Thread: News and Media Reports
+
Add Report
Results 391 to 405 of 850
-
04-24-21 18:56 #460Senior Member

Posts: 425VAERS disclaimer
Posted on https://wonder.cdc.gov/vaers.html.
Originally Posted by Mpduration
[View Original Post]
VAERS accepts reports of adverse events and reactions that occur following vaccination. Healthcare providers, vaccine manufacturers, and the public can submit reports to VAERS. While very important in monitoring vaccine safety, VAERS reports alone cannot be used to determine if a vaccine caused or contributed to an adverse event or illness. The reports may contain information that is incomplete, inaccurate, coincidental, or unverifiable. Most reports to VAERS are voluntary, which means they are subject to biases. This creates specific limitations on how the data can be used scientifically. Data from reports should always be interpreted with these limitations in mind.
The strengths of VAERS are that it is national in scope and can quickly provide an early warning of a safety problem with a vaccine. As part of CDC and FDA's multi-system approach to post-licensure vaccine safety monitoring, VAERS is designed to rapidly detect unusual or unexpected patterns of adverse events, also known as "safety signals. " If a safety signal is found in VAERS, further studies can be done in safety systems such as the CDC's Vaccine Safety Datalink (VSD) or the Clinical Immunization Safety Assessment (CISA) project. These systems do not have the same limitations as VAERS, and can better assess health risks and possible connections between adverse events and a vaccine.
Key considerations and limitations of data:
Reports may include incomplete, inaccurate, coincidental and unverified information.
The number of reports alone cannot be interpreted or used to reach conclusions about the existence, severity, frequency, or rates of problems associated with vaccines.
Data are limited to vaccine adverse event reports received between 1990 and the most recent date for which data are available.
Data data do not represent all known safety information for a vaccine and should be interpreted in the context of other scientific information.
-
04-24-21 16:44 #459Senior Member

Posts: 726Latest CDC covid-19 vaccine death count.
-
04-23-21 08:38 #458Senior Member

Posts: 197Interesting read
The Guardian: Are police the biggest threat to massage parlor workers' safety?.
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/...-threat-safety
-
04-22-21 10:27 #457Senior Member

Posts: 56Wow
You probably believe in Qanon as well?
Originally Posted by Mpduration
[View Original Post]
The below posts just debunked your "facts", and you still don't get it.
"Did a 2-Year-Old in Virginia Die After Getting COVID-19 Vaccination?
The claim is based solely on a dubious report from the Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System, a database that anyone can submit reports to that is frequently abused by anti-vaccine activists".
Give your brain a rest and stay off a bitchute too.
“Bitchute: Hate speech. Neo-Nazi propaganda. Anti-Semitic QAnon conspiracy theories. Even terrorism. It's all there. And the platform keeps growing.”
-
04-22-21 10:07 #456Senior Member

Posts: 726WHen you run the query the deaths show up.
https://www.medalerts.org/vaersdb/index.php
Originally Posted by PilotAviator
[View Original Post]
-
04-22-21 08:38 #455Senior Member

Posts: 383Pfishing Computer Virus and "fake news" (Lies - 2-year-old Virginia girl dead))
Under the age of 16 are not eligible for vaccine -- no medical provider is going to inject any of the covid-vaccines into so young a child. The health industry has only just started small scale testing with teen age volunteers.
SEE SNOPES: https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/two-year-old-virginia-die-vaccine/
One of the URLs activate a website that attempted to attack my PC / load a computer virus (my system blocked the attempt).
Originally Posted by Mpduration
[View Original Post]
-
04-22-21 05:26 #454Senior Member

Posts: 112And what about this?
https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/tw...a-die-vaccine/
Originally Posted by Mpduration
[View Original Post]
-
04-22-21 01:24 #453Senior Member

Posts: 99Vaccines are safe
Friends,
Originally Posted by Mpduration
[View Original Post]
I do not know what Mpduration's agenda may be, but please be aware that he is passing off fake news with these links. Look up Bitchute and thecovid blog, and you will see the disreputable nature of these sites. "Bitchute is a video hosting service known for accomodating far-right individuals and conspiracy theorists, and for hosting hateful content. " (Wikipedia). The "mainstream media" is all over the story of the extremely small risk of clotting from the J&J vaccine. They would be happy to sell the clicks to a story about a baby dying from a COVID vaccine. But it ain't true. Does anyone recall that the FDA has not approved the vaccine (yet) for anyone younger than 16?
I am over 60. I just received my second shot of the Pfizer vaccine. Yes, the allegedly terrible, awful, going-to-screw-me-up mRNA vaccine. I am grateful that the research to develop a vaccine started immediately in January 2020, with financial support from the previous administration, and has now come to fruition and wide distribution with the current administration. Science rocks. I look forward to soon being able to move around without fear of the risks from catching this virus. (Yes, I'd probably survive, but I'm happy not to have to take that risk.).
Mpuration is at the least misguided by the rabbit-hole web sites that he seems to follow. I wonder what he / she is afraid of? Why do you feel threatened by these vaccines, which are truly amazing for their potential to save lives and prevent the pain and suffering and death of hundreds, thousands, millions of people in the US and around the world?
Mpduration: why do you post two links, with no comment? Take ownership if you truly believe it. Own it. Defend it. Prove it.
And if you won't and can't, then keep to yourself, and do not hurt others. Do you have the integrity to do that?
Lucretius.
-
04-22-21 00:49 #452Senior Member

Posts: 7262-year-old Virginia girl dead after getting covid-19 vaccine.
-
12-08-20 10:53 #451Senior Member

Posts: 180I agree with you, but after reading this article I sympathize with the guy here. Remember these girls were on seeking advertising as 18 year olds. Only after the fact the deed was done and he trusted them that they revealed their true age. Obv they wanted more money and he said no. They went to the cops at that point. Seeking is too high of stakes to get railed.
Originally Posted by FogHorn1
[View Original Post]
-
12-08-20 08:33 #450Senior Member

Posts: 466This is very true
I've had to check I'd several times. One girl I met turned 18 3 days prior to us meeting. I had an Asian girl so hot, but I wasn't sure about her age. I asked for I'd and she couldn't provide any and had lame excuses. I took her home and not the hotel. Got to be smart. The website should make females provide proof of age before joining. Always remember it's not worth the trouble. Think what the big head.
Originally Posted by FogHorn1
[View Original Post]
-
12-04-20 12:01 #449Senior Member

Posts: 618Be Careful
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...ia-Conway.html
This is a couple weeks old now and some might know about it, but for those that don't pay attention to those "18-19" y / o who may not be legal. This guy was a scumbag of course, but the point is some of the younger ones on the site are actually under the legal limit.
-
08-24-20 21:14 #448Senior Member

Posts: 1479Probably a silly question but
If Kraft wins and survives the appeals in the state Supreme Court, will the other defendants cases automatically receive the same consideration? Or do they need to pursue the same legal avenues each separately? Also, what about the poor saps that plead out or no contest?
Originally Posted by RockSwithSalt
[View Original Post]
-
08-19-20 16:58 #447Senior Member

Posts: 143One small victory
FORT LAUDERDALE, Fla. — A Florida appeals court ruled Wednesday that police violated the rights of New England Patriots owner Robert Kraft and others when they secretly video recorded them paying for massage parlor sex acts, barring the tapes' use at trial and dealing a potentially deadly blow to their prosecution.
The state 4th District Court of Appeal ruled Kraft's rights were violated under the Fourth Amendment to the Constitution, which protects against unreasonable searches and seizures.
"The type of law enforcement surveillance utilized in these cases is extreme. While there will be situations which may warrant the use of the techniques at issue, the strict Fourth Amendment safeguards developed over the past few decades must be observed," the judges ruled.
"To permit otherwise would yield unbridled discretion to agents of law enforcement and the government, the antithesis of the constitutional liberty of people to be secure against unreasonable searches and seizures," the court added.
Prosecutors will likely appeal the ruling to the state Supreme Court, but if it stands the misdemeanor charges brought against Kraft and other customers would have to be dropped for lack of evidence.
-
02-06-20 14:53 #446Senior Member

Posts: 1947Thanks for the article but, unfortunately, no new info there.
It's a long recital of things that have been discussed many times in the forum. Namely, that politicians and LE and organizations like Polaris Project have labeled pretty much everything as "trafficking" because it serves their various agendas. It points out that AMPs are easy targets and are disproportionately affected. I'm sure the author felt better after writing it but it doesn't change anything and doesn't really add much to the discussion. I was reading it in hopes of something new or interesting, but it wasn't there.
Originally Posted by Shinshi86
[View Original Post]














Reply With Quote









