Korean Agency BB

[Toungsten]

Ever notice a post that complains about a review that describes things that the poster didn't experience? Ever wonder how two mongers could have such disparate experiences? Now I know that looks can be very subjective. Some like them thin or chubby, tall or short, natural or enhanced and thus the term YMMV. However, when it comes to performance that is a different story. Great sex is great sex. There may be different levels of great but we all know a great fuck when we have one. That's why I don't make a choice on who to see based on one or even two reviews and I virtually never TOFTT. I always wait for a good number of great reviews and consistent ones. By the time I make my choice I'm pretty sure it will be a good one. That being said why the disparity in experiences? It's usually not the girl but the customer who is knocking on their door. I've been doing this for a long time and more than one girl has told me that they can tell after only a few minutes alone with a customer whether they want to give him everything they offer or not. It's like a sixth sense that they develop that enables them to spot the ones that they don't feel are worth the effort and it's usually the attitude even though the monger may not even realize it. It's just there. These girls want to be treated respectfully regardless of the profession that they are in and if the least amount of disrespect or disdain is there the customer is cooked. So if one customer gets BBFS and another one doesn't and if one gets a freak in bed and the other doesn't it's not the girl. If she's a great fuck for a good number of reviewers then she plainly is a great fuck and if she's not a great fuck for the one who didn't get it the onus is on him. Treat them right and BBFS will be available more often than some would imagine. That has been my personal experience.

[RickZey]

[Deleted by Admin]

EDITOR'S NOTE: This report was edited or deleted because it appeared to be a public effort to discourage members from posting information. If you have a concern about information posted by another member, then please contact them privately by PM. Please read the Forum's Posting Guidelines for further information.

Tungstons right, not a one of you guys has ever posted anything that the cops didn't know a long, long, LONG time ago.

A2

[QuestBMuffin]

[Deleted by Admin]

EDITOR'S NOTE: This report was edited or deleted because it appeared to be a public effort to discourage members from posting information. If you have a concern about information posted by another member, then please contact them privately by PM. Please read the Forum's Posting Guidelines for further information.

[NooGooGee81]

Don't know if I'm allowed to post this but if any of you are familiar with sawtelle location and you happen to go to the room on the corner facing Starbucks. Kindly let them know to use blackout drapes on their window. I was just there and their window glows bright red through the blinds at night. I would think that makes it very odd and suspicious to the residents there. I would tell them myself but I don't know who operates there.

[Bastard Chorum]

Hi guys,

So I just got verified from the new booker in town. I provided them with number of ROK (I think it's the M you guys referring to?) and also EUK. I believe EUK helped me to finish verification. I'll probably see Nina tomorrow and will provide update.

Probably Tom with Eukgirls verified you with them. It appears that this new agency is affiliated with Lovely Angels in SJ where Vixen / Sally is currently at. So it doesn't take much to connect the dots. As others have mentioned, M probably would not provide a reference.

[BuddhaHead]

As a customer, I still would not incriminate myself by sending my mug shot to a Booker specially with new FOSTA laws in place. Say what you will about me being extra cautious but when shit hits the fan, my luck not all that great.
So why risk it? Anyway, I got verified by Nina Booker using palace as the reference.

People don't seem to know what FOSTA / SESTA actually is about. It is a federal law that makes it illegal to assist / facilitate sex trafficking. Basically, it is intended to target websites that advertise or discuss sex work. That is why many websites voluntarily shutdown or moved their domain offshore. It has nothing to do with an individual's personal "hobby" activities. So whether you give your picture or personal info to a booker isn't relevant to a FOSTA prosecution (it may be for something else, but I'm not commenting on that).

[Heisenberg69]

Neither J nor M would reply to text as reference. I asked M in text if she would act as reference and she said she would only act as reference for bookers that she knew. Also, for a newer LA booker I gave J and M phone numbers and the reply I got right away was they wouldn't act as reference for them so I'd need to provide pic of ID but would be OK to block out personal info on the I'd. It sounds like more are starting to ask for this to act as reference unless you have references from other bookers. Not a complaint because you have to do what you think is best for your biz, or comply with word from higher ups, just an observation.

Were you trying to book Shannon and Amora in the OC? I tried but they wanted a picture I'd and my workplace information. That's a no for me.

[RickZey]

Neither J nor M would reply to text as reference. I asked M in text if she would act as reference and she said she would only act as reference for bookers that she knew. Also, for a newer LA booker I gave J and M phone numbers and the reply I got right away was they wouldn't act as reference for them so I'd need to provide pic of ID but would be OK to block out personal info on the I'd. It sounds like more are starting to ask for this to act as reference unless you have references from other bookers. Not a complaint because you have to do what you think is best for your biz, or comply with word from higher ups, just an observation.

As a customer, I still would not incriminate myself by sending my mug shot to a Booker specially with new FOSTA laws in place. Say what you will about me being extra cautious but when shit hits the fan, my luck not all that great.
So why risk it? Anyway, I got verified by Nina Booker using palace as the reference.

[NooGooGee81]

Are you talking about Sexyangels? Didn't seem like a problem. I texted them and just told them who I was and mentioned M and Sunny. No I'd's or deep scrutiny. About five minutes later I got a text that I was verified and could make my appointment.

Could be the booker already has your number from a previous agency they were booking for. Screening for me was easy as well as I mentioned some of the companies I visited. But I think they already had my number as the response I got was super fast.

[Escorting]

I responded back to new Booker telling them the other Bookers can't confirm the number so please reverify. I also advised I'm not comfortable with a mug shot. New Booker didn't reply back. Definitely shady if you ask me!

Flew in on Monday, TOFFT on this new provider. So their ways of verifications are similar to KTE. An I'd and photo of you. I crossed all my person info on the driver license and left my name and face. Very easy and no hassle. It took booker a bit to respond but nothing too bad. So yeah I'll vouch for them being legitimate.

I have an appointment with Nina today, will update everyone once I'm done. First one for this visit so let's hope she at least decent LOL.

[NintyNine]

M.
Chanel........................ PV.
Katie, Fox, Nikki. ....................WLA.
Angel (she's back)............................ WLA.
https://www.eroticmonkey.ch/angel-es...angeles-431063

Sunny.
Glow, Lyn...................WLA

Angel, she was the one who aka dom perignon.

Anyone remember if she was also a bb upsell?

[Toungsten]

Neither J nor M would reply to text as reference. I asked M in text if she would act as reference and she said she would only act as reference for bookers that she knew. Also, for a newer LA booker I gave J and M phone numbers and the reply I got right away was they wouldn't act as reference for them so I'd need to provide pic of ID but would be OK to block out personal info on the I'd. It sounds like more are starting to ask for this to act as reference unless you have references from other bookers. Not a complaint because you have to do what you think is best for your biz, or comply with word from higher ups, just an observation.

Are you talking about Sexyangels? Didn't seem like a problem. I texted them and just told them who I was and mentioned M and Sunny. No I'd's or deep scrutiny. About five minutes later I got a text that I was verified and could make my appointment.

[Love Em]

Hmmmm. Didn't work out with the 3 Booker's I mentioned. They said they didn't recognize Booker number. Sorry can't help you even if you loyal customer. Which Booker did you ask for you to be verified? I'm just surprised all 3 prominent Booker's didn't confirm me. That's a first! That why I reported as red flag. I'm willing to delete my posts if I stand / sitting down corrected.

Neither J nor M would reply to text as reference. I asked M in text if she would act as reference and she said she would only act as reference for bookers that she knew. Also, for a newer LA booker I gave J and M phone numbers and the reply I got right away was they wouldn't act as reference for them so I'd need to provide pic of ID but would be OK to block out personal info on the I'd. It sounds like more are starting to ask for this to act as reference unless you have references from other bookers. Not a complaint because you have to do what you think is best for your biz, or comply with word from higher ups, just an observation.

[Toungsten]

M.
Chanel........................ PV.
Katie, Fox, Nikki. ....................WLA.
Angel (she's back)............................ WLA.
https://www.eroticmonkey.ch/angel-es...angeles-431063

Sunny.
Glow, Lyn...................WLA

[RickZey]

Thanks to all those responded. I'll try the palace as reference this time. Am customer for long time so should be no problem. I'll delete my red flag post.