Escort Reports

[Umbrellaman1]

Babbling Hooker seems like a f-king weirdo.

Sorry, I just felt like being a sh-t disturber regarding another provider.

WOW!

And I thought I got an earful from the Babbling Hooker when I merely suggested to some one on this board (when He posted asking for info) where to find reviews of Her on Her hometown board in Providence!

The whole purpose of this board, like Jack A Dogov stated, is to exchange info and experiences. This board has a separate place for providers to post.

We, as hobbyists, are here to help each other in an honest and unbiased way. It ALWAYS goes to say that depending on YOUR actions / looks / mood, YMMV with each provider. Just as WE have a provider type we REALLY like, there are types that the PROVIDER is attracted to, and more responsive with.

Let's just forget the back and forth, and as Jack Webb said "Just the Facts"!

[Nimbus22]

I for one thought the original thread was informative and based on opinion which this board is all about Providers should not come on this thread to clarify, challenge etc. I loose immediate interest in that provider when that happens.

Can we now just get back to finding new talent and reviewing the good hotties that keep us happy and grinning?

It's not a matter of Deb or Deana with Herpes Forever and with the way her reviews them. This is an opinion forum after all and everyone is entitled to form their own opinion on a provider. I know I wrote some negative reviews in the past too. It's the way he reacts to others contradicting him, that's the problem. The guy literally flips out. He begins calling other hobbyists names, demanding people stop analyzing him (Huh?) , called me and one other monger White Knights, insinuating that we were trying to suck up to providers when we dared (Oh my Goodness!) to disagree with some of his assertions.

I, for example, didn't feel that Deana's place was all that messy and noted that putting on a few pounds (something that he mentioned in his review) actually made her look better. Big freaking deal. So the guy goes "stop reviewing the reviewers you White Knight and stick to mongering." Gee man, get a life will you? And maybe go for some Anger Management classes at that too.

Now that's the problem with this Herpes guy, and not him reviewing Deb or Deana. It's the fact that he is going after other hobbyists on the forum if they dare to disagree with his impressions. That is besides his nickname which basically places every provider that he reviews under suspicion whether one watches whichever TV show it is that he is watching or not. I really believe that provocative nicknames should not be allowed on the forum, especially in this forum. Just imagine what if I start writing raving reviews for every chick on the backpage under the nickname "AIDS Addict". I bet, we'd be talking about an industry in crisis in no time.

[Nrlmus]

Okay, I don't have a horse in this race. I have never seen Debbie nor do I know herpesforever but let's look at the facts. Herpesforever in his review of Debbie was very reasonable. He was honest and very diplomatic.

In it he said that:

- He thought Debbie was a good person and therefore it was a tough review to write.

- That her apartment was a mess but it was no big deal.

- He didn't find her unattractive but she just wasn't his cup of tea.

- She is short and stout but nothing is sagging. (She has said herself that she is heavier.)

- She is a woman that we wouldn't look twice at but would engage us because of her personality.

None of these (again very diplomatically stated) things can be construed as "Debbie bashing" which is what she has accused him of on this forum. (Only Debbie and herpesforever know what was said in the PMs.)

She also said that he thought Deanna Santana was too heavy and that he didn't like her, neither of which he said. If you read his posts about Deanna, what he said was that she had put on a few pounds since her pictures were taken. He also said that she was a great lady and that she was tops.

Now Debbie has said to let sleeping dogs sleep and drop the issue and others have jumped to her defense. Okay great. I'm all for dropping it but Debbie should never have PM'd him complaining about his review. This site is for the exchange of information and opinion both good and bad. It is not strictly for reviews that meet with the approval of providers or fellow hobbyists for that matter.

Debbie, I will pass on to you a very good piece of advice given to me when I was younger;"You will live a much happier life if you accept the fact that not everyone is going to like you." In other words; get over it and move on.

Oh yeah Asket, here you go.

http://boston.backpage.com/FemaleEsc...day-39/5554697

It's not a matter of Deb or Deana with Herpes Forever and with the way her reviews them. This is an opinion forum after all and everyone is entitled to form their own opinion on a provider. I know I wrote some negative reviews in the past too. It's the way he reacts to others contradicting him, that's the problem. The guy literally flips out. He begins calling other hobbyists names, demanding people stop analyzing him (Huh?) , called me and one other monger White Knights, insinuating that we were trying to suck up to providers when we dared (Oh my Goodness!) to disagree with some of his assertions.

I, for example, didn't feel that Deana's place was all that messy and noted that putting on a few pounds (something that he mentioned in his review) actually made her look better. Big freaking deal. So the guy goes "stop reviewing the reviewers you White Knight and stick to mongering." Gee man, get a life will you? And maybe go for some Anger Management classes at that too.

Now that's the problem with this Herpes guy, and not him reviewing Deb or Deana. It's the fact that he is going after other hobbyists on the forum if they dare to disagree with his impressions. That is besides his nickname which basically places every provider that he reviews under suspicion whether one watches whichever TV show it is that he is watching or not. I really believe that provocative nicknames should not be allowed on the forum, especially in this forum. Just imagine what if I start writing raving reviews for every chick on the backpage under the nickname "AIDS Addict". I bet, we'd be talking about an industry in crisis in no time.

[MarriedTom]

WOW!

And I thought I got an earful from the Babbling Hooker when I merely suggested to some one on this board (when He posted asking for info) where to find reviews of Her on Her hometown board in Providence!

The whole purpose of this board, like Jack A Dogov stated, is to exchange info and experiences. This board has a separate place for providers to post.

We, as hobbyists, are here to help each other in an honest and unbiased way. It ALWAYS goes to say that depending on YOUR actions / looks / mood, YMMV with each provider. Just as WE have a provider type we REALLY like, there are types that the PROVIDER is attracted to, and more responsive with.

Let's just forget the back and forth, and as Jack Webb said "Just the Facts"!

[Member #5013]

My two cents. Haven seen Debbie myself. She is not for everyone. But like others said, if your not into the 100%looks and

Just like a woman who enjoys herself and makes you feel good at the same time. Well then Debbie is for you. If you want.

A tight ass and a tight body move on. It's that simple. But she does not deserve to be spoken badly of.

I wrote my review on on Deb which was fair. She pm me talking sh@t And being disrespectful. I have yet to say what I probably should have only out of the last pieces of respect I have for her.

More than one monger has pm me about her.

Thanks for the mongering advice.

[Jack A Dogov]

Okay, I don't have a horse in this race. I have never seen Debbie nor do I know herpesforever but let's look at the facts. Herpesforever in his review of Debbie was very reasonable. He was honest and very diplomatic.

In it he said that:

- He thought Debbie was a good person and therefore it was a tough review to write.
- That her apartment was a mess but it was no big deal.
- He didn't find her unattractive but she just wasn't his cup of tea.
- She is short and stout but nothing is sagging. (She has said herself that she is heavier.)
- She is a woman that we wouldn't look twice at but would engage us because of her personality.

None of these (again very diplomatically stated) things can be construed as "Debbie bashing" which is what she has accused him of on this forum. (Only Debbie and herpesforever know what was said in the PMs.)
She also said that he thought Deanna Santana was too heavy and that he didn't like her, neither of which he said. If you read his posts about Deanna, what he said was that she had put on a few pounds since her pictures were taken. He also said that she was a great lady and that she was tops.

Now Debbie has said to let sleeping dogs sleep and drop the issue and others have jumped to her defense. Okay great. I'm all for dropping it but Debbie should never have PM'd him complaining about his review. This site is for the exchange of information and opinion both good and bad. It is not strictly for reviews that meet with the approval of providers or fellow hobbyists for that matter.

Debbie, I will pass on to you a very good piece of advice given to me when I was younger; "You will live a much happier life if you accept the fact that not everyone is going to like you." In other words; get over it and move on.

Oh yeah Asket, here you go.

http://boston.backpage.com/FemaleEsc...day-39/5554697

[Loot212]

I private messaged you.

New 2 the site and I'm from mass can anyone put me on 2 sum good spots to go to hit me up in my inbox and definately tryin 2 a lurker LOL thanks.

[Member #4675]

Your getting involved in a disagreement between a monger and provider and taking the providers side. I know your slant Olepapa. Convince the others if you will. Furthermore, you don't write the truth. You write your opinion. Yours may be as different as mine. I respect that. I should hope you respect mine. Otherwise stay out of it. If you have a personal problem with me PM and we can settle it.

As for your girlfriend Deb.

If you read my first review I was fairly reasonable. But you know what? She sent me at least three PM's. Not very nice ones. Tell you what. This is our site to review providers. If they don't like it. Don't read it. No one is going to tell me not to review them.

Asket,

I say this to you my fellow monger. Go for it! Deb is the best ever! You will absolutely love it!

I would go for it it if I could see some pictures of her, link to ad please?

[Member #5013]

I didn't say I have not seen her recently, I said not often (or often enough).

I am no white knight, just someone who speaks the truth and doesn't get carried away like some people (if the show fits.).

WW had some points in their favor, and if they would clean the place up a bit and get rid of purplemoon and his posts they would be better off. Otherwise, they are what they are. Girls are older and not great looking, but very accommodating for a R&T operation.

Likewise, Debbie is what she is, if she's not your taste fine, but you need not go on a campaign against her, just move on.

Your getting involved in a disagreement between a monger and provider and taking the providers side. I know your slant Olepapa. Convince the others if you will. Furthermore, you don't write the truth. You write your opinion. Yours may be as different as mine. I respect that. I should hope you respect mine. Otherwise stay out of it. If you have a personal problem with me PM and we can settle it.

As for your girlfriend Deb.

If you read my first review I was fairly reasonable. But you know what? She sent me at least three PM's. Not very nice ones. Tell you what. This is our site to review providers. If they don't like it. Don't read it. No one is going to tell me not to review them.

Asket,

I say this to you my fellow monger. Go for it! Deb is the best ever! You will absolutely love it!

[Catnibbler]

I didn't say I have not seen her recently, I said not often (or often enough).

I am no white knight, just someone who speaks the truth and doesn't get carried away like some people (if the show fits.).

WW had some points in their favor, and if they would clean the place up a bit and get rid of purplemoon and his posts they would be better off. Otherwise, they are what they are. Girls are older and not great looking, but very accommodating for a R&T operation.

Likewise, Debbie is what she is, if she's not your taste fine, but you need not go on a campaign against her, just move on.

My two cents. Haven seen Debbie myself. She is not for everyone. But like others said, if your not into the 100%looks and

Just like a woman who enjoys herself and makes you feel good at the same time. Well then Debbie is for you. If you want.

A tight ass and a tight body move on. It's that simple. But she does not deserve to be spoken badly of.

[Olepapa]

If you have not seen her recently why are you writing?

Anyone that knows you knows you do speak from your heart not your head.

You are being the truest version of a WHITE KNIGHT. You did the same thing with Waltham Wellness.

I didn't say I have not seen her recently, I said not often (or often enough).

I am no white knight, just someone who speaks the truth and doesn't get carried away like some people (if the show fits.).

WW had some points in their favor, and if they would clean the place up a bit and get rid of purplemoon and his posts they would be better off. Otherwise, they are what they are. Girls are older and not great looking, but very accommodating for a R&T operation.

Likewise, Debbie is what she is, if she's not your taste fine, but you need not go on a campaign against her, just move on.

[Member #4675]

All this talk of this girl deb recently has peaked my interest in seeing her, can someone copy and paste a link of her most recent ad?

[Member #5013]

I read your posts. You didn't like Deana either. Just forget about it. But I do wish you had left if you didn't like me. And stop the Debbie bashing please. I don't deserve it.

Deana is tops. U are nots.

Go away! You are doing yourself no good. We see you for what you are now.

[Member #5013]

I have to say Debbie's pictures, even when lying down, are not misleading to me. I could tell she had some meat on the bones, and many of us prefer something substantial to hold onto and with which to cuddle. If you checked all of her ads, there are pictures where she is not lying down and they show more of her. Either way, she is not a spinner and I do not believe she has tried to make it appear so either. As for age, I really don't care if she's 50 or 60 or 70, (she does not look like 50 to me, her body belies her age and that is more important than what her birth certificate looks like) , to me she is cute and cuddly, and her attitude is much better than you can usually expect from the young spinners. Many of them are so full of themselves they are actually unpleasant.

I, personally, prefer a girl who makes me feel good, who is not all about herself, and if she genuinely enjoys herself while making me happy, then so much the better.

I haven't seen Debbie much as yet, but certainly plan to see more of her.

Mongers differ as do providers. We all have different tastes. Reviews are good to provide information to help fellow mongers decide where to go and who to try. That is all well and good. However, we mongers should never lose sight of the fact these girls are human beings and deserve some respect. There is no need to get nasty, personal, or try to degrade them. There is also no need to continue a debate, discussion or diatribe once a review is posted.

If your session was a disappointment, that is unfortunate, it is informative to post the relevant information for others so they can make their own decisions and choices.

As for Debbie, I'd suggest don't bother trying to refute reviews. It's the opinion of the monger that gets posted, good or bad. Those opinions are not going to change and certainly won't change based on your retort on the forum. I think it best to just let them sit and drift down the page as new posts arrive. If I am not mistaken, you have received more good reviews than bad ones.

I am looking forward to seeing you soon.

Regular readers of this forum know that I tell it like it is, and my reviews are usually spot on.

OlePapa

If you have not seen her recently why are you writing?

Anyone that knows you knows you do speak from your heart not your head.

You are being the truest version of a WHITE KNIGHT. You did the same thing with Waltham Wellness.

[Olepapa]

Please don't mention yourself in the same sentence as Deana. That lady is tops. Let's not play compare. It's just deflecting.

Your pics are of you laying down. So they are misleading. As well as your age. 50ish?

You chose your profession. Guys spend hard earned money on this hobby. Some may like you, others may not. Our job is to inform one another. You trying to defend yourself make you look guilty and pathetic.

I have to say Debbie's pictures, even when lying down, are not misleading to me. I could tell she had some meat on the bones, and many of us prefer something substantial to hold onto and with which to cuddle. If you checked all of her ads, there are pictures where she is not lying down and they show more of her. Either way, she is not a spinner and I do not believe she has tried to make it appear so either. As for age, I really don't care if she's 50 or 60 or 70, (she does not look like 50 to me, her body belies her age and that is more important than what her birth certificate looks like) , to me she is cute and cuddly, and her attitude is much better than you can usually expect from the young spinners. Many of them are so full of themselves they are actually unpleasant.

I, personally, prefer a girl who makes me feel good, who is not all about herself, and if she genuinely enjoys herself while making me happy, then so much the better.

I haven't seen Debbie much as yet, but certainly plan to see more of her.

Mongers differ as do providers. We all have different tastes. Reviews are good to provide information to help fellow mongers decide where to go and who to try. That is all well and good. However, we mongers should never lose sight of the fact these girls are human beings and deserve some respect. There is no need to get nasty, personal, or try to degrade them. There is also no need to continue a debate, discussion or diatribe once a review is posted.

If your session was a disappointment, that is unfortunate, it is informative to post the relevant information for others so they can make their own decisions and choices.

As for Debbie, I'd suggest don't bother trying to refute reviews. It's the opinion of the monger that gets posted, good or bad. Those opinions are not going to change and certainly won't change based on your retort on the forum. I think it best to just let them sit and drift down the page as new posts arrive. If I am not mistaken, you have received more good reviews than bad ones.

I am looking forward to seeing you soon.

Regular readers of this forum know that I tell it like it is, and my reviews are usually spot on.

OlePapa