Escort Reviews

[Miken]

So I been looking around see alot of good looking picture with asians in them wanted to know which ones are real and does anyone have any reviews on any of them.

[Wsst3]

I remember seeing a while back someone was asking about Lisa on the pike with the rabbit, I just saw her post on CV in new haven area. Looks as if she gained weight. She doesn't have in call, you have to pick up and take out for 100 qv seems way to steep. She used to offer qv at incall for. 80 and would nogotiate. She must have been on vacation.

I do not know why anyone would want to see her, she's old and with weight or skinny, her body is nasty, it's falling apart.

[Sw1234]

I remember seeing a while back someone was asking about Lisa on the pike with the rabbit, I just saw her post on CV in new haven area. Looks as if she gained weight. She doesn't have in call, you have to pick up and take out for 100 qv seems way to steep. She used to offer qv at incall for. 80 and would nogotiate. She must have been on vacation.

[Big Mac Daddy]

I saw an ad for her last week in the metro Boston area.

She posted on BkPg Htfd yesterday.

http://hartford.backpage.com/FemaleE...a-grey/8917688

[MrGopher]

Anyone know what's up with Donna Grey?

Seems to not be around the last three weeks.

I saw an ad for her last week in the metro Boston area.

[CTHuskie]

Anyone know what's up with Donna Grey?

Seems to not be around the last three weeks.

[Big Mac Daddy]

Wow, there's a blast from the past. I saw AA once. It was fun.

Yep. Saw her many times in Boston and a few in Htfd. Quite the blonde hottie with that accent.

[SR Only]

Aussie Amber takes it one Plus further, to what I think of as a PSE. She's 100%GFE++ or 100%GFE Plus, Plus.

Wow, there's a blast from the past. I saw AA once. It was fun.

[Ben There]

10 to 15 years ago, a hobbyist devised the definition. It made sense to me.

"When I first started hobbying 4 years ago, I was dismayed how the term "GFE" was bandied about. Some ladies that I dated based on reviews were far, far, from GFE. The reviewer, I decided afterwards, was simply using the term to say he had a nice time, which is fine.

BUT, and always recognizing YMMV, I never had a GF that didn't DFK, or allow DATY, or give BBBJ. When these 3 acts come with enthusiastic FS, I define the experience as 100% GFE on the Saint Bart Scale. For every item missing, 10% is deducted. I usually don't like to be specific in a review about the acts I enjoyed. It can unnecessairily put a lady "on the spot" with the next hobbyist. "you did ABC for him, so why not me?" That's not fair to her.

So, the SBS has just enough ambiguity to protect her, yet describe my experience. For example, I recently posted a review of Lisa from Eye Candy. She was 70% on the SBS. As I think all know, my ATF Badgirl is 100% on the SBS. Top's Penelope, with me, was 80%GFE, which reflected my YMMV as I've subsequently read others found her to be 90%GFE. IMO, this is usually all the detail required for the reader to get a good idea of the service level, subject to YMMV.

Now, sometimes extras are available that go beyond 100%GFE, and might not be allowed by your civilian GF. The two most common examples are Greek and BBBJTC. Actual CIM. To me whether she spits or swallows, it doesn't matter. These are handled in a review with a " or "Plus" for each act. Missy, I've written and many have enjoyed, is famous for her Plus ending. So Missy's 100%GFE+ or 100%GFE Plus. The Plus Missy earns is undefined, but all get the picture. Aussie Amber takes it one Plus further, to what I think of as a PSE. She's 100%GFE++ or 100%GFE Plus, Plus. Again, I think one gets the picture, and doesn't need the actual details. I've had rare dates that actually earned as many as 4 Plusses. More were awarded for spending the night "on the house", and for allowing pictures (hear that Nurse? I suppose they could also be awarded for actions that don't interest me. Be&the, or golden showers, etc.

Amen, brother!

[Driller523]

10 to 15 years ago, a hobbyist devised the definition. It made sense to me.

"When I first started hobbying 4 years ago, I was dismayed how the term "GFE" was bandied about. Some ladies that I dated based on reviews were far, far, from GFE. The reviewer, I decided afterwards, was simply using the term to say he had a nice time, which is fine.

BUT, and always recognizing YMMV, I never had a GF that didn't DFK, or allow DATY, or give BBBJ. When these 3 acts come with enthusiastic FS, I define the experience as 100% GFE on the Saint Bart Scale. For every item missing, 10% is deducted. I usually don't like to be specific in a review about the acts I enjoyed. It can unnecessairily put a lady "on the spot" with the next hobbyist. "you did ABC for him, so why not me?" That's not fair to her.

So, the SBS has just enough ambiguity to protect her, yet describe my experience. For example, I recently posted a review of Lisa from Eye Candy. She was 70% on the SBS. As I think all know, my ATF Badgirl is 100% on the SBS. Top's Penelope, with me, was 80%GFE, which reflected my YMMV as I've subsequently read others found her to be 90%GFE. IMO, this is usually all the detail required for the reader to get a good idea of the service level, subject to YMMV.

Now, sometimes extras are available that go beyond 100%GFE, and might not be allowed by your civilian GF. The two most common examples are Greek and BBBJTC. Actual CIM. To me whether she spits or swallows, it doesn't matter. These are handled in a review with a " or "Plus" for each act. Missy, I've written and many have enjoyed, is famous for her Plus ending. So Missy's 100%GFE+ or 100%GFE Plus. The Plus Missy earns is undefined, but all get the picture. Aussie Amber takes it one Plus further, to what I think of as a PSE. She's 100%GFE++ or 100%GFE Plus, Plus. Again, I think one gets the picture, and doesn't need the actual details. I've had rare dates that actually earned as many as 4 Plusses. More were awarded for spending the night "on the house", and for allowing pictures (hear that Nurse? I suppose they could also be awarded for actions that don't interest me. Be&the, or golden showers, etc.

I have to admit you present a well thought out thesis on GFE and the use of + for extra services I assume you also consider willingness to bring second provider and "really bi" I'm sure they also count as ++.

Using the standard what a real girlfriend may actually do there most likely would be no BJ covered or bareback at all.

The bottom line with providers like iliana if they provide an enthusiastic sensual session and have erotic skills that make me want to come back for more that is all that matters maybe she could not be rated a 10 by the standards of the other site or 100% GFE but the sum total of performance is in the 8 or 9 range for sure and a 90% of anything is a "A" rating. Based on that I consider her a superior provider.

I look foward to your definition of pse.

[Big Mac Daddy]

10 to 15 years ago, a hobbyist devised the definition. It made sense to me.

"When I first started hobbying 4 years ago, I was dismayed how the term "GFE" was bandied about. Some ladies that I dated based on reviews were far, far, from GFE. The reviewer, I decided afterwards, was simply using the term to say he had a nice time, which is fine.

BUT, and always recognizing YMMV, I never had a GF that didn't DFK, or allow DATY, or give BBBJ. When these 3 acts come with enthusiastic FS, I define the experience as 100% GFE on the Saint Bart Scale. For every item missing, 10% is deducted. I usually don't like to be specific in a review about the acts I enjoyed. It can unnecessairily put a lady "on the spot" with the next hobbyist. "you did ABC for him, so why not me?" That's not fair to her.

So, the SBS has just enough ambiguity to protect her, yet describe my experience. For example, I recently posted a review of Lisa from Eye Candy. She was 70% on the SBS. As I think all know, my ATF Badgirl is 100% on the SBS. Top's Penelope, with me, was 80%GFE, which reflected my YMMV as I've subsequently read others found her to be 90%GFE. IMO, this is usually all the detail required for the reader to get a good idea of the service level, subject to YMMV.

Now, sometimes extras are available that go beyond 100%GFE, and might not be allowed by your civilian GF. The two most common examples are Greek and BBBJTC. Actual CIM. To me whether she spits or swallows, it doesn't matter. These are handled in a review with a " or "Plus" for each act. Missy, I've written and many have enjoyed, is famous for her Plus ending. So Missy's 100%GFE+ or 100%GFE Plus. The Plus Missy earns is undefined, but all get the picture. Aussie Amber takes it one Plus further, to what I think of as a PSE. She's 100%GFE++ or 100%GFE Plus, Plus. Again, I think one gets the picture, and doesn't need the actual details. I've had rare dates that actually earned as many as 4 Plusses. More were awarded for spending the night "on the house", and for allowing pictures (hear that Nurse? I suppose they could also be awarded for actions that don't interest me. Be&the, or golden showers, etc.

[Big Mac Daddy]

I do not recall ever using the term GFE in my posts.

In fact you referred to as Iliana as 90% GFE what ever that means.

I prefer to read reviews to see what to expect than rely on ambiguous term GFE.

Sorry. My post was not directed at you. (Wrong click tagged on to yours).

Someone else asked if Iliana was GFE.

[CoralSands]

Any provider doing CBJ is NOT a GFE.

Guys liking CBJ is ok, but any provider claiming to be GFE with CBJ is only kidding herself. Providers using that term say they are GFE to attract clients.

I, and I think most guys, prefer BBBJ and CBJ is a show-stopper. No malice, just my 2 cents.

I do not recall ever using the term GFE in my posts.

In fact you referred to as Iliana as 90% GFE what ever that means.

I prefer to read reviews to see what to expect than rely on ambiguous term GFE.

[Driller523]

Any provider doing CBJ is NOT a GFE.

Guys liking CBJ is ok, but any provider claiming to be GFE with CBJ is only kidding herself. Providers using that term say they are GFE to attract clients.

I, and I think most guys, prefer BBBJ and CBJ is a show-stopper. No malice, just my 2 cents.

I gave read many discussion as to what is GFE.

I concede there are many who define GFE as BBBJ with no other explanation. And that's fine. What about cum / swallow?

I ask what do you call a provider that will suck dick bare back but not kiss or fiv or daty?

I have read often from providers that define GFE as the experience one mite have with a new girlfriend or a lover they have not seen for a long time. Not the ho who grabs the donation counts it in front of you starts the egg timer to ring when the time is up give a quick BBBJ to get hard and then tells you can only go doggie and rushes you out of there in half the time you paid for. What do we call that? Not GFE I hope.

By that standard what is pse is it just BBFS?

I do not expect to ever see a exact definition of either term.

I think there are more than two categories of escort but if I were to limit to two kinds it would be good and bad.

We are painfully aware that so many escorts post borrowed pictures to attract attention.

That is why the presence of review sites that give the details of the type of encounter to expect and that pictures are accurate are more important than any ad banner or general term.

Sounds a lot like the definition of ponorgraphy can't define it but I know it when I see it.

[Big Mac Daddy]

My experience with Iliana much the same nice girl nice skills usually outcalls so if you catch her on a incall good deal.

Any provider doing CBJ is NOT a GFE.

Guys liking CBJ is ok, but any provider claiming to be GFE with CBJ is only kidding herself. Providers using that term say they are GFE to attract clients.

I, and I think most guys, prefer BBBJ and CBJ is a show-stopper. No malice, just my 2 cents.