Bareback Providers

**RedHot11** · 12-11-19 18:35

Very disappointing session. She allows BB but is really old and fat. She has severe mental issues as well.

Red flags started appearing as soon as I entered. Her pics on TNA are at least 2 decades ago. She won't use tongue while kissing. I asked her to talk dirty and she says.

"Americans. Specially white men in this fucking city can only talk about sex. They can't fuck. Immigrants come to US and they get Americanized and now they can't fuck either".

I'm like OK let's not talk about sex, let's fuck. I start fucking her and she loses her mind again and asks me to slow down because I'm going too fast. After being reprimanded twice for going too fast. She asks me to spoon her from behind, kiss her neck and shoulders and fuck her slowly.

I felt like crying because sex with her was like "marriage sex" with spooning and neck kissing.

She goes BB but is a waste of time. She is too old and her libido died long time ago.

**Solomon19** · 12-11-19 17:02

Originally Posted by Flyer99 [View Original Post]

Word on street is executive high roller type snagged her up in a sugar baby role.

Not merely another vacation?

**RawDogger** · 12-11-19 15:30

Except it's not fuzzy at all. You are going to have a really bad time if you continue with this belief.

Originally Posted by Diver6390 [View Original Post]

Yeah, I know all the hookers have the disclaimer that money exchanged is for time spent only. But sugar seem to have a different dimension to it. If you give your girlfriend an allowance, and sex is involved, isn't that technically the same? I know this is a fuzzy line, which is why I thought LE would stay away from the sugar bowl. If they are looking to bust a brothel or nab some human trafficker (because, let's face it, LE is more interested in making political headlines than actually making the world better), the hooker sites would be a bigger fish than the sugar bowl where you may nab one dude.

**Alfador** · 12-11-19 14:47

Originally Posted by Diver6390 [View Original Post]

Yeah, I know all the hookers have the disclaimer that money exchanged is for time spent only. But sugar seem to have a different dimension to it. If you give your girlfriend an allowance, and sex is involved, isn't that technically the same? I know this is a fuzzy line, which is why I thought LE would stay away from the sugar bowl. If they are looking to bust a brothel or nab some human trafficker (because, let's face it, LE is more interested in making political headlines than actually making the world better), the hooker sites would be a bigger fish than the sugar bowl where you may nab one dude.

Bruv, all they got to do is say "human trafficking" and they'll get the green light to set up a sting anywhere. Trying to logic your way into feeling safe is a great way to get clipped.

**Solomon19** · 12-11-19 14:05

Originally Posted by Diver6390 [View Original Post]

Yeah, I know all the hookers have the disclaimer that money exchanged is for time spent only. But sugar seem to have a different dimension to it. If you give your girlfriend an allowance, and sex is involved, isn't that technically the same? I know this is a fuzzy line, which is why I thought LE would stay away from the sugar bowl. If they are looking to bust a brothel or nab some human trafficker (because, let's face it, LE is more interested in making political headlines than actually making the world better), the hooker sites would be a bigger fish than the sugar bowl where you may nab one dude.

I think sugar baby stuff is the same as escorting. Just extra pain in the ass / time wasted. But much cheaper LOL.

And those disclaimers about money exchanged for time and companionship only are useless BTW.

**PoonHound1969** · 12-11-19 13:43

Originally Posted by Diver6390 [View Original Post]

Yeah, I know all the hookers have the disclaimer that money exchanged is for time spent only. But sugar seem to have a different dimension to it. If you give your girlfriend an allowance, and sex is involved, isn't that technically the same? I know this is a fuzzy line, which is why I thought LE would stay away from the sugar bowl. If they are looking to bust a brothel or nab some human trafficker (because, let's face it, LE is more interested in making political headlines than actually making the world better), the hooker sites would be a bigger fish than the sugar bowl where you may nab one dude.

However if they have a fake profile and you send a message saying do you want to meet and fuck for an a allowance that is solicitation, and you can be arrested.

If you contact a SB and say lets grab dinner and drinks and no discussion of sex you're fine even if you offer $.

**Diver6390** · 12-11-19 12:29

Originally Posted by RawDogger [View Original Post]

It's very simple- agree to have sex for money. You don't seem to have a very good understanding about how these things work.

Yeah, I know all the hookers have the disclaimer that money exchanged is for time spent only. But sugar seem to have a different dimension to it. If you give your girlfriend an allowance, and sex is involved, isn't that technically the same? I know this is a fuzzy line, which is why I thought LE would stay away from the sugar bowl. If they are looking to bust a brothel or nab some human trafficker (because, let's face it, LE is more interested in making political headlines than actually making the world better), the hooker sites would be a bigger fish than the sugar bowl where you may nab one dude.

**Sciam** · 12-11-19 12:19

Maybe I am searching wrong, but I found nothing about these two. One is Piper, in Bellingham. The other is Kat, also in Bellingham. Piper has good reviews on TNA, and seems to be into everything I am interested in, but no info on BBFS. Kat, is obviously offering bb, it says so in her ad. I am just wondering if anyone has any previous experience with her.

http://mt-vernon.skipthegames.com/fe...t/169373070800 Kat.

http://mt-vernon.skipthegames.com/fe...e/731251502442 Piper.

Thank for the help.

**Flyer99** · 12-11-19 11:55

Originally Posted by GreenCandles [View Original Post]

Anyone know what happened to her?

The seductive angel website went down right around the time she went AWOL. All the other seductive angels are still posting through TNA but RileyStar's profile is scrubbed.

Word on street is executive high roller type snagged her up in a sugar baby role.

**Nico** · 12-11-19 10:49

Originally Posted by Gamper [View Original Post]

Any info on this one?

http://seattle.skipthegames.com/fema...d/922923722163

Good friend of mine. Not POC friendly if I recall. I will have to make sure that's still the case.

**Gamper** · 12-11-19 10:31

Originally Posted by Chingados [View Original Post]

Do a search for Kori and you'll find some info.

Thought I saw her. A search for Kori didn't show anything, Boards error then.

**Fnarplep** · 12-11-19 01:44

Originally Posted by Gamper [View Original Post]

Any info on this one?

http://seattle.skipthegames.com/fema...d/922923722163

Yes, that's Kori, who's been referenced on this board before. In short: she's real and does BBFS, but she's an anti-size queen, an enormous flake, and has a sleazy boyfriend.

**Chingados** · 12-11-19 01:00

Do a search for Kori and you'll find some info.

Originally Posted by Gamper [View Original Post]

Any info on this one?

http://seattle.skipthegames.com/fema...d/922923722163

**GreenCandles** · 12-11-19 00:40

Anyone know what happened to her?

The seductive angel website went down right around the time she went AWOL. All the other seductive angels are still posting through TNA but RileyStar's profile is scrubbed.