Korean Agency BB

[HapaBoy86]

Has anyone had a positive experience with booker name "Aki"? I am just inquiring as the photos look good. She operates via WeChat app.

Nope, terrible expeirence.

[Dwaeji]

Hygiene wasn't horrid (Believe me, I've seen horrid). However, there was a distinct junk funk that comes after several customers. Somehow, Kgirls seem to be able to stay fresh. Breath was also a slight issue. Shower needed cleaning too. Overall, just felt there was no attenti.

No attention to cleanliness. Oops. Premature upload. LOL.

[JohnSi]

Has anyone had a positive experience with booker name "Aki"? I am just inquiring as the photos look good. She operates via WeChat app.

Pretty nice booker, however all the girls are nothing special. No extra service. They provided fantasy "GFE".

If your into extra service I say stick with M or Julie's, sweetasiangem, mango, OC, booker's girl. These are my exp over hundred of encounters.

I remember I saw Erika and she's great and goes further than I expected. Stick with provider age around early to mid 30's, can't go wrong.

[Dwaeji]

Tina rushed me out 20 minutes early. Not going to repeat for that reason, but her hygiene was fine when I saw her. What did you experience that made you feel her hygiene was subpar?

Hygiene wasn't horrid (Believe me, I've seen horrid). However, there was a distinct junk funk that comes after several customers. Somehow, Kgirls seem to be able to stay fresh. Breath was also a slight issue. Shower needed cleaning too. Overall, just felt there was no attenti.

[Jack926]

Has anyone had a positive experience with booker name "Aki"? I am just inquiring as the photos look good. She operates via WeChat app.

[Member #5844]

I've seen Tina, and agree those pics are hers. Service kinda sucked though. Rushed me out well before time was up. Also hygiene was not to KGirl Standards. I have not seen Sonya, but every one of her pics comes up with multiple hits on Google image search. TGTBT. Yuki was OK. Nice enough, but much much older and worn than her photos. Most of the other photos from this org are also easy hits on image search. I really don't have much use for this org.

I didn't know Sonya's pics come up on Google. She looks close enough to them to be her in my opinion. Maybe it's not her, but I didn't feel bait and switched when I arrived.

Tina rushed me out 20 minutes early. Not going to repeat for that reason, but her hygiene was fine when I saw her. What did you experience that made you feel her hygiene was subpar?

[ConnorHank]

Thanks for all this good info. I've been trying to see Erika forever. Somehow, it keeps not working out. I've been really curious about Cori, but I've never seen any reviews. I might try her based on your report. As for Jenny, so many people have reported her as being "old" that I've refrained. But, if she really is in her late 20's, that's not too old for me.

Saw Cori, cute girl. Average session, nothing note worthy to repeat. Talks a lot. Jenny is is not late 20's. I would honestly say mid 30's. Like really mid. She was energetic and tried her damn hardest to get me off. I was not into her looks so I never repeated. I would recommend Haru. Her tits are fantastic and good service.

[Dwaeji]

I can confirm that Sonya and Tina have real pics. I don't even think Tina's pics are photoshopped at all. She looked even better in person. Sonya's may be slightly enhanced, but they are definitely real and are a fair representation. She's in her mid 30's or so though. Yuki (who is currently "on vacation") also had real pics, but they were noticeably photoshopped to make her look younger. Doesn't matter--A+ service from Yuki.

I've seen Tina, and agree those pics are hers. Service kinda sucked though. Rushed me out well before time was up. Also hygiene was not to KGirl Standards. I have not seen Sonya, but every one of her pics comes up with multiple hits on Google image search. TGTBT. Yuki was OK. Nice enough, but much much older and worn than her photos. Most of the other photos from this org are also easy hits on image search. I really don't have much use for this org.

[Member #5844]

[Deleted by Admin]

EDITOR'S NOTE: This report was edited or deleted because it appeared to be a public effort to discourage members from posting information. If you have a concern about information posted by another member, then please contact them privately by PM. Please read the Forum's Posting Guidelines for further information.

[Member #5844]

Haru is GND type. Maybe early to mid 30's? Very sweet girl. Service wasn't bad from what I remeber. It was earlier this year. Her D Cup breast is what I remember the most! It might be enhanced but it looks and feels natural. It actually might be real which is very rare for an Asian that is not fat or thick. The pic is her or it's a 97% representation of her LOL.

Jenny is Milfy type. She had a sexy MILFy look about her. So not the GND type. Service was good from what I remember. Again this was earlier in the year so I can't remember exactly how it went. The pics look real. Can't tell since it's blurred in the face but it looks like her but maybe about 7-8 years younger.

Erica was thick with hug tits. About D or double D maybe? Very friendly and aims to please. The body you see in the pic is very similar but more thicker and the face is a little different. Doesn't have the sexy look that the picture has, it's more on the cuter side.

Anyone tried some of the girls from asianvibe? Would love to try them out, but the pics all look fake LOL.

I can confirm that Sonya and Tina have real pics. I don't even think Tina's pics are photoshopped at all. She looked even better in person. Sonya's may be slightly enhanced, but they are definitely real and are a fair representation. She's in her mid 30's or so though. Yuki (who is currently "on vacation") also had real pics, but they were noticeably photoshopped to make her look younger. Doesn't matter--A+ service from Yuki.

[JohnPot]

[Deleted by Admin]

EDITOR'S NOTE: This report was edited or deleted because it appeared to be a public effort to discourage members from posting information. If you have a concern about information posted by another member, then please contact them privately by PM. Please read the Forum's Posting Guidelines for further information.

[Ted213]

What is the best way to deal with not so good bookers? Is it once you back out, you're just permanently blacklisted by them?

An OC booker made me screen very heavily for 2 days with him including work information, tax forms, and HR info. After that and day of wanting to book, he says No unless I send a photo ID. I said No, I will try elsewhere and moved on by settling for another booker who came through with just my references, network and she provided accurate pics of the girl.

A very new LA based booker acts like its a high school kid (based on the ads / postings). He / she has a very specific girl I am trying to book with and whitelists me. Once I try to schedule I am told the girl will be back later but do I want to try others? I said no, and will wait only to get unwhitelisted and blocked from communication.

The first OC booker is very popular (I see one of his recent girls mentioned in this thread), but its no loss to me to avoid him and his group.

This second one though is depressing since the escort I have been waiting to see happened to land with this specific booker.

Do I just need to wait it out? I am aware of this girl's patterns and keep missing her (atlanta, dallas, vegas, LA) though.

I never heard of booker asking for tax forms. I'm ok with sending photo I'd with address blocked.

[Member #5844]

Sweetasiangem is actually my go-to agency and I generally have good experiences with their girls.

Cori is a young girl in her early 20's, "thicc," and a bit inexperienced (I saw her during her second week here). She also timed my round 2, which I never got to finish because of the dreaded words "time's up. ".

Haru Haru is a bit on the older side, looks like a MILF. I think she is the half-Japanese girl. Overall, it was a typical GFE K-girl experience, but nothing wrong with that. Wouldn't mind seeing her again.

Jenny imo is the best choice here. Late 20's, sexy body, and very passionate throughout the whole session. I think my review of her should be on them under the handle.

Don't know about Shishi, but I will meet Tina soon and submit my report on them.

Admittedly, none of these girls were BBFS, but I did receive it once with this agency from a girl who went by the name "Candy" in WLA back in July.

Thanks for all this good info. I've been trying to see Erika forever. Somehow, it keeps not working out. I've been really curious about Cori, but I've never seen any reviews. I might try her based on your report. As for Jenny, so many people have reported her as being "old" that I've refrained. But, if she really is in her late 20's, that's not too old for me.

[Im Myself]

Sweetasiangem is actually my go-to agency and I generally have good experiences with their girls.

Cori is a young girl in her early 20's, "thicc," and a bit inexperienced (I saw her during her second week here). She also timed my round 2, which I never got to finish because of the dreaded words "time's up. ".

Haru Haru is a bit on the older side, looks like a MILF. I think she is the half-Japanese girl. Overall, it was a typical GFE K-girl experience, but nothing wrong with that. Wouldn't mind seeing her again.

Jenny imo is the best choice here. Late 20's, sexy body, and very passionate throughout the whole session. I think my review of her should be on them under the handle.

Don't know about Shishi, but I will meet Tina soon and submit my report on them.

Admittedly, none of these girls were BBFS, but I did receive it once with this agency from a girl who went by the name "Candy" in WLA back in July.

I've seen several girls here, but the only one still around is Jenny. I love her she's great, I agree she's very passionate. I don't like to change girls often, so I pretty much only see her 2-3 times a month.

No BBFS also.

[JohnPot]

Booker "asianworld"? He's a wack job. Stay away from that house. His girls are not that great either.

What is the best way to deal with not so good bookers? Is it once you back out, you're just permanently blacklisted by them?

An OC booker made me screen very heavily for 2 days with him including work information, tax forms, and HR info. After that and day of wanting to book, he says No unless I send a photo ID. I said No, I will try elsewhere and moved on by settling for another booker who came through with just my references, network and she provided accurate pics of the girl.

A very new LA based booker acts like its a high school kid (based on the ads / postings). He / she has a very specific girl I am trying to book with and whitelists me. Once I try to schedule I am told the girl will be back later but do I want to try others? I said no, and will wait only to get unwhitelisted and blocked from communication.

The first OC booker is very popular (I see one of his recent girls mentioned in this thread), but its no loss to me to avoid him and his group..