Korean Agency BB

**Abaddon143** · 09-11-21 15:25

You think Becky worth a try? Ahah I'm glad I did two two hr session with pepsi.

**Abaddon143** · 09-11-21 15:23

Originally Posted by CreamInside [View Original Post]

New pics from Sophia look great. Anyone see her recently?

https://www.sweetasiangem.com/sophie

Go for it she is LIT.

**DaddyChill** · 09-11-21 15:12

Originally Posted by TheSexorcist [View Original Post]

Pepsi is now 350. God that hurts.

OOF, anyeonghee keseyo Pepsi.

**Fat Jerk76** · 09-11-21 14:12

Originally Posted by PepsiLover [View Original Post]

Goodbye Pepsi.

You know its bad when PepsiLover is rejecting Pepsi.

**Ramen25** · 09-11-21 13:05

Originally Posted by BuddhaHead [View Original Post]

I don't trust what anyone says about how a girl looks compared to her pictures. Why? Because.

1. Most guys cannot seem to tell whether someone looks like their pictures or not (e. G. , guys swear that fake pictures of Korean models are "real".

2. Most guys word descriptions are totally useless - "pictures are representative", "they're her, but heavily photo shopped", "90% looks like her", "not skinny, but not fat", "typical Korean look".

3. As we all agree, looks are subjective, so, of what use is it when someone has a "big ass" preference, or "big boob" preference, or "MILF" preference, and gives them high ratings, and you have a different preference?

4. Hobbyists seem to rate girls based on other Kgirls they've seen (which may be limited). I see so many girls rated as "model material", who are average looking when compared with real models. If you've only seen 5 Kgirls (who are all average looking MILFs), then you might rate an average looking 20-something as an 8 or 9. They may be "cute" or may be your preference, or the best looking you've seen in the hobby, but that doesn't make them "model material" to the discriminating guy.

5. Hobbyists seem to bias their looks opinion based on their (PSE) service, and vice versa. Someone doesn't become better looking just because they do BBFS.

I've spent a lot chasing the latest "hot" girls, and only a small percentage turned out to be truly hot.

So, I am cautious about trying out the latest and greatest, but sometimes will have to TOFMT (Take One for My Team) even if others have tried.

I know this has probably been mentioned dozens of times over the years and I recall this was talked about some months ago but you always have to keep in mind that everyone's standards are different. Everyone has an their own idea of what a "model" looks like which could differ from someone else's definition. Some people have a very narrow window / criteria of what that is and some people have a wide idea of what that would be (in terms of Kgirl standards).

Also I think people are looking for different things- some people value the experience / service over attractiveness. While others only care about appearance and body. Nothing wrong with that. But what if they're truly model material but they lay there like a dead fish and keep asking you- are you finished yet? Are you finished yet? Does that still make them hot?

Does a Kgirl have to look like Hyuna or Lisa from BlackPink or Nancy from Momoland to be considered model material? But what if their service sucked and they were dead fishes in the bedroom?

And what if a "not so hot" looking girl, lets say like, IU, gave unforgettable PSE pornstar-like experience with BB everything CIP, CIA, CIM, CIE (ear), CIN (nose), CIE (eye) every orfice you can think of. Does that make them hotter in a sense more so than Hyuna, Lisa, or Nancy over their shitty service?

I don't know. It always just turns into a philosophical question at this point and you just have take everyone's word with a grain of salt. I've learned to just use the info people have contributed and make a informed decision based on what I know, what other people have said, and how they compare to what I've observed personally. Then you can kind of get a gauge on whose opinions and views align mostly with yours and whose doesn't and just go from there.

**Toungsten** · 09-11-21 13:03

M. Nicole, Allie. (Viki returning next week).

Newtopasian. http://newtopasia.cuties-sites.com/models/..

Pink Angels. https://pinkangels.site/................

Sexy Angels. https://sexyangels.site/ Jenny.

SFK. https://sexyfunkgirls.escortbook.com/ Dana, Nicole. (Viki returning next week).

PKL http://preciousklove.com/ Pink, Eunji. Saki.

Angels of Ktown (AKT) http://angelsofktown.cuties-sites.com/home Dayoung.

KGLA. https://kgirlsinla.wordpress.com/..............

**Kaamper** · 09-11-21 12:35

Originally Posted by BuddhaHead [View Original Post]

Bad analogy. Also, the jury is out as to whether her pics are real (see my post below). So, if your expectations are that you will see exactly the girl in the pics (how often does that happen?) then that's an issue with your expectations. If you are just looking for a hot girl and a good experience, then your expectations will have been met.

Reality often doesn't match the brochure.

**Owliee** · 09-11-21 12:07

Any info on her?

https://mykupcake.com/L_A?product_id=528

**Cream Inside** · 09-11-21 10:48

Originally Posted by TheSexorcist [View Original Post]

Pepsi is now 350. God that hurts.

I'm assuming that all the non-upcharge girls (who are now 320) will eventually be 350 by end of next year. Happy hunting.

**BootyWatcher69** · 09-11-21 10:33

Saw Pepsi for maybe the last time yesterday. Her price is just way too high. I cannot justify the price tag. Maybe for an hr and a half session but not for the hr. I will say tho, her service is incredible. I took control of the session a bit because I saw she wanted to drag the time out & I ended up having a blast. She's a true ****. She goes out of her way to give you the full experience & then some.

**AhardLanding** · 09-11-21 09:58

Originally Posted by TheSexorcist [View Original Post]

Pepsi is now 350. God that hurts.

She is now out of her price range. Sorry, old girl.

**Cream Inside** · 09-11-21 09:45

Seems like Amora is in Seattle (under GIA) but only offering CFS even though they have the upcharge option over there. That's interesting.

http://www.usasexguide.nl/forum/show...=1#post5510770

https://bellevueservices.net/Gallery.html

**Cream Inside** · 09-11-21 09:15

New pics from Sophia look great. Anyone see her recently?

https://www.sweetasiangem.com/sophie

**Eddy68** · 09-11-21 08:23

Originally Posted by BuddhaHead [View Original Post]

I don't trust what anyone says about how a girl looks compared to her pictures. Why? Because.

1. Most guys cannot seem to tell whether someone looks like their pictures or not (e. G. , guys swear that fake pictures of Korean models are "real".

2. Most guys word descriptions are totally useless - "pictures are representative", "they're her, but heavily photo shopped", "90% looks like her", "not skinny, but not fat", "typical Korean look".

3. As we all agree, looks are subjective, so, of what use is it when someone has a "big ass" preference, or "big boob" preference, or "MILF" preference, and gives them high ratings, and you have a different preference?

4. Hobbyists seem to rate girls based on other Kgirls they've seen (which may be limited). I see so many girls rated as "model material", who are average looking when compared with real models. If you've only seen 5 Kgirls (who are all average looking MILFs), then you might rate an average looking 20-something as an 8 or 9. They may be "cute" or may be your preference, or the best looking you've seen in the hobby, but that doesn't make them "model material" to the discriminating guy.

5. Hobbyists seem to bias their looks opinion based on their (PSE) service, and vice versa. Someone doesn't become better looking just because they do BBFS..

Your some one right. But for me I don't like judging my taste is different then any one here.

Plus talent level has gone way down hill I was 19 when I first got a taste of this and can remember for 2 bills.

The chicks were hotter. Now we have slim pickings. And am mid 30's now so am pretty picky.