Thread: Asian PLEASER discussion forum (please post reviews in the review forum)
+
Add Report
Results 4,351 to 4,365 of 5874
-
07-21-20 22:57 #1524Senior Member

Posts: 328Izabel
Would love to know if her tits are really natural E cup.
Originally Posted by RecentCo673
[View Original Post]
-
07-21-20 20:59 #1523Senior Member

Posts: 142This is news to me in my limited K girl hobbying but good to know.
Originally Posted by Nonsense3099
[View Original Post]
Do SF Bookers acknowledge HX as a reference source?
-
07-21-20 17:29 #1522Banned Member

Posts: 1333Zoey
Has anyone seen Zoe from CA-Kdoll? Are the photos real?
https://www.ca-kdolls.ch/product/zoey/
-
07-21-20 13:17 #1521Senior Member

Posts: 58Izabel Info
Anybody see Izabel from Ca-Kdolls yet? Reverse image search doesn't show anything. Nothing on TER either.
I have info on pretty much everyone else on Ca-Kdolls and Mykupcake so willing to trade info if anything. PM me.
-
07-20-20 22:54 #1520Senior Member

Posts: 174She was definitely still retired as of March 2020, with no intention of coming out of retirement. I saw her a few time post retirement but we stopped seeing each other once the pandemic spread.
Originally Posted by NoWthatsFun
[View Original Post]
-
07-20-20 21:02 #1519Senior Member

Posts: 70First off, thank you those who give honest reviews and those like BC and BA who have provided some invaluable information on the providers out there.
Not to beat the dead horse but I do agree with all said on reviewing HONESTLY and candidly so agencies who read the forums know what we like, what we want, and what we don't want. So they bring the right talent and say no thanks to the wrong ones.
Also, we in SoCal need to STOP paying premiums for the same things our NorCal bro's get.
I was just up in NorCal visiting and let me tell you the providers there are young and attractive and wild as fuck PSE style on the norm for much much much lower than what boring ass GFE goes for down here.
We need to stop paying the upcharges for BB because that is just straight shooting ourselves in the foot every time A desperate uninformed hobbyist pays it.
NorCal standards are PSE for $220. And let me say that it's some crazy shit and agencies list if someone is PSE or GFE so you know exactly what you’re getting. And yes, there are those who are PSE as standard service at that price without the up charge. Those who've experienced can attest.
Why you think a lot of NorCal girls come down to tour here?? Because we down here pay a lot more for less.
The only agencies that have stayed true to being more fair than most have been those like M and SA. But the others are literally ass fucking the rest of you with the up charges and you're gladly taking it and screwing it up for the rest of us.
I mean come on, Sophia at SAG was recently PSE at the normal rate. And because all those who don't know better and act like desperate teens paying the surcharge is causing places like SAG to even take a rate hike.
Enough with the surcharge people.
Originally Posted by PewpHead
[View Original Post]
-
07-20-20 18:49 #1518Senior Member

Posts: 338Jesi
Sweet thanks, her reviews seem off, ranging from 5-8.
Originally Posted by BonerAppetitty
[View Original Post]
-
07-20-20 17:28 #1517Senior Member

Posts: 270I've always been honest in my reviews, and sometimes that means negative reviews. I've never caught any shit for it from from any AAMP. I posted lots of reviews on TER back in the day and never had any issues. Unfortunately, I would see a lot of guys posting reviews on TER were simps who would give flabby-stomach grandmas 9/10 on looks. I think in the back of their mind, they think giving exaggerated positive reviews will ingratiate them to bookers, which is nonsense. Honesty and fairness gets you respect. Simping gets you a race to the bottom. On top of that you have the selfish guys who find a "good one" and then won't review out of fear of the girl becoming popular and less available. It's not hard to see popular girls, I saw Flynn this morning, you just need to plan ahead.
Originally Posted by BonerAppetitty
[View Original Post]
If people give honest and frequent reviews, it will directly result in better quality girls available and better experiences for everyone. Guys who TOFTT and get burned will quickly put their comrades on notice and shut down most of her traffic. Girls who have bad attitudes and hate their jobs will quickly be shut down and free to seek out alternative employment. Men don't want to have experiences with women who don't want to be there. It's better for everyone if those girls find a different profession.
If people don't review, or they give inaccurate reviews, you end up with the hobby turning into Russian roulette where the pics are all fake and sometimes the girl is decent, other times you get washed up old out-of-shape retirees from the asian market who came because because "LOL Americans will stick it in anything", and / or girls who aren't GFE.
Reviewing helps the girls get more business if they're good, and helps dudes avoid the bad ones.
-
07-20-20 12:49 #1516Senior Member

Posts: 56Bulma
I'm a younger gent that similarly saw Tina recently and was a little disappointed. Service was great but her looks were not appealing to me and I had a hard time finishing.
I have also seen Bulma and can wholeheartedly recommend. She's DDG IMO. Perfect amount of curves for her tall frame. I remember watching her in RCG and thinking, WOW because her ass was incredible. It's rare for me that I walk in and think, this girl's younger (or looks younger) than I expected. That was the case with Bulma. No idea her real age but she appeared late 20's / early 30's to me.
Originally Posted by Fiendinpj
[View Original Post]
-
07-20-20 03:38 #1515Senior Member

Posts: 1834Everyone that honestly reviews, provide constructive feedback, pointers for newbies, and the like on this board deserves praise and thanks, including you BA. Like you said, we just need more people to contribute to help steer and influence the girls that we like to extend their stay or come back. Hopefully through a more concerted effort we can change some of the practices and policies that irks many of us here.
Originally Posted by BonerAppetitty
[View Original Post]
-
07-19-20 21:40 #1514Senior Member

Posts: 3448You are selling yourself short. At least one booker knows of your reviews and mine.
As vanguards of the Pussy Liberation Army, we have some influences with our honest reviews and opinions. And we need more comrades to come back.
Simply by reviewing and recommending the young cute talents then treating them well, we can influence the girls to come back and more to come here. Take Ailla as an example, she wasn't thinking of coming back at first but by the end of her tour she was thinking of coming back next year. Every journey begins with a single step.
Increasing demands for some girls while reducing demands for other girls are what we can do. I think I can also help steer guys away from ajunmas and BBFS upsells if I comment on new girls and BBFS upsell girls based on my radar. That would be the same as trying to destroy their businesses. I can sort out ajunmas and BBFS upsells by myself so I just want the businesses to thrive and bring in new girls.
Thank you for reviewing and helping other guys.
Originally Posted by BastardChorum
[View Original Post]
Originally Posted by BastardChorum
[View Original Post]
-
07-19-20 20:46 #1513Senior Member

Posts: 3448Tia was at KTE recently and upcharged for BBFS. Based on pics, she was also in LA a couple years back as Jesi and toured places like NorCal.
Let us know if she does not upcharge anymore.
Her reviews: (Here), (Here), (Here), and (Here).
Originally Posted by JungleFun
[View Original Post]
-
07-19-20 19:36 #1512Senior Member

Posts: 58Jude
Saw jude and she looks similar to the pictures. She has enhanced breasts that sag like they're natural, pale white skin, face similar to photos but in person you can tell she's had work done on her face. She told me she's 29 without me asking but she looks early 30's. Relatively slender, average asian girl body. Ample butt though.
Originally Posted by BoneRanger22
[View Original Post]
Good enough service but nothing spectacular. She tries hard to please but I didn't find her super attractive.
Hope that helps.
-
07-19-20 18:45 #1511Senior Member

Posts: 1834AMPs vs Agencies
Full disclosure, I have never been to an AMP. Or rather, go to one for the expressed purpose of engaging in anything but a relaxing massage. But to answer your question, agencies undoubtedly will have higher pricing. On average, the going rate of an hour with an agency girl is between $240-$280. Towards your point, AMPs are generally accessible to anyone willing to put a little effort into finding where they are, using appropriate lingo and gestures to communicate your intentions, or simply "I've been here before, is X available?" to establish a nonexistent and contrived trustworthiness upon visiting a new AMP for the first time. On the other hand, agencies will require either personal info or solid references put your foot in the door.
Originally Posted by LookslikeLE
[View Original Post]
That said, the higher pricing comes with commensurate quality of life amenities, increased safety and security barriers relative to AMPs, adherence to hygienic routines, and overall quality of service that easily trumps what AMPs have to offer. The peace of mind and caliber of talent (most of the time) agencies provides translates to considerable value in my estimation.
-
07-19-20 17:37 #1510Senior Member

Posts: 1834I wholeheartedly advocate the pursuit to increase the influx of young and cute talent coming here. But then reality sinks in and you have to realize that ahjummas will inevitably be caught in the flow too.
Originally Posted by BonerAppetitty
[View Original Post]
Most here, including myself, would agree that a standard rate that encompasses a generally accepted set of services offered is ideal (remember when MSOG was a given for hour appointments regardless of which org you frequented). But for some unfathomable reason, the market dynamics of Socal and the Bay area are so divergent that it has manifested itself in a tale of two k scenes. One with virtually no upsell and upfront BB designations while the other includes fine print and asterisks showcasing a la carte style menu structure. Not to mention the wide gap in floor donation rates that are not commensurate or objectively reflected bv cost of living differences of each region. While I understand the business decision to capitalize on BB service by tacking on an additional charge, it's only effective if there's adequate demand. Seeing SAG offering lower upcharges for BB signals to me a drop in willingness to pay. It may not reach zero but one could hope. I much prefer BA's approach for obvious reasons and would love for Socal to adopt it. But my preference is worth jack shit to what bookers will do here in LA / OC.
At the end of the day, it's a business and we convey our approval or disapproval of these practices by our willingness to pay for it. And so far, IMO, to the detriment of all mongers here, it appears that the majority approves.














Reply With Quote








