Thread: Korean Agency BB
+
Add Report
Results 41,341 to 41,355 of 49757
-
10-23-19 18:00 #8417Senior Member

Posts: 30Flew in on Monday, TOFFT on this new provider. So their ways of verifications are similar to KTE. An I'd and photo of you. I crossed all my person info on the driver license and left my name and face. Very easy and no hassle. It took booker a bit to respond but nothing too bad. So yeah I'll vouch for them being legitimate.
Originally Posted by RickZey
[View Original Post]
I have an appointment with Nina today, will update everyone once I'm done. First one for this visit so let's hope she at least decent LOL.
-
10-23-19 17:10 #8416Senior Member

Posts: 841Angel, she was the one who aka dom perignon.
Originally Posted by Toungsten
[View Original Post]
Anyone remember if she was also a bb upsell?
-
10-23-19 16:08 #8415Senior Member

Posts: 3480Are you talking about Sexyangels? Didn't seem like a problem. I texted them and just told them who I was and mentioned M and Sunny. No I'd's or deep scrutiny. About five minutes later I got a text that I was verified and could make my appointment.
Originally Posted by LoveEm
[View Original Post]
-
10-23-19 15:40 #8414Senior Member

Posts: 76Same thing happened to me with a booker in OC
Neither J nor M would reply to text as reference. I asked M in text if she would act as reference and she said she would only act as reference for bookers that she knew. Also, for a newer LA booker I gave J and M phone numbers and the reply I got right away was they wouldn't act as reference for them so I'd need to provide pic of ID but would be OK to block out personal info on the I'd. It sounds like more are starting to ask for this to act as reference unless you have references from other bookers. Not a complaint because you have to do what you think is best for your biz, or comply with word from higher ups, just an observation.
Originally Posted by RickZey
[View Original Post]
-
10-23-19 12:14 #8413Senior Member

Posts: 3480Wed Oct. 23
M.
Chanel........................ PV.
Katie, Fox, Nikki. ....................WLA.
Angel (she's back)............................ WLA.
https://www.eroticmonkey.ch/angel-es...angeles-431063
Sunny.
Glow, Lyn...................WLA
-
10-23-19 09:28 #8412

Posts: 365Retracting red flag
Thanks to all those responded. I'll try the palace as reference this time. Am customer for long time so should be no problem. I'll delete my red flag post.
-
10-23-19 02:36 #8411Banned Member

Posts: 85I sent references of two girls from the same agency (Pepsi and Jenny O of The Palace) and booker texted me back within ten minutes telling me I'm verified and I could see Nina.
Originally Posted by RickZey
[View Original Post]
-
10-23-19 01:51 #8410Banned Member

Posts: 1333References
At RickZey: Just so you know that "M", "J" and Amber Booker do not verify their customers. I hobby a lot and I say maybe too fucking muchI have used "J" and "M" so much last year that I would not want to admit it and I can book a week in advance with "J" or "M" but these two always give me an excuse like: "We don't know the booker".
Originally Posted by RickZey
[View Original Post]
My gut feeling is that if you are a SOLID customer, "J" and "M" will most likely won't verify you for fear of losing REVENUE. I have asked "J" & "M" three times for LA bookers and on each occasion, it was "we don't know the booker" story. But GUESS what, both of them verified me for my trip to SJ twice in less than 10 minutes!
-
10-23-19 01:07 #8409Senior Member

Posts: 29Update on Verification
Hi guys,
So I just got verified from the new booker in town. I provided them with number of ROK (I think it's the M you guys referring to?) and also EUK. I believe EUK helped me to finish verification. I'll probably see Nina tomorrow and will provide update.
-
10-23-19 00:00 #8408Senior Member

Posts: 1834Kc
I'm planning to see Nina soonish. If the booker's new then it would make sense that other agencies won't vouch for unknowns. I appreciate that they take that stance as that means, whether intentional or not, they have my back to not provide a false sense of security regarding new agencies that pop up. On the other hand, a new agency has to start from somewhere and the least common denominator is usually proof of identity until reviews from reputable sources start trickling in.
Originally Posted by RickZey
[View Original Post]
My experience with them was similar to others: sent M and Kay as references, KC says no reply and asks for copy of I'd, I replied with four other agencies to try, after 15 minutes came back saying I was verified. One thing that helped their case was that I tried to see Nina on Monday but they were having issues with the door. Moved to option B which was in WLA and booker told me the lock isn't working but the door is open. While that doesn't make them legit, the facts did line up with what they said so I'll give them points for that.
-
10-22-19 23:25 #8407Senior Member

Posts: 7221Just search kgirlfriend Boston on google. Should be the 1st one that comes up.
Originally Posted by MadderMax
[View Original Post]
But, the korg in Boston that shows up first has one of the strictest ref checks or screening. Sometimes that booker will not accept LA, BA or OC refs.
I got in cause I used 4 of girls who've toured out of the Boston that are from LA, OC, LV, and Dallas.
The Boston org / house is "not BBFS!
-
10-22-19 23:09 #8406Senior Member

Posts: 138Boston
Any recommendations for good service in Boston? I know it's an LA. Board, but you guys do get around.
-
10-22-19 22:50 #8405Senior Member

Posts: 841Funny how downgrading to lower agencies takes this much work.
Originally Posted by RickZey
[View Original Post]
To get in with the newb sexyangels, I'd have to get in with a lower agency that M responds to, which is rare. M never responds to reference calls, I heard.
-
10-22-19 22:36 #8404

Posts: 365Cleared my inbox. Please pm me again.
Originally Posted by QuestBMuffin
[View Original Post]
-
10-22-19 22:23 #8403Senior Member

Posts: 391None taken, better to be safe than sorry!
Originally Posted by QuestBMuffin
[View Original Post]















Reply With Quote









