News and Media Reports

**Nova907** · 04-22-21 10:27

Originally Posted by Mpduration [View Original Post]

https://www.medalerts.org/vaersdb/index.php

You probably believe in Qanon as well?

The below posts just debunked your "facts", and you still don't get it.

"Did a 2-Year-Old in Virginia Die After Getting COVID-19 Vaccination?

The claim is based solely on a dubious report from the Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System, a database that anyone can submit reports to that is frequently abused by anti-vaccine activists".

Give your brain a rest and stay off a bitchute too.
“Bitchute: Hate speech. Neo-Nazi propaganda. Anti-Semitic QAnon conspiracy theories. Even terrorism. It's all there. And the platform keeps growing.”

**Mpduration** · 04-22-21 10:07

Originally Posted by PilotAviator [View Original Post]

Under the age of 16 are not eligible for vaccine -- no medical provider is going to inject any of the covid-vaccines into so young a child. The health industry has only just started small scale testing with teen age volunteers.

SEE SNOPES: https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/two-year-old-virginia-die-vaccine/

One of the URLs activate a website that attempted to attack my PC / load a computer virus (my system blocked the attempt).

https://www.medalerts.org/vaersdb/index.php

**PilotAviator** · 04-22-21 08:38

Under the age of 16 are not eligible for vaccine -- no medical provider is going to inject any of the covid-vaccines into so young a child. The health industry has only just started small scale testing with teen age volunteers.

SEE SNOPES: https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/two-year-old-virginia-die-vaccine/

One of the URLs activate a website that attempted to attack my PC / load a computer virus (my system blocked the attempt).

Originally Posted by Mpduration [View Original Post]

/vaers-two-year-old-baby-in-virginia-dead-six-days-after-second-pfizer-shot/[

[]o/dKgLl1BsIXzW/[/]

**Mike85** · 04-22-21 05:26

Originally Posted by Mpduration [View Original Post]

https://thecovidblog.com/2021/04/19/...d-pfizer-shot/

https://www.bitchute.com/video/dKgLl1BsIXzW/

https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/tw...a-die-vaccine/

**Lucretius** · 04-22-21 01:24

Originally Posted by Mpduration [View Original Post]

https://thecovidblog.com/2021/04/19/...d-pfizer-shot/

https://www.bitchute.com/video/dKgLl1BsIXzW/

Friends,

I do not know what Mpduration's agenda may be, but please be aware that he is passing off fake news with these links. Look up Bitchute and thecovid blog, and you will see the disreputable nature of these sites. "Bitchute is a video hosting service known for accomodating far-right individuals and conspiracy theorists, and for hosting hateful content. " (Wikipedia). The "mainstream media" is all over the story of the extremely small risk of clotting from the J&J vaccine. They would be happy to sell the clicks to a story about a baby dying from a COVID vaccine. But it ain't true. Does anyone recall that the FDA has not approved the vaccine (yet) for anyone younger than 16?

I am over 60. I just received my second shot of the Pfizer vaccine. Yes, the allegedly terrible, awful, going-to-screw-me-up mRNA vaccine. I am grateful that the research to develop a vaccine started immediately in January 2020, with financial support from the previous administration, and has now come to fruition and wide distribution with the current administration. Science rocks. I look forward to soon being able to move around without fear of the risks from catching this virus. (Yes, I'd probably survive, but I'm happy not to have to take that risk.).

Mpuration is at the least misguided by the rabbit-hole web sites that he seems to follow. I wonder what he / she is afraid of? Why do you feel threatened by these vaccines, which are truly amazing for their potential to save lives and prevent the pain and suffering and death of hundreds, thousands, millions of people in the US and around the world?

Mpduration: why do you post two links, with no comment? Take ownership if you truly believe it. Own it. Defend it. Prove it.

And if you won't and can't, then keep to yourself, and do not hurt others. Do you have the integrity to do that?

Lucretius.

**Mpduration** · 04-22-21 00:49

https://thecovidblog.com/2021/04/19/...d-pfizer-shot/

https://www.bitchute.com/video/dKgLl1BsIXzW/

**SwiftChariot** · 12-08-20 10:53

Originally Posted by FogHorn1 [View Original Post]

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...ia-Conway.html

This is a couple weeks old now and some might know about it, but for those that don't pay attention to those "18-19" y / o who may not be legal. This guy was a scumbag of course, but the point is some of the younger ones on the site are actually under the legal limit.

I agree with you, but after reading this article I sympathize with the guy here. Remember these girls were on seeking advertising as 18 year olds. Only after the fact the deed was done and he trusted them that they revealed their true age. Obv they wanted more money and he said no. They went to the cops at that point. Seeking is too high of stakes to get railed.

**Jim Rob** · 12-08-20 08:33

I've had to check I'd several times. One girl I met turned 18 3 days prior to us meeting. I had an Asian girl so hot, but I wasn't sure about her age. I asked for I'd and she couldn't provide any and had lame excuses. I took her home and not the hotel. Got to be smart. The website should make females provide proof of age before joining. Always remember it's not worth the trouble. Think what the big head.

Originally Posted by FogHorn1 [View Original Post]

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...ia-Conway.html

This is a couple weeks old now and some might know about it, but for those that don't pay attention to those "18-19" y / o who may not be legal. This guy was a scumbag of course, but the point is some of the younger ones on the site are actually under the legal limit.

**FogHorn1** · 12-04-20 12:01

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...ia-Conway.html

This is a couple weeks old now and some might know about it, but for those that don't pay attention to those "18-19" y / o who may not be legal. This guy was a scumbag of course, but the point is some of the younger ones on the site are actually under the legal limit.

**Miketastic69** · 08-24-20 21:14

Originally Posted by RockSwithSalt [View Original Post]

FORT LAUDERDALE, Fla. A Florida appeals court ruled Wednesday that police violated the rights of New England Patriots owner Robert Kraft and others when they secretly video recorded them paying for massage parlor sex acts, barring the tapes' use at trial and dealing a potentially deadly blow to their prosecution.

The state 4th District Court of Appeal ruled Kraft's rights were violated under the Fourth Amendment to the Constitution, which protects against unreasonable searches and seizures.

"The type of law enforcement surveillance utilized in these cases is extreme. While there will be situations which may warrant the use of the techniques at issue, the strict Fourth Amendment safeguards developed over the past few decades must be observed," the judges ruled.

"To permit otherwise would yield unbridled discretion to agents of law enforcement and the government, the antithesis of the constitutional liberty of people to be secure against unreasonable searches and seizures," the court added.

Prosecutors will likely appeal the ruling to the state Supreme Court, but if it stands the misdemeanor charges brought against Kraft and other customers would have to be dropped for lack of evidence.

If Kraft wins and survives the appeals in the state Supreme Court, will the other defendants cases automatically receive the same consideration? Or do they need to pursue the same legal avenues each separately? Also, what about the poor saps that plead out or no contest?

**RockSwithSalt** · 08-19-20 16:58

FORT LAUDERDALE, Fla. — A Florida appeals court ruled Wednesday that police violated the rights of New England Patriots owner Robert Kraft and others when they secretly video recorded them paying for massage parlor sex acts, barring the tapes' use at trial and dealing a potentially deadly blow to their prosecution.

The state 4th District Court of Appeal ruled Kraft's rights were violated under the Fourth Amendment to the Constitution, which protects against unreasonable searches and seizures.

"The type of law enforcement surveillance utilized in these cases is extreme. While there will be situations which may warrant the use of the techniques at issue, the strict Fourth Amendment safeguards developed over the past few decades must be observed," the judges ruled.

"To permit otherwise would yield unbridled discretion to agents of law enforcement and the government, the antithesis of the constitutional liberty of people to be secure against unreasonable searches and seizures," the court added.

Prosecutors will likely appeal the ruling to the state Supreme Court, but if it stands the misdemeanor charges brought against Kraft and other customers would have to be dropped for lack of evidence.

**JmSuttr** · 02-06-20 14:53

Originally Posted by Shinshi86 [View Original Post]

https://reason.com/2020/02/02/massage-parlor-panic/

I posted this in the Baltimore forum, but I figured it's worth sharing here as well.

It's a long recital of things that have been discussed many times in the forum. Namely, that politicians and LE and organizations like Polaris Project have labeled pretty much everything as "trafficking" because it serves their various agendas. It points out that AMPs are easy targets and are disproportionately affected. I'm sure the author felt better after writing it but it doesn't change anything and doesn't really add much to the discussion. I was reading it in hopes of something new or interesting, but it wasn't there.