Korean Agency BB

[SuperMan333]

This was my post of like 6 weeks ago.

"Well, in recent months she lost a couple of her girls to better paying bookers. Money talks and an extra 100 is an irresistible argument for the girls. Providing good looking girls with a good service attitude for a much lower pay will be the challenge for M. ".

M will have to change her biz model. Sub 300 BBFS is history and she has to take on the better paying competition. M has a huge, loyal customer base and should still be able to offer a better rate than the competitors.

Loyal customer LOL. Customer will just go wherever the good looking girls are going. If there is a girl I like I will see her doesn't matter which booker she is with. M, B,D or S doesn't matter what alphabet the booker he / she is. Just look at the Hana situation, are the John's more loyal to Hana or M?

Unless this mythical M thing is the only person in Los Angeles that could bring in girls that are 10/10 in looks then we could talk about being loyal to a booker.

[Hahasupz]

I am throwing it out there that asking for and / or verifying donation first has always been SOP in this hobby, especially outside of kgirls. The safety and security afforded by the kgirl model has mitigated a lot of the horrible outcomes you sometimes come across or hear about. As a matter of fact, it's been so successful to the point that money can be verified after the fact, out of sight and out of mind. Usually and unfortunately, if they verify first then something must of happened to institute this practice.

I just don't want mongers to equate and conflate verifying donation first as a foreshadowing of bad service. It could or could not. But if it does turn out bad, false equivalence and confirmation bias may be incorrectly established and applied. Logically, how exactly does the act of counting money in any way inform you of how a girl is going to perform?

My bad for not being more clear. I mentioned it was always a bad sign to me. That's just based on MY OWN experience. I've been in the hobby for about 8 years and I'd say most of the time where I was asked for donation first, the service was not that great. As always, this is just my own experience. Everything in this hobby is YMMV. Just sharing my own experience. Things could be totally different for everyone else.

[Frala]

I am throwing it out there that asking for and / or verifying donation first has always been SOP in this hobby, especially outside of kgirls. The safety and security afforded by the kgirl model has mitigated a lot of the horrible outcomes you sometimes come across or hear about. As a matter of fact, it's been so successful to the point that money can be verified after the fact, out of sight and out of mind. Usually and unfortunately, if they verify first then something must of happened to institute this practice.

I just don't want mongers to equate and conflate verifying donation first as a foreshadowing of bad service. It could or could not. But if it does turn out bad, false equivalence and confirmation bias may be incorrectly established and applied. Logically, how exactly does the act of counting money in any way inform you of how a girl is going to perform?

I agree with you here. Asking for donation upfront is not necessarily correlated with bad service. Some of my best sessions happened with upfront donations. I have heard from more than one booker that they have had customers leave without paying so they have the girl ask for beforehand, but if they already know you, likely they'll skip it. Upcharge girls will usually ask for it before, for obvious reasons.

[BobLove]

I am throwing it out there that asking for and / or verifying donation first has always been SOP in this hobby, especially outside of kgirls. The safety and security afforded by the kgirl model has mitigated a lot of the horrible outcomes you sometimes come across or hear about. As a matter of fact, it's been so successful to the point that money can be verified after the fact, out of sight and out of mind. Usually and unfortunately, if they verify first then something must of happened to institute this practice.

I just don't want mongers to equate and conflate verifying donation first as a foreshadowing of bad service. It could or could not. But if it does turn out bad, false equivalence and confirmation bias may be incorrectly established and applied. Logically, how exactly does the act of counting money in any way inform you of how a girl is going to perform?

Girl told me that some guys pay with counterfeit bills. They take the donation into the other room and mark it with fake detector pen.

[SsStuntCock]

I am throwing it out there that asking for and / or verifying donation first has always been SOP in this hobby.

Funny cause before I dove dick first into this hedonistic hijinx, I've read that exact same sentiment in the book "Hobbying for Dummies."

On a related note, most sessions I just conspicuously place the fun tickets on the dresser, then help myself to the BA to wash my hands and BT. Whether she counts it or not is up to her, but the point is to get it out of the way.

[Bastard Chorum]

With SFK.

Photos: It's her.

Looks: A bit of an exotic face but attractive, nostrils are abnormally angled and sharp (surgery probably), has a constant look as if she's squinting at you with a look of doubt, 5'2", man made C's (a bit on the firm side), little ass but looks decent in K9 surprisingly, shaven pussy. Slender figure with soft curves. Pale skin tone, no tattoos, small birthmark under right breast.

English: A little bit.

Attitude: Flippant and aloof.

Service: Overall below average. Limited LFK, no DFK. She moves on to different position at her discretion and insistence. BBBJ was simple and short. K9 was pretty good as her ass become quite shapely in this position. Mish was difficult in particular because she kept her legs stiff preventing deep penetration. As soon as I CIP, she motioned me to get off and went to clean herself. BBFSCIP.

Expense: $300.

Repeat: For the price and performance, definitely a no. Her service needs an overhaul along with that attitude.

[Bastard Chorum]

With SA.

Photos: It's her, but P.S. 'ed to trim off excess curves.

Looks: Very cute face, 4'10", amazing natural D's, OK ass, shaven pussy. Pale skin, short and stocky frame. IMO, she's quite chubby and borderline fat. I do love thick and curvy girls but she's out of my preferred rotundity profile. When your hands are beginning to plump up like hers, you are either pregnant, have periphery edema, or overweight.

English: Decent amount.

Attitude: Friendly, bubbly, and aims to please.

Service: Overall above average. She's gung-ho and cooperative on what you want of her. She enjoys breast play and is very proud of her naturals. Easy going personality lends to a very organic session. Audio feedback was decent. Good DFK throughout. BBBJ was good. Not much DT or BLS though. She was engaged in CG. K9 was Ok. Mish was best with her cute face and bouncing tits. BBFSCIP.

Expense: $280.

Repeat: Leaning towards no. Service was good but looks dropping her rating down hard. She would easily be top 5 if she could lose some weight.

[RocketManP]

She's always had very mixed reviews. Anybody who decides to see her should keep that in mind.

Mixed reviews are an understatement.

Nana averages out to a 6.4 performance on TER, and that's even with your three high scoring reviews of her, out of 35 total reviews!

[Bastard Chorum]

I am throwing it out there that asking for and / or verifying donation first has always been SOP in this hobby, especially outside of kgirls. The safety and security afforded by the kgirl model has mitigated a lot of the horrible outcomes you sometimes come across or hear about. As a matter of fact, it's been so successful to the point that money can be verified after the fact, out of sight and out of mind. Usually and unfortunately, if they verify first then something must of happened to institute this practice.

I just don't want mongers to equate and conflate verifying donation first as a foreshadowing of bad service. It could or could not. But if it does turn out bad, false equivalence and confirmation bias may be incorrectly established and applied. Logically, how exactly does the act of counting money in any way inform you of how a girl is going to perform?

[AlexisDavis]

Just out of curiosity who was it that you tried as your intial bb experience? Was the pep due to your own precaution?

It was with Hana, who is my ATF and the only girl I would even think to go BB with. To be clear, I have zero reason to believe Hana has anything, the pep is just me trying to eliminate the albeit low risk because at the end of the day she is extremely popular. I was just saying that the BB game is not for everyone. I've seen Hana many many times and always covered because I just like to play it safe.

No regrets though, it was amazing and I wouldn't have tried it if it was with anyone else. I imagine if Hana had something everyone would know within minutes, haha.

[Bastard Chorum]

Oldest trick in the book. She is getting the business. For the non upcharge girls at orgs do you not notice the popular girls are at $300. Hana Allie Pepsi. I think Ara is well worth her 300. She will literally BBBJ you beyond what other girls will do. She is one of the top in our market currently as far as service and value. She is one of my CF I rotate often. Others are paying 420 for mediocre girls who were once 280 and don't complain. I welcome more good girls like Ara please. Spread the word to NorCal, come down here.

For the profit comment, they do make more money here. With the NorCal increase, the orgs took half of that increase while LA doesn't change fee. So at the non upcharge rate, SoCal girl would make 20 more still per. The real reason why they stay up there is because it's a smaller market and a large supply of clients. More tech guys obsessed with Asians and they are more consistent. My monger buddy sees 4-5 girls a week but their rate is much lower so they monger more often and book multiple hours. I used to book 2-3 hours often too but I don't down here.

If the point of the trick is to invoke pity and see her more often, then I rather pity the monger that falls for it. Want me to come more often (no pun intended)? Then you need to show and prove it through service. This pricematching shenanigans is deja vu all over again like in the past with Rebecca and Chloe. Hana starts it all off at the $300 mark, then others push up or start at that price. Jealously, envy, and face is damn ingrained in Korean culture and it's a ***** to be caught in the crossfire. Each provider has a right to charge whatever they want and think they can command. However, mongers will ultimately determine if that gambit succeeds or not.

[RocketManP]

Hey why'all. Was wondering if anyone recognizes this gal Ria?

https://newasianvibe.is/project/ria/

Her some of her pics remind me of Kira from NorCal org BGC. But some of the others seem like a past Ca-kdoll gal.

Thanks in advance.

I pmd you, but for everyone. Kira had pics of face that were resembling her real face.

This girl has different pics of at least three different kgirls. I don't think this is Kira. Kira has manmades Ds and delivers pretty aggressive "old PSE" and BBFS / pse.

[Hahasupz]

Booker texted me today that Angel was available. After reading some other reviews, decided to give it a shot. She is definitely cute and young looking. Very quiet and shy. Service was decent. Right after the shower she asked for donation first which is usually a bad sign to me LOL. You can tell she's new but definitely tries. Lots of DFK. Decent BBBJ. Didn't pay for the BB option, so she put on the cover and asked me to be on top. Did mish for a bit and then finished in doggy. Paid for the hour but she already asked me to shower about 35 min in. Felt rushed to leave as soon as I finished. If I had known that, I would have paced myself. Told the booker I wasn't happy that I was rushed out after paying for an hour. Told me sorry and that she just came from Korea and would talk to her about it. Not a repeat for me.

[HawkMoon]

Hey why'all. Was wondering if anyone recognizes this gal Ria?

https://newasianvibe.is/project/ria/

Her some of her pics remind me of Kira from NorCal org BGC. But some of the others seem like a past Ca-kdoll gal.

Thanks in advance.

She was recently running the AA circuit in the bay. I recognize the pics but can't remember her name. If someone else could chime in. Its definitely not Kira though.

[Ghost626]

Watched some porn of tia ling, she look more like Ara than Ara looking like Asa Akira. Both girls got banging abs. Ara's blowjob pretty rough. I still gave her another try next time.