This blog is moderated by Admin
-
Senior Member

Posts: 158

Originally Posted by
Toungsten
[View Original Post]
I think that is a grand overstatement. Some have hotter bodies. Some have hotter faces. Some have great skills even without BBFS. Sure beats some hot girl who won't give the time of day besides not giving BBFS. There is a happy medium there and M has found it. Her girls is what keeps this thread alive.
This. I like my girls a bit curvier, so while a lot of people have been saying cona is thick or pudgy, to me she has the hottest k-girl body next to Alexa that I've ever had the pleasure of putting my penis inside. I've dealt with a lot of the agencies and many a k-girl; hands down M either hires the best actresses or they're the most consistently into the sex. Are some of her girls unattractive? Yeah. Not my type. But that doesn't mean that one isn't going to be catfished by other reputable agencies as well.
-
Senior Member

Posts: 3480

Originally Posted by
TheAbc
[View Original Post]
Most girls are milfy and I can't think of anyone who is youngish that worked there except Diane which was fall of last year. I cannot think of anyone this week that I would like to see. I always wondered if it's worth to fly up north since that is the closest place with the best talent.
Instead of flying up north you may as well find a 400 to 500 girl here instead of paying the plane fare.
-
Senior Member

Posts: 3480

Originally Posted by
DHorn420
[View Original Post]
I stopped trying after a few months LOL especially after learning from talking privately with couple of mongers that have access to her, their selling point is BBFS, that's it. Girls are okay looking or meh, barely anything worth looking at, so mainly it's the BBFS that keeps her agency busy, not the fact that the girls are not hot LOL I have had luck getting BBFS at other agencies where the girls are hot and young.
I think that is a grand overstatement. Some have hotter bodies. Some have hotter faces. Some have great skills even without BBFS. Sure beats some hot girl who won't give the time of day besides not giving BBFS. There is a happy medium there and M has found it. Her girls is what keeps this thread alive.
-
Senior Member

Posts: 3480

Originally Posted by
SlimeBall626
[View Original Post]
40 years old. Boxy looking. 160 lbs. Serena. Pudgy box shape like the old BMW cars.
Damn. I guess she looks nothing like her pics. Is the face at least pretty? 160 pounds? A middleweight?
-
Senior Member

Posts: 931

Originally Posted by
SlimeBall626
[View Original Post]
40 years old. Boxy looking. 160 lbs. Serena. Pudgy box shape like the old BMW cars.
Assume BBFS as with standard M?
-
Senior Member

Posts: 931

Originally Posted by
DHorn420
[View Original Post]
I stopped trying after a few months LOL especially after learning from talking privately with couple of mongers that have access to her, their selling point is BBFS, that's it. Girls are okay looking or meh, barely anything worth looking at, so mainly it's the BBFS that keeps her agency busy, not the fact that the girls are not hot LOL I have had luck getting BBFS at other agencies where the girls are hot and young.
Most girls are milfy and I can't think of anyone who is youngish that worked there except Diane which was fall of last year. I cannot think of anyone this week that I would like to see. I always wondered if it's worth to fly up north since that is the closest place with the best talent.
-
Senior Member

Posts: 3480

Originally Posted by
Kabah
[View Original Post]
I don't get it. I saw Lucia once. I was expecting a PSE girl. Instead I got a Shy, less than GFE type. I even asked her name before I left to make sure I was seeing another girl other than her.
Has anyone had that experience with Lucia on a first experience. Because it was Miles away from PSE for me.
Honestly there was a bit of shyness at first glance at the door but with some heavy DFK and a good pussy eating to begin our time together she loosened up completely and was as sensual and sexual and as responsive and aggressive as anyone would want. Sometimes it's up to us to bring out the beast that lies beneath that shy and unassuming exterior.
-
Senior Member

Posts: 63

Originally Posted by
LundonFrog
[View Original Post]
Is Cona thick in the good curvy way? I don't mind a bit of baby fat.
At the end of the day I guess it comes down to service. She seems like the type to take it slow but I'm Hoping I can get multiple shots with minimal downtime in between.
Yeah its thick in a good curvy way.
She loves getting eaten out. I made her cum like 3 times but beware she allows bbfscip so you might want to avoid giving her daty. She has droopy tits but her body to me is very sexy. I don't really like spinners.
-
Senior Member

Posts: 94
Cona Body Type

Originally Posted by
Slideryyz
[View Original Post]
Cona is a sweetheart but her body isn't the tightest.
Is Cona thick in the good curvy way? I don't mind a bit of baby fat.
At the end of the day I guess it comes down to service. She seems like the type to take it slow but I'm Hoping I can get multiple shots with minimal downtime in between.
-
Senior Member

Posts: 1141

Originally Posted by
LundonFrog
[View Original Post]
Between the three of them all having glowing reviews, I'm having such a hard time deciding.
Cona is a sweetheart but her body isn't the tightest.
-
Senior Member

Posts: 1141

Originally Posted by
Seafor
[View Original Post]
You can call / text / offer a thousand bucks, you will never get into M's agency. I'm reasonably sure after 4 years of trying, that it doesn't even exist. Unicorn agency.
She is very moody and wonder what her standards to let guys in now and then.
-
Senior Member

Posts: 107

Originally Posted by
Toungsten
[View Original Post]
Pretty good assessment. Cona is probably the prettiest but you have to like a little chunkiness. Sasha apparently is YMMV with more GFE and truthfully I didn't feel teeth and I"m not too small. Lucia has that sexual aggression and goes at it at a more PSE pace than the others. Each has her own qualities that make it hard for me to make a choice.
I don't get it. I saw Lucia once. I was expecting a PSE girl. Instead I got a Shy, less than GFE type. I even asked her name before I left to make sure I was seeing another girl other than her.
Has anyone had that experience with Lucia on a first experience. Because it was Miles away from PSE for me.
-
Senior Member

Posts: 3480

Originally Posted by
Ddddd21
[View Original Post]
I would choose cona over lucia and sasha.
Cona is a veteran and she looks really hot. Sasha doesn't allow BBFS and her BBBJ hurts because she uses a lot of her teeth. Lucia is an easy BBFS but her face is just meh. If you want a spinner go for sasha or lucia because cona is a bit on the busty side. Overall for me I would go with cona because to me she looks the hottest and have the best body with top notch service but that's just my opinion.
Pretty good assessment. Cona is probably the prettiest but you have to like a little chunkiness. Sasha apparently is YMMV with more GFE and truthfully I didn't feel teeth and I"m not too small. Lucia has that sexual aggression and goes at it at a more PSE pace than the others. Each has her own qualities that make it hard for me to make a choice.
-

Posts: 904

Originally Posted by
Seafor
[View Original Post]
You can call / text / offer a thousand bucks, you will never get into M's agency. I'm reasonably sure after 4 years of trying, that it doesn't even exist. Unicorn agency.
I stopped trying after a few months LOL especially after learning from talking privately with couple of mongers that have access to her, their selling point is BBFS, that's it. Girls are okay looking or meh, barely anything worth looking at, so mainly it's the BBFS that keeps her agency busy, not the fact that the girls are not hot LOL I have had luck getting BBFS at other agencies where the girls are hot and young.
-
Regular Member

Posts: 18
Serena is boxy and pudgy looking
40 years old. Boxy looking. 160 lbs. Serena. Pudgy box shape like the old BMW cars.