Escort Reports

[LuckyToo]

While you may not have made the initial comments about meth mouth etc. You are still perpetuating that statement and others are simply responding with what our own recent experience was with her. I hardly believe a statement such as "she doesn't need to do this" could be construed as somehow being a white knight, even though I would never say such a thing myself. While yes I agree her photos are filtered, they are not filtered to the point where they make a misrepresentation of what she actually looks like. If you have seen her personally you would most likely agree.

I loved eating her pussy and getting a blowjob with those dark sultry eyes gazing at me. Her cowgirl was exceptional with flawless skinl. She was totally into the moment. Because of her current attitude, gps, bad company, I will not be seeing her again soon Here's to memories!

[ScooterBoy99]

"A call for photography experts. LOL. I have never disputed any of theses above comments you keep harping on or that other people's experience with Layci didn't happen. All of this disdain because I said she currently looks really good in person and doesn't need to use filters to look good. Layci must have really done a number on you for you to be so petty towards her. And I surely need a major upgrade in my white knighting skills. "There are DEFINITELY reasons to not see Layci but currently her appearance is not one of them. ".

I'm happy that her appearance has improved.

If others feel that the experience with her is worth the $300 to $350 an hour she's been quoting recently, that's fine with me.

You obviously need to have the last word.

We'll let you have it.

[Poohbear2]

"I made no accusation of meth mouth or scabs regarding this girl.

I stated that these comments were made by other members on the St Pete escort forum.

Please search for her name on there, and take things up with the original posters of these comments.

Her pictures have been touched up. We have some professional photographers on here. Perhaps they can chime in for us. ".

A call for photography experts. LOL. I have never disputed any of theses above comments you keep harping on or that other people's experience with Layci didn't happen. All of this disdain because I said she currently looks really good in person and doesn't need to use filters to look good. Layci must have really done a number on you for you to be so petty towards her. And I surely need a major upgrade in my white knighting skills. "There are DEFINITELY reasons to not see Layci but currently her appearance is not one of them. ".

[GMoney0505]

I've been considering giving her a bit of my hard earned $. Any intel on if she allows CIM or COF?

Yes for both with me.

[NevauMind]

I choose my words very carefully.

I made no accusation of meth mouth or scabs regarding this girl.

I stated that these comments were made by other members on the St Pete escort forum.

Please search for her name on there, and take things up with the original posters of these comments.

Her pictures have been touched up. We have some professional photographers on here. Perhaps they can chime in for us.

If "white knighters" want to argue that "she really doesn't need to do this", that's fine.

It would be like me saying, "Ted Bundy killed some people, but he really didn't 'need' to do it".

While you may not have made the initial comments about meth mouth etc. You are still perpetuating that statement and others are simply responding with what our own recent experience was with her. I hardly believe a statement such as "she doesn't need to do this" could be construed as somehow being a white knight, even though I would never say such a thing myself. While yes I agree her photos are filtered, they are not filtered to the point where they make a misrepresentation of what she actually looks like. If you have seen her personally you would most likely agree.

[ScooterBoy99]

I choose my words very carefully.

I made no accusation of meth mouth or scabs regarding this girl.

I stated that these comments were made by other members on the St Pete escort forum.

Please search for her name on there, and take things up with the original posters of these comments.

Her pictures have been touched up. We have some professional photographers on here. Perhaps they can chime in for us.

If "white knighters" want to argue that "she really doesn't need to do this", that's fine.

It would be like me saying, "Ted Bundy killed some people, but he really didn't 'need' to do it".

[TheRogue099]

Who do you guys go to when you want to splurge a bit, say $$$ for a quality GFE experience? I'm looking for a hot blonde type, and / or petite.

I checked out EROS and it seems the going rate there is $$ and up, with an average of $$ for an hour. Seems too high based on the quality.

The last time I spent that much was with Anastasia Rose, a bonified porn star. I would be willing to do that again, but only with another porn star.

IMO for a tall blonde. StephanieAnnSimmons out of St. Pete. On EROS and Tryst. Mostly outcall, rarely does she have an incall thet I know of. - have fun.

[NevauMind]

LOL. You originally related a report of meth mouth and facial scabs but now you are resorting to demean her appearance based on skin tone, elasticity, pores and pigmentation when not wearing any makeup. Did she wrong you otherwise I don't understand this petty hate. I've seen her several times since the beginning of the year and her makeup and hair have always at least been close to on point. I've seen her twice in the past two weeks and once she looked slightly better than her current pics and the other still very nice. There are DEFINITELY reasons to not see Layci but currently her appearance is not one of them. Compared to her Christmas photos she has put on some good weight which she wears very well and is more tanned. I have no reason to doubt the other person's report of facial scabs previously but currently she looks very good.

I just saw Layci yesterday and I saw none of what was described. No evidence of meth mouth. No skin blemishes visible, though she was made up and hair was done. She greeted outside her room near the airport and we enjoyed a good 45 minutes with a HH scheduled. Personally I think she's hot AF and I can't wait to get back inside her.

[Banny Boyle]

Does anyone have any information about these providers? Need to find a provider without candy issue for tomorrow.

Thanks in advance.

https://yolo.com.listcrawler.eu/post...tampa/66302675

https://yolo.com.listcrawler.eu/post...tampa/66381928

https://escortalligator.com.listcraw...tampa/66389707

https://escortalligator.com.listcraw...tampa/66347482

https://escortalligator.com.listcraw...tampa/66395275

I saw her couple time couple year ago. No issues. Works out of private house. This reference to last ad

[TSulk74]

https://escortbabylon.net/image_list...cb9159707c4f71

[Poohbear2]

So now you agree that she IS using filters, but you're on here to tell us that she doesn't NEED to use filters. Fine. We appreciate your opinion.

Now I'll tell you my opinion.

I've seen this girl in person and without makeup. Regarding her facial skin: Her complexion, her skin tone, her skin elasticity, her skin pores, her skin pigmentations, etc., are nowhere near as flawless as the pictures she posts.

I suspect that even the "Christmas" photos have been touched up.

I stand by my original statement that the girl you meet in person WILL NOT be as attractive as the pictures she has been posting.

You need to search her on the St Pete forum.

A year ago, she was working with Annie and offered 80 qv's in trash, drug-hole motels. She got popular, developed GPS, and doubled her rates.

She been reported as having meth mouth and scrabs on her face due to picking.

Her pics now are HIGHLY filtered.

The girl you meet in person WILL NOT be as attractive as the photos she's posting now!

LOL. You originally related a report of meth mouth and facial scabs but now you are resorting to demean her appearance based on skin tone, elasticity, pores and pigmentation when not wearing any makeup. Did she wrong you otherwise I don't understand this petty hate. I've seen her several times since the beginning of the year and her makeup and hair have always at least been close to on point. I've seen her twice in the past two weeks and once she looked slightly better than her current pics and the other still very nice. There are DEFINITELY reasons to not see Layci but currently her appearance is not one of them. Compared to her Christmas photos she has put on some good weight which she wears very well and is more tanned. I have no reason to doubt the other person's report of facial scabs previously but currently she looks very good.

[ScooterBoy99]

It's amazing what these photo apps can do.

[ScooterBoy99]

No shit her photos are filtered etc. You "Sir" apparently have not seen her recently in person. Again she looks really good and does not NEED to use filters on her photos. She isn't hiding anything.

So now you agree that she IS using filters, but you're on here to tell us that she doesn't NEED to use filters. Fine. We appreciate your opinion.

Now I'll tell you my opinion.

I've seen this girl in person and without makeup. Regarding her facial skin: Her complexion, her skin tone, her skin elasticity, her skin pores, her skin pigmentations, etc., are nowhere near as flawless as the pictures she posts.

I suspect that even the "Christmas" photos have been touched up.

I stand by my original statement that the girl you meet in person WILL NOT be as attractive as the pictures she has been posting.

[Poohbear2]

ALL of the photos in her current ad have been "filtered", "doctored" "photo-shoped", "app genenerated", "tint modified", or whatever else one chooses to call it.

You, Sir, are apparently not "computer app" literate enough to see and recognize this.

No shit her photos are filtered etc. You "Sir" apparently have not seen her recently in person. Again she looks really good and does not NEED to use filters on her photos. She isn't hiding anything.

[ScooterBoy99]

I have zero reason to doubt the prior reports but currently she is very attractive. Every time she has been dolled up and her skin this week was impeccable. Don't recall seeing her teeth but she does not need to use filters on her photos.

ALL of the photos in her current ad have been "filtered", "doctored", "photo-shopped", "app generated", "tint modified", or whatever else one chooses to call it.

You, Sir, are apparently not "computer app" literate enough to see and recognize this.