Thread: KAngels Discussion
+
Add Report
Results 5,941 to 5,955 of 5965
-
01-04-21 18:26 #25Banned Member

Posts: 1358I believe I know who she is, but it has been a long, long time since I saw her. There actually used to be a good selection of independent Asian providers who had their own AAMP (basically a sensual massage and extras at their apartment), but now it seems there are only 2 of them: Gracee, and JoAnn (they are both located in the same apartment "complex" in Renton). The independent, mature Korean gal I have previously mentioned used to share the apartment with Gracee, and she was excellent. Unfortunately, she left on December 19,2019, and has not returned. Really miss her!
Originally Posted by AussieFury
[View Original Post]
-
01-04-21 17:10 #24Banned Member

Posts: 2302Julie / Zina still here?
Remember a while back a dude named "creeper" posted about an indy Thai girl Julie (previously Zina) that had moved out here. I haven't been able to get a hold of her. Anyone know if she's still here?
-
01-04-21 16:23 #23Banned Member

Posts: 1358Agree 99.9%. But using the name kgirl could be confusing to some folks, and lead to mentioning other Asian gals in other forums. I thing the name "Asian Providers" would be appropriate.
Originally Posted by Twister100
[View Original Post]
-
01-04-21 02:28 #22Senior Member

Posts: 524I agree. It would be nice to have this be a resource for Asian FS providers whether they do BBFS or not since the key is to have the information. It would be nice to change the name to take KAngels out so as not confuse anyone regarding the focus of the forum. Having said that it seems the other cities that have similar forums have just called them kgirl forums since the majority of the discussion has been on kgirls but I don't think they are so rigid as to preclude other Asian providers from being discussed on the kgirl forums.
Originally Posted by AussieFury
[View Original Post]
-
01-04-21 01:13 #21Banned Member

Posts: 1358That sounds reasonable to me. But given some folks complained when gals from KAngels were discussed on the BB thread, and especially the ones who provided BBFS, this thread needs to include such gals, and they are not to be mentioned on the BB thread. And with your suggestion, the title of this thread would need to be changed.
Originally Posted by AussieFury
[View Original Post]
-
01-04-21 00:40 #20Banned Member

Posts: 2302For whatever it's worth, my preference would be to see this thread be a resource to discuss any Asian provider who is not in a storefront AMP, regardless of whether they do BBFS. Those looking primarily for BBFS should be best served in the BB thread, especially since very very few Asian providers offer BBFS (not even all the Kangels do).
Originally Posted by MartyByrde
[View Original Post]
-
01-03-21 23:53 #19Banned Member

Posts: 1358It seems a decision needs to be made as to what "type" of women should be discussed here. Here ism my perspective, along with some comments.
Originally Posted by FantasyManJ
[View Original Post]
The initial objection was that gals from KAngels were being included in the Bareback Providers thread, along with repetitious posts about such women. Additionally, the gals who work there are Korean.
It was then "decided" to create this thread, and for the purpose of discussing KAngels. Given that most of the gals at KAngels allowed BBFS (for an extra $100), it seemed a "natural" way to "segregate" the gals at KAngels from other Bareback providers. However, that seemed counter-productive, and that is one reason why I made an earlier post that we should also include the agencies GSL (Gangnam Style Ladies) and Luna. Both of those agencies have Korean gals working there, although at Luna, apparently only Tia will allow BBFS (don't know too much about GSL gals).
So, it seems we need to agree on the primary purpose for this thread. Here are the choices I see:
1. Only discuss Korean gals from KAngels, whether they offer BBFS or not.
2. Only discuss the Korean gals from KAngels who offer BBFS.
3. Include Korean gals from other agencies, but again only discuss the ones that offer BBFS.
4. What about Asian gals who "work" at AAMPs, or are independent? If any of them offer BBFS, can they be included here?
-
01-03-21 21:56 #18Senior Member

Posts: 120Rename maybe?
I appreciated the proactive work to create this thread. Perhaps we can rename to Agency? I think that was the stickler for some folks with no interest in Kgirls. My post in the BB thread pertaining to Kgirls was in regards to the repetitive info posted. It just seemed like we were bombarded with spam instead of useful info. Same handful of girls were posted with same reviews.
-
01-03-21 19:47 #17Banned Member

Posts: 1358Sorry, cannot agree with that. A KGirl doing bb can be included in both threads. I see that as a positive benefit.
Originally Posted by MorganCreamin
[View Original Post]
-
01-03-21 18:01 #16Banned Member

Posts: 2302I agree that a "Kangels" board is way to narrow in scope to be useful. But I disagree that a general "Asian" discussion board would be, as there are many in other geographic sections of this site that are very popular and useful.
Originally Posted by MorganCreamin
[View Original Post]
Examples:
LA: http://www.usasexguide.nl/forum/showthread.php?30696-Asian-PLEASER-Reviews-only
Chicago: http://www.usasexguide.nl/forum/showthread.php?11059-Asian-Apartment-Girlsl
San Diego: http://www.usasexguide.nl/forum/showthread.php?31932-Asian-Providers
(and there are lots more)
So while I respect MC's opinion, I politely disagree. I think an Asian-only thread would be helpful if did NOT include discussion of any AMPs (massage parlors with a storefront that the public can walk into). I think it would be most useful for discussion Asian providers (on TNA, Eros, and the K-agencies) and AAMPs (private apartments that the public can't just walk into). I bet you could simultaenously open a "black girls only" and "white girls only" and "Asian girls only" threads and the Asian one would fill up quicker than the other two combined. Same thing about bra size. There's enough demand for Asian providers that their open discussion area is completely justified. I'd argue that there are more people looking for Asians than for BBFS.
Anyway, how I described above is how I'm going to use this thread: for AAMPs and Asian providers but not AMPs.
-
01-03-21 16:38 #15Senior Member

Posts: 148Too many threads.
Agreed. And a "toxic *****" thread. We could isolate Buffy, Asha, Peach and so on to that. Make it easier for novices to find who to avoid.
Originally Posted by MorganCreamin
[View Original Post]
Of course we'd have to further delineate. Buffy and Asha would go into the holier-than-thou, block-you and alert-on-you category, while Peach, Crush, etc. Would go into the "fun ride if you can get it but utterly psycho and unreliable" category.
-
01-03-21 10:56 #14Senior Member

Posts: 867Nope. And I think this board is needless as well. If a kgirl does bb it should be in the bb thread, not here.
Originally Posted by AussieFury
[View Original Post]
Why stop there? Let's have a white girl thread and a black girl thread! How about a thread for every bra size?
Too many boards makes the information too spread out and hard to find. This thread is a hindrance not a help.
-
01-03-21 02:48 #13Senior Member

Posts: 82Always YMMV
Have had some great times at GSL with the ladies but it was always their call to so don't expect it. If you ask for it can almost guarantee it won't happen.
Originally Posted by LundonFrog
[View Original Post]
-
01-03-21 02:03 #12Senior Member

Posts: 524Redhot set this up so it's his call but I would vote "Yes" to other Asian FS providers but "No" to Asian massage parlor discussions since there is already a separate massage parlor forum for that.
Originally Posted by AussieFury
[View Original Post]
-
01-03-21 00:50 #11Banned Member

Posts: 2302I saw whoever they were calling Tiana back in early December. There's no guarantee whoever is playing Tiana now is the same girl.
Originally Posted by Coach808
[View Original Post]
She was ok, but I didn't repeat.













Reply With Quote










