know who the skinniest BBFS kgirl in town is right now? Any agency except LTLV. Thanks.
-
10-23-21 22:41 #1414Senior Member

Posts: 3171Pics at the korean agencies
If you read even a couple of pages in this thread, or ANY other review site, it's clear that the pictures are almost never the girl, or so heavily photoshopped, you wouldn't recognize them on the street. But maybe not this time. Go check it out!
Originally Posted by VegasGuy888
[View Original Post]
-
10-23-21 21:02 #1413Regular Member

Posts: 10Cl ltlv
Has anyone seen CL at LTLV? Pics look too good to be true.
-
10-23-21 20:53 #1412Senior Member

Posts: 89LTLV Momo
I guess I might have been one of the last to see her because she's already gone from the lineup. But, in my opinion, you're not missing out.
The two upsides were tight pussy and she certainly seemed like she was eager to please, but eagerness only gets you so far. She wasn't ugly but her looks just weren't doing anything for me. Flat ass but also not small? Idk, I'm not great describing things, LOL. Actually, her tits were pretty nice, but the rest of her was average or below.
Overall it was just boring and lackluster and I wish the booker hadn't talked me into seeing her.
Has anyone seem Chloe?
-
10-22-21 13:48 #1411Senior Member

Posts: 66Erased info
I spent time with a kgirl turned booker. I've seen the phone and nothing is deleted guys. Not even your last conversations. That's how they keep track of you and who you've seen. Your entire history is on that burner. So if le got hold of it and got into it they would see that you agreed to 400 to have your butt licked on a Friday in June than complained because Jane was actually fat.
Originally Posted by BuddhaHead
[View Original Post]
-
10-22-21 05:11 #1410Banned Member

Posts: 621Ruby
Finally Ltlv booker let me in and see ruby if I pay the 400 for.
BBFS. The thing is I nutted in 15 minutes from the BJ and then went bare in her but could.
Not finish. She tried her best though so I give her that. Anyone seen any of the new girls at vac? Haven't read any reviews yet. I also want to know if the rumors are true about new.
K-agency opening up. Or another fake one?
-
10-21-21 22:14 #1409Senior Member

Posts: 778What risks are the girls exposed to? Nonpayment, physical harm, law enforcement. Remember, these are strangers, mostly from out of town, with no references about prior behavior.
Originally Posted by PoundTownMayor
[View Original Post]
Requesting real I'd won't necessarily screen out these risks, but certainly would tend to make potential bad players think twice about providing it since the agency will know who they are.
What is the risk to good customers? LE busts them and confiscated their info, exposing you. But, they can't charge you with anything, since there's no evidence that you did anything wrong. Just having your I'd doesn't prove anything.
Also, I haven't heard of any bust of a Korean Agency since they've started.
-
10-21-21 21:15 #1408Senior Member

Posts: 1081LOL, right? I mean, they all promise to delete your DL photos as soon as you send it, but there's no way they do that. Mainly because I've talked to providers who have told me as much, and even showed me one time how the booker sends them the photo so they know who to expect at the door.
Originally Posted by JimRob
[View Original Post]
-
10-21-21 19:37 #1407Senior Member

Posts: 193Seriously, what could go wrong?
Heck, as long as they swear they are honest and promise they will never flip, I just might be willing to give them all my bank information as well.
Originally Posted by HobbyCruiser
[View Original Post]
-
10-21-21 19:22 #1406Senior Member

Posts: 53Are this pic real? Bc damn they are hot!
Originally Posted by Kumawrx
[View Original Post]
-
10-21-21 18:06 #1405Senior Member

Posts: 308K Agencies Non-Intrusive Screening
These agencies respect your privacy. Client care and privacy is of the utmost concern. They use genuine photos in their ads so you know what you're getting.
Originally Posted by PoundTownMayor
[View Original Post]
For screening they just want your name, dob, race, address, and occupation. Since they absolutely don't bullshit, they also don't want you to bullshit. So to verify what you tell them they merely ask you for a photo of a driver's license and work I'd. For good measure you should also provide your social security number and mother's maiden name.
Not to worry. They delete all info once they have verified you and absolutely don't keep it to trade as evidence on their clients when making deals when they get busted.
Tim and Yuki promise not to ever flip. Can't vouch for the others but their colleagues are probably as upstanding as they are.
-
10-21-21 14:07 #1404Senior Member

Posts: 73But what does this screening actually consist of? I've always been interested in trying one of these places but would a person with privacy concerns have to release their personal info (name, address, DOB, etc) just to get booked and see a girl?
Originally Posted by Ombyb
[View Original Post]
What / who is it they're specifically screening out?














Reply With Quote









