Escort Classified Ads - Member Discussions

[RichmondDude]

Sugar baby if your a woman I would love to school you on how to not get played or low balled by the gentlemen!

I tried to be friends with a lot of clients in Virginia but I found out my mistake

If I can help another from this, because women rule the world why not women educate each other and help each other.

Now the clients I get now are 500hr men I do not low ball myself anymore trust me.

You have got to be kidding me. Lmbo. I just took a few min. To look up your pictures, and we are to believe you get 500 a hr? Really, I also noted alot of your post were deleted by management. Makes you wonder.

[Sugarbaby]

This story about Jody is not new. It's been posted a long time ago in other forums. There has been a few more since then also reported on other forums.

This forum is for classified ads.

The correct URL:

http://www.wtvr.com/news/wtvr-henric...,6781492.story

The final chapter in the story:

http://www2.timesdispatch.com/news/2...io-ar-1016348/

Ok sorry the information to the link to was dated August 20 2011 so I thought it was recent.

[Richmond Fotog]

This story about Jody is not new. It's been posted a long time ago in other forums. There has been a few more since then also reported on other forums.

This forum is for classified ads.

The correct URL:

http://www.wtvr.com/news/wtvr-henric...,6781492.story

The final chapter in the story:

http://www2.timesdispatch.com/news/2...io-ar-1016348/

http://www.wtvr.com/news/wtvr-henric...rrests20100820

0, 6781492. Story.

The above link should provide enough info. For a recent / local doughnut eating contest?

Hey Richmond 1 suggestion. If you desire "real" women then please consider the what we face here in Richmond when.

Requesting screening. Wow!

[Sugarbaby]

http://www.wtvr.com/news/wtvr-henric...rrests20100820.0, 6781492. Story.

The above link should provide enough info. For a recent / local doughnut eating contest?

Hey Richmond 1 suggestion. If you desire "real" women then please consider the what we face here in Richmond when.

Requesting screening. Wow!

[Literal2]

I'm a little confused by a few things here. First off are you really "averaging" 16 bucks a provider because the 250-300 Christmas presents seem to say otherwise. Also, I'm wondering why your bothering to share these experiences at all on this site: over the last few years there have been some people who use the site, but this site is for sharing PERTINENT information. I mean if these are girls that can only be gotten through SD then maybe you should review them there for other people who may have the opportunity to partake. And honestly the way you describe them makes them sound like prostitutes not just the way everyone else labels them.

I'll reply to this on the new thread.

[Literal2]

Start a SB thread Literal then you can post all you want.

OK. I started a new thread.

[Member #4183]

I like SBs. I prefer SBs, when I can find a good one. Posting about them in this section might not be the best placement; maybe the General section, or maybe the Mod should open a new section on SBs. But let's not get too picky, because after all, ALL sexual interaction is prostitution. Only the medium of exchange changes. Free sex is invariably the most expensive kind, and the only difference between a $20 streetwalker, a $200 escort, and a SB you buy things for is desperation and conceit.

So let's not quibble over nits. OK?

I couldn't agree with you more. Invariably you find a favorite and help her out more than you should and when it comes right down to it you always are reminded that it's all about the money. They're all working girls and we're just playing in their world.

DB

[Lone Wolf]

Moving all these posts re "those girls" is okay with me. I just don't know how to do it. Maybe I should refer to them as "so-called amateurs seeking benefits". The only reason my posts are here is because this is where I found the original discussion between obx and fotog. At the time I had just wasted a lot of time on a BP advertiser who was a phony and had spent a frustrating weekend in baltimore calling up "indies" listed on eros (thats a free classified ad site so I can name it, right?). I called six numbers, I reached the same woman each time, only one "girl" ever called me back and when she finally came by she said, after pocketing the cash, she expected to go to the movies. She may have been LE. Anyway I wanted something different and when I read obx's post I decided to try "that site." I had had a free account for a while, got all the marketing spam from them, tried a couple replies, figured out they were fake and didn't pursue it. Last month I signed up. Since then its been as I've reported. Usually the girls who are online troll with I'm's or respond to I'm's and you can quickly separate the phonies and big fat girls and gay hookers out fairly easily when you're chatting with them. I haven't spent more than a couple hours on the site altogether. I don't see the overlap with the BP girls, maybe there is some, but to give you some numbers, on another, similar website for "so-called amateurs seeking benefits" (not "that site") this morning I checked to see how many girls are listed in Florida (not Virginia). It is 10, 000 plus. So, as I said before, with respect, I think these websites are something those of us mongers who like "so-called amateurs" who haven't been ridden hard and hung up wet can use from time to time. I'm having a ball with it. I want to make them ALL squirt. So come on, Fotog, let's have the 411.

Start a SB thread Literal then you can post all you want.

[Literal2]

Moving all these posts re "those girls" is okay with me. I just don't know how to do it. Maybe I should refer to them as "so-called amateurs seeking benefits". The only reason my posts are here is because this is where I found the original discussion between obx and fotog. At the time I had just wasted a lot of time on a BP advertiser who was a phony and had spent a frustrating weekend in baltimore calling up "indies" listed on eros (thats a free classified ad site so I can name it, right?). I called six numbers, I reached the same woman each time, only one "girl" ever called me back and when she finally came by she said, after pocketing the cash, she expected to go to the movies. She may have been LE. Anyway I wanted something different and when I read obx's post I decided to try "that site." I had had a free account for a while, got all the marketing spam from them, tried a couple replies, figured out they were fake and didn't pursue it. Last month I signed up. Since then its been as I've reported. Usually the girls who are online troll with I'm's or respond to I'm's and you can quickly separate the phonies and big fat girls and gay hookers out fairly easily when you're chatting with them. I haven't spent more than a couple hours on the site altogether. I don't see the overlap with the BP girls, maybe there is some, but to give you some numbers, on another, similar website for "so-called amateurs seeking benefits" (not "that site") this morning I checked to see how many girls are listed in Florida (not Virginia). It is 10, 000 plus. So, as I said before, with respect, I think these websites are something those of us mongers who like "so-called amateurs" who haven't been ridden hard and hung up wet can use from time to time. I'm having a ball with it. I want to make them ALL squirt. So come on, Fotog, let's have the 411.

[Lone Wolf]

I like SBs. I prefer SBs, when I can find a good one. Posting about them in this section might not be the best placement; maybe the General section, or maybe the Mod should open a new section on SBs. But let's not get too picky, because after all, ALL sexual interaction is prostitution. Only the medium of exchange changes. Free sex is invariably the most expensive kind, and the only difference between a $20 streetwalker, a $200 escort, and a SB you buy things for is desperation and conceit.

So let's not quibble over nits. OK?

Ok so I went to the site and signed up as a free user. I searched the adds and found 7 out of 10 of these girls advertise on BP Escort section, CL Casual also for $$, another site, Ave X, Best Escort Site, Local Escorts, etc etc. So for the most part they are the same girls you get anywhere else, and are only interested in Money, you give them $$, they give you what you want. Yes there is the odd single girl looking for something and not asking for anything. No offense Literal if you had luck finding them good for you. Now as I said I signed up as a free member, with that comes the constant barrage of spam, emails from supposed members asking you to upgrade so you can communicate. If they were real then I would not be complimented on my pic, I never put any up. And I personally would rather spend 50 bucks on a sure thing once than 50 a month to basically see the same girls I can find on numerous other sites for free. That is just me, an old skeptic, been there seen that a few to many times.

[CantWinLosin]

I like SBs. I prefer SBs, when I can find a good one. Posting about them in this section might not be the best placement; maybe the General section, or maybe the Mod should open a new section on SBs. But let's not get too picky, because after all, ALL sexual interaction is prostitution. Only the medium of exchange changes. Free sex is invariably the most expensive kind, and the only difference between a $20 streetwalker, a $200 escort, and a SB you buy things for is desperation and conceit.

So let's not quibble over nits. OK?

[Literal2]

I'm not sure about everyone else; but I am personally tired of all of this Sugar Baby / Daddy nonsense. The posts from Literal2 are in my opinion nothing more than advertisements for the service and as such they are against the rules against self promotion (and yes I do believe they are self promoting). They have no value to anyone except to advertise for a commercial service and as such they should not be in the member discussion section but in the advertising section. Like I said No info at all just pure advertising (The posts should be deleted. See the rules. No Self-Promotion: Please do not post any messages anywhere on this site that are primarily for the promotion or advertising of any website, forums, email address, business, multi-level marketing activity, or other entities that you have an affiliation with EXCEPT in the classified advertising section.)

If Literal2 wants to put this junk in the advertising section then so be it but get it out of all the other sections. It is not appropriate. (And before I get flamed and he says that it isn't self promotion. All I can see is that his posts are obviously ads for an expensive commercial service that has poor reviews throughout the internet.

In addition Literal2's most recent posts are pure flaming which is also banned. (No Flaming: Please do not post any messages that harrass, insult, belittle, threaten or flame another member.)

I would appreciate it if the moderator would review all these posts and see what he thinks. If he doesn't agree with me that these posts break the rules then so be it but I for one want real information not ads for commercial services and this last post from Literal2 is nothing more than insulting to the entire Sex Guide Community.

Thanks,

Allen

Please don't anyone flame this dude on my account. If this is a real issue, as opposed to forum-rage from not enough pussy, by all means, Moderator. Please review. I can live with the decision, whatever it is. FYI, I have zero interest in promoting a commercial service, zero connection with it except as a customer. How my posts can insult anyone exceeds my mental capacity, but some of you are definitely getting worked up and I'd rather get it resolved calmly. So we can get back to finding girls, which is why I'm here. Not to have pointless exchanges about classifying posts on a sex forum. Sure would like that info from Fotog on squirting, though.

[Allen1965]

So these classifications are real important, huh? Ok, whatever. Go ahead and move the Christie review anywhere you want, I don't care. But what about sugarbabies? You say they don't belong because they aren't escorts, then you say they are prostitutes. What's that all about? Tell you what. If you really do know something about how to make girls squirt, tell me! Can you make pros squirt? Damn, boy! Set up some new topic in whatever forum you want and I'll read it eagerly. 'Cause I want to know! If you have the knowledge, lets hear it. And here is my pledge: lead me with squirter info into a new forum and I will follow you there with any new sugarbaby posts of mine so you will stop getting irritated. By the way, I think I'm homing in on another one, not 100% sure, but I think so. No comp issues yet, just sexy chit chat. She says she wants to fuck. We shall see. Her pix show a sweet ass, full boobs and a perky face. She looks about 25. Next weekend or the day after I think. Don't know if she'll let me take photos. What is it Jackson always says?"With respect"? Well, in that case, Fotog, with respect I must say I think you are wrong about the SD / SB sites, at least for some of us. I've paid for one month so far, about $50, and have fucked two girls I met on the site and I know I have a good shot at fucking number 3. What is that? $16 per girl? If that's not good enough value for you, you must be up to your armpits in free pussy. In which case, good for you, but you got to understand a lot of us like to have an easy way to find amateurs.

I'm not sure about everyone else; but I am personally tired of all of this Sugar Baby / Daddy nonsense. The posts from Literal2 are in my opinion nothing more than advertisements for the service and as such they are against the rules against self promotion (and yes I do believe they are self promoting). They have no value to anyone except to advertise for a commercial service and as such they should not be in the member discussion section but in the advertising section. Like I said No info at all just pure advertising (The posts should be deleted. See the rules. No Self-Promotion: Please do not post any messages anywhere on this site that are primarily for the promotion or advertising of any website, forums, email address, business, multi-level marketing activity, or other entities that you have an affiliation with EXCEPT in the classified advertising section.)

If Literal2 wants to put this junk in the advertising section then so be it but get it out of all the other sections. It is not appropriate. (And before I get flamed and he says that it isn't self promotion. All I can see is that his posts are obviously ads for an expensive commercial service that has poor reviews throughout the internet.

In addition Literal2's most recent posts are pure flaming which is also banned. (No Flaming: Please do not post any messages that harrass, insult, belittle, threaten or flame another member.)

I would appreciate it if the moderator would review all these posts and see what he thinks. If he doesn't agree with me that these posts break the rules then so be it but I for one want real information not ads for commercial services and this last post from Literal2 is nothing more than insulting to the entire Sex Guide Community.

Thanks,

Allen

[Hunted13]

So these classifications are real important, huh? Ok, whatever. Go ahead and move the Christie review anywhere you want, I don't care. But what about sugarbabies? You say they don't belong because they aren't escorts, then you say they are prostitutes. What's that all about? Tell you what. If you really do know something about how to make girls squirt, tell me! Can you make pros squirt? Damn, boy! Set up some new topic in whatever forum you want and I'll read it eagerly. 'Cause I want to know! If you have the knowledge, lets hear it. And here is my pledge: lead me with squirter info into a new forum and I will follow you there with any new sugarbaby posts of mine so you will stop getting irritated. By the way, I think I'm homing in on another one, not 100% sure, but I think so. No comp issues yet, just sexy chit chat. She says she wants to fuck. We shall see. Her pix show a sweet ass, full boobs and a perky face. She looks about 25. Next weekend or the day after I think. Don't know if she'll let me take photos. What is it Jackson always says?"With respect"? Well, in that case, Fotog, with respect I must say I think you are wrong about the SD / SB sites, at least for some of us. I've paid for one month so far, about $50, and have fucked two girls I met on the site and I know I have a good shot at fucking number 3. What is that? $16 per girl? If that's not good enough value for you, you must be up to your armpits in free pussy. In which case, good for you, but you got to understand a lot of us like to have an easy way to find amateurs.

Several guys asked about contact info and compensation. I don't feel I can and I don't really want to give out contact info. The girls aren't pros and would be unhappy I think. I don't want the competition. Any girl in her right mind would spread her legs for the young guys on here before she would for me. Thank god there are some unright minds out there. If I find one that wants referrals I'll let you know. As for compensation, it's too informal to be compensation with the ones I've met. Nobody talks about it specifically. The girls don't ask for it and I don't offer it. I think the SB's idea is that she is a pampered girlfriend of a guy with resources and the SD wants to spoil her so she hopes he will give her gifts. I'm fairly generous as well as old and ugly so I usually make sure I leave her something or some amount that would be a nice Christmas present for her in the $$.5 to $$$ range. I might go higher for the right chick, or lower for a skank.

I'm a little confused by a few things here. First off are you really "averaging" 16 bucks a provider because the 250-300 Christmas presents seem to say otherwise. Also, I'm wondering why your bothering to share these experiences at all on this site: over the last few years there have been some people who use the site, but this site is for sharing PERTINENT information. I mean if these are girls that can only be gotten through SD then maybe you should review them there for other people who may have the opportunity to partake. And honestly the way you describe them makes them sound like prostitutes not just the way everyone else labels them.

[Literal2]

You were the one that said these so-called "Sugarbabies" are not escorts, but for whatever reason you want to post your daily commentary and experiences with them in a forum designated for escort classified ads.

Your commentary on "Provider vs Squirter". Ditto. I got a really good laugh that you seem to be clueless about how and why a woman does that.

You post a review a review about Christie Lamour in this section. Why? By chance if someone wanted to see her they may go over to the escort review forum And search for her. They won't find your review because you posted in the wrong forum.

Here's a little helpful tip for you:

http://www.usasexguide.info/forum/fo...p?714-Richmond

You'll see there are different forums in different subjects and topics.

So these classifications are real important, huh? Ok, whatever. Go ahead and move the Christie review anywhere you want, I don't care. But what about sugarbabies? You say they don't belong because they aren't escorts, then you say they are prostitutes. What's that all about? Tell you what. If you really do know something about how to make girls squirt, tell me! Can you make pros squirt? Damn, boy! Set up some new topic in whatever forum you want and I'll read it eagerly. 'Cause I want to know! If you have the knowledge, lets hear it. And here is my pledge: lead me with squirter info into a new forum and I will follow you there with any new sugarbaby posts of mine so you will stop getting irritated. By the way, I think I'm homing in on another one, not 100% sure, but I think so. No comp issues yet, just sexy chit chat. She says she wants to fuck. We shall see. Her pix show a sweet ass, full boobs and a perky face. She looks about 25. Next weekend or the day after I think. Don't know if she'll let me take photos. What is it Jackson always says?"With respect"? Well, in that case, Fotog, with respect I must say I think you are wrong about the SD / SB sites, at least for some of us. I've paid for one month so far, about $50, and have fucked two girls I met on the site and I know I have a good shot at fucking number 3. What is that? $16 per girl? If that's not good enough value for you, you must be up to your armpits in free pussy. In which case, good for you, but you got to understand a lot of us like to have an easy way to find amateurs.