"Sugar Babies" and "Arrangements"

**AnExplorer40** · 05-01-19 15:48

So easy to forget just how flakey these girls can be. Stand ups on meetings, ghosting. Requires so much patience!

Heard from this one today: https://www.seeking.com/member/51749...3-822fb74f6437.

Any clues on her?

Stay safe.

Anexploer40.

**CatchNGo** · 05-01-19 15:33

Originally Posted by TheWolverineJP [View Original Post]

Met this number last night after being catfished by a beached whale. LOL.

I had deleted my SA profile but made a new one on the way to Atlanta.

She is hot and definately knows how to have fun. Talked her into spending the night for $$. She strips part time at Atlanta clubs. She's cool and has a sweet personality.

https://www.seeking.com/member/fe007...c-d8881c1c7053

LaBria hit me up 3 weeks ago. I figured she was a pro or would be asking to much. Guess I should have talked with her. Thanks for the report.

**LogJammin18** · 05-01-19 15:01

Had great success before and am still seeing 4 gals I met in 2018 on rotation.

Decided to see what was new. Same fool proof techniques used this time, got a few hot ones to text / insta, set up meet and greets / coffee, 4 for 4 no-shows on the first 4 meet ups I set up.

2 went total ghost right before the meet, 1 canceled after I had already headed to the meet and one apologized for not showing and was "busy".

WTF? I could see a 1 no show for every 4, but a 4 for 4, 100% no show ratio?

Saved the 0 fer on the 5th one. I talked this one into skipping the coffee and heading to a hotel. Was raw-dogging it within 3 minutes of her arrival. Ha.

Maybe my technique of always doing a coffee meet up to get the newbie college girl comfortable is not the strategy anymore. However, if I only went after "straight to the hotel" girls, I am going to be no-showed on a lot of rooms.

What are you guys doing that is working. Just sticking with the experienced ones that are DTF and not trying to break in the newbies?

**SeekingHead** · 05-01-19 12:23

Originally Posted by Niteluvr [View Original Post]

Quote of the day! LOL.

SA should create something which identifies them as trans, & gives us the ability to filter them out.

I'm open to a lot of things but will probably never cross that line into gay sex.

**Niteluvr** · 04-30-19 23:10

Originally Posted by DogBert77 [View Original Post]

Yeah. The ones that are out about it are mildly annoying, kind of clogging up the site and wasting our time.

God help me. I'm going full on Lorena Bobbitt.

Quote of the day! LOL.

**DogBert77** · 04-30-19 21:20

Originally Posted by Leep12 [View Original Post]

Got to give him credit for being honest about the trans thing, looks like the body could be a fooler. Better curves than lot of the females out there.

https://www.seeking.com/member/56a90...d-93c199328399

Yeah. The ones that are out about it are mildly annoying, kind of clogging up the site and wasting our time.

But I am convinced there are a shit load of trans on SA that aren't honest about it. I can't tell you how much time I spend scrutinizing jawlines and looking for adam's apples and man hands online. If I ever get fooled and reach down and find a sausage there, God help me. I'm going full on Lorena Bobbitt.

**NewAnonymousName** · 04-30-19 19:17

Does anyone have scoop on this one? She looks familiar, which makes me wonder if she's been a backpage gal. Tineye came up empty, so maybe I'm just remembering the last time I clicked on her profile.

https://www.seeking.com/member/63741...8-1458bfeda934

**TheWolverineJP** · 04-30-19 17:47

Met this number last night after being catfished by a beached whale. LOL.

I had deleted my SA profile but made a new one on the way to Atlanta.

She is hot and definately knows how to have fun. Talked her into spending the night for $$. She strips part time at Atlanta clubs. She's cool and has a sweet personality.

https://www.seeking.com/member/fe007...c-d8881c1c7053

**MrHobbyist** · 04-30-19 05:42

Originally Posted by Airmantroy [View Original Post]

That's actually coming from YOUR search history on Google. Or at least from the search history of the computer you are using to access SA. I googled some electronic parts from a place out west and boom, got a banner on SA. All the more reason to turn off tracking on Google and make sure you're logged out of Gmail.

Incognito mode.

**ElPerron** · 04-30-19 02:39

Originally Posted by Leep12 [View Original Post]

Not sure what the heck I'm doing that attracted this one LMAO.

I'm not selfish so throwing this one out to the vultures. Got to give him credit for being honest about the trans thing, looks like the body could be a fooler. Better curves than lot of the females out there.

https://www.seeking.com/member/56a90...d-93c199328399

This one is like some kind of joke, every time I became premium member he'll be messaging me ,200 BJ LOL.

**Leep12** · 04-29-19 19:57

Not sure what the heck I'm doing that attracted this one LMAO.

I'm not selfish so throwing this one out to the vultures. Got to give him credit for being honest about the trans thing, looks like the body could be a fooler. Better curves than lot of the females out there.

https://www.seeking.com/member/56a90...d-93c199328399

**WildOats** · 04-29-19 16:11

Exoticxashh1.

Here's another time waster. Great convos, moved to text, said she can host, great rates. Then she ghosted as we were setting up the meeting.

https://www.seeking.com/member/2b341...1-804a27fa2deb

**Airmantroy** · 04-29-19 09:13

Originally Posted by Hal1957 [View Original Post]

Word must be getting around, now USPS has banner ads on the SA web site!

That's actually coming from YOUR search history on Google. Or at least from the search history of the computer you are using to access SA. I googled some electronic parts from a place out west and boom, got a banner on SA. All the more reason to turn off tracking on Google and make sure you're logged out of Gmail.

**Lono73** · 04-28-19 11:08

Originally Posted by Dawgins [View Original Post]

Why would LE turn *you* down? They want to get you in and bust you. They don't care if you're asking for certain pics. She's probably not the girl in the pics or they are old.

I assumed because the le didn't have a female officer who looked anything like the pics sent up until that point. She sent pics of at least 2 different girls possibly 3 fully clothed (nothing came up in a google search of her number or photos). So sending me a selfie with specific requirements was too much hassle. There are easier fish for them to catch I'm sure. She was always willing to meet at a hotel as long as I provided it. Who knows if she was real or not. Her one word responses to my texts, the different set of girls photos sent, it all just felt like a set up. It was clear I wasn't meeting without the selfie so that's why I assumed LE, if she was real she could have sent the selfie. She also has since changed her name on SB.

May not mean anything but I go with my gut.