Korean Agency BB

**DankDonk** · 08-12-21 14:18

Originally Posted by IAmGib1 [View Original Post]

Stella on same booker's website is definitely real pics of Jia. If you like Stella pics you will like Jia.

This is Stella from GKS?

https://www.sweetasiangem.com/jia-1

**BuddhaHead** · 08-12-21 11:50

Originally Posted by CreamInside [View Original Post]

Anyone check out Tori yet? Pictures look pretty decent.

Decent. For fake pictures.

**BootyWatcher69** · 08-12-21 11:35

Just got back from a fuck fest up in the bay. My notable favorites that I plan to repeat with were Cora, Serina, & Yuna. Restored my faith in Korean women after being somewhat out of the hobby for the past year. Can't beat those prices either! I have Allison on my todo list & I'm up for any more suggestions if anyone has them.

**Bro Hymn** · 08-12-21 11:14

Temporarily, that is.

Went to see eunji a few days ago and I was cautiously optimistic after reading into the reviews I'd seen. I was pretty ready to write off the hobby altogether, but I think the session with eunji pulled me back in for now. She has a quirky personality and a bit of a lazy eye, but a wonderful attitude. She really wanted to squeeze that second pop out of me, even though I'm usually only good for one. I've been pretty harsh in my reviews on the review site recently, but I will probably rate this session highly and repeat.

Side note: for those who have seen eunji and dana, eunji has what I would consider to be a very nice proportional ass. Definitely isn't kardashian style, but round with a little bounce and very nice to hold on to while in cg or ds. Dana probably only fulfills this category if you have smaller hands.

**Tom Keen** · 08-12-21 05:30

Originally Posted by StopTheMonger [View Original Post]

Better looking than expected, maybe even younger too. 5'4" 120. Early 30's. Nice natural C's, BBFS, some LFK. But pros end there. Very GFE and bubbly, but when it comes to PSE don't expect much. No CIP, no DFK, BBBJ is lacking. I would repeat if she was PSE performance. You sensual GFE guys will like her.

I also can confirm upcharge girls having hard time getting more customers / slots filled. I was her 2nd at 5 pm that day. Also SFK Nina seems to also be relatively available, but I only saw her since SFK Dana cancelled last minute on me this week.

I mean unless you are the one booking for her, how do you really know that she is slow? Do you think it's in a girl's best interest to tell you that you're the 8th guy of the day? Lmao "BTW, there were 7 creampies ahead of you. I am so busy today and so tired. OMG".

**Tom Keen** · 08-12-21 05:27

Originally Posted by BuddhaHead [View Original Post]

I disagree with the premise and characterization. It's a free market. If you don't want to pay the price, then don't. It's only a ripoff if the promised service isn't provided. Maybe it's the bookers who are upping the price. Is it greed to want to get paid as much as you can? Do you think you're underpaid and deserve a raise? Maybe there are other factors to consider when they raise the price. It reduces the demand and maybe that's what is intended. Maybe girls do not want to have so many customers every day. The kgirls are also an oligopoly and know they can set their prices but need to be about the same else one group will attract more business. Yes, as consumers, higher prices are not good. But, not all customers need to have the upcharge services and not all girls offer them. Until there is more competition, we will have to live with it. And, no, boycotting won't work because for every guy who says he's boycotting (which never lasts long anyway), there's someone behind him who's willing to pay. The little head will always win.

This, at the end of the day the price increases are here to stay because we are in an inflationary environment. To expect them to stay at $250 forever with BBFS and MSOG included and all girls have to be less than 25 years old is very unrealistic. People really underestimate how dense los angeles is and truly believe that boycotting is going to work. These prices were slowly increased over time and now $300 is the absolute floor. Shannon is charging $500 and she's already booked weeks in advance.

**Cream Inside** · 08-12-21 05:21

Anyone check out Tori yet? Pictures look pretty decent.

**Cream Inside** · 08-12-21 05:14

Originally Posted by GoldDust58 [View Original Post]

That's a very good argument actually. However, if a popular kgirl came to LA and only saw 5 customers per day she would be gone instantly. The popular girls demand 8-10 per day and if they don't get then they move around. Today environment makes it more difficult to achieve this but the newbies coming from Korea won't come to an org who only gets them 5 a day. That's why most girls who upcharge are rebrands or traveling girls. There are some gems thrown in the mix don't get me wrong. The reason most new girls go to NorCal first is to be filled for weeks 10/ day. We have been lucky to get a few lately and those are the busiest ones. It's about the consistency over profit for most of them.

Overall, girls that charge $300 will be busier than girls who charge $380 so therefore I'm expecting girls who charge $380 to be less burnt out. Besides, everyone always on this forum talking about how the "upcharge girls are so slow they only have 1-2 customers per day" << that is music to my ears but I doubt that is true as there are some upcharge girls who have been here for more than a year now.

**GoldDust58** · 08-12-21 01:58

Originally Posted by CreamInside [View Original Post]

I personally only see upcharge girls knowing that they are likely to be lower volume. Girls that don't upcharge probably see like 10 guys per day, every single day. That's a lot of loads. That extra $80 is nothing. Paying an extra $80 to fuck a girl that only sees maybe 5 customers per day max as opposed to seeing the girl that sees 10 guys per day? It's a no brainer decision. At the end of the day, if it was not a smart business decision then they obviously would not be doing it. It's time to just accept it or vote with your wallet, the market will set the prices.

That's a very good argument actually. However, if a popular kgirl came to LA and only saw 5 customers per day she would be gone instantly. The popular girls demand 8-10 per day and if they don't get then they move around. Today environment makes it more difficult to achieve this but the newbies coming from Korea won't come to an org who only gets them 5 a day. That's why most girls who upcharge are rebrands or traveling girls. There are some gems thrown in the mix don't get me wrong. The reason most new girls go to NorCal first is to be filled for weeks 10/ day. We have been lucky to get a few lately and those are the busiest ones. It's about the consistency over profit for most of them.

**Moodyz** · 08-12-21 01:01

Originally Posted by CreamInside [View Original Post]

I personally only see upcharge girls knowing that they are likely to be lower volume. Girls that don't upcharge probably see like 10 guys per day, every single day. That's a lot of loads. That extra $80 is nothing. Paying an extra $80 to fuck a girl that only sees maybe 5 customers per day max as opposed to seeing the girl that sees 10 guys per day? It's a no brainer decision. At the end of the day, if it was not a smart business decision then they obviously would not be doing it. It's time to just accept it or vote with your wallet, the market will set the prices.

If you really look at it from this perspective, the upcharge is very well worth the extra cost from a long term perspective as you are more likely to get good service most of the time. I have been hobbying for quite awhile and have been tipping girls $100 extra in the past whenever I got BBFS from them so the prices are just catching up to what I've already been paying LOL.

**WillardJ** · 08-12-21 00:52

Originally Posted by CreamInside [View Original Post]

I personally only see upcharge girls knowing that they are likely to be lower volume. Girls that don't upcharge probably see like 10 guys per day, every single day. That's a lot of loads. That extra $80 is nothing. Paying an extra $80 to fuck a girl that only sees maybe 5 customers per day max as opposed to seeing the girl that sees 10 guys per day? It's a no brainer decision. At the end of the day, if it was not a smart business decision then they obviously would not be doing it. It's time to just accept it or vote with your wallet, the market will set the prices.

From a consumer perspective and wanting to get the best service, I have been practicing this approach and service is much better for me from the upcharge girls than the non-upcharge girls who are very high volume. Even some of the popular non-upcharge girls were so-so compared to the upcharge girls that I have seen. Niya is one of my favorites.

**Jack926** · 08-12-21 00:41

Originally Posted by CreamInside [View Original Post]

I personally only see upcharge girls knowing that they are likely to be lower volume. Girls that don't upcharge probably see like 10 guys per day, every single day. That's a lot of loads. That extra $80 is nothing. Paying an extra $80 to fuck a girl that only sees maybe 5 customers per day max as opposed to seeing the girl that sees 10 guys per day? It's a no brainer decision. At the end of the day, if it was not a smart business decision then they obviously would not be doing it. It's time to just accept it or vote with your wallet, the market will set the prices.

I have abstain from screwing for past five weeks due to work load. I decided to see someone today and while she is a CFS, yet she is very popular. The session was awesome and she told me the following: "Business is so slow since July".

I don't buy the argument that 8-10 loads a day-I get few weekly texts from bookers that if I want to visit. .

**Cream Inside** · 08-12-21 00:28

Originally Posted by Leocat2020 [View Original Post]

Just saw Candygirl advertising a lady under the name of Loa.

Pictures look very familiar. Is that "Milk" from the OC? She was active maybe 5-6 years ago. Maybe more?

If it's her she had a vercious sexual appetite but was a hard no for BBFS. This Loa is advertising BBFS for am upcharge. Despite that her DFK was insane and her energy was amazing. Her body was gorgeous. My only drawback about her is she may use botox on her lips because they were so plump. LOL. Dick sucker's for sure!

If that is "Milk". I just may have to splurge for the first time at $$$ 8.

Anyone confirm?

Seen her many times over the years and she's one of my ATFs. I was one of the lucky ones who got BBFS from her when she was in LA before, glad that she is back. Very solid weekly option for me.

**GoldDust58** · 08-12-21 00:25

Originally Posted by GG1234 [View Original Post]

I'm talking about the old Viki who is currently on vacation. I only asked, because I rate Viki's BBBJ very highly. To me, whatever faults Viki has are offset by how well she sucks dick. What she does better than anyone else is maintain constant suction on your dick so that it feels very snug at all times.

She's a stark contrast to someone like (retired) Megan who also gave a great BBBJ, but stylistically, Megan was way more aggressive than Viki. I rate both of their BBBJs very highly, but I prefer Viki's slower methodical style. Perhaps it would have been better to ask about Ace / Diva's BBBJ style. How does she like to do it?

Ace / Diva is a mix. She is better than Viki at BBBJ and I'm a Viki fan. She had a ton to facework done to change appearance from her NorCal days as Hurricane Hana. Older yes but body is good. BBBJ is her skill. She was known as Amora in OC.

Upcharge is my gripe with her. She gave NorCal a 220 bbfs tour as Vixen but we gotta pay for her.

**Cream Inside** · 08-12-21 00:23

Originally Posted by TheAbc [View Original Post]

It seems the general consensus is that people here, me included, that it's generally a rip off from greedy girls. So how much business do these girls get in general? I'm guessing not much with a recent post about them. Wouldn't it make more sense to just offer it at a more reasonable price and garner more business? Basic math would say that if they charged $280, but get 4-6 guys that day instead of 1-2 at $380 the math turns out more with the non upcharge. I understand why they do it, it's to get more profit for less dicks in but at the end of the day, it's all about the bottom line of how much bucks they get isn't it? Am I missing something here?

I personally only see upcharge girls knowing that they are likely to be lower volume. Girls that don't upcharge probably see like 10 guys per day, every single day. That's a lot of loads. That extra $80 is nothing. Paying an extra $80 to fuck a girl that only sees maybe 5 customers per day max as opposed to seeing the girl that sees 10 guys per day? It's a no brainer decision. At the end of the day, if it was not a smart business decision then they obviously would not be doing it. It's time to just accept it or vote with your wallet, the market will set the prices.