Korean Agency BB

[JohnHada]

Yep, I would say 2009-2015 ish were the best and true Golden era. Gaga and Sonya weren't around in 2017-2018, they were here in 2014-2015. Back in that time range all the major bookers were able to bring in fresh and young hotties on basically a weekly basis, J and Jenny were killing it with talent then and even M was getting much higher quality girls than now.

2014-2015 were probably the peak for Kgirl hobbying period, girls like Rebecca, Gaga, Sonya, Cola, Cona, Roya, Cuti, and Stella all hit the scene during that period. Plus you still had the All Stars available too like Love Kim, Lohan and Suri.

Great time to be in the hobby.

Man, you guys are giving me wet dreams thinking about all the great K-girls from 2013-2015. The girls you mentioned were all fantastic. Cola had such an amazing body, and Gaga's face was immaculate!

[Jack926]

The 3 in looks is what caught my attention. A 6 for performance is considered a "good time" which can be a passable time and caused by several things. Maybe she was new, sick, tired from a hard day's / week's work, etc. That said a 3 on a scale of 10 is very unusual and almost hard to imagine. One of the least attractive girls I ever saw was Lia with M but her performance put her way off the charts to a point that I didn't give a shit. When I saw her squirt across the room that was good enough for me. As someone said on this board she fucked as if it was her last fuck on earth. That alone is worth the price of admission. There was one other who was very low in looks. Could have been even lower than 3. I forget her name but she was fat and unattractive that the highest dose of Viagra wasn't enough for me. Actually the norm is most of these girls are at least a 7 or 8 which is "attractive and hot" and at these prices you can't go wrong. Remember looks are also YMMV.

At Toungesten: Agreed that look can be YMMV. And even an ugly girl can fuck you to COMA and in your case let's use Lia as example. One can not mix the LOOK Department with Performance Department. I had lots of "9+" and "10+" in my life that fucked like "3", "4" or "5". I think most of very good looking Girls are a lousy in servicing you whether they are civilian or PRO.

Best example of GORGEOUS PRO one was Charlie or AIDA love; Russian and Korean and she is amazingly gorgeous with great body but her service was always detached. It took me 3-4 visit to get her warmed up but the connection was never there 100%.

https://www.eroticmonkey.ch/aida-lov...angeles-108425#erotic.

[Jack926]

Yep, I would say 2009-2015 ish were the best and true Golden era. Gaga and Sonya weren't around in 2017-2018, they were here in 2014-2015. Back in that time range all the major bookers were able to bring in fresh and young hotties on basically a weekly basis, J and Jenny were killing it with talent then and even M was getting much higher quality girls than now.

2014-2015 were probably the peak for Kgirl hobbying period, girls like Rebecca, Gaga, Sonya, Cola, Cona, Roya, Cuti, and Stella all hit the scene during that period. Plus you still had the All Stars available too like Love Kim, Lohan and Suri.

Great time to be in the hobby.

I have never agreed with a post 100% but you summed it up all so beautifully. Hard to forget girls like Latte / Loren (whom I had such special relationship), Cola (Lesbian in Civie life), Gaga, Lita, Rebecca, Sonya, Cona, Roya, Cuti, and Stella. Luckily Cona is still around and she resurface from time to time.

[ScoopDaDrop]

For me it was probably in 2009 to 2012 when Korea became a visa free nation. Fresh young cuties were all over then.

Yep, I would say 2009-2015 ish were the best and true Golden era. Gaga and Sonya weren't around in 2017-2018, they were here in 2014-2015. Back in that time range all the major bookers were able to bring in fresh and young hotties on basically a weekly basis, J and Jenny were killing it with talent then and even M was getting much higher quality girls than now.

2014-2015 were probably the peak for Kgirl hobbying period, girls like Rebecca, Gaga, Sonya, Cola, Cona, Roya, Cuti, and Stella all hit the scene during that period. Plus you still had the All Stars available too like Love Kim, Lohan and Suri.

Great time to be in the hobby.

[BMoreDog69]

Suri's photo looks like Tracy, who I used to see in NoVA a few years ago. Always BB, but no CIP. I did on one visit, and she just asked not to do it again, which was fine, given her usual moves. She is a jackhammer in CG, and has a 6th sense when it's time, and she would do a DT lip lock to drain me senseless. Afterward she come back to finish cleaning me up with her mouth. I always did 90 minutes with her to get multiple rounds in, and I miss her greatly.

The NoVA scene has changed a lot, thanks to the donut patrol, and I haven't partaken in a couple years. Very sad, indeed.

I know I shouldn't be living in the past, but I remember 2017-2018 being the golden era of Kgirl providers. Providers like Megan (my ATF), Gaga, Sonya, Rozel, & Suri just to name a few, were taken for granted because my recent experiences with the talent pool these days has been less than enjoyable (much less, more like a waste of time and money). I'm sorry but if you've just started this hobby, I can tell you that you have missed out on what truly great Kgirl provides. Maybe I'm just being negative, and I hope I'm completely wrong, but I think the talent has dwindled throughout the past 3 years and I don't see it coming back to the way it was any time soon.

[MyronMGaines]

Hum. I guess Chanel from SexyAngel is back from vacation with a change of heart, now she is BBFSCIP friendly?

Many said she was not CIP but one reported earlier today she is and now you did it today, so safe to say she is, but I bet she spent like 10 minuts in the restroom try to flush it out after you dump it in there, LOL.

Speaking of Luna, not many report here saying any good thing about her. Seem mixed. She is short but was she stocky? Chub? Or spinner?

I've seen Luna twice. Not a spinner, just average body weight and fake tits. She's an older woman in her mid 30's with a reasonably attractive face. My memory is foggy, but I think she had a tattoo of some leaves and flowers across her pelvic area. Also has a noticeable mole in the middle of her back.

My first session with her amazing. Aggressive DFK, decent BBBJ, DATY, and 2 x BBFSCIP. Second session with her was the same, except that she shorted me 10 minutes. There was music playing in the background as I was pounding her for round two, and when the music stopped, she asked me to shower. I know that some providers measure time based on the current song playing in the playlist. I exited the room at exactly the 50th minute mark. Time flies when you're having fun, so I actually thought that the hour was up. When I saw the time on my phone as I left the room, I was immediately annoyed and disappointed that she'd short me 10 minutes despite the great service. I won't repeat for a third visit because of this.

I repeated with Luna because it was a last minute appointment and no other girls were available. Still, I think she's worth seeing at least once.

[DongMinKim]

Luna.

I saw her about 2 months ago. I want to say she is in mid to late 20's. Real cutie with tight body tight pussy. I thought she looked better in person.

Loved the audio feedback. Easy x2 BBFSCIP and more BBBJ after shower. Very passionate and a lot of cuddles. Really tried to drain me out LOL. Definitely recommend.

Jessie.

I think I saw about a month ago? She told me she is new to this and will be going back to Korea soon because of this whole virus situation.

Seemed little bit on the older side. Maybe early to mid 30's? Picture is pretty accurate. Small boob and ass but body was tight overall. Pretty good BJ and easy BBFSCIP as well.

Not my type but she is worth a try.

Who should I see next? It seems like everyone loves Chanel. How is Isabel?

Also, does anyone know if Jenny is coming back?

[DHorn420]

M will respond when she is ready to have a new client. She doesn't take new clients right now but when she is willing, she will. I'm not that long Into the hobby scene and I was able to get into M. So for other mongers out there reading this, just wait. Be patience. Be courteous. You might get a txt. But don't fret, tons of good Booker's out there, enjoy what else is out there as well.

You are not getting in if you don't know M. Been said and done, many tried.

I'm with M because I'm in the game long enough that she knows me somehow from other bookers she knew back in the day, there was no check refer or anything, one day I found out she got BBFS girl I ask and was booked. Simple as that.

You either in or you are not.

[Mintzpo]

Hum. I guess Chanel from SexyAngel is back from vacation with a change of heart, now she is BBFSCIP friendly?

Many said she was not CIP but one reported earlier today she is and now you did it today, so safe to say she is, but I bet she spent like 10 minuts in the restroom try to flush it out after you dump it in there, LOL.

Speaking of Luna, not many report here saying any good thing about her. Seem mixed. She is short but was she stocky? Chub? Or spinner?

Luna has a great body, just shorter, like 5'2". Not spinner, but closer to spinner than fat or stocky. I recommend, she is a cool girl.

[DeJavu27]

You are not getting in if you don't know M. Been said and done, many tried.

I'm with M because I'm in the game long enough that she knows me somehow from other bookers she knew back in the day, there was no check refer or anything, one day I found out she got BBFS girl I ask and was booked. Simple as that.

You either in or you are not.

Is MilkAndHoney their handle on HX?

[Toungsten]

If a booker is mad at me giving a 3, they should be looking at their girl or how they advertise. We all know how many time these bookers bait and switch or just down right fake pic, it is your right to give 3 and I don't care for one less booker from the sea of K bookers.

Most bookers got to learn if they have a low performance girl, soon they will be gone by word of mouth, which comes to your reviews.

Stand firm with your integrity!! If its a 3 and a dead fish 6 then it is what it is.

The 3 in looks is what caught my attention. A 6 for performance is considered a "good time" which can be a passable time and caused by several things. Maybe she was new, sick, tired from a hard day's / week's work, etc. That said a 3 on a scale of 10 is very unusual and almost hard to imagine. One of the least attractive girls I ever saw was Lia with M but her performance put her way off the charts to a point that I didn't give a shit. When I saw her squirt across the room that was good enough for me. As someone said on this board she fucked as if it was her last fuck on earth. That alone is worth the price of admission. There was one other who was very low in looks. Could have been even lower than 3. I forget her name but she was fat and unattractive that the highest dose of Viagra wasn't enough for me. Actually the norm is most of these girls are at least a 7 or 8 which is "attractive and hot" and at these prices you can't go wrong. Remember looks are also YMMV.

[Vulcan1009]

TER is a review forum for shills: Majority of reviews or review (s) are shill at TER. I had shit load of reviews that I requested to be taken down in April due to the FOSTA-SESTA bill. And in 2011, I got banned from a very famous booker for posting a "3" in look and "6" in service. I had to work my way back in a game with her but she asked me to write reviews for her and she get to edit them. We compromised that I will only post good reviews on a girls that I like and if I don't like someone, I won't post a review.

If a booker is mad at me giving a 3, they should be looking at their girl or how they advertise. We all know how many time these bookers bait and switch or just down right fake pic, it is your right to give 3 and I don't care for one less booker from the sea of K bookers.

Most bookers got to learn if they have a low performance girl, soon they will be gone by word of mouth, which comes to your reviews.

Stand firm with your integrity!! If its a 3 and a dead fish 6 then it is what it is.

[Vulcan1009]

Re: Chanel. Ahhhhh, just dropped a massive load in her this morning. For those seeing her the remainder of day. Just know my semen probably leaked on you. One of the reasons I do DATY less nowadays.

Re: Luna. Never trust TER. Platform is whack. USASG is where it's at. I've dropped a couple loads in Luna. She is second runner up with SA. Def recommend. Very cute face, good body, shorter than Chanel, but def fun, easy BBFS. She's a little nympho.

When Nina comes back with SFK, I'm going to destroy that poo nanny.

Hum. I guess Chanel from SexyAngel is back from vacation with a change of heart, now she is BBFSCIP friendly?

Many said she was not CIP but one reported earlier today she is and now you did it today, so safe to say she is, but I bet she spent like 10 minuts in the restroom try to flush it out after you dump it in there, LOL.

Speaking of Luna, not many report here saying any good thing about her. Seem mixed. She is short but was she stocky? Chub? Or spinner?

[Vulcan1009]

Have to agree with you on Megan (aka Lindsey aka Hannah). Spent quite a bit of time with her, both on and off the clock. Her social media is pretty much inactive now, but that has happened in the past. Hope she is doing well in "retirement". I want to see her graduate to a normal life, before her mind and body are all used. Up.

Remember back in the day when she first came out, OMG she was the cream of the crop, top of the line, spinner body with D cup of very nicely done soft tits.

[Vulcan1009]

I have been trying to book Mini from M, but I didn't find their website here. Would you share a link, please?

You are not getting in if you don't know M. Been said and done, many tried.

I'm with M because I'm in the game long enough that she knows me somehow from other bookers she knew back in the day, there was no check refer or anything, one day I found out she got BBFS girl I ask and was booked. Simple as that.

You either in or you are not.