Korean Agency BB

[Tomatillo]

I guess the point of the topic is: "Can "M" recruit new talent or retain existing talent when the girl know that they can do this for $100 more?" The free market economy favor bookers that charge extra for BB unless all mongers decide to boycott those bookers and those girls. I personally don't cough up $100 unless if I really like the girl and it has been only one girl (Emily from EUK Girl) that I have paid the extra $ because she well worth it: I saw her 12 times in two months.

It definitely doesn't favor bookers who upcharge otherwise they would have the best talent which isn't the case at all. If you consider traffic alone, the upcharge agencies have to use multiple bookers, bait and switch tactics, fake pictures etc in order to keep their girls busy where M, J, Pepsi etc. Don't need to do this and they generally keep their girls happy.

[Eponymously]

I can tell these pics are not representative, so I wouldn't try them. Rarely, they get gems who have somewhat genuine pics. The 2 x I went with them, I chose Silver and Danbi. Both delivered on looks and advertised height.

Can I ask a genuine question for the board? Is there any booker that has a reputation for using 100% real pics? In my limited experience it seems like the girls provide the photos, and take them from booker to booker. Sometimes you have a pic that looks like a real selfie in a real environment, but 98% of the time the pictures are of a different girl, touched up beyond recognition, might be some modelling shots from 5 or more years ago, or intentionally obscure the face. No matter the circumstance they're only barely representative of who you're going to see. You can use the pics w / the included measurements to get a general idea of the provider but as far as face goes that's a roll of the dice to me. It seems weird to hold "fake" pics against certain bookers when often the "real" pics communicate about as much actual information.

[Christophe1]

I am extremely happy that we all are part of an extremely productive community here to communicate.

This thread has the most commented on reports in all of the LA and SoCal boards and I'm so proud to be the seed. I would contribute more but I have too much exposure to risk so much. And while I created this board solely for the purpose of not diluting the Bareback Beauties thread.

Safe bareback raw fun should be a duty.

I honest to goodness love being sexually attacked by women.

Maybe it is me. Maybe it is money. Maybe it is an illusion?

I love you fuckers!

[JohnHada]

I see another blank as far as Newtopasian is concerned. Also no current reviews on that other site. Do you know if they are on a hiatus?

Yes, all the girls are not available now. Sia is in the BA.

[Veni1]

M. Hana, Annie, Chanel.

Sunny. Joy, Niya.

Newtopasian.

Sexy Angels. Fanny, Hami, Sophia, Helen, Erica, Taylor.

SFK. Viki, Emily.

PKL. Ara, Hazel.

I see another blank as far as Newtopasian is concerned. Also no current reviews on that other site. Do you know if they are on a hiatus?

[Ramen25]

Exactly my experience-Never a true Photo (s) but I do get the warning before hand. However Ktown booker is a very nice.

Hmm interesting guys, appreciate the feedback. I guess every once in a while we got to play K-Girl Roulette to try and hit the jackpot LOL. But if we keep losing with a particular agency, just got to know when to fold / walk away like Kenny Rogers.

[Jack926]

You kidding? M has so much business that you can hardly get to her if your not a veteran regular (and even then she's constantly stacked up). She can sustain that rate indefinitely if she wants to because she's cornering the market right now by having the only stable of hot girls in LA who aren't up charging. Other bookers maybe getting that extra henny, but not half the demand. Truth is if M starts doing the 100 $ up charge, there would be little reason to go with her stable as a pose to any other.

I guess the point of the topic is: "Can "M" recruit new talent or retain existing talent when the girl know that they can do this for $100 more?" The free market economy favor bookers that charge extra for BB unless all mongers decide to boycott those bookers and those girls. I personally don't cough up $100 unless if I really like the girl and it has been only one girl (Emily from EUK Girl) that I have paid the extra $ because she well worth it: I saw her 12 times in two months.

[IAmGib1]

I don't believe so. I saw Peach. It's unlikely I couldn't get BB if a girl gone with upcharge. I knew of Peach3 before I saw CandyGirl Peach. I pegged Peach3 as easy BB.

There are some girls who have one profile as GFE and a different profile as BB. I don't think CandyGirl Peach is one of those.

Peach3 / bookergray has different pics and description than Peach of candygirls although both offer BBFS for an upcharge. I have seen Peach from candygirls not Peach3. I have been able to book any girl on bookergray via candygirls. BA have you seen both girls? I just got confirmation from the booker that they are both the same girl.

[GoodBoy88]

Which brings us the the million $ question. How much longer can M sustain her present rate structure?

You kidding? M has so much business that you can hardly get to her if your not a veteran regular (and even then she's constantly stacked up). She can sustain that rate indefinitely if she wants to because she's cornering the market right now by having the only stable of hot girls in LA who aren't up charging. Other bookers maybe getting that extra henny, but not half the demand. Truth is if M starts doing the 100 $ upcharge, there would be little reason to go with her stable as a pose to any other.

[Jack926]

Seconding this statement. I try to avoid KTE because I have never seen a provider from them where the picture is even close to accurate, and they are extremely hit or miss, but for some reason, they manage to have an endless rotating supply of "new" girls, and my desire for variety gets the best of me. I've had way more misses than hits, but when they hit, they really hit.

Exactly my experience-Never a true Photo (s) but I do get the warning before hand. However Ktown booker is a very nice.

[Toungsten]

M. Hana, Annie, Chanel.

Sunny. Joy, Niya.

Newtopasian.

Sexy Angels. Fanny, Hami, Sophia, Helen, Erica, Taylor.

SFK. Viki, Emily.

PKL. Ara, Hazel.

[PlutoKiller]

You know she switched agency's because M don't up charge the extra $ for bb.

That is the truth.

Which brings us the the million $ question. How much longer can M sustain her present rate structure?

[Pkim31]

Never booked with them before but are any of those actual photos of the girls? (pocket girl, sarah, amy, fendi)?

I can tell these pics are not representative, so I wouldn't try them. Rarely, they get gems who have somewhat genuine pics. The 2 x I went with them, I chose Silver and Danbi. Both delivered on looks and advertised height.

[Frala]

In my personal experience trying them twice they completely bait and switched me with girls that weren't even close to what was advertised. The fakes pictures were of Korean models and the girls I saw didn't come close the stats that the booker posted. As I understand it, the KTE bookers often haven't even met the girls and have no idea clue what they actually look like or what their body stats really are. So they say stuff like, 90 lbs 5'1 and then you get there it's a women who's 125 lbs and 5'7. According to various reviews on TER, some guys say the the girls they saw look at least "similar" the pictures, others say the pictures are real but extremely photo-shopped, and others say the pictures are outright lies through and through. My guess is, you book with a girl and they just throw you whoever is ready on call, maybe they happen to look like what you want and maybe not. Bottom line, after being burned twice I stay away from them.

Seconding this statement. I try to avoid KTE because I have never seen a provider from them where the picture is even close to accurate, and they are extremely hit or miss, but for some reason, they manage to have an endless rotating supply of "new" girls, and my desire for variety gets the best of me. I've had way more misses than hits, but when they hit, they really hit.

[GoodBoy88]

Never booked with them before but are any of those actual photos of the girls? (pocket girl, sarah, amy, fendi)?

In my personal experience trying them twice they completely bait and switched me with girls that weren't even close to what was advertised. The fakes pictures were of Korean models and the girls I saw didn't come close the stats that the booker posted. As I understand it, the KTE bookers often haven't even met the girls and have no idea clue what they actually look like or what their body stats really are. So they say stuff like, 90 lbs 5'1 and then you get there it's a women who's 125 lbs and 5'7. According to various reviews on TER, some guys say the the girls they saw look at least "similar" the pictures, others say the pictures are real but extremely photo-shopped, and others say the pictures are outright lies through and through. My guess is, you book with a girl and they just throw you whoever is ready on call, maybe they happen to look like what you want and maybe not. Bottom line, after being burned twice I stay away from them.